The Clinical Significance of Small Vessel Vasculitis on Temporal Artery Biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common type of systemic vasculitis in the elderly. Untreated, it can lead to irreversible blindness. Its diagnosis relies on a temporal artery biopsy (TAB). However, a proportion of patients have small vessel vasculitis (SVV) on biopsy; the prognosis of which remains unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical presentation and long-term outcomes of those with SVV with negative and positive biopsies to determine whether long-term corticosteroid therapy can be avoided in these patients. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of patients with suspected GCA who underwent TAB and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan as part of a prospective GCA and PET cohort. Patients were divided in to 3 groups based on TAB result: positive (inflammation in the main artery wall), negative (no inflammation), and SVV (isolated vasa vasorum or periadventitial SVV). Clinical, serological, and PET/CT data of patients with SVV were compared with those with positive and those with negative biopsies. RESULTS: For the 58 eligible patients recruited between May 2016 and December 2017, 11 had SVV, 12 had positive, and 35 had negative biopsies. Patients with SVV had similar clinical, serological, and PET/CT findings to those with negative biopsies. Compared with those with positive biopsies, patients with SVV had lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate (25 vs 78 mm/hour; P = 0.02), platelet count (296 vs 385 ×109/L; P = 0.03), and a lower median total vascular score on PET/CT scan (1.0 vs 13.5; P = 0.01). Median prednisone dose was lower (4.8 vs 11.7 mg; P = 0.015) and fewer were on steroid-sparing agents (20% vs 67%; P = 0.043) at 6 months. The percentage of patients with a clinical diagnosis of GCA was similar between those with SVV (3/11, 27.3%) and those with negative biopsies (5/35, 14.3%; P = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SVV on TAB had similar clinical features, PET/CT findings, and 6-month outcomes to those with negative biopsies. Small vessel vasculitis can be treated as equivalent to a negative biopsy when being considered for diagnosis and treatment of GCA.

Limited utility of novel serological biomarkers in patients newly suspected of having giant cell arteritis.

AIM: Diagnosing and monitoring vascular activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) is difficult due to the paucity of specific serological biomarkers. We assessed the utility of 8 novel biomarkers in an inception cohort of newly suspected GCA patients. METHOD: Consecutive patients were enrolled between May 2016 and December 2017. Serum was collected within 72 hours of commencing corticosteroids and at 6 months. It was analyzed for levels of intra-cellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), pentraxin 3, von Willebrand factor and procalcitonin (5-plex R&D Systems multiplex assay) and interleukin (IL)6, IL12 and interferon-γ (high-sensitivity 3-plex ProcartaPlex multiplex assay). A GCA specific positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) scan was performed at enrolment with uptake in each vascular territory graded and summed to derive a total vascular score (TVS). RESULTS: For the 63 patients enrolled, 12 (19%) had a final diagnosis of biopsy-positive GCA and a further 9 had a clinical diagnosis of biopsy-negative GCA. None of the 8 biomarkers was significantly higher in GCA patients compared with those with alternative diagnoses, or demonstrated a positive correlation with the PET/CT TVS. This was in contrast to the C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) which were higher in the biopsy-positive GCA cohort (P < .04) and showed weak positive correlations with the TVS (correlation coefficient 0.34, P < .01). Procalcitonin did not distinguish between GCA and infection. Concentrations of CRP, ESR, VEGF and pentraxin 3 decreased between diagnosis and 6 months in GCA patients. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify new serological biomarkers to assist in diagnosing or assessing the vasculitis burden in GCA.

Cranial and large vessel activity on positron emission tomography scan at diagnosis and 6 months in giant cell arteritis.

AIM: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect cranial and large vessel inflammation in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to determine the change and significance of vascular activity at diagnosis and 6 months. METHOD: Newly diagnosed GCA patients underwent time-of-flight fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/CT from vertex to diaphragm within 72 hours of commencing corticosteroids and were followed for 12 months. A 6 months scan was performed in patients with inflammatory features on biopsy or CT aortitis. Vascular uptake was visually graded by 2 blinded readers across 18 artery segments from 0 (no increased uptake) to 3 (very marked uptake). Scores were summed to give a total vascular score (TVS). RESULTS: We enrolled 21 GCA patients and 15 underwent the serial scan. Twelve (57%) patients experienced a relapse and 5 of these had ischemic features of vision disturbance, jaw or limb claudication. The median TVS fell from 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-24) at baseline to 5 (IQR 0-10) at 6 months (P < .01) with reduction in both cranial and large artery scores. While the overall relapse rate was similar between patients with a high (≥10) and low baseline TVS, patients with high scores were numerically more likely to experience an ischemic relapse (33% vs 11%, P = .34). Five out of 15 patients had persistent uptake in at least 1 vessel on the serial PET/CT but none experienced a subsequent relapse. CONCLUSION: Vascular activity decreased in cranial and large arteries between diagnosis and 6 months. Persistent activity did not predict subsequent relapse.

Assessment for varicella zoster virus in patients newly suspected of having giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: There is uncertainty if varicella zoster virus (VZV) triggers GCA. This is based on discordant reports of VZV detection in GCA temporal artery biopsies. We conducted a multimodal evaluation for VZV in the inception Giant Cell Arteritis and PET Scan (GAPS) cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy for suspected GCA were clinically reviewed for active and past VZV infection and followed for 6 months. Serum was tested for VZV IgM and IgG. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) sections were stained for VZV antigen using the VZV Mouse Cocktail Antibody (Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA). A selection of GCA and control tissues were stained with the VZV gE antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), which was used in previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients met inclusion criteria, 12 (21%) had biopsy-positive GCA and 20 had clinically positive GCA. None had herpes zoster at enrolment and only one patient developed a VZV clinical syndrome (zoster ophthalmicus) on follow-up. There was no difference in VZV exposure between GCA and non-GCA patients. None of the 53 patients who had VZV serology collected had positive VZV IgM antibodies. VZV antigen was not convincingly demonstrated in any of the TAB specimens; 57 TABs stained negative and 1 stained equivocally positive. The Santa Cruz Biotechnology VZV antibody exhibited positive staining in a range of negative control tissues, questioning its specificity for VZV antigen. CONCLUSION: The absence of active infection markers argues against VZV reactivation being the trigger for GCA. Non-specific immunohistochemistry staining may account for positive findings in previous studies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography of the Head, Neck, and Chest for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has not been well studied as a first-line test for giant cell arteritis (GCA), due, in part, to historical limitations in visualizing the cranial arteries. The Giant Cell Arteritis and PET Scan (GAPS) study was therefore carried out to assess the accuracy of a newer generation PET/CT of the head, neck, and chest for determining a diagnosis of GCA. METHODS: In the GAPS study cohort, 64 patients with newly suspected GCA underwent time-of-flight PET/CT (1-mm slice thickness from the vertex to diaphragm) within 72 hours of starting glucocorticoids and before undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Two physicians with experience in PET reviewed the patients' scans in a blinded manner and reported the scans as globally positive or negative for GCA. Tracer uptake was graded across 18 artery segments. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 58 of 64 patients underwent TAB, and 12 (21%) of the biopsies were considered positive for GCA. Twenty-one patients had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. Compared to TAB, the sensitivity of PET/CT for a diagnosis of GCA was 92% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 62-100%) and specificity was 85% (95% CI 71-94%). The negative predictive value (NPV) was 98% (95% CI 87-100%). Compared to clinical diagnosis, PET/CT had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI 48-89%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI 78-97%). Interobserver reliability was moderate (κ = 0.65). Among the enrolled patients, 20% had a clinically relevant incidental finding, including 7 with an infection and 5 with a malignancy. Furthermore, 5 (42%) of 12 TAB-positive GCA patients had moderate or marked aortitis. CONCLUSION: The high diagnostic accuracy of this PET/CT protocol would support its use as a first-line test for GCA. The NPV of 98% indicates the particular utility of this test in ruling out the condition in patients considered to be at lower risk of GCA. PET/CT had benefit over TAB in detecting vasculitis mimics and aortitis.

EVOLVE: The Australian Rheumatology Association's 'top five' list of investigations and interventions doctors and patients should question.

BACKGROUND: The EVOLVE (evaluating evidence, enhancing efficiencies) initiative aims to drive safer, higher-quality patient care through identifying and reducing low-value practices. AIMS: To determine the Australian Rheumatology Association's (ARA) 'top five' list of low-value practices. METHODS: A working group comprising 19 rheumatologists and three trainees compiled a preliminary list. Items were retained if there was strong evidence of low value and there was high or increasing clinical use and/or increasing cost. All ARA members (356 rheumatologists and 72 trainees) were invited to indicate their 'top five' list from a list of 12-items through SurveyMonkey in December 2015 (reminder February 2016). RESULTS: A total of 179 rheumatologists (50.3%) and 19 trainees (26.4%) responded. The top five list (percentage of rheumatologists, including item in their top five list) was: Do not perform arthroscopy with lavage and/or debridement for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee nor partial meniscectomy for a degenerate meniscal tear (73.2%); Do not order anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing without symptoms and/or signs suggestive of a systemic rheumatic disease (56.4%); Do not undertake imaging for low back pain for patients without indications of an underlying serious condition (50.8%); Do not use ultrasound guidance to perform injections into the subacromial space as it provides no additional benefit in comparison to landmark-guided injection (50.3%) and Do not order anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in ANA negative patients unless the clinical suspicion of systemic lupus erythematosus remains high (45.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This list is intended to increase awareness among rheumatologists, other clinicians and patients about commonly used low-value practices that should be questioned.

How we make good doctors into good teachers: a short course to support busy clinicians to improve their teaching skills.

BACKGROUND: Doctors are expected to teach but many are reluctant through lack of training. Busy clinicians have little time to attend faculty development initiatives. We wanted to increase clinical teaching capacity locally. WHAT WE DID: In response to requests from doctors lacking confidence in their teaching skills, we developed a programme tailored to the needs of working clinical teachers. The emphasis is on teaching effectively in a busy clinical environment. There are five 90 min modules: bedside teaching, effective supervision and feedback, teaching physical examination and procedures, effective lectures and facilitating development of clinical reasoning skills. The course is practical, interactive and takes place in a supportive learning environment adjacent to the workplace. A total of 81 clinicians participated in the course. EVALUATION: The main outcomes were increased confidence in bedside teaching, teaching more effectively on ward rounds and reduction in need for support with teaching. Participants reported a better understanding of basic educational theory and its relevance to clinical teaching. There is increased activity in clinical teaching among past participants. CONCLUSIONS: All clinical teachers require guidance and encouragement in developing their teaching skills. An accessible, practical focused teaching course run locally by colleagues with education expertise can improve clinicians' skills and motivation to teach.