Help-seeking from clergy and spiritual counselors among veterans with depression and PTSD in primary care.

Little is known about the prevalence or predictors of seeking help for depression and PTSD from spiritual counselors and clergy. We describe openness to and actual help-seeking from spiritual counselors among primary care patients with depression. We screened consecutive VA primary care patients for depression; 761 Veterans with probable major depression participated in telephone surveys (at baseline, 7 months, and 18 months). Participants were asked about (1) openness to seeking help for emotional problems from spiritual counselors/clergy and (2) actual contact with spiritual counselors/clergy in the past 6 months. At baseline, almost half of the participants, 359 (47.2%), endorsed being "very" or "somewhat likely" to seek help for emotional problems from spiritual counselors; 498 (65.4%) were open to a primary care provider, 486 (63.9%) to a psychiatrist, and 409 (66.5%) to another type of mental health provider. Ninety-one participants (12%) reported actual spiritual counselor/clergy consultation. Ninety-five (10.3%) participants reported that their VA providers had recently asked them about spiritual support; the majority of these found this discussion helpful. Participants with current PTSD symptoms, and those with a mental health visit in the past 6 months, were more likely to report openness to and actual help-seeking from clergy. Veterans with depression and PTSD are amenable to receiving help from spiritual counselors/clergy and other providers. Integration of spiritual counselors/clergy into care teams may be helpful to Veterans with PTSD. Training of such providers to address PTSD specifically may also be desirable.

Gender differences in smoking and smoking cessation treatment: an examination of the organizational features related to care.

OBJECTIVES: Veterans experience a particularly heavy burden with smoking rates higher than the general population, and the smoking prevalence for women Veterans has increased in recent years. We examined differences in smoking prevalence and treatment by gender for Veterans receiving at least some of their care at a VA facility, and examined the degree to which organizational factors may be associated with reductions in gender disparities in smoking cessation treatment. METHODS: We merged national organizational-level data focused on primary care (sites = 225) and women's health (sites = 195) with patient-level survey data (n = 15,033 smokers). Organizational measures focused on smoking cessation-specific structure and processes in primary care and women's health. Primary outcomes were patient-reported receipt of smoking cessation treatments-advised to quit, medication recommendation, and other treatment recommendation. We used multi-level, random-intercept logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2007, 29% of women and 23% of men were smokers. Overall, 83% of smokers reported they had been advised to quit, 62% recommended medications, and 60% recommended other treatments. Women were more likely to report being advised to quit (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.64) but equally likely as men to have medications or other treatment recommended. Organizational factors did not eliminate the gender differences in being advised to quit. CONCLUSION: Despite having equivalent or higher smoking cessation treatment rates, women Veterans were more likely to smoke than men. With the rapid growth of women entering VA care, the need for effective gender-focused and gender-sensitive smoking cessation care arrangements is critical for the future health of women who have served.

Addressing patients' concerns about pain management and addiction risks.

Fear of engendering addiction is frequently reported as both a provider and a patient barrier to effective pain management. In this study, a clinical scenario ascertained nursing staff members' usual practice in addressing addiction fears for patients with concerns about the addictive potential of pain medication. One hundred forty-five Veterans Health Administration nursing staff members from eight ambulatory care sites were queried to identify variables associated with proclivity to address patient fears about addiction risks in a population where pain is prevalent and the risk for substance abuse is high. Regarding addressing addiction concerns, 66% of nursing staff were very likely, 16% somewhat likely, 9% unsure, 6% somewhat unlikely, and 2% very unlikely to take action. Health technicians were less likely to address addiction concerns than registered or licensed vocational nurses (odds ratio [OR] 0.116; p=.004). Nursing staff with more years' experience (OR 1.070; p=.005) and higher levels of self-efficacy/confidence (OR 1.380; p=.001) were more likely to engage in discussions related to addiction risks. Targeted efforts to improve pain management activities should focus on retaining experienced nursing staff in initial assessment positions and improving the skills and confidence of less experienced and less skilled staff.

Does screening for pain correspond to high quality care for veterans?

BACKGROUND: Routine numeric screening for pain is widely recommended, but its association with overall quality of pain care is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to measures of pain management quality and identify associated patient and provider factors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional visit-based study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty adult VA outpatient primary care clinic patients reporting a numeric rating scale (NRS) of moderate to severe pain (four or more on a zero to ten scale). Seventy-seven providers completed a baseline survey regarding general pain management attitudes and a post-visit survey regarding management of 112 participating patients. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: We used chart review to determine adherence to four validated process quality indicators (QIs) including noting pain presence, pain character, and pain control, and intensifying pharmacological intervention. The average NRS was 6.7. Seventy-three percent of charts noted the presence of pain, 13.9% the character, 23.6% the degree of control, and 15.3% increased pain medication prescription. Charts were more likely to include documentation of pain presence if providers agreed that "patients want me to ask about pain" and "pain can have negative consequences on patient's functioning". Charts were more likely to document character of pain if providers agreed that "patients are able to rate their pain". Patients with musculoskeletal pain were less likely to have chart documentation of character of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite routine pain screening in VA, providers seldom documented elements considered important to evaluation and treatment of pain. Improving pain care may require attention to all aspects of pain management, not just screening.

Exploring alternative approaches to routine outpatient pain screening.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential alternatives to the numeric rating scale (NRS) for routine pain screening. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Nineteen Veterans Affairs outpatient clinics in Southern California at two hospitals and six community sites. PATIENTS: Five hundred twenty-eight veterans from primary care, cardiology, and oncology clinics sampled in proportion to the total number of visits made to each clinic during the previous year. METHODS: Veterans were approached following clinic visits to complete researcher-administered surveys about their clinic experience. Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference scale of > or =5 as a reference standard for important unrelieved pain, we evaluated potential alternative pain screening items and item combinations by analyzing sensitivity and specificity, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the veterans, 43.6% had unrelieved pain as measured by the reference standard. Approximately half had painful musculoskeletal diagnoses and one-third had comorbid mental health or substance use disorders. The fifth vital sign detected pain less accurately than did an NRS with a 1-week timeframe and an item assessing pain-related bother over the past week. AUCs were 0.79, 0.86, and 0.86, respectively. A sequential approach combining the pain-related bother and NRS with a 1-week timeframe items had good discriminatory ability. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative single or combined pain screening strategies assessing pain-related bother may improve routine pain detection.

Heart failure: the hidden problem of pain.

Although dyspnea and fatigue are hallmark symptoms of heart failure (HF), the burden of pain may be underrecognized. This study assessed pain in HF and identified contributing factors. As part of a multicenter study, 96 veterans with HF (96% male, 67+/-11 years) completed measures of symptoms, pain (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), functional status (Functional Morbidity Index), and psychological state (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2). Single items from the BPI interference and the quality of life-end of life measured social and spiritual well-being. Demographic and clinical variables were obtained by chart audit. Correlation and linear regression models evaluated physical, emotional, social, and spiritual factors associated with pain. Fifty-three (55.2%) HF patients reported pain, with a majority (36 [37.5%]) rating their pain as moderate to severe (pain>or=4/10). The presence of pain was reported more frequently than dyspnea (67 [71.3%] vs. 58 [61.7%]). Age (P=0.02), psychological (depression: P=0.002; anxiety: P=0.001), social (P<0.001), spiritual (P=0.010), and physical (health status: P=0.001; symptom frequency: P=0.000; functional status: P=0.002) well-being were correlated with pain severity. In the resulting model, 38% of the variance in pain severity was explained (P<0.001); interference with relations (P<0.001) and symptom number (P=0.007) contributed to pain severity. The association of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual domains with pain suggests that multidisciplinary interventions are needed to address the complex nature of pain in HF.

Early identification of co-occurring pain, depression and anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety frequently co-occur with pain and may affect treatment outcomes. Early identification of these co-occurring psychiatric conditions during routine pain screening may be critical for optimal treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine aspects of pain related to psychological distress, and, among distressed patients, to determine whether pain factors are related to provider identification of distress. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview of primary care patients and their providers participating in a Veteran's Administration HELP-Vets study. SUBJECTS: A total of 528 predominately male Veterans MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured self-reported pain, including a 0-10 numeric rating scale and interference items from the Brief Pain Inventory. To evaluate distress, brief indicators of depression, anxiety and PTSD were combined. A substantial number of patients had psychological distress (41%), which was even higher (62%) among patients with moderate-severe current pain. Only 29% of those with distress reported talking to their provider about emotional problems during their visit. In multivariate analyses, other pain factors related to distress included interference with enjoyment of life and relationships with others, pain in multiple locations and joint pains. Prior diagnoses of depression and anxiety were also related to current distress. Only prior diagnosis and patient reported headaches and sleep interference because of pain were related to provider identification of distress. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with moderate-severe pain are at high risk for psychological distress, which often goes unrecognized. Providers need to be more vigilant to mental health problems in patients experiencing high pain levels. Targeted screening for co-occurring conditions is warranted.

A comparative study of pain in heart failure and non-heart failure veterans.

BACKGROUND: Progress has been made in addressing pain in specific diseases such as cancer, but less attention has focused on understanding pain in nonmalignant states, including heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2006 to June 2007, 672 veterans were surveyed and scores for the Brief Pain Inventory, pain distress, clinically significant pain levels (moderate to severe pain), and pain locations were compared using univariate and multivariate models. Fifteen percent of the final sample had HF (95/634). In our study, the HF patients were older (P < .000), reported lower levels of general health (P = .018), had more co-morbidities (P < .000), were more likely to have a history of cancer (P = .035), and suffered more chest pain and fewer headaches (P = .026, P = .03, respectively) than their non-HF cohorts. When controlling for age, co-morbidity and cancer disorders, HF and non-HF patients did not differ in pain severity, interference, distress or locations. Of the patients currently experiencing pain, 67.3% of HF patients and 68.4% of non-HF patients rated their pain as moderate or severe (pain >or=4 on a 0 to 10 scale). CONCLUSIONS: Although HF has not been identified as a painful condition, this study suggests the burden of pain is significant for both HF and non-HF ambulatory care patients.

Availability of gynecologic services in the department of veterans affairs.

PURPOSE: The optimum approach to providing the Congressionally mandated gender-specific services for which women veterans are eligible is unknown. We evaluated onsite availability of gynecologic services, clinic type and staffing arrangements, and the impact of having a gynecology clinic (GYN) and/or an obstetrician gynecologist (OBGYN) routinely available. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2001 national VHA Survey of Women Veterans Health Programs and Practices (n = 136 sites; response rate, 83%). We assessed availability of gynecologic services, and evaluated differences in availability by clinic type (designated women's health provider in primary care [PC], separate women's health clinic for primary care [WHC], and/or separate GYN) and staffing arrangements (OBGYN routinely involved versus not). MAIN FINDINGS: Out of 133 sites, 77 sites (58%) offered services through a GYN and 56 sites (42%) did not have GYN. Seventy-two (54%) sites had a WHC. More sites with an OBGYN provided endometrial biopsies (91% vs. 20%), IUD insertion (85% vs. 14%), infertility evaluation (56% vs. 23%), infertility treatment (25% vs. none), gynecologic surgery (65 vs. 28%), p < .01. In comparison to sites without WHC, those with WHC were more likely to offer services onsite: endometrial biopsy odds ratio (OR) 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-18.1); IUD insertion 4.4 (1.6-12.2); infertility evaluation 2.8 (1.2-6.3); and gynecologic surgery 2.3 (1.0-5.4). CONCLUSION: As the VA develops strategic plans for accommodating the growing number of women veterans, leaders should consider focusing on establishing WHC for primary care and routine availability of OBGYN or other qualified clinicians, rather than establishing separate GYN.

Effectiveness of an on-call counselor at increasing smoking treatment.

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation programs are very effective, but little is known about how to get smokers to attend these programs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether an "on-call" counselor increased smoking cessation program referrals and attendance. DESIGN: We randomly assigned 1 of 2 primary care teams at the Sepulveda VA Ambulatory Care Center to intervention and the other to usual care. The intervention team had access to an on-call counselor who provided counseling and care coordination. Social marketing efforts included educational outreach, provider feedback, and financial incentives. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline telephone interviews with a sample of 482 smokers were conducted, covering smoking history, health status, and smoking cessation treatments. Follow-up surveys were conducted at mid-intervention (n = 251) and post-intervention (n = 251). RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients were referred to the on-call counselor, who counseled each patient in person and provided follow-up calls. The counselor referred 45% to the on-site program, and 27% to telephone counseling; of these, half followed through on the referral; 28% declined referral. Patients on the intervention team were more likely to report being counseled about smoking (68% vs 56%; odds ratio [OR] 1.7, CI 1.0-2.9) and referred to a cessation program (38% vs 23%; OR 2.1, CI 1.2-3.6); having attended the program (11% vs 4%; OR 3.6, CI 1.2-10.5); and receiving a prescription for bupropion (17% vs 8%) (OR 2.3, CI 1.1-5.1). The effect was not sustained after the case management period. CONCLUSIONS: Having access to an on-call counselor with case management increased rates of smoking cessation counseling, referral, and treatment. The intervention could be reproduced by other health care systems.

Assessing the structure of smoking cessation care in the Veterans Health Administration.

PURPOSE: National smoking cessation practice guidelines offer recommendations regarding the processes and structure of care. Facilities routinely measure the processes of care but not the structure of care. This pilot study assessed the structure of smoking cessation care at Veterans Health Administration facilities. METHODS: Key informants at 18 sites completed a brief checklist survey adapted from national smoking cessation guidelines. Responses were compared with detailed site surveys. RESULTS: Guideline adherence was seen in identifying smokers and treating inpatient smokers. Areas of low adherence include offering incentives and defining staff responsibilities. The checklist survey showed poor correspondence with the detailed survey, with low agreement on systematic screening (kappa = .21) and higher agreement on primary care prescribing authority (kappa = .53). DISCUSSION: This pilot survey provides a potential rapid method for assessing adherence to systems recommendations from the national smoking cessation guidelines. The relatively low agreement with a more detailed survey suggests that the two surveys may have been measuring different aspects of smoking cessation care.

Ethnic disparities in the use of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in an equal access health care system.

PURPOSE: To examine ethnic variations in the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in an equal access health care system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Eighteen Veterans Affairs medical and ambulatory care centers. SUBJECTS: A cohort of male current smokers (n = 1606). MEASURES: Use of NRT (nicotine patch or nicotine gum), ethnicity, sociodemographics, health status, smoking-related history, and facility prescribing policy. RESULTS: Overall, only 34% of African-American and 26% of Hispanic smokers have ever used NRT as a cessation aid compared with 50% of white smokers. In the past year, African-American smokers were most likely to have attempted quitting. During a serious past-year quit attempt, however African-American and Hispanic smokers reported lower rates of NRT use than white smokers (20% vs. 22% vs. 34%, respectively, p = .001). In multivariate analyses, ethnicity was independently associated with NRT use during a past-year quit attempt. Compared with white smokers, African-American (adjusted odds ratio, .53; 95% confidence interval, .34-.83) and Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, .55; 95% confidence interval, .28-1.08) smokers were less likely to use NRT. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of variations in use of NRT demonstrates that African-American and Hispanic smokers are less likely to use NRT during quit attempts. Future research is needed on the relative contributions of patient, physician, and system features to gaps in guideline implementation to provide treatment for ethnic minority smokers.

Smokers' interest in quitting and services received: using practice information to plan quality improvement and policy for smoking cessation.

Given the prevalence of smoking, its impact, and the benefits of cessation, helping smokers quit should be a top priority for health care organizations. To restructure health care delivery and guide future policy, the authors used baseline survey data from an 18-site Veterans Health Administration group randomized trial to assess the level of interest in quitting smoking for a practice population and determine what smoking cessation services they reported receiving. Among 1941 current smokers, 55% did not intend to quit in the next 6 months, and the remainder intended to quit in the next month (13%) to 6 months (32%). Forty-five percent reported a quit attempt in the prior year. While nearly two thirds of smokers reported being counseled about cessation within the past year, only 29% were referred to a cessation program, and 25% received a prescription for nicotine patches. Tobacco control efforts within this population should focus on increasing the rate of assisting patients with quitting.

Smoking cessation care received by veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Smoking is the main cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and smoking cessation is the only effective intervention to slow its progression. We examined whether smokers with COPD received more cessation services than smokers without COPD. Current smokers from 18 Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics completed baseline and 12 month follow-up surveys (baseline n = 1,941; 12 month n = 1,080), composed of validated questions on smoking habits, history, and attitudes; health/functional status; and sociodemographics. Both at baseline and 12 month follow-up, smokers with COPD were more likely to report that they had been advised to quit, prescribed nicotine patches, or referred to a smoking cessation program within the last year. However, the rate of quitting smoking was the same for smokers with COPD and smokers without COPD. The increase in cessation services received by smokers with COPD was noted primarily among smokers not interested in quitting. New approaches may be required, particularly to help smokers not interested in quitting.