Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT. METHODS: A total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients. RESULTS: At 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.

Intensive lipid-lowering therapy for early achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction ("Jena auf Ziel").

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, less than 20% of patients at very high-risk achieve ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guideline-recommended LDL-C target levels in Europe. "Jena auf Ziel-JaZ" is a prospective cohort study in which early combination therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg was initiated on admission in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and lipid-lowering therapy was escalated during follow-up with bempedoic acid and PCSK9 inhibitors to achieve recommended LDL-C targets in all patients. Moreover, we evaluated side-effects of lipid-lowering therapy. METHODS: Patients admitted with STEMI at Jena University Hospital were started on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg on admission. Patients were followed for EAS/ESC LDL-C target achievement during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. On discharge, 32.9% achieved LDL-C targets on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg. After 4-6 weeks, 80% of all patients on atorvastatin 80 mg and ezetimibe started at the index event were on ESC/EAS LDL-C targets. In 20%, combined lipid-lowering therapy was escalated with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors. All patients achieved LDL-C levels of or below 55 mg/dL during follow-up on triple lipid-lowering therapy. Combined lipid-lowering therapy was well-tolerated with rare side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Early combination therapy with a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe and escalation of lipid-lowering therapy with either bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors gets potentially all patients with STEMI on recommended ESC/EAS LDL-C targets without significant side effects.

Subintimal shift as mechanism for side-branch occlusion in percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions with bifurcation lesions.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the mechanism of subintimal shift (SIS), standardise diagnostic criteria and sensitise the interventional community to this phenomenon. The treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complicated by bifurcation lesions involved in the CTO segment or adjacent to it. Extraplaque expansion of intracoronary devices during CTO PCI may extend the dissection plane over the bifurcation with the consequential side or main branch compression by an intimo-medial flap. This phenomenon is hereby described for the first time and named subintimal shift. METHODS: Experienced CTO operators from 3 international high volume centers for CTO PCI retrospectively searched their personal records for paradigmatic cases of SIS, summarising key features and proposing diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The series comprised 7 demonstrative cases, illustrating SIS by intravascular imaging (2 cases) or indirect angiographic signs during CTO PCI (5 cases). Five cases were triggered by stent expansion, 1 by balloon inflation and 1 case was aborted after angiographic warning signs. In 4 cases, SIS resulted in total occlusion of a branch, refractory to ballooning whenever attempted. Four cases required bailout intervention and in 2 cases the branch was left occluded, resulting in a rise of cardiac markers. CONCLUSIONS: Subintimal shift is a noteworthy complication in CTO bifurcations, potentially resulting in occlusion of the relevant side or even the main branch. Intracoronary imaging prior to stenting is recommended to understand the tissue planes. Some counterintuitive peculiarities of this phenomenon, like its refractoriness to ballooning, must be known by CTO operators for its efficient resolution.

Anatomical classification of chronic total occlusions in coronary bifurcations.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) is undergoing substantial technical progress and standardization, paralleling the evolution of dedicated devices, tools, and techniques. A standard consensus to classify CTO-CBL might be instrumental to homogenize data collection and description of procedures for scientific and educational purposes. The Medina-CTO classification replicates the classical three digits in Medina classification for bifurcations, representing the proximal main vessel, distal main vessel, and side branch, respectively. Each digit can take a value of 1 if it concerns atherosclerosis and is anatomically stenosed, or 0 if it is not. In addition, the occluded segment(s) of the bifurcation are noted by a subscript, which describes key interventional features of the cap: t (tapered), b (blunt), or a (ambiguous). This approach results in 56 basic categories that can be grouped by means of different elements, depending on the specific needs of each study. Medina-CTO classification, consisting of adding a subscript describing the basic cap characteristics to the totally occluded segment(s) of the standard Medina triplet, might be a useful methodological tool to standardize percutaneous intervention of bifurcational CTO lesions, with interesting scientific and educational applications.

Rationale and Design of JenaMACS-Acute Hemodynamic Impact of Ventricular Unloading Using the Impella CP Assist Device in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction or heart failure entails a reduction in end organ perfusion. Patients who cannot be stabilized with inotropes and who experience increasing circulatory failure are in need of an extracorporeal mechanical support system. Today, small, percutaneously implantable cardiac assist devices are available and might be a solution to reduce mortality and complications. A temporary, ventricular, continuous flow propeller pump using magnetic levitation (Impella®) has been approved for that purpose. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: JenaMACS (Jena Mechanical Assist Circulatory Support) is a monocenter, proof-of-concept study to determine whether treatment with an Impella CP® leads to improvement of hemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal, hemodynamic support. The primary outcomes of JenaMACS are changes in hemodynamic parameters measured by pulmonary artery catheterization and changes in echocardiographic parameters of left and right heart function before and after Impella® implantation at different support levels after 24 h of support. Secondary outcome measures are hemodynamic and echocardiographic changes over time as well as clinical endpoints such as mortality or time to hemodynamic stabilization. Further, laboratory and clinical safety endpoints including severe bleeding, stroke, neurological outcome, peripheral ischemic complications and occurrence of sepsis will be assessed. JenaMACS addresses essential questions of extracorporeal, mechanical, cardiac support with an Impella CP® device in patients with cardiogenic shock. Knowledge of the acute and subacute hemodynamic and echocardiographic effects may help to optimize therapy and improve the outcome in those patients. CONCLUSION: The JenaMACS study will address essential questions of extracorporeal, mechanical, cardiac support with an Impella CP® assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock. Knowledge of the acute and subacute hemodynamic and echocardiographic effects may help to optimize therapy and may improve outcome in those patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee of the University Hospital of Jena. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants of the study. The results of this study will be published in a renowned international medical journal, irrespective of the outcomes of the study. Strengths and Limitations: JenaMACS is an innovative approach to characterize the effect of additional left ventricular mechanical unloading during cardiogenic shock via a minimally invasive cardiac assist system (Impella CP®) 24 h after onset and will provide valuable data for acute interventional strategies or future prospective trials. However, JenaMACS, due to its proof-of-concept design, is limited by its single center protocol, with a small sample size and without a comparison group.

Pre-procedural predictors for multiple clips in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral valve (MV) clipping for mitral regurgitation (MR) revolutionized MV repair; however, valve anatomies and pathologies vary. Often multiple clips are required, and predicting this pre-procedurally would be useful. We evaluated pre-procedural predictors for multiple clips. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 severe MR patients treated by mitral clipping between January 2011 and August 2018. Patients were grouped according to the use of a single (group I) or multiple clips (group II) and pre-procedure echocardiographs compared. No demographic differences existed except group II had more males (68.1%) than group I (48.3%). Mean left atrial diameter was larger in group II, 51 ± 9 mm, than group I, 48 ± 5 mm, p = 0.026. Mean mitral annular diameter differed: 34 ± 4mm (group II) versus 33 ± 3 mm (group I), p = 0.017. The vena contracta was broader in group II than group I (6.6 ± 1 mm vs. 6 ± 0.9 mm, p = 0.001). Severe mitral annular calcification occurred more in group I (36.2%) than group II (10.1%), p = 0.0001. On multivariate analysis, vena contracta width correlated positively with multiple clips (B 0.125, p = 0.013), but severe annular calcification correlated inversely (B - 0.35, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Vena contracta width and severe annular calcification are factors to consider when planning MV clipping.

Long-term outcome after thrombus aspiration in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the TATORT-NSTEMI trial : Thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To investigate the long-term prognostic value of aspiration thrombectomy in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to conventional PCI in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: In the randomized TATORT-NSTEMI (Thrombus aspiration in thrombus containing culprit lesions in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) trial, NSTEMI patients with thrombus containing culprit lesions were randomized to either PCI with aspiration thrombectomy or conventional PCI. The endpoint was a combination of all-cause death, reinfarction and new congestive heart failure. RESULTS: From 440 patients initially randomized, outcome data were available in 432 (98.2%) patients at a median follow-up of 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.4-5.0) years. Thrombectomy was associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint compared to conventional PCI (19.9% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.01). This finding was primarily driven by a reduced rate of reinfarction with thrombectomy (3.4% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01). Thrombectomy was still independently associated with the combined endpoint after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.76, p = 0.002). Findings were consistent across all analyzed subgroups (p values for interaction all > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In NSTEMI, thrombus aspiration is associated with favorable clinical outcome during long-term follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01612312.

Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial.

AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCB) may avoid stent-associated long-term complications. This trial compared the clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with either DCB or stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with NSTEMI were enrolled in a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing a paclitaxel iopromide-coated DCB with primary stent treatment. The main inclusion criterion was an identifiable culprit lesion without angiographic evidence of large thrombus. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF; combined clinical endpoint consisting of cardiac or unknown death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularisation) after nine months. Secondary endpoints included total major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and individual clinical endpoints. Mean age was 67±12 years, 67% were male, 62% had multivessel disease, and 31% were diabetics. One hundred and four patients were randomised to DCB, 106 to stent treatment. In the stent group, 56% of patients were treated with BMS, 44% with current-generation DES. In the DCB group, 85% of patients were treated with DCB only whereas 15% underwent additional stent implantation. During a follow-up of 9.2±0.7 months, DCB treatment was non-inferior to stent treatment with a TLF rate of 3.8% versus 6.6% (intention-to-treat, p=0.53). There was no significant difference between BMS and current-generation DES. The total MACE rate was 6.7% for DCB versus 14.2% for stent treatment (p=0.11), and 5.9% versus 14.4% in the per protocol analysis (p=0.056), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI, treatment of coronary de novo lesions with DCB was non-inferior to stenting with BMS or DES. These data warrant further investigation of DCB in this setting, in larger trials with DES as comparator (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01489449).

Functional impairment assessed by the Barthel Index influenced outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Objective. We investigated the influence of functional impairment assessed by the Barthel index (BI) on the three-month outcomes after transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TF-TAVI) under general anesthesia. Design. We included retrospectively analyzed 336 patients undergoing TAVI between January 2017 and January 2018 in central hospital, Bad Berka, Germany. All patients were followed up at three-month in our center's outpatient clinic. We stratified the patients according to the BI. Results. At baseline, 76 patients had a BI <80. Patients with a BI <80 were characterized by advanced age (80.6 ± 5.6 vs. 83 ± 4.1 years. p = .027), diabetes mellitus on insulin and higher surgical risk scores. A prior cerebral ischemic event was recorded more in patients with a BI ≥80. Regarding intermediate outcomes, three-month mortality was significantly higher in patients with a BI <80. Patients with a BI <80 developed significantly more postoperative cardiac decompensation, delirium and strokes. Patients with BI <80 had lower hemoglobin level preoperative and needed more blood transfusion postoperative. Other valve academic research consortiums (VARCs) complications were equally distributed in both groups. A BI <80 was associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay and was an independent predictor of FT protocol failure (OR 4; CI 95% 1.3-11. p .02). Conclusions. A BI <80 is associated with increased mortality and risk of neurological events and cardiac decompensations after TF TAVI. A BI <80 is an independent predictor of failure in fast track TAVI.

Impact of Hierarchy on Multidisciplinary Heart-Team Recommendations in Patients with Isolated Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Background: The Heart Team (HT) discussion has been incorporated in the current guidelines for myocardial revascularization in order to optimize treatment decisions for patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). There are no data in the literature, whether hierarchical issues do have an impact on HT decisions. We aimed to analyze the therapeutic recommendations of the multidisciplinary "Heart Team" (HT) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if: (a) The head of cardiovascular surgery (HOS) and the head of cardiology (HOC) were present during the HT meeting, (b) both directors were absent, (c) only HOS or HOC was present. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all HT discussions between 2012 and 2015 in patients with isolated MVD (without any other cardiac problems requiring surgery). Results: During the study period, we analyzed 209 HT discussions in patients with isolated MVD. If neither HOS nor HOC was present at the HT discussion, the therapeutic recommendation was in 69% CABG and 31% PCI. If HOS and HOC were present in 77% CABG and 23% PCI was recommended (p = 0.34). If only HOS was present therapeutic recommendation was in 83% CABG and 17% PCI, and if only HOC was present the recommendation was in 54% CABG and 46% PCI (p < 0.0001). This difference did not attenuate during the study period. Conclusions: The hierarchy of the participating physicians significantly impacts treatment recommendations of a multidisciplinary HT in patients with isolated MVD. This impact did not attenuate after several years of Heart Team interaction.

Multicentre propensity-matched comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the ACURATE TA/neo self-expanding versus the SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable prosthesis.

AIMS: In the absence of randomised data, we aimed to compare the transapical ACURATE and transfemoral ACURATE neo with the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis using propensity matching. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 1,306 patients at three German centres received either the ACURATE/ACURATE neo prosthesis (n=591) or the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis (n=715). Through nearest neighbour matching with exact allocation for access route and centre, pairs of 329 patients (250 transfemoral, 79 transapical) per group were determined. Patients were 81 years old on average and had a logistic EuroSCORE I of 19%. Predilatation and post-dilatation were more frequent in the ACURATE group (97.6% versus 52.1%, p<0.001 for predilatation and 40.4% versus 11.6%, p<0.001 for post-dilatation), but rapid pacing for implantation was used less frequently (37.1% versus 98.2%, p<0.001). More-than-mild aortic regurgitation at postoperative echocardiography was 12.0% for the ACURATE group and 3.1% for the SAPIEN group, p≤0.001). More-than-mild aortic regurgitation in the ACURATE group differed amongst the centres with 6.0% (3/50) in centre A, 34.1% (29/85) in centre B and 3.4% (6/181) in centre C. Patients in the ACURATE group less frequently had pacemaker implantation compared to the SAPIEN 3 group (11.9% versus 18.5%, p=0.020), 30-day mortality was 4.6% versus 2.1%, respectively, p=0.134, and one-year survival was 83.1% (95% CI: 77.6-87.4) versus 88.8% (95% CI: 84.0-92.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score analysis, patients treated with the transapical ACURATE or transfemoral ACURATE neo prosthesis less frequently had pacemakers at 30 days but had more aortic regurgitation and lower one-year survival.

Effect of renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus on in-hospital mortality after acute coronary syndromes treated with primary PCI. Results from the ALKK PCI Registry.

BACKGROUND: It is known that patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk for in-hospital adverse events. However, we hypothesized that the higher event rate is due to the patients' subgroup with renal failure (RF), a common sequel of DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data of the prospective ALKK-PCI registry including all consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for ACS of 48 hospitals between 2008 and 2013. We divided 69,651 patients in four groups according to their history of DM and RF (GFR < 60 ml/min). All-cause, in-hospital mortality of the following four groups: noDM/noRF, DM/noRF, DM/RF, RF/noDM, was: 3.5%, 6.6%, 21.9%, and 14.1% for STEMI and 1.5%, 2.1%, 7.2%, and 5.4% for NSTE-ACS. In a multivariate analysis we looked for independent mortality-predictors. Odds ratios with confidence intervals for the following variables: DM without RF, DM with RF, RF without DM were: 1.62 (1.37-1.90), 3.02 (2.43-3.76), and 2.13 (1.80-2.52) for STEMI and 1.20 (0.99-1.45), 2.72 (2.18-3.88), and 2.08 (1.69-2.56) for NSTE-ACS. We also calculated mortality in four groups (60-90, 45-60, 45-30, <30 ml/min) according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Mortality rates were: 5.0%, 12.8%, 17.7%, and 31.5% for STEMI and 2.1%, 3.8%, 7.1%, and 12.0% for NSTE-ACS (p for trend <0.0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital death after PCI in patients with ACS and DM is mainly observed in the subgroup with co-existing RF. In a multivariate analysis, DM without RF was a significant mortality-predictor in STEMI, but not in NSTE-ACS. RF, irrespective of co-existent DM, was a stronger predictor than DM alone for both ACS-types (OR > 3) and mortality increased with decreasing eGFR.

Derivation and Validation of a Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Intervention Procedural Success Score From the 20,000-Patient EuroCTO Registry: The EuroCTO (CASTLE) Score.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to establish a contemporary scoring system to predict the outcome of chronic total occlusion coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Interventional treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs) is a developing subspecialty. Predictors of technical success or failure have been derived from datasets of modest size. A robust scoring tool could facilitate case selection and inform decision making. METHODS: The study analyzed data from the EuroCTO registry. This prospective database was set up in 2008 and includes >20,000 cases submitted by CTO expert operators (>50 cases/year). Derivation (n = 14,882) and validation (n = 5,745) datasets were created to develop a risk score for predicting technical failure. RESULTS: There were 14,882 patients in the derivation dataset (with 2,356 [15.5%] failures) and 5,745 in the validation dataset (with 703 [12.2%] failures). A total of 20.2% of cases were done retrogradely, and dissection re-entry was performed in 9.3% of cases. We identified 6 predictors of technical failure, collectively forming the CASTLE score (Coronary artery bypass graft history, Age (≥70 years), Stump anatomy [blunt or invisible], Tortuosity degree [severe or unseen], Length of occlusion [≥20 mm], and Extent of calcification [severe]). When each parameter was assigned a value of 1, technical failure was seen to increase from 8% with a CASTLE score of 0 to 1, to 35% with a score ≥4. The area under the curve (AUC) was similar in both the derivation (AUC: 0.66) and validation (AUC: 0.68) datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroCTO (CASTLE) score is derived from the largest database of CTO cases to date and offers a useful tool for predicting procedural outcome.

Temporal Trends in Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The study focuses on the evolution of practice, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital complications of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 17 626 procedures enrolled in European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion between January 2008 and June 2015 were assessed. The mean patient age was 63.9±10.9 years; 85% were men. Procedural success increased from 79.7% to 89.3% through the study period. Patients enrolled during the years had increasing comorbidities and lesion complexity (J-CTO score [Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan] increased from 1.76±1.03 in 2008 to 2.17±0.91 in 2015; P for trend, <0.001). Retrograde approach utilization steadily increased from 10.1% in 2008 to 29.9% in 2015 ( P for trend, <0.001). Antegrade dissection reentry adoption was low, not exceeding 5.5%. In-hospital mortality decreased during the study period from 0.4% to 0.1% ( P for trend, <0.001), whereas in-hospital complication rates remained essentially unchanged, in the range 4.4% to 5.2% ( P for trend, 0.390). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention has shown a steady increase in procedural success rate over time, with unchanged complication rates, despite the increasing complexity of the lesions attempted. The J-CTO score predictive value for procedural success was low for the entire registry and had no predictive ability for the retrograde approach.

Effect of intraoperative local application of 3% hydrogen peroxide on pocket infections following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: An observational study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze whether local application of 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) additionally to standard antibiotic prophylaxis following implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) reduces the incidence of pocket infections (PI). METHODS: In this observational case-control study every patient from the group additionally treated with H2O2 was matched with two patients out of the control group for age, male-gender, body-mass-index and operation time. The incidence of PI within 365 days after device implantation was compared. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 429 consecutive patients were additionally treated with H2O2 and matched with 858 patients undergoing standard treatment (mean age 69 ±â€¯12 years, 876 males (67.4%), body-mass-index 28 ±â€¯4.0 kg/m2 and operation time 45 ±â€¯23 min). Except for a more frequent use of dual-platelet-inhibition in the H2O2-group, clinical characteristics were otherwise similar. A total of 23 (1.78%) PIs occurred, most of them (14/23; 61%) during the first 45 days after implantation procedure. The use of H2O2 was associated with a significant reduction (3/429 = 0.69% versus 20/858 = 2.33%; p = 0.04), although patients of the H2O2 treated group received more complex procedures increasing the risk of PI. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative local application of 3% H2O2 seems to be associated with a significant reduced incidence of PI following implantation of CIED. Because of its non-randomized character this trial should be considered as a hypothesis generating study.

A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions.

Aims: The clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs) is not established by randomized trials. This study should compare the benefit of PCI vs. optimal medical therapy (OMT) on the health status in patients with at least one CTO. Method and results: Three hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized, multicentre, open-label, and controlled clinical trial to compare the treatment by PCI with OMT with a 2:1 randomization ratio. The primary endpoint was the change in health status assessed by the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) between baseline and 12 months follow-up. Fifty-two percent of patients have multi-vessel disease in whom all significant non-occlusive lesions were treated before randomization. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed including 13.4% failed procedures in the PCI group and 7.3% cross-overs in the OMT group. At 12 months, a greater improvement of SAQ subscales was observed with PCI as compared with OMT for angina frequency [5.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75; 8.71; P = 0.003], and quality of life (6.62, 95% CI 1.78-11.46; P = 0.007), reaching the prespecified significance level of 0.01 for the primary endpoint. Physical limitation (P = 0.02) was also improved in the PCI group. Complete freedom from angina was more frequent with PCI 71.6% than OMT 57.8% (P = 0.008). There was no periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. At 12 months, major adverse cardiac events were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention leads to a significant improvement of the health status in patients with stable angina and a CTO as compared with OMT alone. Trial registration: NCT01760083.

Matched comparison of next- and early-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve implantations in failed surgical aortic bioprostheses.

AIMS: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation (VinV) is established for the treatment of degenerated surgical bioprostheses in patients at high operative risk. Our aim was to report on the first large assessment of VinV with next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: After SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 VinV, 514 patients were analysed using an inverse probability of treatment weighting. Standardised clinical and haemodynamic outcomes were compared, and core laboratory evaluation of implantation depth was performed. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 0.6% and 3.5% for SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT (p=0.077). Residual transprosthetic gradient ≥20 mmHg was observed in 38.3% (SAPIEN 3) and 35.7% (SAPIEN XT) of patients (p=0.627) with increased rates in small bioprostheses (≤21 mm true ID). In SAPIEN 3 VinV, low implantation depth >20% THV stent frame length was associated with a higher rate of elevated transaortic gradients (p=0.048). Similarly, an implantation depth >5 mm was linked to more pacemaker implantations (p=0.01). Overall, a trend towards higher pacemaker implantation rates was observed after SAPIEN 3 VinV (6% vs. 2.5% in SAPIEN XT, p=0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic VinV with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 was similarly safe and effective. However, residual stenosis remains a concern, particularly in smaller bioprostheses and with increasing implantation depth.

Patients' preferences for coronary bypass grafting or staged percutaneous coronary intervention in multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The decision for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (mCAD) is currently made by a heart-team approach. Patients' preference is less well investigated. METHODS: All consecutive patients with prior CABG and at least 2 PCI procedures were interviewed whether they would elect bypass surgery or staged PCI in case of a hypothetical scenario in which they had mCAD and CABG or PCI will equally improve symptoms and survival. RESULTS: A total 213 patients were surveyed. About 21 (10%) patients had multiple CABG, and mean number of PCI per patient was 4.0 ± 2.7. Complications during CABG were reported in 19.7% and in 14% after PCI, respectively. About 15% experienced complications after both CABG and PCI, and 51% had no complications at all. Mean symptom-free period was 5.2 (following CABG) vs 1.8 years (following PCI); P<.001. Duration of recovery was significant shorter after PCI (mean 9.2 ± 1.2 vs 136.4 ± 57.9 days; P<.01). Based on their personal experience with both procedures, 15% of the participants elected CABG in the hypothetical scenario and 67% choose staged PCI, 18% were equally happy with either. More participants preferred PCI when age was ≥70, complications following CABG occurred, and when undergoing CABG first. Gender, number of CABG or PCI procedures per patient, and complications following PCI did not affect participants' preference. CONCLUSIONS: In our hypothetical scenario, the majority of participants preferred staged PCI over CABG. Preferences were related to age, complications following CABG, and whether CABG was performed first.

Transapical tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation: An alternative approach to a challenging clinical scenario.

We report on a transapical tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation performed via right ventricular apex using the Sapien-XT-prosthesis. A 57-year-old woman with recurrent episodes of right heart failure and three previous sternotomies, including tricuspid valve repair with a 32 mm Carpentier-Edwards-Classic annuloplasty ring was admitted due to recurrent severe tricuspid regurgitation. Given the excessive surgical risk, a 29 mm Sapien-XT-prosthesis was selected for valve-in-ring implantation. Transapical valve-in-ring implantation procedure was uneventful. Predischarge echocardiography showed only trace paravalvular tricuspid regurgitation in the septal region. Transapical approach via right ventricular apex is a viable alternative for tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation in selected high-risk patients. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.