[Pilot study: Determination of the subjective trunk vertical in upright head position]. / Pilotstudie: Bestimmung der subjektiven Rumpfvertikalen in lotrechter Kopfposition.

BACKGROUND: Consensus has been established that the subjective vertical (SV) is a result of multimodal sensory integration. In order to be able to calculate the vestibulocervical sensory competence for the SV, the isolated subjective trunk vertical axis (STV) was measured under conditions of vertical head fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Young, healthy volunteers (n = 49) were compared to older, healthy volunteers (n = 50) on a three-dimensionally deflectable (tilt, torsion, pitch) trunk excursion chair in which the volunteer's head remains in an upright position. Another young, healthy group was divided into a placebo (n = 27) and a monophasic cervical transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (C-TENS; n = 22) group to examine verticality perception. RESULTS: In the STV after trunk pitch, age was a significant variable (p = 0.021). The older, healthy group of subjects missed the physical vertical by an average of 1.8° more than the younger group. Only the placebo group showed an average improvement in STV of 4.3° after torsion. CONCLUSION: Apart from the macular organs the vestibulocervical sensory afference is involved in finding the trunk vertical. A difference in age to the disadvantage of the older healthy subjects was observed, as well as a lack of learning success after applied C­TENS. The presented pilot study was able to confirm that a correct vertical trunk sensation is caused by vestibulocervical sensory afference in upright head position.

[The vestibular craniovertebral joints]. / Die vestibulären Kopfgelenke.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of cervical proprioception for human balance has thus far not been sufficiently elucidated. The aim of this study was to provoke selective cervico-vestibular stimulation using the trunk excursion test (TET) we ourselves constructed. This chair is designed to enable evaluation of cervico-ocular reactions during isolated trunk excursion and possible effects of aging. METHODS: The previously used head excursion test (HET) was statistically compared to the TET. In both methods, 100 healthy subjects of two age groups (group(26): median age = 26 years, n = 50; group(50): median age = 50 years, n = 50) were randomized for comparison of similar neck-to-trunk-positions. RESULTS: HET enabled detection of significant nystagmus modulation in horizontal and vertical dimensions; whereas in pure cervical stimulation using the new TET, this was only evident in the horizontal dimension and only during trunk torsion. Comparison of the two methods confirmed significantly stronger nystagmus modulation through head excursion. In terms of the HET, group(50) showed significantly more vertical nystagmus activity than group(26). However, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of their reactions to trunk excursion in the TET. In a group-specific comparison of the methods, group(26) showed a significant increase in horizontal nystagmus in head compared to trunk excursion, whereas group(50) generally displayed a significantly greater response to provocation by head excursion in HET. Analysis of the significant vertical nystagmus modulation produced with the TET method showed predominance of upbeat- (UBN) over downbeat-nystagmus (DBN). Through head excursion with the HET, DBN was more frequently evoked in group(50) than in group(26). No significant age-dependent difference could be derived in UBN. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot study indicate that head-to-trunk provocation is a suitable means of evaluating cervicotonic provocation nystagmus. Only by evaluation of adequate excursion limits and consistent analysis of patients with cervical deficiency can the effects of the method be further assessed.