Tolerance and efficacy of a polyamine-deficient diet for the treatment of perioperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Polyamines have been identified as pain agonists and interact with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, and blinded phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate a polyamine-deficient diet for the treatment of perioperative pain in patients during spinal surgery. METHODS: All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial was designed to evaluate the dose-ranging effect of a low polyamine diet with respect to a total (group 1) or partial (group 2) polyamine diet on perioperative pain (7 d before and 5 d after surgery). Pain (numerical scale at rest and motion), quality of life questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory, EIFEL questionnaire, and Short Form-12 acute questionnaire), and tolerance of and compliance with the nutritional program were measured. RESULTS: Compliance (preoperatively: 100% in group 1 and 83% in group 2; postoperatively: 83% in group 1 and 71% in group 2) and tolerance were good. After 7 d following the diet before surgery, decreased pain was observed in group 1 whereas no effect was observed in group 2 (P = 0.144). This analgesic effect became significant in group 1 in the subgroup of patients with initial high levels of pain (NS ≥ 4) at rest (P = 0.03) and during motion (P = 0.011). Quality of life was significantly improved in group 1 (P = 0.0465). In the postoperative period, pain was significantly decreased in group 1 compared to group 2 at rest (P = 0.022) and during motion (P = 0.029). The effect was significantly better on patients with higher initial pain both at rest (P = 0.013) and during motion (P = 0.005) in group 1 compared to group 2. CONCLUSION: Suppression of polyamines from the diet offers a nutrition-based treatment option for perioperative pain reduction independent of and complementary to typical analgesic approaches.

Alkalinization of intracuff lidocaine improves endotracheal tube-induced emergence phenomena.

UNLABELLED: We sought to evaluate the effect of filling an endotracheal tube cuff with 40 mg lidocaine alone (Group L) or alkalinized lidocaine (Group LB) in comparison to an Air Control group (Group C) on adverse emergence phenomena in a randomized controlled study (n = 25 in each group). The incidence of sore throat was decreased for Group LB in comparison to Group L during the 24 postextubation hours. The difference between Group L and Group C remained significant in the two postextubation hours only. Plasma lidocaine levels increased when lidocaine was alkalinized (C(max) were 62.5 +/- 34.0 ng/mL and 3.2 +/- 1.0 ng/mL for Groups LB and L, respectively). Cough and restlessness before tracheal extubation were decreased in Group LB compared with Group L and in Group L compared with Group C. Nausea, postoperative vomiting, dysphonia, and hoarseness were increased after extubation in Group C compared with the liquid groups, and a better tolerance was recorded with Group LB compared with Group L. The increase of arterial blood pressure and cardiac frequencies during the extubation period was less in the liquid groups than in the control group and less in Group LB compared with Group L. We concluded that use of intracuff alkalinized lidocaine is an effective adjunct to endotracheal intubation. IMPLICATIONS: Use of 40 mg of alkalinized lidocaine, rather than lidocaine or air, to fill the endotracheal tube cuff reduces the incidence of sore throat in the postoperative period. This approach also decreases hemodynamic effects, restlessness, dysphonia, and hoarseness.