Microsatellite instability analysis of bilateral breast tumors suggests treatment-related origin of some contralateral malignancies.

PURPOSE: High-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) occurs frequently in colorectal cancers and some other tumor types, but is very uncommon in breast cancer. In the earlier study devoted to microsatellite analysis of allelic imbalances, the authors accidentally detected several MSI-H tumors in patients with the bilateral form of breast cancer (biBC). The present study was designed to examine this unexpected phenomenon in more detail. METHODS: All DNA samples were tested by the standard panel of MSI-specific markers BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, D5S346, and D17S250. If the tumor was unstable for at least one marker, or PCR amplification was not successful for any of the listed above loci, the analysis of additional five dinucleotide markers (D1S225, D11S4167, D22S272, D22S1166, and D3S3527) was performed. Tumors showing instability in > or = 30% loci were classified as MSI-H. RESULTS: In biBC group, MSI-H status was detected in 6/60 (10%) contralateral tumors, but in 0/50 (0%) first malignancies (P = 0.021) and only in 1/22 (5%) synchronous biBC (P = 0.434). None of 52 unilateral breast cancers showed MSI-H status. Shifts of mononucleotide markers were revealed in four second carcinomas from biBC patients but in none of the breast tumors from other categories. CONCLUSIONS: MSI-H is detected with a noticeable frequency in bilateral but not in unilateral breast cancers. Preferable occurrence of MSI-H in second metachronous tumors from biBC patients allows to hypothesize that the development of some contralateral breast neoplasms is casually related to the adjuvant treatment of the initial malignancy.

Nonrandom distribution of oncogene amplifications in bilateral breast carcinomas: Possible role of host factors and survival bias.

Amplification of HER2, C-MYC and CCND1 oncogenes is a hallmark of breast cancer (BC); however, its involvement in the bilateral form of this disease has not been investigated yet. In this study, 50 bilateral BC (biBC) pairs (100 tumors) and 72 control unilateral BC were examined using real-time PCR analysis of microdissected archival tissues. In biBC, the frequency of >3-fold oncogene amplification was 6/100 (6%) for HER2, 6/100 (6%) for C-MYC and 7/100 (7%) for CCND1. Altogether, 18/100 (18%) biBC tumors had increased gene dosage of at least one oncogene. Tumors forming synchronous biBC pairs had amplification in 11/46 cases (24%). In 3 of 8 patients with amplification-positive carcinomas, the amplification was detected in both neoplasms: 2 biBC had concordant activation of the same oncogene (HER2 and CCND1, respectively), and in the remaining case distinct oncogenes were affected (HER2 and C-MYC). In contrast, amplifications in metachronous biBC were strongly discordant: none of 27 first carcinomas carried this abnormality, while the frequency of amplification in second tumors (7/27; 26%) was similar to the one observed in unilateral BC (20/72; 28%). The trend toward concordance of oncogene amplification status in synchronous but not in metachronous biBC pairs can be explained by the nearly identical natural history of the disease in simultaneously arising tumors. The skewed pattern of amplifications in metachronous biBC might be attributed to their association with adverse BC prognosis; it appears that only patients with amplification-negative first BC have sufficient chances to survive until the development of the contralateral carcinoma.

NBS1 657del5 mutation may contribute only to a limited fraction of breast cancer cases in Russia.

The gene for Nijmegen chromosomal breakage syndrome (NBS1) plays a role in a variety of processes protecting chromosomal stability. Recently, it was suggested in a Polish case-control study that the founder hypomorphic mutation in NBS1, 657del5, which occurs in approximately 0.5% of Slavic subjects, may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (BC). We attempted to validate these findings in Russian subjects, who are also of Slavic descent. Heterozygous carriers for the 657del5 mutation were detected in 2 of 173 (1.16%) bilateral breast cancer cases, 5 of 700 (0.71%) unilateral breast cancer patients, 2 of 348 (0.57%) healthy middle-aged females and in 0 of 344 elderly tumor-free women. The difference between the "extreme" cohorts, i.e., biBC patients vs. elderly controls, approached the formal limit of statistic significance (p=0.046). LOH at NBS1 was detected in only 3 of 5 available breast tumors from NBS1 657del5-carriers. In 2 of these tumors, the loss involved the mutant NBS1-allele. Overall, our data suggest that the NBS1 657del5 allele may contribute only to a limited fraction of breast cancer cases in Russia.