The impact of retrograde intrarenal surgery for asymptomatic renal stones in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for a symptomatic ureteral stone.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the era of rigid ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteral stones, asymptomatic renal stones were often left in place. With the advent of flexible URS, however, the treatment of such renal stones became an attractive option. Data are scarce regarding the impact of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) performed at the time of URS for a symptomatic ureteral stone in comparison with ureteral stone removal alone. The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of URS combined with RIRS with URS alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparison between patients who underwent URS and RIRS (group A, n=47) and a matched control group of patients undergoing URS alone (group B, n=47) was performed. Matching was based on ureteral stone size and location, and preprocedural Double-J stent placement. RESULTS: The median size of the largest ureteral stone in both groups was 8 mm with a mean total stone burden of 52.9 mm(2) (28.9) and 47 mm(2) (21.1) in groups A and B, respectively. Median renal stone size was 9 mm with a mean total stone burden of 84.1 mm(2) (40.3). Mean surgery time in groups A and B was 68 minutes (19.61) and 39 minutes (15.96), respectively (P<0.001). Median hospital stay was 1 day for both groups. The success rate for ureteral stone removal was 98% and 100% in groups A and B, respectively. Success rate for RIRS was 85% (40/47 cases). Hospitalization length and complications, mainly postoperative fever, did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Managing asymptomatic renal stones at the time of URS for symptomatic ureteral stones significantly prolongs surgery duration but does not lengthen hospital stay, increase complications, or lower success rates. This combined approach reduces the need for future procedures and is probably more cost effective.

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour complicated by perforation requiring open surgical repair - clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: • To examine the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with bladder perforation requiring open surgical repair as a complication of transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). PATIENT AND METHODS: • A search of our institutional database yielded 4144 patients who underwent TURBT from 1996 to 2008, of whom 15 (0.36%) required open surgical intervention to repair a large bladder perforation. • In all cases, a filling cystogram was performed before laparotomy. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were reviewed, and the incidence and time of extravesical tumour recurrence were recorded. RESULTS: • Median patient age was 77 years. Intraperitoneal perforation was diagnosed in 12 patients, generally involving the posterior wall. Concomitant bowel injury was identified in two patients and managed by primary repair. Two patients in whom the diagnosis and intervention were delayed died within 1 week of surgery. • Metastatic progression was observed in two patients shortly after the perforation (median interval, 4.8 months), and local pelvic recurrence was noted in one of them. • None of the patients with stage Ta tumours had evidence of extravesical progression. Actuarial estimates of disease-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after the perforation were 83%, 71% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: • A significant bladder perforation during TURBT requiring open surgical repair is more likely to occur in elderly patients with large posterior wall tumours and heavily pretreated bladders. • Despite its potential for considerable morbidity, this adverse event does not seem to substantially increase the risk of extravesical tumour seeding. Prompt diagnosis, immediate intervention and meticulous bladder and bowel inspection during laparotomy are imperative.

Predictors of nocturia quality of life before and shortly after prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictors of nocturia-related quality of life and to assess the early effect of prostatectomy on these parameters in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. METHODS: The study group included 56 consecutive patients scheduled for prostatectomy to treat medical treatment-refractory lower urinary tract symptoms. Nocturia severity was assessed preoperatively and 2 to 3 months after prostatectomy by the number of nocturia events, time from falling sleep to first awakening to void (hours of undisturbed sleep [HUS]), longest sleep interval between voids, and score on the nocturia quality-of-life (N-QOL) questionnaire (range 0 to 48). RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 69 +/- 9 years. The preoperative N-QOL score correlated strongly with the number of nocturia events, HUS, and longest sleep interval between voids (r = -0.69, r = 0.67, and r = 0.69, respectively, and P <0.001). Of the 56 patients, 36 (65%) underwent transurethral prostatectomy and 20 (35%) underwent open prostatectomy. Significant improvement (P <0.001) was noted in all factors after treatment. The number of nocturia events decreased from 3.4 +/- 1.2 to 2.6 +/- 0.99; the HUS increased from 1.83 +/- 0.55 to 2.74 +/- 0.64 hours; the longest sleep interval between voids increased from 2.36 +/- 0.64 to 2.91 +/- 0.6 hours; and the N-QOL score increased from 24.1 +/- 7 to 34.4 +/- 7.5. On multivariate stepwise regression analysis, the factors predicting for improvement in the N-QOL score after prostatectomy were the number of nocturia events and HUS. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy is associated with an early postoperative improvement in nocturia indexes. The increases in the interval to first void and decrease in even less than one nocturia event were associated with significant improvement in nocturia quality of life.

Expanding use of ureteral access sheath for stones larger than access sheath's internal diameter.

The internal diameter of the ureteral access sheath limits the size of stones that can be removed during flexible ureteroscopy. We describe a technique that allows removal of larger stones, which are entrapped and removed en bloc with the access sheath. This new technique was shown to be efficient and safe.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who previously underwent open nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Open stone surgery nowdays is rare. However, some patients who are treated today have in the past undergone open nephrolithotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the possible impact of open nephrolithotomy on the efficacy and morbidity of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of all 167 patients undergoing PCNL at our institution between December 2000 and December 2003. The same surgeon performed all of the procedures. We compared 21 patients undergoing PCNL after open nephrolithotomy to the same kidney with all other patients undergoing PCNL. The groups did not differ in terms of age or stone burden (mean size, number of stones, percentage with staghorn calculi). The outcomes measured were operating time, necessity for secondary procedures, stonefree rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The operating time (203+/-92 v 177+/-52 minutes) and percentage of secondary procedures (29% v 12%) were significantly higher in patients who had previously undergone open stone surgery. However, the stone-free rate (95% v 93%), intraoperative complication rate (10% v 9%), and postoperative complication rate (10% v 11%) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A PCNL in a patient with a history of open nephrolithotomy may take longer and lead to a higher percentage of auxiliary procedures, probably because of scar tissue and anatomic changes in the kidney. However, the morbidity and efficacy of PCNL appear to remain the same in these patients.

Ureteral ultrasonic lithotripsy revisited: a neglected tool?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ultrasonic lithotripsy was one of the first modalities used for treating renal and ureteral stones. However, in recent years, it has been largely replaced by newer techniques such as laser lithotripsy with rigid as well as flexible ureteroscopes. The aim of this study was to review the results and our current indications for ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy (UUL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and May 2002, 340 ureteroscopies were performed for the treatment of ureteral stones in the Rabin Medical Center. Of this series, 9 patients (2.6%) underwent UUL using a semirigid 8F ureteroscope (Wolf) and an Olympus ultrasonic lithotripter (LUS-1) with a 4.5F hollow probe. Four patients had Steinstrasse following shockwave lithotripsy, four had large (1-2-mm) ureteral stones, and one had an impacted calcified ureteral double-J stent. Stones >5 mm were initially fragmented by the holmium laser (550-microm fiber). A double-J stent was placed in all patients. The mean follow-up time was 20 months. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 84 minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. Eight patients became stone free after the first procedure, and the other underwent secondary ureteroscopy, which rendered him stone free. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom UUL is performed are relatively complex stone patients. The use of ultrasonic lithotripsy following, or in combination with, laser or ballistic devices utilizes the unique properties of UUL, which combines stone fragmentation and efficient removal of small fragments. The technique was particularly useful in patients with Steinstrasse or a large stone burden. Thus, UUL has a limited but significant role in the treatment of ureteral stones.

Urinary tract infection in men younger than 45 years of age: is there a need for urologic investigation?

OBJECTIVES: To determine in a prospective study whether urinary tract infection (UTI) in men younger than 45 years of age is associated with anomalies of the genitourinary tract that necessitate additional urologic evaluation. UTI in young men is uncommon. In these patients, it is customary to follow the same policy as that for children or older men and to routinely perform urologic investigations. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive, otherwise healthy, male patients aged 16 to 45 years (mean 30.5) were hospitalized for a first event of acute UTI. All patients underwent an imaging evaluation, including ultrasonography and intravenous urography. Those with macroscopic hematuria underwent cystoscopy. Uroflowmetry was performed at least 1 month after recovery, and patients with a maximal flow rate of less than 15 mL/s underwent a pressure flow study. RESULTS: Significant urethral stricture was excluded in all patients. Twenty-seven patients (93%) had a postvoid residual urine volume of less than 20 mL, and only two had values of 120 and 200 mL. The imaging and cystoscopic evaluation demonstrated a normal urinary tract in all patients. The maximal urinary flow rate was greater than 15 mL/s in 22 patients (76%) and lower than 15 mL/s in 7 patients (24%). In the latter group, urodynamic investigations, including free flowmetry and/or pressure flow study, revealed normal lower urinary tract function in 6 patients and a bladder outflow obstruction in 1 (3%). CONCLUSIONS: A first event of UTI in men younger than 45 years is usually not associated with significant structural or functional urinary tract abnormalities. Therefore, no radiologic, endoscopic, or urodynamic investigation is required.

Intrarenal foreign body presenting as a solid tumor.

A 45-year-old man underwent radical nephrectomy for an asymptomatic solid renal mass radiographically interpreted as a tumor. The pathologic examination revealed an intrarenal sponge forgotten during nephrolithotomy performed 5 years previously. The sponge was surrounded by a thick fibrous capsule. This case suggests that foreign body should be included in the differential diagnosis of a suspected renal mass in patients with a history of previous surgery.

Metastatic renal carcinoid: case report and review of the literature.

Primary renal carcinoid tumor is a rare tumor of the kidney. Metastatic renal carcinoid tumor has not been described in the medical literature. We report a case of renal metastasis of a primary bronchial carcinoid tumor and review the literature about renal carcinoid tumors.

Empirical management of urinary tract infections complicating transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE: Although urinary tract infection is a recognized complication of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, to our knowledge there are no recommendations in the literature for its management. We studied the unique features of this infection and provide management recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective design was used. The study group was composed of patients admitted to the emergency department from 2000 to 2001 with complaints suggestive of urinary tract infection after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The indication for biopsy, prophylactic regimen used and clinical manifestations were documented. Urine and blood cultures were obtained at hospital admission and bacterial susceptibility was examined for all positive cultures. RESULTS: All 23 patients enrolled in the study underwent biopsy for acceptable indications and 95.7% had received antibiotic prophylaxis, including 69.5% with fluoroquinolones. Infection was typically accompanied by high fever (mean +/- SD 39.1 +/- 0.6C), chills in 78.3% of cases and leukocytosis in 56.5%. All positive blood cultures and 92.9% of positive urine cultures yielded Escherichia coli. Bacterial isolates showed high resistance to fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 100% susceptibility to second and third generation cephalosporins, amikacin and carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: The successful management of urinary tract infection complicating transrectal prostate biopsy depends on the recognition of its unique features, the pathogens involved and their antimicrobial susceptibility. The recommended empirical treatment is a second or third generation cephalosporin, amikacin or a carbapenem.