Bidirectional regulation of intravenous general anesthetic actions by α3-containing γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors.

BACKGROUND: γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors mediate the actions of several intravenous general anesthetics. However, the contribution of α3-containing GABAA receptors to the action of these drugs is unknown. METHODS: The authors compared anesthetic endpoints (hypnosis, immobility, hypothermia) in response to various intravenous anesthetics in mice lacking the α3 subunit of the GABAA receptor (α3 knockout) and in wild-type mice. Furthermore, the authors generated and analyzed conditional mutant mice expressing the GABAA receptor α3 subunit exclusively in noradrenergic neurons. RESULTS: α3 knockout mice displayed decreased hypnotic and hypothermic responses to etomidate and midazolam, but an increased response to pentobarbital. The hypnotic response to ketamine was unaltered, whereas the hypothermic response was increased. In contrast, the hypnotic but not the hypothermic response to medetomidine was increased. The combination of ketamine/xylazine displayed increased hypnotic, immobilizing, and hypothermic effects in α3 knockout mice. Mice expressing the α3 subunit exclusively in noradrenergic neurons were generated to assess whether the lack of α3 subunits on noradrenergic neurons may be responsible for this effect. In these mice, the increases of the hypnotic and immobilizing actions induced by ketamine/xylazine were largely absent, whereas the increase in the hypothermic action was still present. CONCLUSION: α3-containing GABAA receptors bidirectionally regulate essential anesthetic actions: they mediate anesthetic actions of etomidate and midazolam, known to selectively act at GABAA receptors, and they negatively constrain anesthetic actions of compounds with targets partly or exclusively distinct from GABAA receptors such as medetomidine, ketamine, and pentobarbital. Furthermore, our results indicate that α3-containing GABAA receptors on noradrenergic neurons may contribute to this constraint.

Differential roles of GABA(A) receptor subtypes in benzodiazepine-induced enhancement of brain-stimulation reward.

Benzodiazepines such as diazepam are widely prescribed as anxiolytics and sleep aids. Continued use of benzodiazepines, however, can lead to addiction in vulnerable individuals. Here, we investigate the neural mechanisms of the behavioral effects of benzodiazepines using the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) test, a procedure with which the reward-enhancing effects of these drugs can be measured. Benzodiazepines bind nonselectively to several different GABA(A) receptor subtypes. To elucidate the α subunit(s) responsible for the reward-enhancing effects of benzodiazepines, we examined mice carrying a histidine-to-arginine point mutation in the α1, α2, or α3 subunit, which renders the targeted subunit nonresponsive to diazepam, other benzodiazepines and zolpidem. In wild-type and α1-point-mutated mice, diazepam caused a dose-dependent reduction in ICSS thresholds (reflecting a reward-enhancing effect) that is comparable to the reduction observed following cocaine administration. This effect was abolished in α2- and α3-point-mutant mice, suggesting that these subunits are necessary for the reward-enhancing action of diazepam. α2 Subunits appear to be particularly important, since diazepam increased ICSS thresholds (reflecting an aversive-like effect) in α2-point-mutant animals. Zolpidem, an α1-preferring benzodiazepine-site agonist, had no reward-enhancing effects in any genotype. Our findings implicate α2 and α3 subunit containing GABA(A) receptors as key mediators of the reward-related effects of benzodiazepines. This finding has important implications for the development of new medications that retain the therapeutic effects of benzodiazepines but lack abuse liability.