Diagnosis and management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in sickle cell disease: A review.

Pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease (SCD) is a complex phenomenon resulting from multiple overlapping etiologies, including pulmonary vasoconstriction in the setting of chronic hemolytic anemia, diastolic dysfunction, and chronic thromboembolic disease. The presence of pulmonary hypertension of any cause in SCD confers a significant increase in mortality risk. Evidence to guide the management of patients with sickle cell disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is scant and largely the realm of case reports and small case series. Centered on a discussion of a complex young patient with hemoglobin hemoglobin SC who ultimately underwent treatment with pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, we review the available literature to guide management and discuss and overview of treatment of CTEPH in SCD, considering the unique considerations and challenges facing patients suffering from this multisystem disease.

Utility of hemoglobin electrophoresis to distinguish between severe delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction versus hyperhemolysis syndrome.

Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) and hyperhemolysis syndrome (HHS) are both complications of red blood cell transfusions in patients with sickle cell disease.Clinically, both present with hemolysis and can be difficult to differentiate. Hemoglobin electrophoresis may aid in the diagnosis. Herein we describe a case in which a patient with hemoglobin SC disease presented with features of severe hemolysis several days after initiation of red blood cell exchange. Increase in reticulocyte count and complete absence of hemoglobin A on electrophoresis during this event supported the diagnosis of severe DHTR, indicating a rapid and selective destruction of the transfused red blood cells. Ability to interpret the hemoglobin electrophoresis can help clinicians distinguish between these two severe transfusion complications in patients living with sickle cell disease. It is important to identify the presence or absence of concomitant HHS, as patients with HHS tend to have a worse prognosis and there is a higher rate of recurrence of HHS with subsequent transfusions. Accurate diagnosis can lead to prompt management and decrease morbidity and mortality.

Clinical outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and cardiovascular disease.

Incidence of both acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases with age. We evaluated whether pre-existing CVD impacts clinical outcomes in AML. We retrospectively evaluated 291 consecutive adult AML patients treated at our institution, 2014-2020. Pretreatment comorbidities were identified by chart review. Outcomes included complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and incidence of cardiovascular adverse events. CVD was present in 34% of patients at AML diagnosis. CVD patients had worse performance status (p=0.03) and more commonly had secondary AML (p=0.03) and received hypomethylating (HMA) agent-based therapy (72% vs 38%, p< 0.001). CVD (0.45 vs 0.71, p<0.001) and diabetes mellitus (HR= 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.8, p= 0.01) were associated with lower probability of achieving CR/CRi. Accounting for age, performance status (PS), complex karyotype, secondary disease and treatment, CVD patients had shorter OS (HR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2, p=0.002), with 1- and 3-year OS 44% vs 67% and 25% vs 40%, respectively, but there was no difference in cumulative incidence of relapse between patients with vs without CVD. Thus, CVD is an independent risk factor for lower response rate and shorter survival in AML patients.

Imaging Biomarkers to Predict Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma With a Day 28 Partial Response by 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Following CAR-T Therapy.

BACKGROUND: CD19 directed CAR-T therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has shown great therapeutic response in patients with relapsed/refractory disease with response rates of 60-80%. However, in patients with a partial response (PR) on initial day 28 post CAR-T therapy imaging, clinical uncertainty remains as half of these patients will ultimately have relapsed disease.   PATIENTS: In 24 patients receiving CD19 directed CAR-T therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL achieving a PR on day 28, we utilize imaging biomarkers by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at pre CAR-T therapy baseline and day 28 to determine factors that may predict best overall response (B-OR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).   METHODS: Out of 75 patients receiving CAR-T therapy at a single institution, we retrospectively identified and reviewed 25 (33%) as achieving a PR on day 28. PR was defined using the 2014 Lugano classification system. All patients received standard of care CD19 directed CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel. Two independent nuclear medicine physicians measured baseline (pre-CAR-T therapy) and day 28 PET/CT SUVmax, SUVmean and TMV (cm3) of each lesion (node, organ or marrow uptake, if any) using ROVER software. All statistical tests were two-sided and conducted at the 0.05 level of significance. R version 1.3.1099 (R-studio) was used for statistical modeling.   CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that a higher day 28 SUVmax was significantly higher in those with a B-OR of PR and in our modeling, a lower day 28 SUVmax may predict favorable PFS and OS. Additionally, lower TMV, both at baseline and day 28, may also be predictive of longer PFS and OS, while lower TLG at baseline, but not day 28 is significantly associated with a B-OR of CR. While further study is warranted, these imaging biomarkers may allow for early identification of those with a day 28 PR at highest risk for relapse leading to early intervention to improve long term outcomes.

Fulminant Hepatic Failure as the Initial Presentation of Hodgkin Lymphoma in 4 Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

In the era of antiretroviral therapy (ART), Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is a common non-AIDS-defining cancer with increasing incidence in people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). Through review of these cases, we identify clinical patterns such as declining CD4 count despite ART, hyperbilirubinemia and recurrent fever, which preceded diagnosis. Identifying these important signs and symptoms may lead to earlier diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Fulminant hepatic failure limits the ability to give standard of care chemotherapy, likely jeopardizing outcomes in this patient population. Alternative bridging therapies should be considered until hepatic function improves.

Patterns of treatment and their outcomes in primary breast lymphoma; a comprehensive population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is managed differently among centers, using surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation. With data derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to describe treatments utilized in the United States, estimate the overall survival (OS) of different therapeutic modalities and determine the role of systemic therapy in patients with PBL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data from the NCDB. The NCDB provided records of 4616 patients diagnosed with PBL between 2004 and 2015. We excluded patients diagnosed with HIV, with no survival data, not treated in the reporting facility, without histologic confirmation, with stage III/ IV disease and for whom surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy was contraindicated. Both propensity score weighting and Cox models were used to obtain adjusted estimates. Based on histopathology, PBL was classified into indolent (I-PBL) and aggressive (A-PBL). RESULTS: In a sample size of 2063 PBL patients, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR): 57-78), and 97% were females. In 1027 patients with I-PBL, the median follow-up was 66 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-107.2) and 60% of patients had extranodal marginal zone subtype. Systemic therapy did not improve adjusted-OS (median: 154 vs. 143 months, P = 0.36) (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.25, P = 0.42). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were as follows: radiation (85%), surgery (79%), systemic & radiation (87%) and radiation & surgery (87%) (P = 0.9). In 1036 patients with A-PBL, the median follow-up was 67.4 months (95% CI: 35.9-105), and 87% of patients had diffuse large B-cell subtype. Patients with A-PBL who received systemic therapy had an improved adjusted-OS (median: 115 vs. 72 months, P < 0.01) (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P < 0.001). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were: systemic (69%), systemic & radiation (77%), systemic & radiation & surgery (79%) and systemic & surgery (79%) (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy used as first-line treatment is essential in A-PBL. Local therapy in the I-PBL using surgery and/or radiation is effective in long-term disease control. There is significant variation in front-line treatment modalities utilized in PBL across the US, many associated with similar outcomes.

Impact of FLT3-ITD Insertion Length on Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Cohort Study.

The prognostic significance of the length of internal tandem duplication (ITD) insertions in mutant FLT3 genes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the correlation between the ITD base-pair (bp) insertion length and clinical outcomes. The mutational status of the FLT3 gene was evaluated in 402 of 467 consecutive AML patients treated at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2013 and 2020; 77 had FLT3-ITD mutations. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on bp insertion length (<30 (0−33rd percentile), 30−53 (34th−66th percentile),and >53 (>66th percentile)). The median overall survival (OS) of patients was 16.5 months (confidence interval (CI) 7.3-NA), 18.5 months (CI 7.3-NA), and 21.9 months (CI 19.1-NA) (p = 0.03) for the <30, 30−53, and >53 bp insertion length cohorts, respectively. The adjusted median event-free survival (EFS) for the ITD insertion lengths >30, 30−53, and >53 bp was 11.1 months (CI 2.8−16.5), 5.2 months (CI 2.9−12.6), and 9.1 months (CI 5.4-NA) (p = 0.5), respectively. Complete remission (CR) rates were 64% (<30 inserted bp), 55% (30−53 inserted bp), and 79% (>53 inserted bp) (p = 0.23). For patients treated with gilteritinib and midostaurin, the unadjusted median OS was not statistically significantly different between cohorts.

Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Whole Brain Radiation in PCNSL; a Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The best consolidation strategy after induction chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Our objective is to estimate the overall survival (OS) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the consolidation setting. We also sought to evaluate the factors affecting treatment selection METHODS: We identified 1620 patients with PCNSL who received chemotherapy followed by either ASCT or WBRT between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of ASCT use. RESULTS: Only 12.2% of patients received ASCT, and this proportion rose steadily between 2004 and 2015, with APC of +23%. Treatment selection was affected by age, type of area, distance from the treating facility, and level of education. With a median follow-up of 68.4 months, adjusted-median OS was 91.4 months and not reached for WBRT and ASCT groups, respectively (P < .001). 5-year OS was 74.4% in the ASCT group versus 58.7% in the WBRT group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60, P -value < .01). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of consolidative treatment in patients with PCNSL which can alter outcomes. Frequency of consolidative ASCT is increasing for patients with PCNSL. This is the first and largest cohort study, to our knowledge, to show an OS advantage in favor of ASCT. This OS benefit needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled fashion.

Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Hypomethylating Agents With or Without Venetoclax: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Cohort Study.

There is a deficiency of real-world data on the impact of combining venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We conducted a single-center, propensity-adjusted retrospective cohort study to compare composite complete remission (CCR) rates, median overall survival (m-OS) and median event-free survival (m-EFS). A total of 170 adult AML patients were treated with first-line azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) +/- VEN. Median age was 71 years and 99 (58%) were male. Median follow-up in HMA and HMA-VEN groups was 79 and 21 months. Treatments included AZA alone (n=35, 21%), DEC alone (n=84, 49%), AZA-VEN (n=24, 14%) and DEC-VEN (n=27, 16%). VEN improved CCR rates to HMAs overall (52% vs. 27%, P<0.05) and to AZA (54% vs. 10%, P<0.05), but not to DEC (43% vs. 32%, P=0.35); it did not improve OS, and only improved EFS for AZA (10.5 vs. 3.8 months, P<0.05). CCR rates were lower with AZA than with DEC (13% vs. 33%, P<0.05), but OS and EFS were not different statistically. CCR rates did not differ for AZA-VEN vs. DEC-VEN (CCR: 58% vs. 52%, P=0.66), but OS and EFS were longer for AZA-VEN (m-OS: 12.3 vs. 2.2 months, P<0.05; m-EFS: 9.2 vs. 2.1 months, P<0.05). Our analysis showed that combining VEN with AZA in newly diagnosed AML patients improved outcomes, but combining VEN with DEC did not. AZA-VEN was associated with improved outcomes compared to DEC-VEN. Further studies are needed to test the benefit of combining VEN with DEC.

Impact of IDH1 c.315C>T SNP on Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Cohort Study.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the common type of acute leukemia in adults. Definitive prognostic significance of variants of unknown significance lacks for many commonly mutated genes, including the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variant c.315C>T. In this retrospective cohort study of 248 AML patients at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, we show that the IDH1 c.315C>T SNP, previously reported to be associated with poor prognosis by other studies with conflicting data, does not confer worse prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 17.1 months compared to 15.1 months for patients without this SNP (P=0.57). The lack of negative effect on prognosis by IDH1 SNP c.315C>T is consistent with the absence of amino acid alteration (p.Gly105Gly).

Low utility of the H-Score and HLH-2004 criteria to identify patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis after CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.

Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening immune dysregulation disorder. Use of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) and secondary HLH. However, application of HLH scoring systems (H-score, HLH-2004 criteria) are not validated in this setting. We analyzed the utility of applying the H-score and the HLH-2004 criteria to identify patients with possible HLH post-CAR-T for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Only two of four patients with post CAR-T HLH met five or more of the diagnostic criteria for HLH by HLH 2004 criteria. In contrast all four post CAR-T HLH patients had a high H-score (>169); however, an additional ten patients that did not have HLH also had a high H-score. Thus, in this patient population, both scoring systems were demonstrated to have low prognostic significance in differentiating between high grade CRS and HLH.

Single-route CNS prophylaxis for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes from 21 US academic institutions.

Prophylaxis is commonly used to prevent central nervous sy stem (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no clear standard of care. We retrospectively evaluated 1162 adult patients across 21 US academic centers with DLBCL or similar histologies who received single-route CNS prophylaxis as part of frontline therapy between 2013 and 2019. Prophylaxis was administered intrathecally(IT) in 894 (77%) and using systemic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 236 (20%); 32 patients (3%) switched route due to toxicity and were assessed separately. By CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), 18% were considered low-risk, 51% moderate, and 30% high. Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) was confirmed in 243 of 866 evaluable patients (21%). Sixty-four patients (5.7%) had CNS relapse after median 7.1 months from diagnosis, including 15 of 64 (23%) within the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in CNS relapse between IT and HD-MTX recipients (5.4% vs 6.8%, P = .4), including after propensity score matching to account for differences between respective recipient groups. Weighting by CNS-IPI, expected vs observed CNS relapse rates were nearly identical (5.8% vs 5.7%). Testicular involvement was associated with high risk of CNS relapse (11.3%) despite most having lower CNS-IPI scores. DHL did not significantly predict for CNS relapse after single-route prophylaxis, including with adjustment for treatment regimen and other factors. This large study of CNS prophylaxis recipients with DLBCL found no significant difference in CNS relapse rates between routes of administration. Relapse rates among high-risk subgroups remain elevated, and reconsideration of prophylaxis strategies in DLBCL is of critical need.

The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

In the relapsed/refractory setting for treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Patients often have aggressive disease that requires prompt treatment in the form of bridging therapy (BT) for disease stabilisation while CAR-T cells are manufactured. Patients (n = 75) undergoing CAR-T therapy infusion for LBCL at our institution were identified. A total of 52 (69·3%) received BT and 23 (30·7%) received no BT (NBT). BT modalities included systemic BT (SBT) in 28 patients, radiation BT (RBT) in 14, and high-dose steroid BT (HDS) in 10. There was no difference in incidence of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome between BT and NBT (P = 0·18 and P = 0·53 respectively). Prolonged cytopenias at Day 180 were more common in BT than NBT (50% vs. 13·3%, P = 0·04). The SBT and RBT subgroups had more cytopenias at Day 180 compared to the HDS and NBT subgroups (58·3% and 57·1% vs. 20% and 13·3% respectively, P = 0·04). Disease response at last follow-up, progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between BT, NBT, and BT subgroups. In summary, BT can be safely considered in patients undergoing CAR-T therapy. However, those undergoing BT with SBT or RBT are at higher risk of prolonged cytopenias after CAR-T therapy.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Same Disease Spectrum but Two Distinct Diagnoses.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rare malignancies developing from lymphocyte precursor cells, lymphoblastic leukemia (LBL), and acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) have historically been viewed as different manifestations of the same disease process. This review examines data on their epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and response to treatment while highlighting areas of similarity and divergence between these two clinical entities. RECENT FINDINGS: Pediatric-type ALL chemotherapy regimens, compared to both lymphoma-type chemotherapy and adult-type ALL regimens, have led to improved outcomes for children, adolescents, and young adults with ALL. BCR-ABL-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) ALL and in rare cases of Ph + LBL. Newer therapies including blinatumomab, inotuzumab, CAR-T therapy, and nelarabine have improved outcomes in selected cases of ALL and have an emerging role in the management of LBL. Better understanding of ALL and LBL biology allows for the development of therapies that target immunophenotypic or genetic features found in subsets of both diseases. Novel therapies are leading to improved outcomes in Ph + and relapsed and refractory disease.