Self-reported effects of warm seasonal temperatures in persons with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) interrupts motor, sensory, and autonomic pathways, impairing mobility and increasing heat storage during warm seasonal temperatures due to compromised autonomic control of vasodilation and sweating and recognition of body temperature. Thus, persons with SCI are more vulnerable to hyperthermia and its adverse effects. However, information regarding how persons with SCI perceive warmer seasons and whether thermal discomfort during warmer seasons restricts routine activities remains anecdotal. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-report surveys. SETTING: VA Medical Center and Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of 50 participants each: tetraplegia, paraplegia, and matched non-SCI controls. OUTCOME MEASURES: Tetraplegia, paraplegia, and control groups responded "yes" or "no" when asked whether warm seasonal temperatures adversely affected comfort or participation in routine activities. RESULTS: The percentage of responses differed among tetraplegia, paraplegia, and control groups when asked if they required ≥20 min to cool down once overheated (44 vs. 20 vs. 12%; X2 = 14.7, P < 0.001), whether heat-related discomfort limited their ability to go outside (62 vs. 34 vs. 32%; X2 = 11.5, P = 0.003), if they needed to use a water-mister because of the heat (70 vs. 44 vs. 42%; X2 = 9.8, P = 0.008), and if heat-related discomfort limited participation in social activities (40 vs. 20 vs. 16%; X2 = 8.7, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Warmer seasonal temperatures had a greater negative impact on reported comfort and daily activities of persons with SCI than non-SCI controls. Those with tetraplegia were most adversely affected. Our findings warrant increasing awareness and identifying interventions to address the vulnerability of persons with SCI to hyperthermia.

The Use of Intravenous Lidocaine in Perioperative Medicine: Anaesthetic, Analgesic and Immune-Modulatory Aspects.

This narrative review provides an update on the applied pharmacology of lidocaine, its clinical scope in anaesthesia, novel concepts of analgesic and immune-modulatory effects as well as the current controversy around its use in perioperative opioid-sparing multi-modal strategies. Potential benefits of intravenous lidocaine in the context of cancer, inflammation and chronic pain are discussed against concerns of safety, toxicity and medico-legal constraints.

Core Temperature Lability Predicts Sympathetic Interruption and Cognitive Performance during Heat Exposure in Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries.

Among persons with high spinal cord injury (Hi-SCI: > T5), changes in core body temperature (Tcore) and cognitive performance during heat exposure appear related to degree of sympathetic interruption. Twenty men with Hi-SCI (C4-T4, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] A-B) and 19 matched, able-bodied controls were acclimated to 27°C baseline (BL) before exposure to 35°C heat challenge (HC). Two groups, differentiated by increase in Tcore during HC, were identified: high responders (HR-SCI: ΔTcore ≥0.5°C; n = 13, C4-T2) and low responders (LR-SCI: ΔTcore <0.5°C; n = 7, C4-T4). Tcore, distal skin temperatures (Tskavg), and distal microvascular perfusion (LDFboth feet) were measured, as were indices of sympathetic integrity, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and extremity sweat rate (SRavg). Cognitive performance was assessed at BL and post-HC, using the Stroop Color and Word and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span tests. At BL, Tcore of the HR-SCI group (36.6 ± 0.4°C) was lower than that for the LR-SCI (37.1 ± 0.3°C; p = 0.011) and control groups (37.3 ± 0.3°C; p < 0.001). After HC, Tcore was not different among groups. MAP of the HR-SCI group (70.9 ± 9.8 mm Hg) was lower than that of the LR-SCI (81.8 ± 7.0 mm Hg; p = 0.048) and control groups (89.9 ± 9.9 mm Hg; p < 0.001). SRavg increased more in the control group (77.0 ± 52.5 nL/cm2/min) than in the HR-SCI group (15.5 ± 22.0 nL/cm2/min; p = 0.001). Only the HR-SCI group had significant increases in T-Scores of Stroop Word (7.5 ± 4.4; p < 0.001), WAIS-IV Digit Span Sequence (1.9 ± 1.8; p = 0.002), and WAIS-IV Digit Span Total (1.4 ± 1.6; p = 0.008). Persons with SCI who responded to HC with a greater change in Tcore demonstrated evidence of greater sympathetic interruption and had an associated improvement in cognitive performance.