[Guidelines on the urological management of the adult patient with spinal dysraphism (spina bifida)]. / Recommandations sur la gestion du risque et la prise en charge urologique du patient adulte atteint de dysraphisme spinal (spina bifida).

INTRODUCTION: Improved life expectancy and prenatal screening have changed the demographics of spina bifida (spinal dysraphism) which has presently become a disease of adulthood. Urinary disorders affect almost all patients with spinal dysraphism and are still the leading cause of mortality in these patients. The aim of this work was to establish recommendations for urological management that take into account the specificities of the spina bifida population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Diagnosis and Management Guidelines (PNDS) were drafted within the framework of the French Rare Diseases Plan at the initiative of the Centre de Référence Maladies Rares Spina Bifida - Dysraphismes of Rennes University Hospital. It is a collaborative work involving experts from different specialties, mainly urologists and rehabilitation physicians. We conducted a systematic search of the literature in French and English in the various fields covered by these recommendations in the MEDLINE database. In accordance with the methodology recommended by the authorities (Guide_methodologique_pnds.pdf, 2006), proposed recommendations were drafted on the basis of this literature review and then submitted to a review group until a consensus was reached. RESULTS: Bladder dysfunctions induced by spinal dysraphism are multiple and varied and evolve over time. Management must be individually adapted and take into account all the patient's problems, and is therefore necessarily multi-disciplinary. Self-catheterisation is the appropriate micturition method for more than half of the patients and must sometimes be combined with treatments aimed at suppressing any neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) or compliance alteration (anticholinergics, intra-detrusor botulinum toxin). Resort to surgery is sometimes necessary either after failure of non-invasive treatments (e.g. bladder augmentation in case of NDO resistant to pharmacological treatment), or as a first line treatment in the absence of other non-invasive alternatives (e.g. aponeurotic suburethral tape or artificial urinary sphincter for sphincter insufficiency; urinary diversion by ileal conduit if self-catheterisation is impossible). CONCLUSION: Spinal dysraphism is a complex pathology with multiple neurological, orthopedic, gastrointestinal and urological involvement. The management of bladder and bowel dysfunctions must continue throughout the life of these patients and must be integrated into a multidisciplinary context.

Neurogenic bladder in patients with paraplegia: a two-center study of the real-life experience of the patients' journey.

INTRODUCTION: Several patterns of urological dysfunctions have been described following spinal cord injury (SCI), depending on the level and the completeness of the injury. A better understanding of the natural history of neurogenic bladder in patients with SCI, and the description of their successive therapeutic lines based on their clinical and urodynamic pattern is needed to improve their management. This study aimed to describe the real-life successive therapeutic lines in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) following SCI. METHODS: We conducted a two-center retrospective review of medical files of patients with SCI followed in two French specialized departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation between January 2000 and January 2018. All patients with SCI with a level of lesion bellow T3 and older than 18 years old were eligible. The primary outcome was the description of the natural journey of neurogenic bladder in this population, from the awakening bladder contraction to the last therapeutic line. Survival curves were calculated with a 95-confidence interval using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were included in this study. Most of the patients were young men with a complete SCI lesion. The median time of treatment introduction was 1 and 9 years for anticholinergics and intradetrusor injection of BoNT/A, respectively. Median duration of effect of treatments was 4 and 6 years post-introduction of anticholinergics and BoNT/A, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study describes NLUTD journey of patients with SCI demonstrating the mid-term efficacy of the two first therapeutic lines of NDO management. An improvement of non-surgical therapeutics is needed.

[External sphincterotomy in neurological patients with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia: Short and mid-term results]. / Résultat à court et moyen terme du traitement de la dyssynergie vésico-sphinctérienne par sphinctérotomie endoscopique.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in the short and mid-term the success of external sphincterotomy (ES) in neurological patients with detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). METHODS: Retrospective, monocentric study, conducted in 51 patients who had a first ES between January 2003 and June 2018, with at least two years of follow-up. The success of ES was defined by maintenance of reflex voiding mode at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were early postoperative complications, rate of revision, functional impact, urodynamic follow-up and upper urinary tract impact. RESULTS: The median age was 50.6 years and the median follow-up was 4.6 years. The success rate was 80% (n=41). Ten patients had to change their voiding mode. For 5 patients, it was related to secondary detrusor low contractility. A second ES was required for 39% of patients. At the end of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) (26 vs 7 patients, P<0.001), urinary tract infections (UTI) (31 vs 15 patients, P<0.001) and a significant decrease in post-voiding residuals (200 vs 50mL, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: ES allowed to maintain reflex voiding in 80% of our patients. It significantly improves AD and UTI despite a high rate of re-operation (39%). A long-term follow-up is mandatory in order not to ignore a recurrence of bladder outlet obstruction and/or decrease in detrusor contractility, which may justify a re-operation or an alternative bladder management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

New technique of robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter implantation in female by a posterior approach with intraoperative cystoscopic monitoring.

PURPOSE: To report the early experience of a modified technique of robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in female, with a posterior approach to the bladder neck and intraoperative real-time cystoscopic monitoring. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study included all consecutive female who underwent a primary robot-assisted AUS implantation between 2017 and 2019. Real-time intraoperative cystoscopic monitoring was carried out to check the correct level of the dissection and to avoid any injury during bladder neck dissection. Perioperative and intraoperative data, functional outcomes and complications were assessed. Continence was defined as 0 to 1 pad per day. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included, the median age was 66 years, 23/24 (96%) had previous SUI or prolapse surgery. Two conversions to open surgery and 2 modifications of the surgical technique with anterior dissection of the bladder neck were required due to major vesicovaginal adhesions. Overall, 20 patients underwent the robotic posterior approach. Eleven intraoperative complications in 10 patients (50%) occurred, including 7 bladder injuries 4 vaginal injuries, without the need to stop the procedure. The median hospital stay was 3 days (2-7). One AUS was removed at 1 year due to vaginal erosion. At last follow-up (median 26 months (22-36)), 95% of the devices were in place and activated and the continence rate was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Early functional results of robot-assisted AUS implantation with a posterior approach to the bladder neck and intraoperative cystoscopic monitoring are promising despite the high rate of intraoperative complications due to previous surgeries. Further evaluation of this technique is required.

Pregnancy and Delivery in Women with Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction: A National Multicenter Retrospective Study from the French-Speaking Neuro-Urology Study Group (GENULF) and the Neuro-Urology Committee of the French Association of Urology.

PURPOSE: Management of pregnancy and delivery in women with lower urinary tract reconstruction is challenging and the currently available literature is insufficient to guide clinical practice. We report pregnancy and delivery outcomes in this specific population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a national multicenter retrospective study (16 centers) including 68 women with 96 deliveries between 1998 and 2019. These women had at least 1 successful pregnancy and delivery after augmentation enterocystoplasty, catheterizable channel creation and/or artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy and delivery were reported, as well as postpartum functional outcomes, according to the delivery mode. The chi-square test and Student's t-test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Overall 32% of reported pregnancies were complicated by febrile urinary tract infections, 13.5% by renal colic and 14.6% required upper urinary tract diversion. In addition, 10% of patients reported transient self-catheterization difficulties and 13.5% reported de novo or increased urinary incontinence. The preterm delivery rate was 35.3%. Elective C-section was performed in 61% of pregnancies. Twenty complications occurred during delivery (20%), including 19 during elective C-section. Urinary continence at 1 year was unchanged for 93.5% of deliveries. Delivery mode (p=0.293) and multiparity (p=0.572) had no impact on urinary continence. CONCLUSIONS: In this population C-section appeared to be associated with a high risk of complications. In the absence of any obstetric or neurological contraindications, vaginal delivery should be proposed as the first line option to the majority of these women.

[Short version of recommendations for enhanced recovery program (ERP) for cystectomy: Technical measures]. / Version courte des recommandations de la récupération ameliorée après chirurgie (RAAC) pour la cystectomie : mesures techniques.

INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery program (ERP) is a management mode whose objective is to reduce the risk of complications and allow the patient to recover more quickly all its functional capacities and to reintegrate at most quickly and safely in his usual environment. This intentionally synthetic document aims to disseminate in the urological community the main points of the ERP recommendations for cystectomy. This work, coordinated by AFU, involves several other partners. The full document is available on the "Urofrance" website. Another article will follow on organizational measures. METHOD: The development of the recommendations is based on the method "formalized consensus of experts" proposed by the HAS. The report is based on a systematic review of the literature (January 2006-May 2017), two rounds of iterative quotations and a national proofreading. Levels of proof of conclusions and gradation of recommendations are based on the HAS grid. RESULTS: The bibliographic strategy made it possible to retain 298 articles. Only the recommendations that obtained a strong agreement after the two rounds of iterative listing were retained. The recommendations presented here are in chronological form (before, during, after hospitalization). Twenty-six key points on the technical and organizational measures of ERP have been identified. CONCLUSION: The result of the literature review, supplemented by expert opinion, suggests a significant clinical interest in the application and dissemination of ERP for cystectomy, despite the limited data available for this indication.

[Bladder cancer in neurogenic patients: A retrospective study of management and follow-up]. / Cancers de vessie chez les patients neurologiques : étude rétrospective de prise en charge et de suivi.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of bladder cancer (BC) in neurological patients seems to be similar to that of the general population. However, they are more aggressive with a higher rate of muscle-invasive forms and squamous cells carcinomas. The aim of the current study was to report etiologies, management and outcomes of BC in neurological population. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Were enrolled all neurological patients with a BC diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. The following data were retrospectively reported: age, gender, duration of the disease, mode of discovery, histological type, treatment and outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 27 patients were included: 11 spinal cord injuries, 7 Parkinson's disease, 5 multiple sclerosis, 3 head trauma, 3 brain strokes, 2 cerebral palsies and 1 spina bifida. The histological subtypes were as follows: 22 transitional cells carcinomas, 4 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), one mucinous adenocarcinoma, one sarcomatoid and one neuroendocrine with 19 high-grade tumors and 15 muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Seven patients (26%) were diagnosed before 15 years history of neurogenic bladder. The mean follow-up was 14 months (1-210 months). Eight deaths were observed, with 5 related to bladder cancer. In our study, smoking habits, voiding mode, lithiasis or infection histories were not related with a more aggressive pattern, such as SCC. CONCLUSION: The high rate of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and aggressive patterns justify neuro-urological follow-up, even before 15 years of neurogenic bladder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in neurologic patients with severe motor disability]. / L'urétérorénoscopie souple avec fragmentation laser dans le traitement des calculs du haut appareil urinaire chez les patients atteints d'une maladie du système nerveux avec un handicap moteur sévère.

OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in patients with a nervous system pathology including severe motor disability. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2013, we retrospectively analyzed 83 flexible ureterorenoscopy to treat 63 kidneys in 42 patients. Stone free (SF) kidneys defined as an absence of stones on computerized tomography, renal ultrasound, X-ray or direct ureterorenoscopy, were considered a surgical success. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: Success rates were 49.2 %, 57.1 % and 58.7 %, respectively after first, second and third flexible ureterorenoscopy procedure. Clearance after one procedure was achieved in 64.3 % of cases involving less than 20mm stones. No major complication (Clavien-Dindo>2) was described (0 %). Complication rates were 44.7 %, with 31.6 % Clavien-Dindo 2. The main complication was urosepsis, which occurred in 27.6 % of cases. CONCLUSION: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsies for upper urinary tract stones in neurologic patients with severe motor disability are associated with a lower success rate and some frequent low grade complications compared to overall population. In clinical practice, the indications of flexible ureterorenoscopy for these patients seem restricted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Lower urinary tract dysfunction in normal pressure hydrocephalus: Review of the literature]. / Troubles vésico-sphinctériens dans l'hydrocéphalie à pression normale : revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract dysfunction in normal pressure hydrocephalus has received little attention from the scientific community. The aim of this review article was to discuss diagnostic and therapeutic options for these patients. SOURCES: A literature review of MedLine publications on urinary incontinence in normal pressure hydrocephalus was conducted. The following keywords were used: "hydrocephalus, normal pressure" and "bladder dysfunction" or "urinary incontinence" or "overactive bladder" or "urinary bladder, neurogenic". Prospective and retrospective studies as well as previous reviews were analyzed. RESULTS: Urinary symptoms in normal pressure hydrocephalus are mainly represented by overactive bladder, which is a significant burden for the concerned patients. Isolated overactive bladder is more frequent (64%) than urinary incontinence (57%). Detrusor overactivity is seen in 95.2% of the cases. Neuro-surgery is efficient on urinary symptoms for 61.5% of the patients. Bladder recovery after surgery relates with increased mid-cingulate perfusion, probably linked with a functional restoration of the mid-cingulate that normally inhibits the micturition reflex. Medical options, added or not to surgery, include anticholinergic drugs unable to pass through the blood-brain barrier, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and sacral neuromodulation. CONCLUSION: There is actually an insufficient concern about urinary symptoms in normal pressure hydrocephalus. This article highlights the importance of a harmonization of neuro-urological practices in the pre-therapeutic evaluation of patients suffering from normal pressure hydrocephalus.

[Clinical practice guidelines: Synthesis of the guidelines for the surgical treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse in women by the AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : synthèse des recommandations pour le traitement chirurgical du prolapsus génital non récidivé de la femme par l'AFU, le CNGOF, la SIFUD-PP, la SNFCP, et la SCGP.

OBJECTIVE: Develop guidelines for surgery for primary pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Literature review, establishment of levels of evidence, external review, and grading of recommendations by 5 French academic societies: Association Française d'Urologie, Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français, Société Interdisciplinaire d'Urodynamique et de Pelvi-Périnéologie, Société Nationale Française de Colo-proctologie, and Société de Chirurgie Gynécologique et Pelvienne. RESULTS: It is useful to evaluate symptoms, their impact, women's expectations, and to describe the prolapse prior to surgery (grade C). In the absence of any spontaneous or occult urinary sign, there is no reason to perform urodynamics (grade C). When a sacrocolpopexy is indicated, laparoscopy is recommended (grade B). A bowel preparation before vaginal (grade B) or abdominal surgery (grade C) is not recommended. There is no argument to systematically use a rectovaginal mesh to prevent rectocele (grade C). The use of a vesicovaginal mesh by vaginal route should be discussed taking into account an uncertain long-term risk-benefit ratio (grade B). Levator myorrhaphy is not recommended as a first-line rectocele treatment (grade C). There is no indication for a vaginal mesh as a first-line rectocele treatment (grade C). There is no reason to systematically perform a hysterectomy during prolapse repair (grade C). It is possible to not treat stress incontinence at the time of prolapse repair, if the woman is advised of the possibility of a 2-step surgical treatment (grade C).

[Clinical practice guidelines: Summary of recommendations for first surgical treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse by 5 French academic societies: AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Synthèse des recommandations pour le traitement chirurgical du prolapsus génital non récidivé de la femme par l´AFU, le CNGOF, la SIFUD-PP, la SNFCP et la SCGP.

OBJECTIVE: Providing clinical practice guidelines for first surgical treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Systematic literature review, level of evidence rating, external proofreading, and grading of recommendations by 5 French academic societies: Association française d'urologie, Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français, Société interdisciplinaire d'urodynamique et de pelvi-périnéologie, Société nationale française de coloproctologie, and Société de chirurgie gynécologique et pelvienne. RESULTS: It is useful to evaluate symptoms, their impact, women's expectations, and to describe the prolapse prior to surgery (Grade C). In the absence of any spontaneous or occult urinary sign, there is no reason to perform urodynamics (Grade C). When a sacrocolpopexy is indicated, laparoscopy is recommended (Grade B). A bowel preparation before vaginal (Grade B) or abdominal surgery (Grade C) is not recommended. There is no argument to systematically use a rectovaginal mesh to prevent rectocele (Grade C). The use of a vesicovaginal mesh by vaginal route should be discussed taking into account an uncertain long-term risk-benefit ratio (Grade B). Levator myorrhaphy is not recommended as a first-line rectocele treatment (Grade C). There is no indication for a vaginal mesh as a first-line rectocele treatment (Grade C). There is no reason to systematically perform a hysterectomy during prolapse repair (Grade C). It is possible to not treat stress incontinence at the time of prolapse repair, if the woman is advised of the possibility of a 2-step surgical treatment (Grade C). Clinical practice guidelines. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice]. / Traitement du prolapsus génital par promontofixation laparoscopique : recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

INTRODUCTION: Open sacrocolpopexy have demonstrated its efficiency in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with an important backward on a large number of patients. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy reproduced the same surgical technique with reduced morbidity and may benefits from the recent development of robotic. Numerous technical variants have been developped around the original procedure but results seems not ever equivalent. Our objectives are to establish practical recommendations issues from the data of the litterature on the various technical aspects of this technique. METHODS: This work leans on an exhaustive lecture of the literature concerning meta analyses, randomized tries, registers, controlled studies and the largest non controlled studies published on the subject. Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary workgroup then reread and amended by an also multidisciplinary group of proofreaders (urologists, gynecologists, gastroenterologists and surgeons). The methodology follows at best the recommendations of the HAS with a scientific argument for every question (accompanied with the level of proof, NP) and the recommendations, the officers (In, B, C and agreement of experts) and validated at the end of the phase of review. RESULTS: Surgical treatment of uro-genital prolapse by abdominal route classically associated hystero and anterior vaginopexy on the sacral ligament with a synthethic mesh. There are no argument to systematically associated a posterior vaginopexy to prevent secondary rectocele (level C). The consensual indication of laparoscopic rectopexy is represented by symptomatic rectal prolapse, the anatomical and functional results of which are the best estimated (level C). The surgical treatment of rectocele, elytrocele and enterocele with a posterior vaginopexy is not well estimated (level 3). Thus, it is not possible to conclude on the results of a posterior vaginal fixation with a mesh in these indications (AP). In the absence of colpocèle, the interest brought by the posterior vaginal mesh is not established (level 3). There is no comparative studies which allows to conclude on the type and mode of fixation of the prostheses of sacrocolpopexy. We would only report the most common practices without other conclusion. The anterior mesh is usually fixed upper on the anterior part of uterus cervix and lower on the anterior vaginal wall. These fixations are most of the time made by suture and on the promontory with non absorbable suture. The great majority of the authors recommend to make a peritonisation of prostheses to limit the risk of post-operative occlusion. It is now recommended to use only 2 kind of not absorbable prostheses: type I (macroporous polypropylene) or type III (polyester) and not to use any more prostheses type II (PTFE, Silicone) (level C) because of a high rate of mesh erosion: PTFE (9 %) or Silicone (19%) (level 3). Biological prostheses are no more recommended, because of short and medium-term lower anatomical results (level B). Anatomical and functional results are not stastistically differents between laparotomy and coelioscopy (NP1) but the comparison of tong-term results between both ways is not yet established. Coelioscopy allows significant reduction of blood losses, hospital stay and return to normal activity (level 1). Furthemore, there is a higher level of post-operative complications in laparotomy (level 1). When sacrocolpopexy is indicated, coelioscopy is thus recommended (level B). During coelioscopic sacrocolpopexy, anatomical and functional result have not shown any significance difference when using or no a robotics assistance but real randomised studies does not exist (level 2). In comparison to coelioscopy, robotic seems not to improve post-operative consequences and not to decrease the rate of complications of sacrocolpopexy (level 3). Robotic assistance cannot be yet recommended when a coelioscopic sacrocolpopexy is indicated (rank B). CONCUSION: Sacrocolpopexy using not absorbable meshes allows to cure pelvic organ prolapses with very good results with few complications in terms of prothetic exposure and infection and thus is now considered as the referent prothetic surgical technique in this indication. Thus, it seems very important to establish clear recommendations on the numerous operating technical variants which developed around the original technique. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Is the use of synthetic mesh by vaginal route decrease the risk of cystocele recurrence? Clinical practice guidelines]. / Une interposition prothétique synthétique inter-vésico-vaginale implantée par voie vaginale diminue-t-elle le risque de récidive de cystocèle ? Recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

INTRODUCTION: The use of prosthetic surgery by vaginal route has been widely used to try to reduce the risk of prolapse recurrence in the surgical treatment of vaginal cystoceles. Specific complications including type of erosion have led to randomized studies comparing surgery by vaginal route with and without use of Mesh. METHOD: This work is based on a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cochrane database of systemactic reviews, EMBASE) for meta-analyzes, randomized trials, registries, literature reviews, controlled studies and major not controlled studies, published on the subject. Its implementation has followed the methodology of the HAS on the recommendations for clinical practice, with a scientific argument (with the level of evidence, NP) and a recommendation grade (A, B, C, and professional agreement (AP)). RESULTS: The use of inter-vesicovaginal synthetic mesh improves the anatomical result compared to the autologous surgery for the treatment of cystocele (NP1). However, there is no difference in the functional outcome and there is an increase in the number of reoperations related to specific complications, including vaginal erosions. CONCLUSION: If the use of inter-vesicovaginal synthetic mesh improves the anatomical result compared to the autologous surgery for the treatment of cystocele (NP1), no difference in functional outcome and the increased number of related reoperations specific complications including vaginal erosions, do not argue for the systematic use of mesh in the treatment of primary cystocele. It must be discussed case by case basis taking into account a risk-benefit uncertain at long-term (grade B). Its use should be supported by additional studies focused on specific populations at risk of recurrence. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Vaginal surgery and transanal approach for posterior vaginal wall prolapse: Guidelines for clinical practice]. / Traitement par voie basse des colpocèles postérieures : recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surgery for posterior vaginal wall prolapse by vaginal route, in order to identify a therapeutic algorithm based on benefit/risk evaluation of each surgical procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a review of the litterature published up to september 2015 (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library, Cochrane database of systemactic reviews) according to the HAS methodology. Level evidence (1 to 4) was determined for each study as well as evidence based recommendations (A, B, C or professional agreement). RESULTS: Posterior vaginal wall prolapse include mid and low rectoceles and high, beyond levator ani, defects (vaginal vault prolapse, enterocele). Patients with these prolapses frequently complain of bowel symptoms. Due to their high incidence in women, these symptoms require a careful evaluation before surgery in order to correlate them to the prolapse. Repair of the rectovaginal fascia without levatorplasty is recommended in mid rectoceles by vaginal route. The transvaginal approach is superior to the transanal approach for repair of posterior wall prolapse. Biological grafts are not recommended. Due to the lack of evaluation and to the morbidity of polypropylene meshes, there is no indication for their use in the first line surgical procedure of posterior compartment prolapse in the transvaginal approach. Superficial colpoperineorraphy must be proposed only in the symptomatic low rectoceles. Sacrocolpopexy is the procedure of choice for vaginal vault prolapse, but there is still a place for non-prothetic vault suspension by vaginal route according to the age of patients, comorbidities and associated surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical option by vaginal route must be proposed only in symptomatic posterior vaginal wall prolapse. An anorectal evaluation can be required before surgery to avoid worsening of preoperative symptoms or a de novo fecal incontinence, which can lead to a dramatic impairment of patients' quality of life in this functional surgery. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Colpocleisis: guidelines for clinical practice]. / Chirurgie d'occlusion vaginale (colpocléisis) pour prolapsus génital : recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) based on the best evidence available (level of evidence (LE)), concerning colpocleisis as a surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: This article concern a systematically review of the literature concerning colpocleisis (obliterative surgery). RESULTS: At short term follow-up, colpocleisis is associated with an anatomical success rate of 98 % (LE3) and a subjective success rate of 93% (LE3). A decrease in genital, urinary and anorectal symptoms and an enhancement of quality of life are observed in most women following colpocleisis (LE4). At mid-term (1 to 3 years) follow-up, patients' satisfaction ("satisfied" or "very satisfied" ranges from 85 to 100% (LE3)). At long-term follow-up, regret rate (women who regret having had the surgery) is 5% (LE4). In women over 80 years old, colpocleisis is associated with a decrease in per-and post-operative complication rates when compare to other surgical techniques used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LE2). CONCLUSION: Colpocleisis is a valid surgical option for elderly patients with pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and who are definitely permanently sexually inactive (Grade C). © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines]. / L'hystérectomie modifie-t-elle les résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels de la cure de prolapsus ? : Recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

OBJECTIVE: Provide guidelines for clinical practice concerning hysterectomy during surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolaps, with or without mesh. METHODS: Systematically review of the literature concerning anatomical and functionnal results of uterine conservation or hysterectomie during surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolaps. RESULTS: Sacrospinous hysteropexy is as effective as vaginal hysterectomy and repair in retrospective comparative studies and in a meta-analysis with reduced operating time, blood loss and recovery time (NP2). However, in a single RCT there was a higher recurrence rate associated with sacrospinous hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with mesh augmentation of the anterior compartment was as effective as hysterectomy and mesh augmentation (NP2), with no significant difference in the rate of mesh exposure between the groups (NP3). Sacral hysteropexy is as effective as sacral colpopexy and hysterectomy in anatomical outcomes; however, the sacral colpopexy and hysterectomy were associated with increase operating time and blood loss (NP1). Performing hysterectomy at sacral colpopexy was associated with a higher risk of mesh exposure compared with sacral colpopexy without hysterectomy (NP3). There is no sufficient data in the literature to affirm that the uterine conservation improve sexual function (NP3). CONCLUSION: While uterine preservation is a viable option for the surgical management of uterine prolapse the evidence on safety and efficacy is currently lacking. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Assessment before surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse: Clinical practice guidelines]. / Bilan avant le traitement chirurgical d'un prolapsus génital : Recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

INTRODUCTION: The issue addressed in this chapter of recommendations is: What is the clinical and para-clinical assessment to achieve in women with genital prolapse and for whom surgical treatment has been decided. What are the clinical elements of the examination that must be taken into account as a risk factor of failure or relapse after surgery, in order to anticipate and evaluate possible surgical difficulties, and to move towards a preferred surgical technique? MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work is based on a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systemactic Reviews, EMBASE) for meta-analyzes, randomized trials, registries, literature reviews, controlled studies and major not controlled studies, published on the subject. Its implementation has followed the methodology of the HAS on the recommendations for clinical practice, with a scientific argument (with the level of evidence, NP) and a recommendation grade (A, B, C, and professional agreement [AP]). RESULTS: It suits first of all to describe prolapse, by clinical examination, helped, if needed, by a supplement of imagery if clinical examination data are insufficient or in case of discrepancy between the functional signs and clinical anomalies found, or in case of doubt in associated pathology. It suits to look relapse risk factors (high grade prolapse) and postoperative complications risk factors (risk factors for prothetic exposure, surgical approach difficulties, pelvic pain syndrome with hypersensitivity) to inform the patient and guide the therapeutic choice. Urinary functional disorders associated with prolapse (urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, dysuria, urinary tract infection, upper urinary tract impact) will be search and evaluated by interview and clinical examination and by a flowmeter with measurement of the post voiding residue, a urinalysis, and renal-bladder ultrasound. In the presence of voiding disorders, it is appropriate to do their clinical and urodynamic evaluation. In the absence of any spontaneous or hidden urinary sign, there is so far no reason to recommend systematically urodynamic assessment. Anorectal symptoms associated with prolapse (irritable bowel syndrome, obstruction of defecation, fecal incontinence) should be search and evaluated. Before prolapse surgery, it is essential not to ignore gynecologic pathology. CONCLUSION: Before proposing a surgical cure of genital prolapse of women, it suits to achieve a clinical and paraclinical assessment to describe prolapse (anatomical structures involved, grade), to look for recurrence, difficulties approach and postoperative complications risk factors, and to appreciate the impact or the symptoms associated with prolapse (urinary, anorectal, gynecological, pelvic-perineal pain) to guide their evaluation and their treatment. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

[Treatment of Urinary incontinence associated with genital prolapse: Clinical practrice guidelines]. / Traitement de l'incontinence urinaire associée au prolapsus génital : Recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

INTRODUCTION: Prolapse and urinary incontinence are frequently associated. Patente (or proven) stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined by a leakage of urine that occurs with coughing or Valsalva, in the absence of any prolapse reduction manipulation. Masked urinary incontinence results in leakage of urine occurring during reduction of prolapse during the clinical examination in a patient who does not describe incontinence symptoms at baseline. The purpose of this chapter is to consider on the issue of systematic support or not of urinary incontinence, patent or hidden, during the cure of pelvic organs prolapse by abdominal or vaginal approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work is based on an systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, EMBASE) for meta-analyzes, randomized trials, registries, literature reviews, controlled studies and major not controlled studies, published on the subject. Its implementation has followed the methodology of the HAS on the recommendations for clinical practice, with a scientific argument (with the level of evidence, NP) and a recommendation grade (A, B, C, and professional agreement). RESULTS: In case of patent IUE, concomitant treatment of prolapse and SUI reduces the risk of postoperative SUI. However, the isolated treatment of prolapse can treat up to 30% of preoperative SUI. Concomitant treatment of SUI exposed to a specific overactive bladder and dysuria morbidity. The presence of a hidden IUE represents a risk of postoperative SUI, but there is no clinical or urodynamic test to predict individually the risk of postoperative SUI. Moreover, the isolated treatment of prolapse can treat up to 60% of the masked SUI. Concomitant treatment of the hidden IUE therefore exposes again to overtreatment and a specific overactive bladder and dysuria morbidity. CONCLUSION: In case of overt or hidden urinary incontinence, concomitant treatment of SUI and prolapse reduces the risk of postoperative SUI but exposes to a specific overactive bladder and dysuria morbidity (NP3). The isolated treatment of prolapse often allows itself to treat preoperative SUI. We can suggest not to treat SUI (whether patent or hidden) at the same time, providing that women are informed of the possibility of 2 stages surgery (Grade C). © 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Carcinoma arising in enteric diversion or rectal neobladder for bladder exstrophy.

Bladder exstrophy is a rare malformation. Ureteral diversion, such as ureterosigmoidostomy or a neorectal bladder, has been described. When the patients reach adulthood, cancer may arise in these reconstructions. Our aim was to perform a systematic review (all languages) of the published literature on neoplasia after urinary diversion and suggested management in cases of cancer. PubMed and Cochrane library were searched for relevant articles published within the last 20 years. All identified articles were reviewed for inclusion. Carcinoma occurring in the bladder and unreconstructed exstrophy were excluded. Out of 47 articles found, 12 matched our search criteria. The outcomes of 23 patients (including 2 from the authors' institution) were reported. Twenty-two patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 with carcinoid tumour were identified. Median age at urinary diversion was 3 (range 1-13) years. There were 20 ureterosigmoidostomies and 2 neorectal bladders. Cancer was diagnosed subsequently at a median of 31 (range 5-55) years after urinary diversion still in place (n = 18) or 21 years (range 1-30) after incomplete excision of ureteric stump when re-diverted (n = 5). The long-term outcomes of 15 patients were available. Ten died due to colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 5 were disease-free at 3 years. Patients with enteric diversion for bladder exstrophy, including those with subsequent reconstruction, are at risk of adenocarcinoma during adulthood. It is important to provide adequate surveillance. If lesions suggestive of carcinoma are seen, complete excision of the receptive bowel and urinary diversion are mandatory.