Quality of life and psychological outcomes of body-weight supported locomotor training in spinal cord injured persons with long-standing incomplete lesions.

STUDY DESIGN: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from two parallel independent single-blinded controlled randomized studies of manual (Study 1) and robotic (Study 2) locomotor training were combined (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00854555). OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of body-weight supported locomotor training (BWSLT) programs on HRQOL in persons with long-standing motor incomplete spinal cord injury and poor walking function. SETTINGS: Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities and one outpatient clinic in Norway. METHODS: Data were merged into intervention (locomotor training 60 days) or control group ("usual care"). Participants completed questionnaires before randomization and 2-4 weeks after the study period, including demographic characteristics, HRQOL (36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey, SF-36), physical activity (The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, IPAQ-SF), exercise barrier self-efficacy (EBSE), and motivation for training (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire, BREQ). Physical outcomes i.e., Lower extremity motor score (LEMS) was assessed. The main outcome was change in HRQOL. Secondary outcomes included changes in IPAQ-SF, EBSE, BREQ, and physical outcomes. RESULTS: We recruited 37 of 60 predetermined participants. They were autonomously motivated with high baseline physical activity. BWSLT with manual or robot assistance did not improve HRQOL, though LEMS increased in the BWSLT group compared with control group. CONCLUSIONS: The study was underpowered due to recruitment problems. The training programs seem to benefit LEMS, but not other physical outcomes, and had minimal effects on HRQOL, EBSE, and motivation. Autonomous motivation and high physical activity prior to the study possibly limited the attainable outcome benefits, in addition to limitations due to poor baseline physical function.

Robot-assisted locomotor training did not improve walking function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of robot-assisted locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The intervention site was an outpatient clinic, and pre- and post-evaluations were performed in a rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 24 subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades C or D, >?2 years post-injury. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to 60 days of robot-assisted locomotor training, or to usual care. METHODS: Walking function, lower extremity muscle strength and balance were assessed single-blinded pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: After a 9-year recruitment period, only 24 of the planned 30 subjects had been enrolled (mean time since injury 17 (standard deviation (SD) 20) years for all subjects). Walking function, lower extremity muscle strength and balance improved modestly in both groups, with no statistically significant group difference in walking function or muscle strength, whereas postural control declined significantly in the intervention group, compared with controls (p?=?0.03). CONCLUSION: Late-onset robot-assisted locomotor training did not re-establish independent walking function. A modest, but non-significant, effect was seen on muscle strength and balance. However, significant between-group differences were found only in postural control in the control group.

Manually assisted body-weight supported locomotor training does not re-establish walking in non-walking subjects with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of manually assisted body-weight supported locomotor training in subjects with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades C or D and > 2 years post-injury. METHODS: Random allocation to 60 days of body-weight supported locomotor training, or usual care, which might include over-ground walking. Walking function, lower extremity muscle strength and balance were blindly evaluated pre-/post-intervention. RESULTS: A small, non-significant improvement in walking function was observed (0.1 m/s (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.2, 0.4)), but subjects without baseline gait function, did not re-establish walking. The effect on lower extremity muscle strength was 2.7 points (95% CI -1.4, 6.8). No difference was observed in balance measures. CONCLUSION: Subjects with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury without baseline walking function were unable to re-establish gait with manually assisted body-weight supported locomotor training. A modest, non-significant, improvement was found in strength and walking speed. However, due to study recruitment problems, an effect size that was smaller than anticipated, and large functional heterogeneity among study subjects, the effect of late-onset body-weight supported locomotor training is not clear. Future studies should include larger numbers of subjects with less functional loss and greater functional homogeneity. Intensive training should probably start earlier post-injury.

Health status of regularly physically active persons with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: A non-controlled cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To make a descriptive examination of health status in persons with paraplegia and tetraplegia who exercise regularly according to Canadian guidelines. SETTINGS: Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital and the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences. METHODS: Eighteen persons (men/women = 9/9), aged 41‒72 years with spinal cord injury (SCI), who exercise regularly were included. Post-injury years ranged from 4 to 48 years. Clinical examination of body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), diffusion capacity (DLCO), cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max), and self-reported quality of life (QOL) obtained by questionnaire was performed. Lung function results are presented as % predicted and VO2max as absolute values relative to body weight. All results are given as median and range. RESULTS: Persons with paraplegia (n = 13) were defined as overweight with fat mass 42% (25‒51). BMD 1.047 g cm-2 (0.885‒1.312) was within normal range. FVC 95% predicted (60‒131), FEV1 90% predicted (61‒119), DLCO 77% predicted (56‒103), and VO2max 16.66 ml kg-1 min-1 (12.15‒25.28) defined good aerobic capacity according to age controlled reference values (18). Persons with tetraplegia (n = 5) were slightly overweight with fat mass 35% (26‒47). BMD 1.122 g cm-2 (1.095‒1.299) was within normal range. FVC 72% predicted (46‒91), FEV1 75% predicted (43‒83), DLCO 67% predicted (56‒84), and VO2max 16.70 ml kg-1 min-1 (9.91‒21.01) defined excellent aerobic capacity according to reference values (18). QOL was ranked as median 7.5 (0‒10 scale). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with SCI who exercise regularly following the Canadian guidelines responded with rather positive associations for health outcomes. Additional research is needed to strengthen our findings.