Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.

PURPOSE: Colonoscopy is an effective method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), and it can prevent CRC by detection and removal of precancerous lesions. The most important considerations when performing colonoscopy screening are the safety and satisfaction of the patient and the diagnostic accuracy. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) herein proposes an optimal level of standard performance to be used in endoscopy units and by individual colonoscopists for screening colonoscopy. These guidelines establish specific criteria for assessment of safety and quality in screening colonoscopy. METHODS: The Colonoscopy Committee of the KSCP commissioned this Position Statement. Expert gastrointestinal surgeons representing the KSCP reviewed the published evidence to identify acceptable quality indicators and indicators that lacked sufficient evidence. RESULTS: The KSCP recommends an optimal standard list for quality control of screening colonoscopy in the following 6 categories: training and competency of the colonoscopist, procedural quality, facilities and equipment, performance indicators and auditable outcomes, disinfection of equipment, and sedation and recovery of the patient. CONCLUSION: The KSCP recommends that endoscopy units performing CRC screening evaluate 6 key performance measures during daily practice.

Nomogram Development and External Validation for Predicting the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk is crucial in determining further treatment strategies following endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to establish a new prediction model for the risk of LNM in T1 CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development set included 833 patients with T1 CRC who had undergone endoscopic (n=154) or surgical (n=679) resection at the National Cancer Center. The validation set included 722 T1 CRC patients who had undergone endoscopic (n=249) or surgical (n=473) resection at Daehang Hospital. A logistic regression model was used to construct the prediction model. To assess the performance of prediction model, discrimination was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the ROC curve (AUC), and calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: Five independent risk factors were determined in the multivariable model, including vascular invasion, high-grade histology, submucosal invasion, budding, and background adenoma. In final prediction model, the performance of the model was good that the AUC was 0.812 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.770 to 0.855) and the HL chi-squared test statistic was 1.266 (p=0.737). In external validation, the performance was still good that the AUC was 0.771 (95% CI, 0.708 to 0.834) and the p-value of the HL chi-squared test was 0.040. We constructed the nomogram with the final prediction model. CONCLUSION: We presented an externally validated new prediction model for LNM risk in T1 CRC patients, guiding decision making in determining whether additional surgery is required after endoscopic resection of T1 CRC.

Clinical Features of Tuberculous Versus Crohn's Anal Fistulas, in Korea.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In Western countries, tuberculous anal fistula may not be an issue because tuberculosis [TB] is not common, and this is a very rare form of extrapulmonary manifestation of TB. However in TB-endemic countries, careful diagnostic differentiation is required because the clinical features of TB anal fistula and Crohn's disease [CD] anal fistula are similar, with distinguishing features remaining unclear. We aimed to analyse the clinical features of TB versus CD anal fistulas. METHOD: Among 13872 patients who underwent anal fistula surgery from 2003 to 2014, 87 patients with TB fistulas and 116 patients with CD fistulas were included. Data on the annual incidence of TB and CD, as well as the clinical, pathological, ultrasonographic, colonoscopic and surgical data were analysed. RESULTS: Compared with CD, the TB group was older [median: 37 vs 22 years] and underlying chronic illness was more common [20.3% vs 2.6%]. In the TB group, 46 patients [59.7%] showed active or inactive pulmonary TB, and acid-fast bacilli and caseating granuloma were found in 56.3% and 62.1%, respectively. During colonoscopy, mucosal lesions were observed more frequently in CD [96.9% vs 16.9%]. CONCLUSIONS: TB anal fistula is clinically very similar to CD anal fistula. In Korea, the incidence of CD anal fistula has recently increased in prevalence, whereas the prevalence of TB anal fistula is decreasing but is still persistent. We recommend that clinicians should prepare for a possibility of TB as well as CD anal fistula in TB-endemic countries including Korea.