Loss of oestrus, concealed ovulation and paternity confusion in free-ranging Hanuman langurs.

Ovarian cycles in catarrhine primates are uniquely characterized by prolonged periods of sexual activity in which the timings of ovulation and copulation do not necessarily correspond. According to current hypotheses of primate social evolution, extended sexuality in multi-male groups might represent part of a female strategy to confuse paternity in order to reduce the risk of infanticide by males. We test this hypothesis by examining mating behaviour in relation to timing of ovulation and paternity outcome in a multi-male group of free-living Hanuman langurs. Using faecal progestogen measurements, we first document that female langurs have extended receptive periods in which the timing of ovulation is highly variable. Next, we demonstrate the capacity for paternity confusion by showing that ovulation is concealed from males and that copulations progressively decline throughout the receptive phase. Finally, we demonstrate multiple paternity, and show that despite a high degree of monopolization of receptive females by the dominant male, non-dominant males father a substantial proportion of offspring. We believe that this is the first direct evidence that extended periods of sexual activity in catarrhine primates may have evolved as a female strategy to confuse paternity.

DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys.

Although the killing of dependent infants by adult males is a widespread phenomenon among primates, its causes and consequences still remain hotly debated. According to the sexual selection hypothesis, infanticidal males will gain a reproductive advantage provided that only unrelated infants are killed and that the males increase their chances of siring the next infants. Alternatively, the social pathology hypothesis interprets infanticide as a result of crowded living conditions and, thus, as not providing any advantage. Based on DNA analyses of wild Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) we present the first evidence that male attackers were not related to their infant victims. Furthermore, in all cases the presumed killers were the likely fathers of the subsequent infants. Our data, therefore, strongly support the sexual selection hypothesis interpreting infanticide as an evolved, adaptive male reproductive tactic.

Amplification of microsatellites adapted from human systems in faecal DNA of wild Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).

Microsatellite systems originally established for human DNA were utilized for paternity testing from faecal DNA in a natural population of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Thirty-two primer pairs were applied to amplify DNA obtained from langur faeces. Twenty-two of these primer pairs yielded specific amplification products and 11 loci were polymorphic. Allele distributions and heterozygosity rates were determined for five systems. Genetic information from these five systems was sufficient for paternity exclusion in 46 out of 52 cases. Results were consistent enough to allow genotyping from faeces, although sometimes only one allele was amplified in a heterozygous individual. In conclusion, relationship analyses from faeces are possible in spite of the evolutionary distance between humans and langurs.