Comparison of Ultrasound Features of Major Salivary Glands in Sarcoidosis, Amyloidosis, and Sjögren's Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: While salivary gland ultrasound (SGU) has gained prominence for evaluating Sjögren's syndrome, little information exists on SGU appearance of sarcoidosis and amyloidosis, potential mimics of Sjögren's syndrome. Our goal in this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of major SGU features in differentiating Sjögren's syndrome from sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, and controls. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adult ambulatory patients with a clinical diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome fulfilling the 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria; we also enrolled patients with a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis or systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, with histologic confirmation from any tissue, and rheumatology outpatients without diagnoses affecting salivary glands. Subjects underwent major SGU using the Hocevar protocol, with resulting video clips reviewed blind to clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Sjögren's syndrome SGU scores were greater than in patients from the other groups, but there were no distinguishing salivary gland features from AL amyloidosis or sarcoidosis. None of the patients in the control group scored higher than 17, a cutoff previously suggested for Sjögren's syndrome, but 27% of patients with AL amyloidosis and 19% with sarcoidosis scored higher than 17. Adding Hocevar SGU scores of ≥17 to the 2016 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism criteria in a parallel scheme increased the sensitivity for Sjögren's syndrome from 87% to 98%, while combining the 2 criteria in series increased specificity from 81% to 98%. CONCLUSION: Sjögren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, and AL amyloidosis share common SGU features that can help distinguish these conditions from patients without systemic rheumatologic disease. Clinicians should carefully consider these potential mimics when interpreting salivary gland US results.

Role of biological agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Advances in understanding of the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis with concurrent advances in protein engineering led to the development of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs which have dramatically revolutionized the treatment of this condition. This review article focuses on the role of biological agents currently employed in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as novel biological agents in development.

SB4 in the Era of Biosimilars: Clinical Data and Real-World Experience.

A biosimilar is a biological medicinal product that is highly similar to an already authorized original biological medicinal product. The introduction of biosimilars may allow for a reduction in health care costs, due to discount pricing. Current clinical studies and real-world data suggest that the biosimilar SB4 is equivalent to etanercept with respect to efficacy and safety. Additional real-world safety data for SB4 via pharmacovigilance studies are needed to draw conclusions regarding the risks of rare adverse events such as serious infections and malignancy. Clinical trial design of biosimilars should be standardised to improve consistency, increase confidence and facilitate interpretation of data. Where there are health economic advantages of switching from originator to biosimilar, patients should be appropriately informed, and, ideally, in order to minimise nocebo responses and maximise benefit, switching should be undertaken by shared decision-making between the physician and patient on a case-by-case basis.

When the first visit to the rheumatologist is established rheumatoid arthritis.

The outlook for people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved tremendously in a generation. Major contributions to this include recognition of the importance of early treatment initiation, improved understanding of the pathobiology, the identification of therapeutic targets and their subsequent validation in clinic trials and the realisation of the importance of 'tight control' of inflammatory responses. Despite these advances, many patients meeting classification criteria present for the first time to a rheumatologist with longstanding symptoms. There is no definition as to when RA becomes 'established'. But there is evidence that a 'window of opportunity' exists over about 12-16 weeks symptom duration, during which treatment intervention gives rise to the most optimal outcomes. This review addresses issues regarding the management of patients presenting outside the window of opportunity in terms of heterogeneity of presentation, assessment, therapeutic goals and treatment options as well as the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to holistic care.

Liver Kupffer cells control the magnitude of the inflammatory response in the injured brain and spinal cord.

The CNS inflammatory response is regulated by hepatic chemokine synthesis, which promotes leukocytosis and facilitates leukocyte recruitment to the site of injury. To understand the role of the individual cell populations in the liver during the hepatic response to acute brain injury, we selectively depleted Kupffer cells (KC), using clodronate-filled liposomes, and assessed the inflammatory response following a microinjection of IL-1beta into the rat brain or after a compression injury in the spinal cord. We show by immunohistochemistry that KC depletion reduces neutrophil infiltration into the IL-1beta-injected brain by 70% and by 50% into the contusion-injured spinal cord. qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic chemokine mRNA expression showed that chemokine expression in the liver after brain injury is not restricted to a single cell population. In non-depleted rats, CXCL-10, IL-1beta, CCL-2, and MIP-1alpha mRNAs were increased up to sixfold more than in KC depleted rats. However, CXCL-1 and MIP-1beta were not significantly affected by KC depletion. The reduction in chemokine mRNA expression by the liver was not associated with decreased neutrophil mobilisation as might have been expected. These findings suggest that in response to CNS injury, KC mediated mechanisms are responsible for increasing neutrophil entry to the site of CNS injury, but that neutrophil mobilisation is dependent on other non-KC mediated events. However, the suppression of KC activity may prevent secondary damage after acute brain injury.