Cardiac Performance and Cardiopulmonary Fitness After Infection With SARS-CoV-2.

Aims: Persistent cardiac symptoms are an increasingly reported phenomenon following COVID-19. However, the underlying cause of cardiac symptoms is unknown. This study aimed to identify the underlying causes, if any, of these symptoms 1 year following acute COVID-19 infection. Methods and Results: 22 individuals with persistent cardiac symptoms were prospectively investigated using echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), 6-min walking test, cardio-pulmonary exercise testing and electrocardiography. A median of 382 days (IQR 368, 442) passed between diagnosis of COVID-19 and investigation. As a cohort their echocardiography, CMR, 6-min walking test and exercise testing results were within the normal ranges. There were no differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (61.45 ± 6.59 %), global longitudinal strain (19.80 ± 3.12 %) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (24.96 ± 5.55 mm) as measured by echocardiography compared to a healthy control group. VO2 max (2045.00 ± 658.40 ml/min), % expected VO2 max (114.80 ± 23.08 %) and 6-minute distance walked (608.90 ± 54.51 m) exceeded that expected for the patient cohort, whilst Troponin I (5.59 ± 6.59 ng/l) and Nt-proBNP (88.18 ± 54.27 ng/l) were normal. Conclusion: Among a cohort of 22 patients with self-reported persistent cardiac symptoms, we identified no underlying cardiac disease or reduced cardiopulmonary fitness 1 year following COVID-19.

Myocardial efficiency in patients with different aetiologies and stages of heart failure.

AIMS: Myocardial external efficiency (MEE) is the ratio of cardiac work in relation with energy expenditure. We studied MEE in patients with different aetiologies and stages of heart failure (HF) to discover the role and causes of deranged MEE. In addition, we explored the impact of patient characteristics such as sex, body mass index (BMI), and age on myocardial energetics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac energetic profiles were assessed with 11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was acquired with echocardiography. MEE was studied in 121 participants: healthy controls (n = 20); HF patients with reduced (HFrEF; n = 25) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF; n = 23) LVEF; and patients with asymptomatic (AS-asymp; n = 38) and symptomatic (AS-symp; n = 15) aortic stenosis (AS). Reduced MEE coincided with symptoms of HF irrespective of aetiology and declined in tandem with deteriorating LVEF. Patients with AS-symp and HFmrEF had reduced MEE as compared with controls (22.2 ± 4.9%, P = 0.041 and 20.0 ± 4.2%, P < 0.001 vs. 26.1 ± 5.8% in controls) and a further decline was observed in patients with HFrEF (14.7 ± 6.3%, P < 0.001). Disproportionate left ventricular hypertrophy was a major cause of reduced MEE. Female sex (P < 0.001), a lower BMI (P = 0.001), and advanced age (P = 0.03) were associated with a lower MEE. CONCLUSION: MEE was reduced in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HF due to pressure overload and MEE may therefore constitute a treatment target in HF. Patients with LVH, advanced age, female sex, and low BMI had more pronounced reduction in MEE and personalized treatment within these patient subgroups could be relevant.

The DANish randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial in patients with chronic HEART failure (DANHEART): A 2 × 2 factorial trial of hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in patients with chronic heart failure (H-HeFT) and metformin in patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes or prediabetes (Met-HeFT).

OBJECTIVES: The DANHEART trial is a multicenter, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This investigator driven study will include 1500 HFrEF patients and test in a 2 × 2 factorial design: 1) if hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate reduces the incidence of death and hospitalization with worsening heart failure vs. placebo (H-HeFT) and 2) if metformin reduces the incidence of death, worsening heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke vs. placebo in patients with diabetes or prediabetes (Met-HeFT). METHODS: Symptomatic, optimally treated HFrEF patients with LVEF ≤40% are randomized to active vs. placebo treatment. Patients can be randomized in either both H-HeFT and Met-HeFT or to only one of these study arms. In this event-driven study, it is anticipated that 1300 patients should be included in H-HeFT and 1100 in Met-HeFT and followed for an average of 4 years. RESULTS: As of May 2020, 296 patients have been randomized at 20 centers in Denmark. CONCLUSION: The H-HeFT and Met-HeFT studies will yield new knowledge about the potential benefit and safety of 2 commonly prescribed drugs with limited randomized data in patients with HFrEF.

Metformin Lowers Body Weight But Fails to Increase Insulin Sensitivity in Chronic Heart Failure Patients without Diabetes: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: The glucose-lowering drug metformin has recently been shown to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and increase myocardial efficiency in chronic heart failure (HF) patients without diabetes. However, it remains to be established whether these beneficial myocardial effects are associated with metformin-induced alterations in whole-body insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism. METHODS: Eighteen HF patients with reduced ejection fraction and without diabetes (median age, 65 (interquartile range 55-68); ejection fraction 39 ± 6%; HbA1c 5.5 to 6.4%) were randomized to receive metformin (n = 10) or placebo (n = 8) for 3 months. We studied the effects of metformin on whole-body insulin sensitivity using a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp incorporating isotope-labeled tracers of glucose, palmitate, and urea. Substrate metabolism and skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity were determined by indirect calorimetry and high-resolution respirometry, and body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. The primary outcome measure was change in insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, metformin treatment lowered mean glycated hemoglobin levels (absolute mean difference, - 0.2%; 95% CI - 0.3 to 0.0; p = 0.03), reduced body weight (- 2.8 kg; 95% CI - 5.0 to - 0.6; p = 0.02), and increased fasting glucagon levels (3.2 pmol L-1; 95% CI 0.4 to 6.0; p = 0.03). No changes were observed in whole-body insulin sensitivity, endogenous glucose production, and peripheral glucose disposal or oxidation with metformin. Equally, resting energy expenditure, lipid and urea turnover, and skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity remained unaltered. CONCLUSION: Increased myocardial efficiency during metformin treatment is not mediated through improvements in insulin action in HF patients without diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02810132. Date of registration: June 22, 2016.

Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Increased Apical-to-Basal Strain Ratio in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative prevalence, relation to symptoms, and prognostic implications of elevated left ventricular (LV) apical-to-basal strain ratio (ABr) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: A total of 499 contemporary consecutive patients with AS treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement were retrospectively included. Patients were included if they underwent preoperative echocardiography with adequate image quality for assessment of LV global longitudinal strain. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed in ABr subgroups. From two-dimensional echocardiographic apical images, ABr was calculated as mean longitudinal strain of the five LV apical segments divided by the mean of the six basal segments. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 743 days. Mean age was 79.8 ± 7 years. The prevalence of severely increased ABr ≥4 was 16% (n = 78). Patients with ABr ≥4 had higher preoperative New York Heart Association functional class; 77% of those with ABr ≥4 were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV compared with 59% of those with ABr of 0 to 1.9 (P < .01). Median preoperative N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level in patients with ABr ≥4 was 1,781 pmol/L, compared with 876 pmol/L in those with ABr of 0 to 1.9 (P = .003). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels at 3-month follow-up remained considerably elevated in patients with ABr ≥4 (the median in patients with ABr ≥4 was 1,262 pmol/L vs 645 pmol/L in those with ABr of 0 to 1.9, P < .01). AS severity was comparable across ABr subgroup levels. Overall, increased ABr ≥4 was associated with poor survival, as overall 3-year survival was 67% among patients with ABr ≥4 compared with 83% in those with ABr of 2 to 3.9 and 86% in those with ABr of 0 to 1.9 (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Among patients with increased ABr ≥4, pre- and postoperative New York Heart Association functional class, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, and mortality were significantly increased, and ABr may thus serve as a new echocardiographic marker of high mortality risk among patients with AS treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of metformin on myocardial efficiency in insulin-resistant chronic heart failure patients without diabetes.

AIMS: The present study tested the hypothesis that metformin treatment may increase myocardial efficiency (stroke work/myocardial oxygen consumption) in insulin-resistant patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-six HFrEF patients (ejection fraction 37 ± 8%; median age 66 years) were randomised to metformin (n = 19) or placebo (n = 17) for 3 months in addition to standard heart failure therapy. The primary endpoint was change in myocardial efficiency expressed as the work metabolic index (WMI), assessed by 11 C-acetate positron emission tomography and transthoracic echocardiography. Compared with placebo, metformin treatment (1450 ± 550 mg/day) increased WMI [absolute mean difference, 1.0 mmHg·mL·m-2 ·106 ; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 1.8; P = 0.03], equivalent to a 20% relative efficiency increase. Patients with above-median plasma metformin levels displayed greater WMI increase (25% vs. -4%; P = 0.02). Metformin reduced myocardial oxygen consumption (-1.6 mL O2 ·100 g-1 ·min-1 ; P = 0.014). Cardiac stroke work was preserved (-2 J; 95% CI -11 to 7; P = 0.69). Metformin reduced body weight (-2.2 kg; 95% CI -3.6 to -0.8; P = 0.003) and glycated haemoglobin levels (-0.2%; 95% CI -0.3 to 0.0; P = 0.02). Changes in resting and exercise ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, and exercise capacity did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Metformin treatment in non-diabetic HFrEF patients improved myocardial efficiency by reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. Measurement of circulating metformin levels differentiated responders from non-responders. These energy-sparing effects of metformin encourage further large-scale investigations in heart failure patients without diabetes.

Myocardial strain assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases - A comparison with echocardiography.

Myocardial deformation assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is increasingly used for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis in patients with clinical and pre-clinical cardiovascular diseases. Feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) also allows myocardial deformation analysis. To clarify whether the two modalities can be used interchangeably, we compared myocardial deformation analysis by FT-CMR with STE in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases and healthy subjects. We included 40 patients and 10 healthy subjects undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiographic examination for left ventricular volumetric assessment. We studied patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (n = 10), acute perimyocarditis (n = 10), aortic valve stenosis (n = 10), and previous heart transplantation (n = 10) by global longitudinal (GLS), radial (GRS) and circumferential strain (GCS). Myocardial deformation analysis by FT-CMR was feasible in all but one participant. While GLS, GRS and GCS measured by FT-CMR correlated overall with STE (r = 0.74 and p < 0.001, r = 0.58 and p < 0.001, and r = 0.76 and p < 0.001), the correlations were not consistent within subgroups. GLS was systematically lower, whereas GRS and GCS were higher by FT-CMR compared to STE (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were comparable for FT-CMR and STE overall and across subgroups. In conclusion, myocardial deformation can be evaluated using FT-CMR applied to routine cine-CMR images in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases. However, correlation between FT-CMR and STE was modest and agreement was not optimal due to systematic bias regarding GLS and GCS. Consequently, FT-CMR and STE should not be used interchangeably for myocardial strain evaluation.

Left Ventricular Myocardial Contractile Reserve during Exercise Stress in Healthy Adults: A Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic Study.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to determine left ventricular (LV) myocardial contractile reserve during exercise stress testing in healthy adults and to evaluate the effects of gender and age on exercise LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: The study population consisted of 67 healthy adults (age range, 23-80 years; 49% women). Subjects were analyzed with respect to gender and predefined age groups (age < 35 years, n = 18; age 35-55 years, n = 24; age > 55 years, n = 25). All subjects underwent comprehensive echocardiographic assessment at rest and during symptom-limited semisupine exercise test. LV GLS was determined using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: LV GLS magnitude during peak stress was 25.4 ± 2.0%. The average absolute numeric LV GLS increase was 5.3%, equivalent to a relative 26.7% increase of LV GLS. LV GLS magnitude at peak exercise was without clinically significant differences between age groups (P = .07). No significant difference was found in peak exercise LV GLS between genders (P = .48). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant but weak correlation between peak LV GLS and age (r = -0.30, P = .02), whereas peak LV GLS was independent of maximal heart rate (r = 0.23, P = .07), peak mean arterial blood pressure (r = -0.11, P = .38), body mass index (r = 0.15, P = .22), and peak pulsed Doppler-derived cardiac index (r = -0.06, P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: LV GLS increases significantly during exercise stress in a healthy population. A dose-response relationship was found between LV GLS and exercise level independent of gender, and the influence of age appeared marginal. The technique is feasible, with low intra- and interobserver variability.

Abnormal Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve and Decreased Myocardial Contractile Reserve Are Main Factors in Relation to Physical Exercise Capacity in Cardiac Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical importance of echocardiographic coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), resting and exercise left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and myocardial work efficiency (MWE) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). METHODS: The study population comprised 69 subjects: group A, 27 patients with CA confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy (CA positive); group B, 42 healthy control subjects. The amyloid phenotype in group A was as follows: patients with wild-type transthyretin-related amyloidosis (n = 10), carriers of the Danish familial transthyretin amyloidosis mutation with cardiac involvement (n = 5), and patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis with cardiac involvement (n = 12). All subjects underwent comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation during rest and during symptom-limited, semisupine exercise testing. Furthermore, CFVR was assessed using Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Patients with CA had significantly lower CFVR (1.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 0.8, P < .0001), MWE (1.9 ± 1.0 vs 3.0 ± 0.7, P < .0001), and LVGLS magnitude (11% [10%-14%] vs 20% [18%-21%], P < .0001) than control subjects. Patients with CA showed severely reduced deformation and efficiency reserve compared with control subjects (ΔLVGLS 0.9 ± 2.8% vs 5.6 ± 2.3%, P < .0001; ΔMWE 2.5 ± 2.8 vs 8.8 ± 2.6, P < .0001). In patients with CA, a strong relation was seen between physical capacity by the metabolic equivalent of tasks test and CFVR (r = 0.55, P < .01), peak exercise LVGLS (r = 0.64, P < .0001), and peak exercise MWE (r = 0.60, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CA had a profound lack of CFVR and longitudinal myocardial deformation reserve compared with healthy control subjects. Both parameters were significantly associated with exercise capacity and may prove useful for evaluating cardiac performance in patients with CA.