Impact of Advanced Diabetes Centers on the healthcare experience of patients with type 2 diabetes using the IEXPAC tool.

AIMS: To determine the experience with healthcare among patients with type 2 diabetes according to the assistance model provided in their primary care centers, and to determine factors related with their experience. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed in patients with type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular or renal complications. The patients were divided in two groups according to whether they had been attended in Advanced Diabetes centers (ADC) or the traditional assistance centers. Patient's healthcare experience was assessed with the "Instrument for Evaluation of the Experience of Chronic Patients" (IEXPAC) questionnaire, with possible scores ranging from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience). RESULTS: A total of 451 patients (215 from ADC and 236 from traditional assistance centers) were included. The mean overall IEXPAC scores were 5.9 ±â€¯1.7 (ADC) and 6.0 ±â€¯1.9 (traditional assistance centers; p = 0.82). In the multivariant analyses, in ADC, the regular follow-up by the same physician (p = 0.01) and follow-up by a nurse (p = 0.01), were associated with a better patient experience, whereas receiving a higher number of medications with a worse patient experience (p = 0.04). In the traditional assistance centers, only the regular follow-up by the same physician was associated with a better experience (p = 0.02). Patients from ADC centers reported a higher score in the quality of life scale (69.1 ±â€¯16.5 vs 64.6 ±â€¯17.5; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the healthcare experience of type 2 diabetic patients with their sanitary assistance can be improved. Patients from ADC centers report a higher score in the quality of life scale.

The efficacy of an integrated care training program for primary care nurses for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE: to assess the effect of the "Program of Training in Integral Care for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care Nursing" on the level of knowledge, the degree of application of comprehensive cardiovascular care, and on the continuity of care between the cardiac rehabilitation and primary care units, in relation to post-infarction patients. METHODS: Quasi-experimental before-after study without control group. Comprised an ad-hoc survey prior to training via the Internet and a post-training survey; both the pre- and post-course surveys were anonymous. The program consisted of secondary cardiovascular prevention training, chronicity in the cardiovascular patient and adherence to the therapeutic plan, and follow-up protocol. RESULTS: Over one third of the respondents did not know the control objectives of the different cardiovascular risk factors, more marked regarding lipid control. The program significantly improved the knowledge of the objectives of blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and the self-perception of better monitoring of lipid parameters and waist circumference. In centers with a cardiac rehabilitation unit, 73% of respondents indicated that there was "no" communication with the unit before the course, reducing to 55% in the post-course survey. CONCLUSION: There are clear training needs of nurses for their involvement in these secondary prevention programs. A specific continuous training in secondary cardiovascular prevention for nurses in the field of primary care, improves and facilitates the acquisition of knowledge at this level, can improve the approach of patients with cardiovascular events during the first months of said event and communication with the reference cardiac rehabilitation units.

Healthcare experience among patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional survey using the IEXPAC tool.

Aim: To assess the experience with health care among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and to evaluate patients' demographic variables and healthcare-related characteristics which may affect their experience. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was delivered to T2DM adults. Patient experiences were assessed with the 'Instrument for Evaluation of the Experience of Chronic Patients' (IEXPAC) questionnaire, a validated 12-item survey, which describes patient experience within the last 6 months (items 1-11) and hospitalization in the last 3 years (item 12), with possible scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 10 (best experience). Results: A total of 451 T2DM patients responded to the survey (response rate 72.3%; mean age 69.5 ± 10.1 years, 67.8% men). The mean overall IEXPAC score was 5.92 ± 1.80. Mean scores were higher for productive interactions (7.92 ± 2.15) and self-management (7.08 ± 2.27) than for new relational model (1.72 ± 2.01). Only 32.8% of patients who had been hospitalized in the past 3 years reported having received a follow-up call or visit after discharge. Multivariate analyses identified that regular follow-up by the same physician and follow-up by a nurse were associated with a better patient experience. Continuity of healthcare score was higher only in those patients requiring help from others. Conclusions: The areas of T2DM care which may need to be addressed to ensure better patient experience are use of the Internet, new technologies and social resources for patient information and interaction with healthcare professionals, closer follow-up after hospitalization, and a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach with regular follow-up by the same physician and a nurse.

The efficacy of an integrated care training program for primary care nurses for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk. / Efectividad de un programa de capacitación en cuidados integrales para la prevención secundaria cardiovascular en enfermeras de atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the "Program of Training in Integral Care for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care Nursing" on the level of knowledge, the degree of application of comprehensive cardiovascular care, and on the continuity of care between the cardiac rehabilitation and primary care units, in relation to post-infarction patients. METHODS: Quasi-experimental before-after study without control group. Comprised an ad-hoc survey prior to training via the Internet and a post-training survey; both the pre- and post-course surveys were anonymous. The program consisted of secondary cardiovascular prevention training, chronicity in the cardiovascular patient and adherence to the therapeutic plan, and follow-up protocol. RESULTS: Over one third of the respondents did not know the control objectives of the different cardiovascular risk factors, more marked regarding lipid control. The program significantly improved the knowledge of the objectives of blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and the self-perception of better monitoring of lipid parameters and waist circumference. In centers with a cardiac rehabilitation unit, 73% of respondents indicated that there was "no" communication with the unit before the course, reducing to 55% in the post-course survey. CONCLUSION: There are clear training needs of nurses for their involvement in these secondary prevention programs. A specific continuous training in secondary cardiovascular prevention for nurses in the field of primary care, improves and facilitates the acquisition of knowledge at this level, can improve the approach of patients with cardiovascular events during the first months of said event and communication with the reference cardiac rehabilitation units.