RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized trial is to evaluate the early removal of postoperative drains after robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIE). Evidence is lacking about feasibility, associated pain, recovery, and morbidity. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 72 patients undergoing RAMIE. Patients will be allocated into two groups. The "intervention" group consists of 36 patients. In this group, abdominal and chest drains are removed 3 h after the end of surgery in the absence of contraindications. The control group consists of 36 patients with conventional chest drain management. These drains are removed during the further postoperative course according to a standard algorithm. The primary objective is to investigate whether postoperative pain measured by NRS on the second postoperative day can be significantly reduced in the intervention group. Secondary endpoints are the intensity of pain during the first week, analgesic use, number of postoperative chest X-ray and CT scans, interventions, postoperative mobilization (steps per day as measured with an activity tracker), postoperative morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: Until now, there have been no trials investigating different intraoperative chest drain strategies in patients undergoing RAMIE for oesophageal cancer with regard to perioperative complications until discharge. Minimally invasive approaches combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols lower morbidity but still include the insertion of chest drains. Reduction and early removal have been proposed after pulmonary surgery but not after RAMIE. The study concept is based on our own experience and the promising current results of the RAMIE procedure. Therefore, the presented randomized controlled trial will provide statistical evidence of the effectiveness and feasibility of the "drainless" RAMIE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05553795. Registered on 23 September 2022.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Robótica , Humanos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Abdome , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
Because of new surgical techniques, advanced monitoring modalities and improvements in perioperative care, perioperative mortality and morbidity have been significantly reduced in the last decades; however, patients still suffer from high perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially those with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Not only perioperative myocardial infarction but also myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery, which presents without clinical symptoms, is associated with an adverse outcome. Patients at risk require particular interdisciplinary attention throughout the perioperative phase. The premedication visit is of particular importance. In addition to a thorough patient medical history and physical assessment, the perioperative handling of the patient's pre-existing medication and possible necessity for further preoperative tests should be verified. If necessary and where possible, optimization of the patient's state of health can be planned together with other disciplines. It is the anesthesiologist's responsibility to optimally guide and support patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases through the entire surgical procedure. This review summarizes perioperative interventions that have an influence on patient mortality and morbidity and evaluates the underlying evidence. This covers the perioperative handling of cardioprotective medication, choice of the anesthetic regimen, blood pressure management and transfusion regimens. Furthermore, this review highlights recent findings, e.g. perioperative reloading with statins and short-term preoperative initiation of beta blockers. The pros and cons of thoracic epidural anesthesia in patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk are discussed. Not only intraoperative hypotension should be of concern to anesthesiologists but also postoperative hypotension can have a deleterious impact on the outcome. This is relevant in the time period when a significant proportion of patients have already left the monitoring ward. The recently published recommendations by the World Health Organization concerning perioperative hyperoxia might not be beneficial for patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk. Finally, the treatment options for perioperative cardiovascular events are explained and an algorithm for handling of patients with perioperative myocardial injury without clinical ischemic symptoms is suggested (myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery).
Assuntos
Anestesiologia/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidade , Assistência Perioperatória/efeitos adversos , Assistência Perioperatória/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas , Pressão Sanguínea , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipotensão , MorbidadeRESUMO
Liver transplantation (LTPL) is the only curative option for patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) or with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eurotransplant in Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for organ allocation. The model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score, which describes the severity of the liver disease, is decisive for organ allocation. The heterogeneous patient collective and hepatic-related comorbidities and their dynamics represent challenges. The anesthesiologist is responsible for evaluating the overall prognosis, whereby cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neurological comorbidities must be taken into consideration. During LTPL surgery is divided into several stages. Besides volume management, heat preservation and coagulation management, major challenges for the anesthesiologist are hemodynamic stabilization and regulation of the acid-base balance.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Fígado/cirurgia , Doença Hepática Terminal , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Obtenção de Tecidos e ÓrgãosAssuntos
Reto/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Anestesia , Anestesiologistas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/terapia , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Assistência Perioperatória , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
Due to the comprehensive establishment of modern techniques, tracheostomy has become a routine procedure in intensive care units (ICU). The negative effects of prolonged translaryngeal intubation on the laryngeal and tracheal mucosa up to tracheal stenosis can be reduced by tracheostomy. Furthermore, long-term ventilation is facilitated; however, there is no clear evidence on the optimal timing of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. The specific indications and contraindications of surgical as well as percutaneous tracheostomy must be strictly observed for a safe and successful intervention. Exchanging the tracheostomy tube may lead to potentially dangerous situations especially after percutaneous tracheostomy. A standardized and structured approach is therefore recommended.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Traqueotomia/métodos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Traqueotomia/normasRESUMO
Analysis of biological samples is problematic because of their complex composition. Reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and, more recently, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) are routinely used for the analysis of these samples, but are eventually limited because they are one-dimensional (1-D) methods. As sample complexity increases, the separation efficiency necessary to resolve a large number of sample components in one dimension becomes prohibitively high. A solution to this problem has been to use a two-dimensional (2-D) approach. Each dimension in a 2-D separation relies on a different separating mechanism. By expanding the separation into two dimensions, sample components unresolved in the first dimension can often be separated in the second. This circumvents the requirement for extremely high efficiencies in either dimension. Two-dimensional slab gel electrophoresis has been used successfully in this area, but a more instrumental approach is desired. In this paper we describe three coupled-column approaches to 2-D separations. First, microcolumn SEC-CZE is explored as a means of 2-D protein analysis. Next, RPLC-CZE is investigated for analysis of peptides in tryptic maps. Finally, RPLC is coupled with fast CZE (FCZE), a unique form of CZE analysis, for fast 2-D analysis of peptides. Details of the instrumentation used in these 2-D systems will be presented along with the results of some typical 2-D analyses.