Independent Registries Are Cost-Effective Tools to Provide Mandatory Postauthorization Surveillance for Orphan Medicinal Products.

OBJECTIVES: Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) often receive market authorization under conditions imposed by regulators for ongoing postauthorization surveillance (PAS) to answer questions that remain at the time of market entry. This surveillance may be provided through industry-funded registries (IFRs). Nevertheless, data in these registries may not be of sufficient quality to answer these questions and may not always be accessible for regulatory review. We propose that a mandatory independent registry is an efficient and cost-effective tool for PAS for OMPs. METHODS: Using data from the Canadian Fabry Disease Initiative, we reviewed costs per unique patient from sites participating in both the independent national registry and IFRs for Fabry disease and compared data completeness from the Canadian Fabry Disease Initiative to that in published documents from IFRs. RESULTS: The costs of data collection through the independent registry were 17% to 36% (depending on site) lower than costs to collect data in the IFRs, and completeness of data collected through the independent registry was higher than that through the IFRs. Data from the independent registry were reviewed annually to guide indications for publicly funded Fabry disease therapy. Even when enrollment ceased to be a requirement to receive therapy, 77% of patients continued to enroll in the registry, suggesting the structure was acceptable to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Independent registries are cost-effective and efficient tools and should be mandated by regulatory agencies as the preferred tool for PAS for OMPs. Countries with publicly funded health systems should consider investment in registry infrastructure for OMPs.

Lentivirus-mediated gene therapy for Fabry disease.

Enzyme and chaperone therapies are used to treat Fabry disease. Such treatments are expensive and require intrusive biweekly infusions; they are also not particularly efficacious. In this pilot, single-arm study (NCT02800070), five adult males with Type 1 (classical) phenotype Fabry disease were infused with autologous lentivirus-transduced, CD34+-selected, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells engineered to express alpha-galactosidase A (α-gal A). Safety and toxicity are the primary endpoints. The non-myeloablative preparative regimen consisted of intravenous melphalan. No serious adverse events (AEs) are attributable to the investigational product. All patients produced α-gal A to near normal levels within one week. Vector is detected in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells, plasma and leukocytes demonstrate α-gal A activity within or above the reference range, and reductions in plasma and urine globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) are seen. While the study and evaluations are still ongoing, the first patient is nearly three years post-infusion. Three patients have elected to discontinue enzyme therapy.

Therapeutic challenges in two adolescent male patients with Fabry disease and high antibody titres.

Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been shown to stabilize certain aspects of Fabry disease (FD). However, in some patients on ERT, high antibody titres have been documented, with limited clinical improvement in systemic manifestations and often with significant adverse drug reactions. We present two related adolescent males with a 4.5 kb GLA deletion, not amenable to chaperone therapy, leading to profound reduction in α-galactosidase A (α-gal A) enzyme activity. Over a 3-year period of ERT, increasing IgG antibody titres against α-gal A were noted. After starting ERT serial urine globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) measurements showed an upward trend from 333 to 2260 µg/mmol creatinine for patient 1 and 1165 to 2260 µg/mmol creatinine for patient 2. Markedly increased levels of urine and plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3) analogues were also found. The patients experienced recurrent infusion-associated reactions necessitating premedication and prolonged infusion times. Over the 3-year period of ERT, the patients experienced continued malaise, gastrointestinal symptoms and neuropathic pain. In addition, they had increasing anxiety related to their disease and apparent lack of response to ERT which led to a decision to ultimately stop ERT. No other approved treatment options are currently available for these patients. It is possible that the rapid development of the high antidrug neutralizing antibody (ADA) titres is related to the large GLA deletion leading to virtually absent enzyme activity. It remains unclear if their symptomatology during the period of receiving ERT is related to lack of its efficacy, the rising ADA titres, or both. These two patients highlight the need for further research into the management of antidrug antibodies and additional therapeutic approaches for FD. SYNOPSIS: The development of very high antidrug antibody titres in response to ERT in two related adolescent males with FD highlight the need for other therapeutic options for patients in whom ERT or other currently approved therapies does not meet their treatment needs.