The swallowing and speech after transoral robotic surgery-does the site impact the outcome?

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been introduced to head and neck surgery as a minimally invasive techqniques to improve the functional outcomes of patients. Compare the functional outcome for swallowing and speech in each site of TORS within the head and neck. Retrospective cohort study for patients who underwent TORS within the head and neck unit. Patients were assessed at four different time points (one day, one month, six months and twelve months, respectively) with bedside/office testing. Methods of testing for swallowing assessment were by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), and speech assessments were carried out using the Understandability of Speech score (USS). Outcomes were compared to patient-specific pre-treatment baseline levels. 68 patients were included. 75% and 40% of the patients resumed normal fluid intake and normal diet immediately after surgery. 8.8% required a temporary feeding tube, with 1% required gastrostomy. There was a steep improvement in diet between 3 and 6 months. Fluid and diet consistency dropped significantly following the majority of transoral robotic surgery with more noticeable diet changes. Early deterioration in diet is temporary and manageable with a modified diet. Rapid recovery of swallowing is achieved before the first year. There is no long-term effect on speech.

Transoral robotic tongue base mucosectomy for head and neck cancer of unknown primary: six-year outcome experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary is a diagnostic dilemma. The clinical and imaging workup remains ineffective in two-thirds of patients. Transoral robotic surgery has shown an advantage in the primary detection over the previous standard panendoscopy. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study that took place at a large healthcare centre with robotic surgery experience in head and neck over six-years. All included carcinoma of unknown primary patients followed the standard recommendation for primary identification. Final diagnostic step of robotic tongue base mucosectomy with or without tonsillectomy was introduced. The cancer detection rate in tongue base only, the functional outcome and the effect on the cancer pathway were evaluated. RESULTS: Carcinoma of unknown primary was reported in 44 per cent of patients. All identified specimens were human papillomavirus positive. There was no significant effect on functional outcome of swallowing and the national 62-day cancer pathway. Robotic surgery allowed optimum treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary in early nodal disease. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery is a useful paradigm in the management of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is safe with minimal morbidity and good functional outcome after the surgery.

Revision Transoral Robotic Surgery for Early Stage HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, it's Timing and Margins: Past and Present- a Prospective Single Centre Observational Study.

To review cohort of patients with HPV positive early stage oropharyngeal cancer that underwent revision trans oral robotic surgery for positive or close margin for evidence of residual disease, its impact on survival and discussion about clear margin. This is a prospective observational study. Our TORS revision rate was 20.6%. 91.7% did not need radiotherapy to primary site; mean recurrence free survival is 31 months and no mortality in this cohort due to the primary disease. There is no consensus on what is clear margin. The surgical margins are a surrogate marker for later recurrences or long-term survival and this is what guides our treatment but equally attempts should be made to preserve their function and not increase the morbidity.

Follow up imaging of oral, oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients: Comparison of PET-CT and MRI post treatment.

There is currently no consensus as to the ideal timing, frequency and modality of imaging for follow up of head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of PET-CT versus MRI, and imaging at 3 versus 6 months for follow up of head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent with no clinical signs of treatment failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for all head and neck cancers treated with curative intent at the Royal Derby Hospital. Data collected included demographic information, site of primary cancer, staging, treatment provided, type of follow up imaging performed and results of follow up imaging. Inclusion in the study was for oral, oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers treated with curative intent, asymptomatic patients, those who have had follow up imaging within 6 months of treatment, and those followed up for at least 2.5 years since treatment. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in the study. 25% of patients had evidence of recurrent/metastatic disease on imaging, 60% of which were identified within 6 months post treatment. The majority (60%) of failures were due to distant metastases. The sensitivity and specificity of both MRI and PET-CT was higher at 6 months post-treatment compared to 3 months post-treatment. Overall the sensitivity and specificity for PET-CT and MRI within 3-6 months post treatment were 94.7% and 83.5% and 60% and 85.7% respectively for identifying treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Follow up Imaging at 6 months post treatment is more likely to accurately identify treatment failures with fewer false positives than imaging at 3 months. PET-CT is preferable to MRI for identifying post treatment locoregional and distant treatment failure.

Primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the head and neck: a case study and brief review.

We present a patient who had an aggressive primary signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma in the oral cavity that spread rapidly and led to his death. Most reports describe an indolent clinical course, but further reports are needed to better evaluate the particular clinical characteristics and course of this uncommon and biologically variable condition.

The horizontal and stepped osteotomy technique for mandibular reconstruction using fibular free flap.

The mandible is an important component of the orofacial skeleton, and resection of part of the mandible as part of head and neck oncological procedures can have dramatic impact on both function and cosmesis. In this article, we describe a new technique in the resection osteotomy and flap fixation that improves the stability and aesthetic outcome of the reconstruction. The mandibular resection is performed utilizing a horizontal osteotomy above the mandibular angle on one side and a stepped body or angle osteotomy on the other side. Our technique is unique as it allows flexibility in adjusting the chin point projection to give the best possible aesthetic outcome; it allows more bone-to-bone contact, which increases the stability; it reduces rotation; and it allows for use of miniplate fixation, facilitating future rehabilitation with implants. We have been using this technique with great success in our hospital, and we recommend its use for its improved flexibility, stability, and aesthetic outcome.