A multi-center international study on the spinal cord independence measure, version IV: Rasch psychometric validation.

CONTEXT: The Spinal Cord Independence Measure is a comprehensive functional rating scale for individuals with spinal cord lesion (SCL). OBJECTIVE: To validate the scores of the three subscales of SCIM IV, the fourth version of SCIM, using advanced statistical methods. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-center cohort study. SETTING: Nineteen SCL units in 11 countries. METHODS: SCIM developers created SCIM IV following comments by experts, included more accurate definitions of scoring criteria in the SCIM IV form, and adjusted it to assess specific conditions or situations that the third version, SCIM III, does not address. Professional staff members assessed 648 SCL inpatients, using SCIM IV and SCIM III, at admission to rehabilitation, and at discharge. The authors examined the validity and reliability of SCIM IV subscale scores using Rasch analysis. RESULTS: The study included inpatients aged 16-87 years old. SCIM IV subscale scores fit the Rasch model. All item infit and most item outfit mean-square indices were below 1.4; statistically distinct strata of abilities were 2.6-6; most categories were properly ordered; item hierarchy was stable across most clinical subgroups and countries. In a few items, however, we found misfit or category threshold disordering. We found SCIM III and SCIM IV Rasch properties to be comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Rasch analysis suggests that the scores of each SCIM IV subscale are reliable and valid. This reinforces the justification for using SCIM IV in clinical practice and research.

Development of an implementation-focused network to improve healthcare delivery as informed by the experiences of the SCI knowledge mobilization network.

Context: Implementing research findings into clinical practice is challenging. This manuscript outlines the experiences and key learnings from a network that operated as a community of practice across seven Canadian Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) rehabilitation centers. These learnings are being used to inform a new implementation-focused network involving SCI rehabilitation programs based in Ontario, Canada. Methods: The SCI KMN adapted and applied implementation science principles based on the National Implementation Research Network's (NIRN) Active Implementation Frameworks in the implementation of best practices in pressure injury and pain prevention and management. Results: The SCI KMN was successful in implementing best practices in both pressure ulcer and pain prevention and management across the various participating sites. Other key objectives met were building capacity in implementation methods in site personnel so that project scaling could occur with these skills and expertise applied to numerous other initiatives. Additionally, various papers, abstracts and conference presentation as well as an implementation guide were disseminated to inform the field of implementation science. Conclusion: The key lessons learned from this experience are being used to develop a new implementation-focused network. Features felt to be especially important for the SCI KMN includes a highly representative governance structure, the use of indicators within an overall evaluation framework and the systematic application of implementation processes with shared learnings supporting each site.

A Web-Based Physical Activity Portal for Individuals Living With a Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: The population with a spinal cord injury (SCI) largely remains inactive following discharge from rehabilitation despite evidence on the benefits of physical activity. These individuals need to develop skills to self-manage their condition in order to prevent secondary comorbidities and rehospitalization. A Web-based physical activity portal can address this need. Few Web-based interventions incorporate theoretical frameworks, behavior change techniques, and modes of delivery into their design. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the preferred features of a Web-based self-management physical activity portal through stakeholder engagement with individuals with a spinal cord injury and health care professionals (HCPs). METHODS: An interpretative phenomenology methodology and participatory design, along with an integrated knowledge translation approach, were used to conduct this study. Convenience sampling was used to recruit individuals with an SCI living in the community, who were either interested or already engaging in physical activity, and HCPs working with individuals with an SCI, from three city-based rehabilitation sites. Individual 1-hour sessions involving navigation of an existing website and a semistructured interview were conducted with all participants. Individuals with an SCI completed a demographics questionnaire prior to the individual sessions, while demographic information of the HCPs was collected during their interviews. Additionally, all participants were asked a question on their intention to use or recommend a portal. An in-depth thematic analysis was used to derive themes from participants' responses. RESULTS: Thirteen individuals with an SCI and nine HCPs participated in the study. Five core themes emerged: (1) knowledge: guidance and barrier management; (2) possibility of achievement: the risks and benefits of physical activity and modelling; (3) self-regulation strategies: action planning, goal setting, tracking, rewards, and reminders; (4) interactivity: peers and professionals; and (5) format: appearance, language, and ease of use. The mean (median) ratings of the likelihood of promoting and using a Web-based portal tailored to individuals' needs were 9.00 (8.78) and 7.75 (7.88) for HCPs and individuals with an SCI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights features of an online self-management platform that can provide individuals with an SCI the motivation and volition to engage in physical activity. These findings will inform the design of a Web-based self-management physical activity portal to increase physical activity adherence and behavior change.

The Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS): an assessment of validity using Rasch analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of retrospective data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further validate the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) using Rasch analysis. SETTING: Two rehabilitation centers in Canada. METHOD: Data were collected as part of the Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network (SCI KMN) initiative. The SCIPUS was completed within 72 h of inpatient admission. Persons admitted for initial rehabilitation in two inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation programs were included in the project. RESULTS: Data from 886 participants were analyzed, approximately 60% of whom were males. Rasch analyses demonstrated that the SCIPUS, in its current format did not meet criteria required for true measurement. A transformed version of the SCIPUS obtained by deletion of misfitting items and modification of the response scales improved fit to the model and showed preliminary evidence of unidimensionality. The person separation index, however indicated that the scale requires further adjustments of its scoring options. CONCLUSIONS: In its original form, the SCIPUS does not meet the requirements of the Rasch model and its total score should be used cautiously. However, following some adjustments to the items such as addressing DIF between sites to insure a standardized assessment across sites and adding response options to some of the items, interval-scale measurement should be possible.

Determining Pressure Injury Risk on Admission to Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the FIM, Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale, and Braden Scale.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the utility of the admission Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS), Braden Scale, and the FIM for identifying individuals at risk for developing pressure injury during inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Two tertiary rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=754) participating in inpatient SCI rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the utility of the SCIPUS, Braden Scale, and FIM for identifying individuals at risk for developing pressure injury (PI) during inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false negative rate, odds ratio, likelihood ratio, and area under the curve (AUC) are reported. RESULTS: The SCIPUS total score and its individual items did not demonstrate acceptable accuracy (AUC≥0.7) whereas the Braden Scale (0.73) and the FIM score (0.74) did. Once items were dichotomized into high and low risk categories, 1 Braden item (friction and shear), 5 FIM items (bathing, toileting, bed/chair transfer, tub/shower transfer, toilet transfer), the FIM transfers subscale, FIM Motor subscale, and the FIM instrument as a whole, maintained AUCs ≥0.7 and negative predictive values ≥0.95. The FIM bed/chair transfer score demonstrated the highest likelihood ratio (2.62) and overall was the most promising measure for determining PI risk. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that a simple measure of mobility, admission FIM bed/chair transfer score of 1 (total assist), can identify at-risk individuals with greater accuracy than both an SCI specific instrument (SCIPUS) and a PI specific instrument (Braden). The FIM bed/chair transfer score can be readily determined at rehabilitation admission with minimal administrative and clinical burden.

Advancing research and clinical care in the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.

Background: Optimal management of neuropathic pain (NP) is essential to enhancing health-related quality of life for individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI). A key strategic priority for the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF) and Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) is optimizing NP management after SCI. Aims: A National Canadian Summit, sponsored by ONF and RHI, was held to develop a strategic plan to improve NP management after SCI. Methods: In a one-day meeting held in Toronto, Ontario, a multidisciplinary panel of 18 Canadian stakeholders utilized a consensus workshop methodology to (1) describe the current state of the field, (2) create a long-term vision, and (3) identify steps for moving into action. Results: A review of the current state of the field identified strengths including rigourously developed evidence syntheses and practice landscape documentation. Identified gaps included limited evidence on NP hindering recommendation development in evidence syntheses, absence of a national strategy, care silos with limited cross-continuum connections, limited consumer involvement, and limited practice standard implementation. The panel identified key themes for a long-term vision to improve the management of SCI NP in Canada, including establishing an integrated collaborative network; standardized care and outcome evaluation; education; advocacy; and directing resources to innovative solutions. The panel identified the next step as prioritization of areas that will have the greatest impact in a 5-year time frame. Conclusion: A strategic plan outlining a long-term vision to improve management of NP after SCI in Canada was developed and will inform future activities of the sponsors.

Contexte: La gestion optimale de la douleur neuropathique est essentielle à l'amélioration de la qualité de vie liée à la santé des personnes vivant avec une lésion de la moelle épinière. L'une des priorités stratégiques de la Fondation ontarienne de neurotraumatologie et de l'Institut Rick Hansen est l'optimisation de la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière.Buts: Un sommet national canadien parrainé par la Fondation ontarienne de neurotraumatologie et l'Institut Rick Hansen a été tenu afin d'élaborer un plan stratégique pour l'amélioration de la gestion de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière.Méthodes: Dans le cadre d'une rencontre d'une journée tenue à Toronto, Ontario, un panel multidisciplinaire composé de 18 parties prenantes canadiennes a eu recours à la méthodologie de l'atelier consensuel pour (1) décrire la situation actuelle dans le domaine, (2) définir une vision à long terme et (3) déterminer les étapes à suivre pour passer à l'action.Résultats: Une revue de la situation actuelle dans le domaine a permis d'en répertorier les forces, parmi lesquelles on compte des synthèses de données probantes élaborées avec rigueur et la documentation des pratiques. Les lacunes suivantes ont été répertoriées: des données probantes limitées en ce qui concerne la formulation de recommandations pour empêcher la douleur neuropathique dans les synthèses de données probantes; l'absence de stratégie nationale; un mode de prestation des soins en silos, où les liens entre les continuums sont limités; une participation du consommateur limitée et une mise en œuvre limitée des normes de pratique. Le panel a répertorié les grands thèmes pour élaborer une vision à long terme afin d'améliorer la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique occasionnée par une lésion de la moelle épinière au Canada, parmi lesquels on compte: l'établissement d'un réseau de collaboration intégré; la normalisation des soins et l'évaluation des résultats; l'éducation; le plaidoyer; et l'attribution de ressources aux solutions novatrices. Le panel a déterminé que la prochaine étape consisterait à prioriser les domaines qui auront le plus de répercussions au cours des cinq prochaines années.Conclusion: Un plan stratégique définissant une vision à long terme pour améliorer la prise en charge de la douleur neuropathique après une lésion de la moelle épinière a été élaboré. Ce plan servira de base aux prochaines activités des promoteurs.

Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment During Inpatient Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) for pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=759) participating in inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation between January 3, 2012, and April 23, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Admission SCIPUS scores and the corresponding risk stratification, PU incidence, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interrater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Mean SCIPUS scores were higher for individuals who developed PUs than for those who did not (mean SCIPUS score, 9.8±2.5 vs 8.5±2.6). Interrater reliability was excellent for SCIPUS composite scores (ICC=.91) and very good for risk stratification (ICC=.86). Using the existing cutoff value of ≥6 for "high risk" category, sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be .97 and .12, respectively, with an LR of 1.1. A cutoff value of ≥8 yielded a better balance between sensitivity and specificity (.85 and .38, respectively). The AUC equaled .64 with an LR of 1.4. Results were similar when the analysis was confined to PUs of stage II or greater. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the SCIPUS do not currently support its routine use as a measure of PU risk in individuals with spinal cord injury undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. LRs of <2 indicate that stratification as high risk or very high risk does not substantially increase the likelihood of identifying individuals who develop PUs beyond chance alone. AUCs were also below the desired cutoff value of 0.7.