Approaching ramp lesions from the different world of posterior knee compartment: A review of evidence with a proposal of a new classification and treatment.

Ramp lesions (RLs) are peripheral lesions that occur in the posterior part of the medial meniscus or where it attaches to the joint capsule. The classification of the medial meniscus RLs has been the focus of numerous studies and publications. This review provides an overview of RL's current classification and treatment options in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. The study also aims to present a more practical classification system for RLs to assist in treatment decision-making. For the first time, we also presented a new surgical treatment for incomplete inferior and double-complete RL based on the posterior knee arthroscopy that provides direct access to the posterior meniscal borders, enabling effective treatment and stronger biomechanical repair. Level of Evidence: Level V.

Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesions are disruptions at the meniscocapsular junction and/or meniscotibial attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, and occur in up to 42% of all acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears1,3-5. Ramp lesions are frequently missed because of the limited diagnostic sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), physical examination, and standard anterior compartment arthroscopic exploration4,6,7. Arthroscopic evaluation of ramp lesions often requires a modified Gillquist maneuver and/or a posteromedial accessory portal for adequate assessment of the posteromedial "blind spot."4,8-10 Clinically, ramp lesions are associated with increased preoperative anterior knee instability, which may increase the risk of ACL graft failure if left untreated6,13. Although long-term comparative data on ramp-repair techniques are limited, proper arthroscopic assessment and treatment is recommended for all patients with ramp lesions at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR)1-5. In the present video article, we demonstrate a systematic approach for the identification and assessment of ramp lesions and describe a mini-open inside-out arthroscopically assisted repair technique for unstable ramp lesions at the time of ACLR. Description: (1) The patient is placed in the supine position, and a contralateral leg holder is utilized to create more working room on the medial side. (2) Standard diagnostic arthroscopy is performed through anteromedial and anterolateral portals. (3) Next, with the arthroscope in the anterolateral portal, the scope is advanced through the intercondylar notch with the knee in 30° of flexion in order to inspect the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Probing is directed both over the superior aspect of the posterior horn to assess for tears, separation, and/or displacement of the meniscocapsular junction, and under the inferior aspect of the posterior horn to assess the integrity of the meniscotibial attachment. (4) After confirmation of a ramp tear, an open dissection is carried out through the sartorial fascia, with blunt dissection performed anterior to the medial gastrocnemius and above the semimembranosus to create the posteromedial surgical site. (5) A suture-shuttling device is utilized, and the corresponding cannula is placed into the anterolateral portal and directed toward the tear under arthroscopic visualization from the anteromedial portal. (6) Next, the first needle is passed through the meniscus, and the second is delivered through the adjacent capsule to create a vertical or oblique suture pattern. The needles are retrieved from the posteromedial surgical site and promptly cut, and the sutures are tied. (7) Multiple sutures, both above (femoral) and below (tibial) the meniscus, are placed 3 to 5 mm apart in a similar fashion. (8) On completion of the repair, the meniscocapsular junction is probed in order to confirm adequate stability with minimal translation of the medial meniscus. Alternatives: In the setting of an ACL tear, surgical options for concomitant repair of an unstable ramp lesion include all-inside, inside-out, or hybrid techniques (i.e., outside-in, inside-in, and/or all-inside). Rationale: Repair of ramp lesions using an inside-out technique restores preoperative excessive knee instability, which may decrease the risk of ACL graft failure. In addition, an inside-out ramp repair has a reported low secondary meniscectomy rate (2%), offers flexibility regarding the number and placement of the sutures, and creates a potentially stronger repair; however, this procedure is more technically challenging compared with other repair techniques6,10. All-inside ramp repairs have been reported to have higher secondary meniscectomy rates, ranging from 11% to 31%, because of the inability to repair the meniscotibial ligament from the anterior portals13,14. Suture hook repair using a posteromedial portal is becoming more popular and reportedly has a significantly lower secondary meniscectomy rate compared with all-inside techniques (19% compared with 30.6%)15. Expected Outcomes: At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, DePhillipo et al. reported similar clinical outcomes and return to sports for patients who underwent combined ACLR plus inside-out repair of ramp lesions (n = 50) compared with a matched cohort who underwent isolated ACLR (n = 50). Although the ACLR plus ramp lesion repair group had had significantly greater preoperative knee instability compared with the isolated ACLR group, there was no difference in postoperative instability between groups at an average of 2.8 years (range, 2 to 8 years) of follow-up6. Important Tips: The exterior posteromedial incision should be facilitated by inside-out transillumination of the medial compartment and by palpation using an intra-articular probe at the medial aspect of the joint in order to avoid saphenous vein injury10.Two-thirds of the posteromedial incision should be distal to the joint line, with one-third proximal, because the suture needles often angle downwards as they exit the capsule10.The pes anserinus tendons should be retracted during the posteromedial dissection in order to avoid injury to the saphenous nerve (which lies posteromedial to the tendons)10.70° to 90° of flexion relaxes the hamstring and gastrocnemius, which improves visualization and aids in retrieval of the suture needles as they exit the posterior capsule10.Entering the anterolateral portal with the suture-delivery device decreases the risk of neurovascular damage and optimizes the direction of the needle10.After placement of the first needle, keep slight tension on the first suture to avoid inadvertent suture damage during advancement of the second needle10.Recent reports have suggested that ramp lesions can occur in isolation without ACL injury or accompanying isolated or combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. Do not forget to assess for ramp lesions in these scenarios16. Acronyms: ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentMMBH = medial meniscus bucket-handleMRI = magnetic resonance imagingMFC = medial femoral condyleMTP = medial tibial plateauPMC = posteromedial capsuleMM = medial meniscusAT = adductor tuberclesMCL = superficial medial collateral ligamentSM = semimembranosusMGT = medial head of gastrocnemius tendonACLR = anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionPROMs = patient-reported outcome measuresMTL = meniscotibial ligament.

Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation.

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined 'a priori' if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.

Concomitant Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy and Anterior Closing-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy With Tunnel Bone Grafting for the First Stage of a Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Multiple risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction graft failure have been reported, including improper tunnel placement, unrepaired meniscus or ligamentous injuries, and coronal/sagittal malalignment. Various biomechanical studies have reported on the increased forces experienced by the ACL graft when there is valgus malalignment or increased posterior tibial slope. This technique describes an opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy to correct valgus alignment and a closing-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy to correct increased posterior tibial slope in the setting of an ACL reconstruction graft failure. This technique is the first stage of a 2-stage surgery in which the second stage is the revision ACL reconstruction. By performing both osteotomies first, the patient can begin weight bearing earlier after the revision ACL reconstruction.

The Fibular Collateral Ligament is a More Important Restraint to Varus Laxity Compared to the Anterolateral Complex in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficient Knee in a Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and the anterolateral complex (ALC) on varus knee laxity in paired anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient cadaveric knees using varus stress radiographs. METHODS: Varus laxity in nine paired (N=18, mean age 73.8 years) human cadaveric knees was assessed using varus stress radiographs with a 12 Nm varus stress applied at 20° of knee flexion. All knees underwent testing in the intact state and following ACL sectioning. One knee of each pair was randomly assigned to undergo FCL sectioning and the contralateral knee was assigned to undergo ALC sectioning (anterolateral ligament [ALL] followed by the Kaplan fibers). RESULTS: Both FCL sectioning and ALC (ALL and the Kaplan fibers) sectioning resulted in increased lateral compartment gapping compared to the intact state, 2.44 mm and 1.13 mm, respectively. ALL sectioning with intact Kaplan fibers did not result in increased lateral compartment gapping. Paired knee comparison revealed a significantly greater influence of the FCL than the ALC in restraining lateral compartment gapping under an applied varus stress (p=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Sectioning the FCL resulted in significantly greater lateral compartment gapping under a varus stress than combined sectioning of the ALL and Kaplan fibers in an ACL deficient knee, although both scenarios resulted in significantly increased gapping compared to the intact state. Sectioning of the ALL with intact Kaplan fibers did not result in increased lateral compartment gapping. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The FCL is the most important structure in restraining varus laxity in the ACL deficient knee and the ALC is of secondary importance in restraining varus laxity. In ACL deficient patients with a high-grade pivot shift, mild varus laxity on clinical examination, and an intact FCL on MRI, injury to the anterolateral complex should be considered and may be evaluated with varus stress radiographs. This study validates prior biomechanical studies of FCL deficiency and demonstrates that approximately 1 mm increase in lateral compartment gapping on varus stress radiographs may occur secondary to ALC injury and clinicians should be aware of this when considering treatment for ACL deficient patients with high-grade anterolateral laxity.

Inflammatory biomarkers and state of the tibiofemoral joint in the osteoarthritic knee: a narrative review.

Background: The healing process is initiated by injurious stimuli in response to cellular damage. Upon recruiting proinflammatory biomarkers to the tissue site of injury, the release of additional biomarkers occurs, including the likes of cytokines, matrix molecules, macrophages, neutrophils, and others. This influx of immune system mediators can occur for chronic periods, and though its intention is for healing the original injurious stimuli, it is also suspected of causing long term cartilage impairment following internal structure damage. The objective of this narrative review is to identify which inflammatory factors have the leading roles in the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) following knee injuries and how they fluctuate throughout the healing process, both acutely and chronically. Methods: This narrative review was performed following a computerized search of the electronic database on PubMed in May 2023. Abstracts related to the inflammatory biomarkers of the post-traumatic knee were included for review. Key Content and Findings: The chronic low-level inflammation that leads to OA leads to the destruction of the cartilage extracellular matrix, which new and developing orthopedic research is still attempting to find resolve for. Some of this damage is attributed to the biomechanical alterations that occurs following injury, though with most procedures capable of joint biomechanical restoration, focus has rather been shifted toward the environment of inflammatory biomarkers. Conclusions: Future studies will be aiming to improve the diagnostics of OA, focusing on a consistent correlation of inflammatory biomarkers with imaging. Additionally, biochemical treatments will need to focus on validating reproducible modulation of signaling molecules, in attempts to lessen the chronic elevations of destructive biomarkers.

Ultrasound With Stress for Assessing Injuries to the Medial and Lateral Collateral Ligaments of the Knee.

Physical examination of knee ligament injuries often is considered subjective and imprecise as the result of various factors affecting its reliability. Magnetic resonance imaging is widely used but lacks information on ligament function and is costly. Stress radiography is commonly employed, but alternatives are sought because of radiation exposure and the need for a physician's presence during the procedure. Ultrasonography represents a noninvasive, rapid, and cost-effective method for assessing knee injuries. This Technical Note presents stress ultrasonography protocols for evaluating medial and lateral tibiofemoral openings in patients with posteromedial corner and/or posterolateral corner injuries. The ultrasonography examination parameters are detailed for both the medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament evaluation. Studies have associated certain degrees of tibiofemoral opening with knee ligament injuries, aiding surgeons in surgical decision-making. Examination with stress ultrasonography offers a dynamic and reproducible method without adverse effects for patients, potentially expediting the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries.

Patient Perception of Allograft Versus Autograft in ACL Reconstruction Using a Validated Online Survey Marketplace.

Background: Little is known regarding the opinions of the general population on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft options. Purpose: To evaluate the general population's perception of the use of allografts versus autografts in ACL reconstruction using a previously validated online marketplace platform. Methods: A prospective 34-question survey was distributed via the online marketplace. After collecting baseline demographics, participant preferences for ACL reconstruction with an allograft or autograft were established. All respondents completed a preeducation survey, reviewed an evidence-based education sheet, and completed a posteducation survey to assess their understanding. Upon completion, participants were asked which graft they would prefer. Participants were then asked if they would be willing to change their preference based on surgeon recommendation. Finally, participants were asked to rank the factors from the education sheet that were most influential. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Results: There were 491 participants that completed the survey (mean age, 39.9 years [range, 19-72 years]; 244 male, 241 female, and 6 nonbinary/third-gender participants). Before reading the education sheet, 276 (56%) reported no graft preferences, 146 (30%) preferred autograft, and 69 (14%) preferred allograft. After reading the provided sheet, 226 (46%) participants preferred autograft, 185 (38%) preferred allograft, and 80 (16%) had no preference. The mean score on the preeducation test was 45%, and the mean score on the posteducation test was significantly greater (61%; P < .01). Overall, 345 participants (83.9%) stated they would change their preference for autograft or allograft if their surgeon recommended it. Surgeon preference (n = 330; 67%), educational information provided (n = 117; 24%), and previous knowledge (n = 44; 9%) were the most important factors for making graft selections. The mean ages of the participants selecting each graft type before and after education were as follows: allograft (37.8 ± 10.1 vs 40.6 ± 11.8 years; P = .05), autograft (38 ± 11.5 vs 39.5 ± 10.1 years; P = .21), and no preference (41.5 ± 11.2 vs 39.4 ± 11.8 years; P = .16). Conclusion: Education resulted in a greater number of individuals' reporting a preference in graft type (either allograft or autograft) compared with preinformation questioning. In addition, 83.9% of the participants were willing to switch their graft choice if recommended by their surgeon.

Investigating the Bone Bruise Patterns in Pediatric Patients With Contact and Noncontact Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: In adults with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, bone bruises on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans provide insight into the underlying mechanism of injury. There is a paucity of literature that has investigated these relationships in children with ACL tears. PURPOSE: To examine and compare the number and location of bone bruises between contact and noncontact ACL tears in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Boys ≤14 years and girls ≤12 years of age who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery between 2018 and 2022 were identified at 3 separate institutions. Eligibility criteria required detailed documentation of the mechanism of injury and MRI performed within 30 days of the initial ACL tear. Patients with congenital lower extremity abnormalities, concomitant fractures, injuries to the posterolateral corner and/or posterior cruciate ligament, previous ipsilateral knee injuries or surgeries, or closed physes evident on MRI scans were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on a contact or noncontact mechanism of injury. Preoperative MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of bone bruises in the coronal and sagittal planes using fat-suppressed T2-weighted images and a grid-based mapping technique of the tibiofemoral joint. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included, with 76 (69.7%) patients sustaining noncontact injuries and 33 (30.3%) patients sustaining contact injuries. There were no significant differences between the contact and noncontact groups in terms of age (11.8 ± 2.0 vs 12.4 ± 1.3 years; P = .12), male sex (90.9% vs 88.2%; P > .99), time from initial injury to MRI (10.3 ± 8.1 vs 10.4 ± 8.9 days; P = .84), the presence of a concomitant medial meniscus tear (18.2% vs 14.5%; P = .62) or lateral meniscus tear (69.7% vs 52.6%; P = .097), and sport-related injuries (82.9% vs 81.8%; P = .89). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of combined lateral tibiofemoral (lateral femoral condyle + lateral tibial plateau) bone bruises (87.9% contact vs 78.9% noncontact; P = .41) or combined medial tibiofemoral (medial femoral condyle [MFC] + medial tibial plateau) bone bruises (54.5% contact vs 35.5% noncontact; P = .064). Patients with contact ACL tears were significantly more likely to have centrally located MFC bruising (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-11; P = .0038) and less likely to have bruising on the anterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.097-0.76; P = .013). CONCLUSION: Children with contact ACL tears were 4 times more likely to present with centrally located MFC bone bruises on preoperative MRI scans compared with children who sustained noncontact ACL tears. Future studies should investigate the relationship between these bone bruise patterns and the potential risk of articular cartilage damage in pediatric patients with contact ACL tears.

Effect of Timing of Surgery on the Outcomes and Complications in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and A Meta-analysis.

Background and Aims: Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are serious and challenging to manage. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of surgical timing on both early and long-term outcomes following an MLKI. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was employed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were identified using a combination of relevant keywords encompassing "multi-ligament knee injury," "knee dislocation," "reconstruction," "repair," "surgery," and "timing," and their synonyms, along with appropriate Boolean operators. Selection of articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) adhered to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted utilizing data extracted from primary studies. Results: Early surgery for MLKI demonstrated a significant advantage over delayed surgery, reflected by significantly higher Lysholm scores (Mean Difference [MD] 3.51; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.79, 5.22), IKDC objective scores (Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio [MH-OR] 2.95; 95% CI 1.30, 6.69), Tegner activity scores (MD 0.38; 95% CI 0.08, 0.69), and Mayer's ratings (MH-OR 5.47; 95% CI 1.27, 23.56). In addition, we found a significantly reduced risk of secondary chondral lesions (MH-OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.23, 0.48), lower instrumented anterior tibial translation in the early surgery group (MD -0.92; 95% CI -1.83, -0.01), but no significant difference was observed in the secondary meniscal tears, between the two groups. However, the early surgery group also exhibited a significantly increased risk of knee stiffness (MH-OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.22, 5.01) and a greater likelihood of requiring manipulation under anaesthesia (MH-OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.10, 13.87). Conclusion: Early surgery for MLKI improves function, and stability, and reduces further articular cartilage damage, but increases the risk of stiffness. Level of Evidence: IV. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01224-1.

Patellar Tendon Open Debridement and Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Severe Patellar Tendinopathy.

Patellar tendinopathy is an overuse injury of the patella tendon common in jumping sports or activities. Degeneration of the patellar tendon fibers causes microtears in the tendon, leading to partial patellar tendon tears. If nonoperative treatment fails and the tears are mild, a debridement of the detached tissue with a patella tendon repair can help to reduce pain, promote healing, and improve function. However, if more than 50% of the patella tendon attachment to the inferior pole of the patella is detached, a debridement with a patellar tendon reconstruction is indicated to restore the strength of the patellar tendon. This reconstruction technique uses gracilis and semitendinosus autografts to surround and reconstruct the patellar tendon. Tunnels are drilled horizontally at the tibial tubercle and through the midpoint of the patella for graft passage. This technique can help to improve patient outcomes and reduce some of the risk of failure associated with performing only the debridement when significant partial patellar tendon tearing is present.

Seven tesla knee MRI T2*-mapping detects intrasubstance meniscus degeneration in patients with posterior root tears.

Background: Medial meniscus root tears often lead to knee osteoarthritis. The extent of meniscal tissue changes beyond the localized root tear is unknown. Purpose: To evaluate if 7 Tesla 3D T2*-mapping can detect intrasubstance meniscal degeneration in patients with arthroscopically verified medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs), and assess if tissue changes extend beyond the immediate site of the posterior root tear detected on surface examination by arthroscopy. Methods: In this prospective study we acquired 7 T knee MRIs from patients with MMPRTs and asymptomatic controls. Using a linear mixed model, we compared T2* values between patients and controls, and across different meniscal regions. Patients underwent arthroscopic assessment before MMPRT repair. Changes in pain levels before and after repair were calculated using Knee Injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Pain changes and meniscal extrusion were correlated with T2* using Pearson correlation (r). Results: Twenty patients (mean age 53 ± 8; 16 females) demonstrated significantly higher T2* values across the medial meniscus (anterior horn, posterior body and posterior horn: all P < .001; anterior body: P = .007), and lateral meniscus anterior (P = .024) and posterior (P < .001) horns when compared to the corresponding regions in ten matched controls (mean age 53 ± 12; 8 females). Elevated T2* values were inversely correlated with the change in pain levels before and after repair. All patients had medial meniscal extrusion of ≥2 mm. Arthroscopy did not reveal surface abnormalities in 70% of patients (14 out of 20). Conclusions: Elevated T2* values across both medial and lateral menisci indicate that degenerative changes in patients with MMPRTs extend beyond the immediate vicinity of the posterior root tear. This suggests more widespread meniscal degeneration, often undetected by surface examinations in arthroscopy.

Supratubercle Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy: No Changes in Patellar Height and Significant Decreases in Anterior Tibial Translation at 6 Months Postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Because of the increased prevalence of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a desire to understand the role of posterior tibial slope on increased anterior tibial translation and increased ACL graft forces. One potential concern in supratubercle anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (ACW-PTO) for decreasing the posterior tibial slope is the risk of altering the patellar height. PURPOSE: To radiographically assess changes in (1) patellar height, (2) anterior tibial translation, and (3) posterior tibial slope after supratubercle ACW-PTO. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent supratubercle ACW-PTO by a single surgeon between July 2019 and June 2023 were included. Standardized lateral knee weightbearing radiographs to assess patellar height (via the Caton-Deschamps index), anterior tibial translation of the lateral tibial plateau relative to the lateral femoral condyle, and posterior tibial slope were obtained at 4 time points (preoperatively and 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively). Paired t test was used to compare differences between preoperative, 1-day, and 3- and 6-month values for patellar height as measured using the Caton-Deschamps index and for posterior tibial slope. Paired t test was also used to compare differences in the preoperative and 6-month postoperative values for anterior tibial translation. RESULTS: In 20 patients after ACW-PTO, the Caton-Deschamps index demonstrated a significant increase in patellar height on postoperative day 1 (P < .001) but no significant differences at 3 (P = .057) and 6 (P = .176) months postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation on standing lateral knee radiographs was significantly decreased by a mean of 8.9 mm from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Posterior tibial slope was significantly decreased by a mean of 11.2° from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Supratubercle ACW-PTO performed for ACL reconstruction failure in the setting of an increased posterior tibial slope did not induce significant changes in patellar height postoperatively. Furthermore, after ACW-PTO, there was a significant decrease in anterior tibial translation and posterior tibial slope.

Principles for optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes in elite athletes: a review of current techniques.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common sport-related injuries and occur in greater than 3% of athletes in a four-year window of sports participation. Non-contact injuries are the most common mechanism for ACL injury in elite-level athletes, especially with increased valgus and external rotation of the knee when loading eccentrically in flexion. Because of the immense toll these injuries and their recovery take on athletes especially, optimal treatment has been a subject of great interest for some time. Many ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and repair techniques have been implemented and improved in the last two decades, leading to many surgical options for this type of injury. The surgical approach to high-level athletes in particular requires additional attention that may not be necessary in the general population. Important considerations for optimizing ACL treatment in high-level athletes include choosing repair vs. reconstruction, surgical techniques, choice of auto- or allograft, and associated concomitant procedures including other injuries or reinforcing techniques as well as attention to rehabilitation. Here, we discuss a range of surgical techniques from repair to reconstruction, and compare and contrast various reconstructive and reinforcing techniques as well as associated surgical pearls and pitfalls. Good outcomes for athletes suffering from ACL injury are attainable with proper treatment including the principles discussed herein.

Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Graft and Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) attempts to restore native ACL function. Persistent anterolateral instability is a common symptom after ACLR that can lead to worse patient outcomes. Additional surgeries, like anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), can augment the ACL graft and help increase anterolateral rotational stability. Certain indications for ACLR with ALLR include high-grade pivot shift, increased posterior tibial slope (>12°), revision ACLR, and concomitant ligamentous or meniscal injuries. We describe an anatomic ALLR technique using an 8 cm long × 1 cm wide strip of the inferior aspect of the iliotibial band fixed at the native attachment sites of the ALL.

The Functional Integrity of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Can Be Objectively Assessed With the Use of Stress Radiographs: A Systematic Review.

Background: Stress radiography is a viable imaging modality that can also be used to assess the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after primary or secondary injury. Because conventional radiography is relatively easy, affordable, and available worldwide, the diagnostic efficacy of ACL standing, lateral decubitus, and supine stress radiography should be evaluated. Purpose: To examine the existing literature regarding the application of stress radiography in evaluating the integrity of the ACL. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for relevant articles published between 1980 and the present, a systematic review was conducted to identify evidence related to the radiographic diagnosis or assessment of ACL tears. The literature search was conducted in September 2022. Results: Of 495 studies, 16 (1823 patients) were included. Four studies examined standing stress radiography, and 12 investigated lateral decubitus or supine stress radiography. Significant heterogeneity in imaging technique and recorded anterior tibial translation was identified. Anterior tibial translation for ACL-injured knees ranged from 1.2 to 10.6 mm for standing stress radiographs and 2.7 to 11.2 mm for supine stress radiographs, with high sensitivities and specificities for both. Conclusion: Stress radiography was a dependable diagnostic method for identifying ACL rupture. Further research is necessary to determine the ideal anatomic landmarks, optimal patient positioning, and appropriate applied stresses to establish a standardized protocol for both assessing ACL tears and evaluating the postoperative integrity of ACL reconstruction using stress radiography.

Meniscal Radial Tears: A Classification System Based on Tear Morphology.

Appropriate management of radial meniscal tears is complex, with continued efforts focused on optimizing diagnostic methods for identification to help dictate treatment, especially as surgical indications for repair have expanded, coupled with improvements in surgical techniques and instrumentation. Currently, no standardized classification system for radial meniscal tears exists, limiting the ability to accurately characterize injury patterns and guide surgical decision-making.

Biomechanical Performance of Transtibial Pull-Out Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair Is Improved With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation.

Background: While posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) techniques have evolved, there remains a need to both optimize repair strength and improve resistance to cyclic loading. Hypothesis: Adjustable tensioning would lead to higher initial repair strength and reduce displacement with cyclic loading compared with previously described transtibial pull-out repair (TPOR) fixation techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 56 porcine medial menisci were used. Eight intact specimens served as a control for the native meniscus. For the others, PMMR tears were created and repaired with 6 different TPOR techniques (8 in each group). Fixed PMMR repairs were executed using 4 different suture techniques (two No. 2 cinch sutures, two cinch tapes, two No. 2 simple sutures, and two No. 2 sutures in a Mason-Allen configuration) all tied over a cortical button. Adjustable PMMR repairs using Mason-Allen sutures were fixed with an adjustable soft tissue anchor fixation tensioned at either 80 N or 120 N. The initial force, stiffness, and relief displacement of the repairs were measured after fixation. Repair constructs were then cyclically loaded, with cyclic displacement and stiffness measured after 1000 cycles. Finally, the specimens were pulled to failure. Results: The PMMR repaired with the 2 cinch sutures fixed technique afforded the lowest (P < .001) initial repair load, stiffness, and relief displacement. The adjustable PMMR repairs achieved a higher initial repair load (P < .001) and relief displacement (P < .001) than all fixed repairs. The 2 cinch sutures fixed technique showed an overall higher cyclic displacement (P < .028) and was completely loose compared with the native meniscus functional zone. Repairs with adjustable intratunnel fixation showed displacement with cyclic loading similar to the native meniscus. With cyclic loading, the Mason-Allen adjustable repair with 120 N of tension showed less displacement (P < .016) than all fixed repairs and a stiffness comparable to the fixed Mason-Allen repair. The fixed Mason-Allen technique demonstrated a higher ultimate load (P < .007) than the adjustable Mason-Allen techniques. All repairs were less stiff, with lower ultimate failure loads, than the native meniscus root attachment (P < .0001). Conclusion: Adjustable TPOR led to considerably higher initial repair load and relief displacement than other conventional fixed repairs and restricted cyclic displacement to match the native meniscus function. However, the ultimate failure load of the adjustable devices was lower than that of a Mason-Allen construct tied over a cortical button. All repair techniques had a significantly lower load to failure than the native meniscus root. Clinical Relevance: Knotless adjustable PMMR repair based on soft anchor fixation results in higher tissue compression and less displacement, but the overall clinical significance on healing rates remains unclear.