Endovascular Embolization of Traumatic Vessel Injury Using N-butyl Cyanoacrylate: A Case Series.

There is limited evidence of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) use in endovascular embolization of traumatic face and neck vessel injuries. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of n-BCA for this purpose. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center between April 2021 and July 2022. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years old with any vessel injury in the face and neck circulation requiring n-BCA embolization. The primary endpoint was n-BCA effectiveness defined as immediate control of active bleeding post-embolization. In total, 13 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median decade of life was 3 (IQR 3 - 5) with a male predominance (n = 11, 84.6%). Median Glasgow Coma Scale score on presentation was 15 (IQR 3-15). Eleven patients suffered gunshot wound injuries; two patients suffered blunt injuries. Injured vessels included facial artery (n = 6, 46.2%), buccal branch artery (n = 3, 23.1%), internal maxillary (n = 5, 38.5%), cervical internal carotid artery (n = 1, 7.7%), and vertebral artery (n = 1, 7.7%). All patients were treated with 1:2 n-BCA to ethiodol mixture with immediate extravasation control. No bleeding recurrence or need for retreatment occurred. One patient died in-hospital (7.7%). Patients were discharged to home (n = 8, 61.5%), day rehabilitation (n = 1, 7.7%), or acute rehabilitation (n = 3, 23.1%). One patient developed a right posterior cerebral artery infarct with hemorrhagic transformation. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of n-BCA liquid embolism in traumatic vessel injuries, especially penetrating gunshot wounds.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Severity and Outcomes in Penetrating Versus Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Propensity Matched Cohorts.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health challenge; however, penetrating brain injury (PBI) remains under-represented in evidence-based knowledge and research efforts. This study utilized data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to investigate outcomes of PBI as compared with clinical-severity-matched non-penetrating or blunt TBI. A total of 1765 patients with PBI were 1:1 propensity score-matched for clinical severity with blunt TBI patients. The intent of PBI was self-inflicted in 34.1% of the cases, and the mechanism was firearm-inflicted in 89.1%. Mortality was found to be significantly more common in PBI than in the severity- matched TBI cohort (33.9% vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001) as was unfavorable outcome. Mortality was mediated by withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WOLST) 30% of the time, and WOLST occurred earlier (median 3 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) in PBI. Increased rate of mortality was observed with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of <11 in PBI as compared with <7 in blunt TBI. In conclusion, PBI patients exhibited higher mortality rates and unfavorable outcomes; one third of excess mortality was mediated by WOLST. The study also brings into question the applicability of the conventional TBI classification, based on GCS, in PBI. We emphasize the need to address the observed disparities and better understand the distinctive characteristics and mechanisms underlying PBI outcomes to improve patient care and reduce mortality.

Comparative Effectiveness of Early Neurosurgical Intervention in Civilian Penetrating Brain Injury Management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of early vs no-neurosurgical intervention in civilians with penetrating brain injury (PBI). METHODS: We collected data from the National Trauma Data Bank for PBI between 2017 and 2019. A total of 10 607 cases were identified; 1276 cases met the following criteria: age 16-60 years, an intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) of >2 days, a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3-12, and at least one reactive pupil on presentation. Patients with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 72 hours were excluded, leaving 1231 patients for analysis. Neurosurgical intervention was defined as an open-approach cranial procedure involving release, drainage, or extirpation of brain matter performed within 24 hours. Outcomes of interest were mortality, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, ICU LOS, and dispositional outcome. RESULTS: The target population was 1231 patients (84.4% male; median [IQR] age, 29 [18] years); 267 (21.7%) died, and 364 (29.6%) had a neurosurgical intervention within the first 24 hours. 1:1 matching yielded 704 patients (352 in each arm). In the matched cohort (mortality 22.6%), 64 patients who received surgery (18.2%) died compared with 95 (27%) in the nonsurgical group. Survival was more likely in the surgical group (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, CI 1.16-2.38, P < .01; number needed to treat 11). Dispositional outcome was not different. Overlap propensity score-weighted analysis (1231 patients) resulted in higher odds of survival in the surgical group (OR 1.8, CI 1.16-2.80, P < .01). The E-value for the OR calculated from the matched data set was 2.83. Early neurosurgical intervention was associated with longer ICU LOS (median 12 days [7.0, 19.0 IQR] vs 8 days [4.0, 15.0 IQR], P < .05). CONCLUSION: Management including early neurosurgical intervention is associated with decreased mortality and increased ICU LOS in matched cohorts of PBI.

Novel EEG Metric Correlates with Intracranial Pressure in an Animal Model.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) can be continuously and reliably measured using invasive monitoring through an external ventricular catheter or an intraparenchymal probe. We explore electroencephalography (EEG) to identify a reliable real-time noninvasive ICP correlate. METHODS: Using a previously described porcine model of intracranial hypertension, we examined the cross correlation between ICP time series and the slope of the EEG power spectral density as described by ϕ. We calculated ϕ as tan-1 (slope of power spectral density) and normalized it by π, where slope is that of the power-law fit (log frequency vs. log power) to the power spectral density of the EEG signal. Additionally, we explored the relationship between the ϕ time series and cerebral perfusion pressure. A total of 11 intracranial hypertension episodes across three different animals were studied. RESULTS: The mean correlation between ϕ angle and ICP was - 0.85 (0.15); the mean correlation with cerebral perfusion pressure was 0.92 (0.02). Significant correlation occurred at zero lag. In the absence of intracranial hypertension, the absolute value of the ϕ angle was greater than 0.9 (mean 0.936 radians). However, during extreme intracranial hypertension causing cerebral circulatory arrest, the ϕ angle is on average below 0.9 radians (mean 0.855 radians). CONCLUSIONS: EEG ϕ angle is a promising real-time noninvasive measure of ICP/cerebral perfusion using surface electroencephalography.

Penetrating Firearm-Inflicted Injury-The Neglected Traumatic Brain Injury.

This Viewpoint discusses penetrating firearm-inflicted brain injury and the current collaborative efforts to perform more penetrating brain injury­specific randomized clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research to identify effective management guidelines.

Practice Standards for the Use of Multimodality Neuromonitoring: A Delphi Consensus Process.

OBJECTIVES: To address areas in which there is no consensus for the technologies, effort, and training necessary to integrate and interpret information from multimodality neuromonitoring (MNM). DESIGN: A three-round Delphi consensus process. SETTING: Electronic surveys and virtual meeting. SUBJECTS: Participants with broad MNM expertise from adult and pediatric intensive care backgrounds. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two rounds of surveys were completed followed by a virtual meeting to resolve areas without consensus and a final survey to conclude the Delphi process. With 35 participants consensus was achieved on 49% statements concerning MNM. Neurologic impairment and the potential for MNM to guide management were important clinical considerations. Experts reached consensus for the use of MNM-both invasive and noninvasive-for patients in coma with traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracranial hemorrhage. There was consensus that effort to integrate and interpret MNM requires time independent of daily clinical duties, along with specific skills and expertise. Consensus was reached that training and educational platforms are necessary to develop this expertise and to provide clinical correlation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide expert consensus in the clinical considerations, minimum necessary technologies, implementation, and training/education to provide practice standards for the use of MNM to individualize clinical care.

Informed Consent and Decision-Making for Patients with Acquired Cognitive Impairment.

Informed consent (IC) is an ethical and legal requirement grounded in the principle of autonomy. Cognitive impairment may often interfere with decision-making capacity necessitating alternative models of ethically sound deliberation. In cases where the patient lacks decision-making capacity, one must determine the appropriate decision-maker and the criteria used in making a medical decision appropriate for the patient. In this article, I critically discuss the traditional approaches of IC, advance directives, substituted judgment, and best interests. A further suggestion is that thinking about sufficient reasons for or against a course of action is a conceptual enrichment in addition to the concepts of interests and well-being. Finally, I propose another model of collective consensus-seeking decision-making.

Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Secondary brain injury after neurotrauma is comprised of a host of distinct, potentially concurrent and interacting mechanisms that may exacerbate primary brain insult. Multimodality neuromonitoring is a method of measuring multiple aspects of the brain in order to understand the signatures of these different pathomechanisms and to detect, treat, or prevent potentially reversible secondary brain injuries. The most studied invasive parameters include intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), autoregulatory indices, brain tissue partial oxygen tension, and tissue energy and metabolism measures such as the lactate pyruvate ratio. Understanding the local metabolic state of brain tissue in order to infer pathology and develop appropriate management strategies is an area of active investigation. Several clinical trials are underway to define the role of brain tissue oxygenation monitoring and electrocorticography in conjunction with other multimodal neuromonitoring information, including ICP and CPP monitoring. Identifying an optimal CPP to guide individualized management of blood pressure and ICP has been shown to be feasible, but definitive clinical trial evidence is still needed. Future work is still needed to define and clinically correlate patterns that emerge from integrated measurements of metabolism, pressure, flow, oxygenation, and electrophysiology. Pathophysiologic targets and precise critical care management strategies to address their underlying causes promise to mitigate secondary injuries and hold the potential to improve patient outcome. Advancements in clinical trial design are poised to establish new standards for the use of multimodality neuromonitoring to guide individualized clinical care.

Comparative Effectiveness of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring vs No Monitoring in Severe Penetrating Brain Injury Management.

Importance: Civilian penetrating brain injury (PBI) is associated with high mortality. However, scant literature is available to guide neurocritical care monitoring and management of PBI. Objective: To examine the association of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring with mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and dispositional outcomes in patients with severe PBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study analyzed data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the National Trauma Data Bank in the US from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients with PBI were identified, and those aged 16 and 60 years who met these inclusion criteria were included: ICU LOS of more than 2 days, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score lower than 9 on arrival and at 24 hours, and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 to 5 for the head region and lower than 3 for other body regions. Patients with bilaterally fixed pupils or incomplete data were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was used to create a subgroup of patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with vs without ICP monitoring. Data analysis was conducted between September and December 2022. Exposures: Intracranial pressure monitoring vs no monitoring. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were mortality, rate of withdrawal, ICU LOS, and dispositional outcome. Measures were age, initial systolic blood pressure, initial oxygen saturation level on a pulse oximeter, first-recorded GCS score, GCS score at 24 hours, Abbreviated Injury Scale score, midline shift, and pupillary reactivity. Results: A total of 596 patients (505 males [84.7%]; mean [SD] age, 32.2 [12.3] years) were included, among whom 220 (36.9%) died and 288 (48.3%) had ICP monitoring. The PS matching yielded 466 patients (233 in each group with vs without ICP monitoring). Overall mortality was 35.8%; 72 patients with ICP monitoring (30.9%) died compared with 95 patients (40.8%) without ICP monitoring . Patients with ICP monitoring were more likely to survive (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.25; P = .03; number needed to treat, 10). No difference in favorable discharge disposition was observed. The PS-weighted analysis included all 596 patients and found that patients with ICP monitoring were more likely to survive than those without (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.78; P = .005). The E-value for the OR calculated from the PS-matched data set was 1.79. In addition, ICP monitoring vs no monitoring was associated with an increase in median (IQR) ICU LOS (15.0 [8.0-21.0] days vs 7.0 [4.0-12.0] days; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study, PBI management guided by ICP monitoring was associated with decreased mortality and increased ICU LOS, challenging the notion of universally poor outcomes after civilian PBI. Randomized clinical trials that evaluate the efficacy of ICP monitoring in PBI are warranted.

Avoiding brain hypoxia in severe traumatic brain injury in settings with limited resources - A pathophysiological guide.

Cerebral oxygenation represents the balance between oxygen delivery, consumption and utilization by the brain, and therefore reflects the adequacy of cerebral perfusion. Different factors can influence the amount of oxygen to the brain including arterial blood pressure, hemoglobin levels, systemic oxygenation, and transfer of oxygen from blood to the cerebral microcirculation. A mismatch between cerebral oxygen supply and demand results in cerebral hypoxia/ischemia, and is associated with secondary brain damage and worsened outcome after acute brain injury. Therefore, monitoring and prompt treatment of cerebral oxygenation compromise is warranted in both neuro and general intensive care unit populations. Several tools have been proposed for the assessment of cerebral oxygenation, including non-invasive/invasive or indirect/direct methods, including Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation (SjO2), Partial Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension (PtiO2), Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), Transcranial Doppler, electroencephalography and Computed Tomography. In this manuscript, we aim to review the pathophysiology of cerebral oxygenation, describe monitoring technics, and generate recommendations for avoiding brain hypoxia in settings with low availability of resources for direct brain oxygen monitoring.

Coding the Dead: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Organ Preservation.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of consensus in the bioethics literature regarding the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for organ-preserving purposes. In this study, we assessed the perspectives of clinicians in critical care settings to better inform donor management policy and practice. METHODS: An online anonymous survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine that presented various scenarios about CPR for organ preservation. RESULTS: The email was sent to 10,340 members. It was opened by 5,416 (52%) of members and 405 members (4%) completed the survey with few missing data. A majority of respondents (81%) answered that donation status should not influence whether CPR is performed on an imminently dying patient. There was very strong agreement (>85%) that 1) CPR should be performed on a registered donor who experiences a cardiac arrest with an unknown code status before death by neurological criteria (DNC) and 2) CPR should be performed if the patient is not a registered donor and experiences cardiac arrest but the surrogate/power of attorney (POA) has not yet been approached regarding code status and donation. When a registered donor with a DNR order experiences cardiac arrest before DNC, 98% of respondents would not perform CPR. However, after DNC, respondents were evenly divided on whether they would (49%) or would not (51%) perform CPR on a registered donor with an undocumented code status. When asked whether consent should be required for CPR for organ-preserving purposes, 39% answered "Yes" when a patient arrests before DNC and 48% answered "Yes" when a patient arrests after DNC (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents did not consider donor status relevant to CPR decisions before DNC, and virtually all would respect a DNR order in a registered donor before DNC. Respondents were divided about the need for an affirmative consent for CPR for organ-preserving purposes both before and after DNC.

Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Across Resource Settings: Latin American Perspectives.

Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a condition of increasing epidemiologic concern worldwide. Outcomes are worse as observed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) versus high-income countries. Global targets are in place to address the surgical burden of disease. At the same time, most of the published literature and evidence on the clinical approach to sTBI comes from wealthy areas with an abundance of resources. The available paradigms, including the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference, Consensus Revised Imaging and Clinical Examination, and multimodality approaches, may fit differently depending on local resources, expertise, and sociocultural factors. A first step toward addressing heterogeneity in practice is to consider comparative effectiveness approaches that can capture actual practice patterns and record short-term and long-term outcomes of interest. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) decreases intracranial pressure burden and can be lifesaving. Nevertheless, completed randomized controlled trials took place within high-income settings, leaving important questions unanswered and making extrapolations to LMICs questionable. The concept of preemptive DC specifically to address limited neuromonitoring resources may warrant further study to establish a benefit/risk profile for the procedure and its role within local protocols of care.

Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma. BACKGROUND: While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in patients presenting with multisystem trauma, recent data demonstrate that resuscitation and prognostic features for such patients remains poorly described, with trauma guidelines out of date in this field. METHODS: We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed guidelines for PBI and coupled this with expert opinion from trauma, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, pediatric and transplant surgery, surgical ethics and importantly our community partners. RESULTS: Traditional prognostic signs utilized in traumatic brain injury may not be applicable to PBI with a multidisciplinary team approach suggested on a case-by-case basis. Even with no role for neurosurgical intervention, neurocritical care, and neurointerventional support may be warranted, in parallel to multicavitary operative intervention. Special considerations should be afforded for pediatric PBI. Ethical considerations center on providing the patient with the best chance of survival. Consideration of organ donation should be considered as part of the continuum of patient, proxy and family-centric support and care. Community input is crucial in guiding decision making or protocol establishment on an institutional level. CONCLUSIONS: Support of the patient after multicavitary PBI can be complex and is best addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with extensive community involvement.

Prediction of Intracranial Hypertension and Brain Tissue Hypoxia Utilizing High-Resolution Data from the BOOST-II Clinical Trial.

The current approach to intracranial hypertension and brain tissue hypoxia is reactive, based on fixed thresholds. We used statistical machine learning on high-frequency intracranial pressure (ICP) and partial brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) data obtained from the BOOST-II trial with the goal of constructing robust quantitative models to predict ICP/PbtO2 crises. We derived the following machine learning models: logistic regression (LR), elastic net, and random forest. We split the data set into 70-30% for training and testing and utilized a discrete-time survival analysis framework and 5-fold hyperparameter optimization strategy for all models. We compared model performances on discrimination between events and non-events of increased ICP or low PbtO2 with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. We further analyzed clinical utility through a decision curve analysis (DCA). When considering discrimination, the number of features, and interpretability, we identified the RF model that combined the most recent ICP reading, episode number, and longitudinal trends over the preceding 30 min as the best performing for predicting ICP crisis events within the next 30 min (AUC 0.78). For PbtO2, the LR model utilizing the most recent reading, episode number, and longitudinal trends over the preceding 30 min was the best performing (AUC, 0.84). The DCA showed clinical usefulness for wide risk of thresholds for both ICP and PbtO2 predictions. Acceptable alerting thresholds could range from 20% to 80% depending on a patient-specific assessment of the benefit-risk ratio of a given intervention in response to the alert.

Brain Shock-Toward Pathophysiologic Phenotyping in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous pathophysiologic entity where multiple interacting mechanisms are operating. This viewpoint offers an emerging, clinically actionable understanding of the pathophysiologic heterogeneity and phenotypic diversity that comprise secondary brain injury based on multimodality neuromonitoring data. This pathophysiologic specification has direct implications for diagnostic, monitoring, and therapeutic planning. Cerebral shock can be helpfully subanalyzed into categories via an examination of the different types of brain tissue hypoxia and substrate failure: a) ischemic or flow dependent; b) flow-independent, which includes oxygen diffusion limitation, mitochondrial failure, and arteriovenous shunt; c) low extraction; and d) hypermetabolic. This approach could lead to an alternative treatment paradigm toward optimizing cerebral oxidative metabolism and energy crisis avoidance. Our bedside approach to TBI should respect the pathophysiologic diversity involved; operationalizing it in types of "brain shock" can be one such approach.