Longer duration of symptoms at the time of presentation is not associated with worse survival in primary bone sarcoma.

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of the duration of symptoms (DOS) prior to diagnosis on the overall survival in patients with a primary bone sarcoma. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective analysis of a sarcoma database at a single institution between 1990 and 2014, we identified 1446 patients with non-metastatic and 346 with metastatic bone sarcoma. Low-grade types of tumour were excluded. Our data included the demographics of the patients, the characteristics of the tumour, and the survival outcome of patients. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed, and the survivorship of the non-metastatic and metastatic cohorts were compared. Results: In the non-metastatic cohort, a longer DOS was associated with a slightly more favourable survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.996, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.994 to 0.998, p < 0.001). In all types of tumour, there was no difference in survival between patients with a DOS of greater than four months and those with a DOS of less than four months (p = 0.566). There was no correlation between the year of diagnosis and survival (p = 0.741). A diagnosis of chondrosarcoma (HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.474 to 0.854, p = 0.003) had the strongest positive effect on survival, while location in the axial skeleton (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.29, p < 0.001) had the strongest negative effect on survival. Larger size of tumour (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06, p < 0.001) and increased age of the patient (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, p < 0.001) had a slightly negative effect on survival. Metastatic and non-metastatic cohorts had similar median DOS (16 weeks, p = 0.277), although the median survival (15.5 months vs 41 months) and rates of survival at one year (69% vs 89%) and five years (20% vs 59%) were significantly shorter in the metastatic cohort. Conclusion: A longer DOS prior to diagnosis is not associated with a poorer overall survival in patients with a primary bone sarcoma. Location in the axial skeleton remains the strongest predictor of a worse prognosis. This may be helpful in counselling patients referred for evaluation on a delayed basis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:652-61.

Pre-operative evaluation prior to soft tissue sarcoma excision - Why can't we get it right?

BACKGROUND: To define the association between an appropriate pre-operative workup (pre-operative advanced imaging studies, diagnostic biopsy) and incomplete soft tissue sarcoma (STS) excision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 397 consecutive patient records (2000-2008), looking at primary site advanced imaging (MRI or CT) and diagnostic biopsy procedures completed prior to the initial attempt at definitive surgical excision. Downstream effects of an inadequate pre-operative workup were also evaluated, including time to referral to a sarcoma multi-disciplinary care team and perceived alteration of surgical care in order to obtain a complete excision of the altered sarcoma bed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent (149/397) of soft tissue sarcomas identified underwent an incomplete excision prior to referral. A significant difference in the incidence of pre-operative primary site advanced imaging (91% vs. 42%, p < 0.001) and a pre-operative diagnostic biopsy (85% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) was found between the wide excision group and incomplete excision groups. Pre-operative biopsy (p < 0.001), tumor size >5 cm (p < 0.001), and a referral from an orthopaedic surgeon (p < 0.02) were all associated with reduced risk of incomplete excision in multivariate analysis. Seventy-four percent of patients in the incomplete excision group required an alteration in their definitive wide margin surgical resection, including rotational muscle flap coverage (37%), free flap coverage (11%), or amputation (11%). CONCLUSION: A minority of patients referred following incomplete excision of a STS had undergone an appropriate pre-operative workup prior to referral, leading to increased long-term morbidity following definitive re-excision. Education efforts to heighten awareness of suspicious soft tissue lesions remain vital.