Advances of Direct Peripheral Nerve Repair Techniques: Do We Already Have Enough Scientific Evidence?

Purpose: To systematically review the evidence of direct peripheral nerve repair techniques and to determine any differences in outcomes that would guide rational treatment. Additionally, we compare the results and outcomes of these studies and find future directions for peripheral nerve repair techniques. Methods: We searched PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Embase databases to identify articles involving direct peripheral nerve techniques. We analyzed and compared the results and outcomes of these techniques. We also aimed to look for the differences in outcomes that would guide the current and future treatments. Results: We identified 1390 articles, and 19 met our criteria with evidence ranging from level I to level IV. The nerve repair techniques included direct repair, epineural repair, fascicular repair, and group fascicular repair. These nerve techniques are based on the surgeons' personal experience. The results and the outcome of these studies were based on prognostic factors and not on surgical techniques. Few studies compared the surgical techniques and found no significant difference in nerve repair techniques. Conclusions: Analyzing all direct peripheral nerve techniques and literature of all levels of evidence, our data show no significant difference between different suturing techniques. Currently, there is a lack of scientific evidence on the best direct peripheral nerve repair techniques. Therefore, we need more research to understand the rational treatment methods for peripheral nerve injuries. Level of evidence: IV.

Evaluation of peripheral nerve injury by magnetic resonance neurography: A systematic review.

In view of the limitations of current methods for assessing peripheral nerve injury, there is a need for technical innovations to improve diagnosis, surgical approach and postoperative monitoring. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review to analyze the applicability of magnetic resonance neurography in peripheral nerve injuries. The present systematic review focused on the use of magnetic resonance neurography. The literature was searched in the PUBMED, Cochrane Library and Virtual Health Library databases using the PICO method. One hundred sixty-two articles were retrieved with the terms "magnetic resonance imaging" and "peripheral nerve injury", with a filter for the last 10 years (2010-2020). Nineteen were eligible for the review. Most were reviews, with few systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. Although not included in the recommended protocol, MRI is increasingly used due to its numerous advantages: it is non-invasive, providing objective visualization of neural and perineural tissues, fascicular representation as a result of high resolution, and objective visualization of serial interval images of successful treatment. This is one of the first systematic reviews of the literature regarding the use of magnetic resonance imaging neurography to assess peripheral nerve injury, highlighting the need to implement new imaging techniques in this field of medical practice.