A Decision-Making Algorithm for Remote Digital Assessments of Alzheimer's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Remote digital assessments (RDAs) such as voice recording, video and motor sensors, olfactory, hearing, and vision screenings are now starting to be employed to complement classical biomarker and clinical evidence to identify patients in the early AD stages. Choosing which RDA can be proposed to individual patients is not trivial and often time-consuming. This position paper presents a decision-making algorithm for using RDA during teleconsultations in memory clinic settings. METHOD: The algorithm was developed by an expert panel following the Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The decision-making algorithm is structured as a series of yes-no questions. The resulting questionnaire is freely available online. DISCUSSION: We suggest that the use of screening questionnaires in the context of memory clinics may help accelerating the adoption of RDA in everyday clinical practice.

myHealthHub for older adult inpatients to reduce loneliness, and improve patient engagement and mental health: protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Older Canadian adults make up 85% of hospital stays which are associated with increased loneliness, stress, anxiety, and/or depression. There is a need for novel approaches to reduce loneliness and mental health outcomes in older adult hospital inpatients to prevent further strain on an already overwhelmed healthcare system. METHODS: This is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) exploring the efficacy of a bedside multimodal interaction system, myHealthHub, on loneliness, quality of life (QOL), patient engagement, and other mental health outcomes compared to an active control group in older adult inpatients (n = 60) from baseline to 5-days. Qualitative analyses will be conducted through semi-structured interviews with older adults (n = 8-10) and hospital staff, nurses, and clinicians (n = 4-5) facilitating the service to evaluate patient engagement and experience with myHealthHub. RESULTS: Not applicable. CONCLUSION: This novel pilot clinical trial will obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of myHealthHub in reducing loneliness, QOL, patient engagement, and mental health outcomes in older adult inpatients. If successful, this could provide a potential means to improve patient experience in hospitals and reduce the burden and additional expense on the healthcare system.

Effects of virtual reality guided meditation in older adults: the protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Background: Virtual reality (VR) based meditation has been shown to help increase relaxation and decrease anxiety and depression in younger adults. However, this has not been studied in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) in the older adult population. The aim of this RCT is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a VR-guided meditation intervention for community-dwelling older adults and its effect on stress and mental health. Methods: We will recruit 30 participants aged ≥ 60 years, whose perceived stress score (PSS) is > 14 (moderate stress), and randomize them 1:1 to the intervention or control waitlist group. The intervention will involve exposure to eight 15-min VR-guided meditation sessions distributed twice weekly for 4-weeks. Two modalities will be offered: in-home and at the hospital. Data analysis: Baseline and post-intervention assessments will evaluate perceived stress, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, quality of life, and mindfulness skills. Analyses will employ mixed methods repeated ANOVA tests. Qualitative analyses through semi-structured interviews and participant observation will be used to assess participants' experiences. Study outcomes include: (A) feasibility and acceptability compared to a waitlist control (B) stress, using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (C) anxiety, and depression, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); (D) insomnia, quality of life and mindfulness skills, using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Forms (FFMQ-SF), respectively. We will also measure immersive tendencies, sickness and sense of presence using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and the Presence Questionnaire (PQ). Discussion: Virtual reality-guided meditation could be an acceptable, feasible, safe, and cost-effective novel alternative health intervention for improving older adults' mental health.Clinical trial registration: NCT05315609 at https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Alzheimer's early detection in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and expert consensus on preclinical assessments.

Introduction: The risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older adults increasingly is being discussed in the literature on Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS). Remote digital Assessments for Preclinical AD (RAPAs) are becoming more important in screening for early AD, and should always be available for PACS patients, especially for patients at risk of AD. This systematic review examines the potential for using RAPA to identify impairments in PACS patients, scrutinizes the supporting evidence, and describes the recommendations of experts regarding their use. Methods: We conducted a thorough search using the PubMed and Embase databases. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews, and observational studies that assessed patients with PACS on specific RAPAs were included. The RAPAs that were identified looked for impairments in olfactory, eye-tracking, graphical, speech and language, central auditory, or spatial navigation abilities. The recommendations' final grades were determined by evaluating the strength of the evidence and by having a consensus discussion about the results of the Delphi rounds among an international Delphi consensus panel called IMPACT, sponsored by the French National Research Agency. The consensus panel included 11 international experts from France, Switzerland, and Canada. Results: Based on the available evidence, olfaction is the most long-lasting impairment found in PACS patients. However, while olfaction is the most prevalent impairment, expert consensus statements recommend that AD olfactory screening should not be used on patients with a history of PACS at this point in time. Experts recommend that olfactory screenings can only be recommended once those under study have reported full recovery. This is particularly important for the deployment of the olfactory identification subdimension. The expert assessment that more long-term studies are needed after a period of full recovery, suggests that this consensus statement requires an update in a few years. Conclusion: Based on available evidence, olfaction could be long-lasting in PACS patients. However, according to expert consensus statements, AD olfactory screening is not recommended for patients with a history of PACS until complete recovery has been confirmed in the literature, particularly for the identification sub-dimension. This consensus statement may require an update in a few years.

Profiles of socially isolated community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent class analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify different profiles of socially isolated older adults during the first wave of COVID-19 in Quebec, Canada. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data were obtained through a telehealth socio-geriatric risk assessment tool, ESOGER, administered to adults aged 70 years or more between April and July 2020 in Montreal, Canada. MEASURES: Those living alone with no social contacts in the last few days were considered socially isolated. Latent class analysis was performed to identify profiles of socially isolated older adults based on: age, sex, polypharmacy, use of home care, use of a walking aid, recall of current year/month, anxiety level (scale 0-10), and need for follow-up from a healthcare provider. RESULTS: Three-hundred and eighty (380) older adults identified as socially isolated were analyzed, of whom 75.5 % were female and 56.6 % were over 85. Three classes were identified: Class 1 ("physically frail older females") had the highest proportion of polypharmacy, walking aid, and home care use. Class 2 ("anxious, relatively younger males") were predominantly males who used the least home care but had the highest anxiety levels. Class 3 ("seemingly well older females") had the highest proportion of females, lowest proportion of polypharmacy, lowest anxiety level, and none used a walking aid. Recall of current year/month was similar across the three classes. CONCLUSIONS: This study found heterogeneity among socially isolated older adults during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with varying levels of physical and mental health. Our findings may contribute to the development of targeted interventions to support this vulnerable population during and after the pandemic.

Isolating together during COVID-19: Results from the Telehealth Intervention Program for older adults.

Background: A pressing challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond is to provide accessible and scalable mental health support to isolated older adults in the community. The Telehealth Intervention Program for Older Adults (TIP-OA) is a large-scale, volunteer-based, friendly telephone support program designed to address this unmet need. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 112 TIP-OA participants aged ≥60 years old was conducted in Quebec, Canada (October 2020-June 2021). The intervention consisted of weekly friendly phone calls from trained volunteers. The primary outcome measures included changes in scores of stress, depression, anxiety, and fear surrounding COVID-19, assessed at baseline, 4 and 8-weeks. Additional subgroup analyses were performed with participants with higher baseline scores. Results: The subgroup of participants with higher baseline depression scores (PHQ9 ≥10) had significant improvements in depression scores over the 8-week period measured [mean change score = -2.27 (±4.76), 95%CI (-3.719, -0.827), p = 0.003]. Similarly, participants with higher baseline anxiety scores (GAD7 ≥10) had an improvement over the same period, which, approached significance (p = 0.06). Moreover, despite peaks in the pandemic and related stressors, our study found no significant (p ≥ 0.09) increase in stress, depression, anxiety or fear of COVID-19 scores. Discussion: This scalable, volunteer-based, friendly telephone intervention program was associated with decreased scores of depression and anxiety in older adults who reported higher scores at baseline (PHQ 9 ≥10 and GAD7 ≥10).

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident hospitalization in Quebec's older population: Results of the NuAge cohort study.

Background: Screening older adults at risk of hospitalization is essential to prevention of this adverse event. Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) has been associated with incident dementia and falls, which are both risk factors of hospitalization. There is no information on the association of MCR with incident hospitalization in older adults. Objective: The study aims to examine the association of MCR with incident hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults. Design: Quebec older population-based observational cohort study with 3 years of follow-up. Setting: Community dwellings. Subjects: A subset of 999 participants recruited in the NuAge study. Methods: Participants with MCR (i.e., with slow gait and cognitive complaint without dementia or motor disability) were identified at baseline assessment. Incident hospitalization (i.e., ≥1) and its recurrence (i.e., ≥2) were collected annually over a 3 year follow-up period. Results: The prevalence of MCR was 5.0% at baseline. The overall incidence of hospitalization was 29.0% and its recurrence 4.8%. MCR was associated with incident recurrent hospitalization [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 2.58 with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = (1.09-6.09) and P = 0.031], but not with incident hospitalization [aHR = 1.48, with 95%CI = (0.95-2.28) and P = 0.081]. Conclusion: MCR is associated with incident recurrent hospitalization in NuAge participants, suggesting that MCR may be of clinical interest for screening individuals at risk for hospitalization in Quebec's older population.

Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations and Risk Screening of Incident Major Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Females: Results of an Observational Population-Based Cohort Study.

Background: "Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" (ER2) risk levels (i.e., low, moderate and high) may be used to screen for major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD) in older emergency department users, as a high ER2 risk level is associated with MNCD diagnosis. This study aims to examine the association of ER2 risk levels with incident MNCD in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A total of 709 participants of the EPIDémiologie de l'OStéoporose (EPIDOS) study-an observational population-based cohort study-were recruited in Toulouse (France). ER2 low, moderate and high risk levels were determined at baseline. Incident MNCD and their type (i.e., Alzheimer's disease (AD) vs. non-AD) were diagnosed after a 7-year follow-up period. Results: The overall incidence of MNCD was 29.1%. A low ER2 risk level was associated with low incidence of MNCD [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71 with P = 0.018] and AD (HR = 0.56 with P = 0.003), whereas a high risk level, both individually and when combined with a moderate risk level, was associated with high incidence of MNCD (HR ≥ 1.40 with P ≤0.018) and AD (HR ≥ 1.80 with P ≤ 0.003). No association was found with incident non-AD. Conclusion: ER2 risk levels were positively associated with incident MNCD in EPIDOS participants, suggesting that ER2 may be used for risk screening of MNCD in the older population.

Implementing a Telehealth Support Tool for Community-Dwelling Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Investigation of Provider Experiences.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, policymakers had to quickly offer telehealth services to address older adults' needs. This study aimed to understand the experiences of providers who implemented a telephone-based telehealth tool named Socio-Geriatric Evaluation (ESOGER), which assessed health and social isolation risks in community-dwelling older adults in Quebec (Canada). This qualitative study used 20 semi-structured online/phone interviews with health and social service providers coming from publicly-funded healthcare facilities and community organizations. We included adopters and non-adopters of the telehealth tool. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used reflexive thematic analysis to interpret the data. Three dimensions of providers' practice influenced the tool's implementation: service organization, working conditions, and interactions with older adults. Participants reported that the tool fostered continuity of care, provided guidance for their pandemic-related new tasks, and helped identify and support socially isolated older adults. Challenges to implementation included limited appropriateness of the telehealth tool for diverse services, feasibility barriers to adopting a new tool amid the health crisis, and acceptability challenges with some older adults. Despite relevance of the telehealth tool for providers, organizational, professional, and interactional barriers could hinder implementation success. Participatory approaches to telehealth may be promising avenues for future policies in this field.

Improving the mental and physical health of older community-dwellers with a museum participatory art-based activity: results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the mental and physical effects of a participatory art-based activity carried out at museums in older community-dwellers. METHODS: Based on a bicentre (the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; the Fuji Museum, Tokyo, Japan) single-blind RCT in two parallel groups (intervention group versus control group), 228 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 71.1 ± 5.4 years, 76.3% female) were enrolled. The intervention was a participatory art-based activity carried out at the MMFA and the Fuji Museum. The intervention group met weekly for 2 h over a 12-week period. The control group did not participate in any art-based intervention over the study period. Well-being was assessed before and after the first (M0) and the twelfth (M3) workshops, and quality of life and frailty before workshops at M0 and M3. These outcomes were assessed with standardized questionnaires with the same schedule in both groups. RESULTS: Well-being and quality of life improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group. Mixed results were observed with frailty. Although there were significantly more vigorous and fewer mildly frail participants by the end of the session when comparing intervention to control group participants, only a trend was observed in the decrease in mean value of the intervention group's frailty score. INTERPRETATION: This RCT confirmed that a participatory art-based activity performed weekly over a 3-month period may improve both mental and physical health in older community-dwellers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03679715; Title: A-Health RCT: Effects of Participatory Art-Based Activity on Health of Older Community Dwellers; First posted date: September 20, 2018; prospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679715.

CARE frailty e-health scale: Association with incident adverse health outcomes and comparison with the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty scale in the NuAge cohort.

BACKGROUND: This study examines and compares CARE and Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty states (i.e., robust, prefrail and frail) for their association with incident adverse health outcomes, including falls, depression, cognitive and functional decline, major neurocognitive disorders, hospitalization and mortality in community-dwelling older adults living in the province of Quebec (Canada). METHODS: A subset of individuals (n = 1098) who participated in "Nutrition as a determinant of successful aging: The Quebec longitudinal study" (NuAge), which is an elderly population-based observational cohort study with 3 years of follow-up, were selected. CARE and CHS frailty states were determined using the NuAge baseline assessment. Incident falls (i.e., ≥1, ≥2 and severe falls), depression (i.e., 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale score > 10/30), decline in cognition (i.e., Modified Mini Mental State (3MS) score < 79/100) and functionality (i.e., Activity Daily Living (ADL) score ≤ 3/4 and an Instrumental Activity Daily Living (IADL) score ≤ 6/8), major neurocognitive disorders (i.e., 3MS score < 79/100 and IADL score < 6/8), hospitalization and mortality were annually recorded over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: 66.8% and 23.6% of participants were classified as pre-frail and frail with CARE respectively, whereas this distribution of frailty states differed with CHS (47.9% and 8.4%). There were significant associations of CARE pre-frail and frail states with all incident adverse health outcomes, the lowest odds ratio (OR) being reported with falls and the highest with cognitive decline (OR ranging from 1.63 to 12.85 with P ≤ 0.032). All ORs of the CARE frailty states were greater than those of the CHS, except for frail participants with IADL decline (OR = 4.92 for CARE versus OR = 9.62 for CHS). CONCLUSIONS: CARE frail states were associated with incident adverse health outcomes and these associations were greater than with CHS, suggesting that the CARE scale is of clinical interest when screening for frailty and related adverse health outcomes in the elderly population.

"Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" and Incident Hospital Admissions in Older People with Major Neurocognitive Disorders Visiting Emergency Department: Results of an Experimental Study.

INTRODUCTION: Older people with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCDs) visiting the emergency department (ED) are at high risk of hospital admissions. The "Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" (ER2) tool decreases the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital when older people visiting ED are hospitalized after an index ED visit, regardless of their cognitive status. Its effect on hospital admissions has not yet been examined in older people with MNCD visiting ED. This study aimed to examine whether ER2 recommendations were associated with incident hospital admissions and LOS in ED in older people with MNCD visiting ED. METHODS: A total of 356 older people with MNCD visiting ED of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) were recruited in this non-randomized, pre-post-intervention, single arm, prospective and longitudinal open label trial. ED staff and patients were blinded of the ER2 score, and patients received usual ED care during the observation period, whereas ED staff were informed about the ER2 score, and patients had ER2 tailor-made recommendations in addition to usual care during the intervention period. Hospital admissions and the LOS in ED were the outcomes. RESULTS: There were less incident hospital admissions (odds ratio ≤ 0.61 with p ≤ 0.022) and longer LOS in ED (coefficient beta ≥4.28 with p ≤ 0.008) during the intervention period compared to the observation period. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: ER2 recommendations have mixed effects in people with MNCD visiting ED. They were associated with reduced incident hospital admissions and increased LOS in ED, suggesting that they may have benefits in addition to usual ED care.

Health benefits of "Thursdays at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts": Results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: . This study aims to examine and compare changes in frailty status, well-being and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults living in Montreal (Quebec, Canada) participating in a 3-month session of weekly "Thursdays at the Museum" and in their control counterparts who did not participate in art-based activities. METHODS: . 165 older community dwellers were recruited to a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups (intervention versus control). The intervention was weekly participatory art-based activities over a 3-month period carried out at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Frailty, well-being and quality of life were assessed using standardized questionnaires completed at baseline (M0) and before the fifth (M1), ninth (M2) and twelfth (M3) workshops in the intervention group. The control group completed these questionnaires according to the same schedule. The outcomes were mean values of frailty, well-being and quality of life scores, as well as the distribution of frailty categories (vigorous versus mild, moderate and severe frailty) at M0, M1, M2 and M3. RESULTS: . The intervention group showed significant improvements in frailty, well-being and quality of life scores (P≤0.004) when compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: . The results suggest that the 3-month session of weekly "Thursdays at the Museum" may improve both physical and mental health in Montreal community-dwelling older adults.

Late-Life Depressive Symptomatology, Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, and Incident Dementia: The "NuAge" Study Results.

Background: Late-life depressive symptomatology and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) have independently been associated with an increased risk for incident dementia. This study aimed to examine the association of late-life depressive symptomatology, MCR, and their combination on incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults living in Quebec (Canada). Methods: The study was carried out in a subset of 1,098 community dwellers aged ≥65 years recruited in the "Nutrition as a determinant of successful aging: The Quebec longitudinal study" (NuAge), an observational prospective cohort study with 3 years follow-up. At baseline, MCR was defined by the association of subjective cognitive complaint with slow walking speed, and late-life depressive symptomatology with a 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score >5/30. Incident dementia, defined as a Modified Mini-Mental State score ≤79/100 test and Instrumental Activity Daily Living score <4/4, was assessed at each annual visit. Results: The prevalence of late-life depressive symptomatology only was 31.1%, of MCR only 1.8%, and the combination of late-life depressive symptomatology and MCR 2.4%. The combination of late-life depressive symptomatology and MCR at baseline was associated with significant overall incident dementia (odds ratio (OR) = 2.31 with P ≤ 0.001) but not for MCR only (OR = 3.75 with P = 0.186) or late-life depressive symptomatology only (OR = 1.29 with P = 0.276). Conclusions: The combination of late-life depressive symptomatology and MCR is associated with incident dementia in older community dwellers. The results suggested an interplay between late-life depressive symptomatology and MCR exposing them to an increased risk for dementia.

Risk for short-term undesirable outcomes in older emergency department users: Results of the ER2 observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The "Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" (ER2) is a clinical tool designed to determine prognosis for the short-term Emergency Department (ED) undesirable outcomes including long length of stay (LOS) in ED and in hospital, as well as the likelihood of hospital admission during an index ED visit. It is also designed to guide appropriate and timely tailor-made geriatric interventions. This study aimed to examine whether ER2 assessment part was: 1) usable by ED healthcare workers (e.g. nurses) and 2) scoring system associated with long LOS in ED and in hospital, as well as hospital admission in older ED users on stretchers. METHODS: Based on an observational, prospective and longitudinal cohort study 1,800 participants visiting the ED of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) were recruited between September and December 2017. ER2 assessment determined three risk-levels (i.e., low, medium and high) for short-term ED undesirable outcomes. The rate of ER2 digital form completed, the time to fill ER2 items and obtain ER2 risk-levels, the LOS in ED and in hospital, and hospital admission were used as outcomes. RESULTS: ER2 was usable by ED nurses in charge of older ED users. High-risk group was associated with both increased ED stay (coefficient of regression ß = 3.81 with P≤0.001) and hospital stay (coefficient of regression ß = 4.60 with P = 0.002) as well as with hospital admission (HR = 1.32 with P≤0.001) when low ER2 risk level was used as referent level. Kaplan-Meier distributions showed that the three risk groups of participants differed significantly (P = 0.001). Those with high-risk level (P≤0.001) were discharged later from hospital to a non-hospital location compared to those with low risk. There was no significant difference between those classified in low-risk and in medium-risk groups (P = 0.985) and those in medium and high-risk groups (P = 0.096). CONCLUSION: The ER2 assessment part is usable in daily practice of ED care and its risk stratifications may be used to predict adverse outcomes including prolonged LOS in ED and in hospital as well as hospital admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03964311.

Emergency room evaluation and recommendations for older emergency department users: results of the ER2 experimental study.

PURPOSE: The study aims to examine whether the use of "emergency room evaluation and recommendations" (ER2) tool in daily ED practice reduces the length of stay in ED and hospital, and hospital admission in older patients visiting ED on stretcher. METHODS: A total of 3931 older patients visiting ED of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) on stretcher were recruited in this non-randomized, pre-post intervention, single arm, prospective and longitudinal open-label trial. ED staff and patients were blinded of the ER2 score and patients received usual ED care over the observational phase, whereas ED staff were informed about the ER2 score and patients had usual care plus interventions based on tailor-made geriatric recommendations during the interventional phase. The length of stay in ED and in hospital, and hospital admission were the outcomes. RESULTS: The ER2 recommendations were associated with increased length of stay in ED (ß = 2.94 with P ≤ 0.001) and decreased length of stay in hospital (ß = - 2.07 with P = 0.011). No effect was found for hospital admission (Odd Ratio (OR) = 0.92 with P = 0.182). CONCLUSION: Emergency room evaluation and recommendations (ER2) tool had mixed effects. Shorter hospital stay has been reported for older ED users hospitalized, but increased ED stay and no effects on hospital admission were found.

Pre-Dementia Stages and Incident Dementia in the NuAge Study.

BACKGROUND: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are two pre-dementia stages with an overlap, which may influence the risk for dementia. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to examine the association of MCR, MCI, and their combination with incident dementia in Quebec community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: 1,063 older adults (i.e., ≥65) were selected from a population-based observational cohort study known as the "Nutrition as a determinant of successful aging: The Quebec longitudinal study" (NuAge). Participants were separated into four groups at the baseline assessment: those without MCR and MCI (i.e., cognitively healthy individual; CHI), those with MCR alone, those with MCI alone, and those with MCR plus MCI. Incident dementia was recorded at each annual visit during a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of CHI was 87.2%, MCR 3.0%, MCI 8.8%, and MCR plus MCI 0.9%. The overall incidence of dementia was 2.4% and was significantly associated with MCR alone (Odd Ratio (OR) = 5.00 with 95% Confidence interval (CI) = [1.01;24.59] and p = 0.049), MCI alone (OR = 6.04 with 95% CI = [2.36;15.47] and p≤0.001), and the combination of MCR and MCI (OR = 25.75 with 95% CI = [5.32;124.66] and p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Combining MCR and MCI increased the risk for incident dementia. These results also demonstrated that this combination is a better predictor of dementia than MCI or MCR alone.

Prognosis tools for short-term adverse events in older emergency department users: result of a Québec observational prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: The "Program of Research on the Integration of Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy" (PRISMA-7) and "Emergency room evaluation and recommendations" (ER2) are both clinical tools used in Québec Emergency Departments (EDs) for screening of older ED users at higher risk of poor outcomes, such as prolonged length of stay (LOS) in EDs and in hospital. The study aimed to: 1) examine whether the PRISMA-7 and ER2 risk levels were associated with length of stays in ED and hospital, as well as hospital admission; and 2) compare the criteria performance (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios and area under receiver operating characteristic curve) of the PRISMA-7 and ER2 high-risk levels for these three ED adverse events in Québec older patients visiting ED on a stretcher. METHODS: A total of 1905 older patients who visited the ED of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Québec, Canada) on stretchers were recruited in this prospective observational cohort. Upon their ED arrival, PRISMA-7 and ER2 were performed. The outcomes were LOS in ED and in hospital, and hospital admission. RESULTS: The PRISMA-7 and ER2 risk levels were associated with length of stay in ED and hospital as well as with hospital admission. Prolonged stays and higher hospitalization rates were associated with high-risk levels, whereas those in low-risk level groups had significantly shorter LOS and a lower rate of hospital admission (P < 0.006). While performance measures were poor for both assessment tools, ER2 had a greater prognostic testing accuracy compared with PRISMA-7. CONCLUSION: PRISMA-7 and ER2 were both associated with incidental short-term ED adverse events but their overall prognostic testing accuracy was low, suggesting that they cannot be used as prognostic tools for this purpose.

Long-term effects of the Montreal museum of fine arts participatory activities on frailty in older community dwellers: results of the A-Health study.

PURPOSE: The study aims (1) to examine the long-term effects (i.e., at 12 months) of the Montreal museum of fine arts (MMFA) participatory art-based activities on frailty in a subset of participants of the Art and Health (A-Health) study and (2) to compare these long-term effects with short-term effects (i.e., at 3 months). METHODS: The A-Health study is a pre-post intervention, single arm, prospective and longitudinal study. A subset of 101 participants (67.3%) who completed the 12-month follow-up assessment was selected for this study. The intervention consisted in one weekly structured participatory art-based workshop over a 3-month period. Participants were separated according to their frailty status: vigorous (i.e., no frailty) versus mild frailty, moderate frailty and frailty merging mild and moderate frailty. Frailty was assessed before the intervention (M0), at the end of the 3-month intervention (M3) and 12 months (M15) after the end of the intervention. RESULTS: The mean value of frailty score was lower after the intervention compared to the beginning, regardless of the time of the assessments (i.e., M3 and M15). The proportion of vigorous participants increased and the proportion of mild frail participants decreased at the end of the intervention (i.e., M3) but no long-term effect was shown (i.e., M15) compared to M0. The proportion of moderate frail participants and frail participants at M15 were significantly lower compared to M0. CONCLUSION: The MMFA participatory art-based activities improved frailty at short and long terms, suggesting that it could be an effective way to promote an active and healthy aging. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03557723; Title: Effect of Art Museum Activity Program for the Elderly on Health: A Pilot Study; First submission date: January 31, 2018; First posted date: June 15, 2018; prospectively registered.

"Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" (ER2) Tool for the Screening of Older Emergency Department Visitors With Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results From the ER2 Database.

Purpose: The Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendation (ER2) is an application in the electronic medical file of patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) of the Jewish General Hospital (JGH; Montreal, Quebec, Canada). It screens for older ED visitors at high risk of undesirable events. The aim of this study is to examine the performance criteria (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], positive likelihood ratio [LR+], negative likelihood ratio [LR-] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]) of the ER2 high-risk level and its "temporal disorientation" item alone to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED visitors at the JGH. Methods: Based on a cross-sectional design, 999 older adults (age 84.9 ± 5.6, 65.1% female) visiting the ED of the JGH were selected from the ER2 database. ER2 was completed upon the patients' arrival at the ED. The outcomes were ER2's high-risk level, the answer to ER2's temporal disorientation item (present vs. absent), and the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders (yes vs. no) which was confirmed when it was present in a letter or other files signed by a physician. Results: The sensitivities of both ER2's high-risk level and temporal disorientation item were high (≥0.91). Specificity, the PPV, LR+, and AROC were higher for the temporal disorientation item compared to ER2's high-risk level, whereas a highest sensitivity, LR-, and NPV were obtained with the ER2 high-risk level. Both area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were high (0.71 for ER2's high-risk level and 0.82 for ER2 temporal disorientation item). The odds ratios (OR) of ER2's high-risk level and of temporal disorientation item for the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders were positive and significant with all OR above 18, the highest OR being reported for the temporal disorientation item in the unadjusted model [OR = 26.4 with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 17.7-39.3]. Conclusion: Our results suggest that ER2 and especially its temporal disorientation item may be used to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED users.