Pelvic Floor Organ Prolapse After Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Uroepithelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify whether women who undergo a radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma are at increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared female subjects who had undergone a radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma, as identified through an institutional cancer survivor database, with subjects who presented to the Pelvic Health and Continence Clinic with symptoms of either uterovaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence. Demographic data were collected regarding risk factors for prolapse, and study subjects were asked to complete a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6). Data were collected through retrospective chart review. The primary outcome is difference in the POPDI-6 between the groups. Statistical evaluation of responses was performed, with analysis of variance used to compare the questionnaire scores between groups and correction for risk factors with χ2 tests, with a P value of 0.05 selected for statistical significance. RESULTS: There were 36 postcystectomy subjects who responded to the survey, 37 subjects in the prolapse group, and 44 subjects in the incontinence group. With correction for age, body mass index, and number of vaginal deliveries, the postcystectomy group reported significantly lower scores on the POPDI-6 than both the prolapse group (P < 0.0001) and the incontinence group (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Radical cystectomy for uroepithelial carcinoma does not correlate with an increased risk of patient-reported symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.

Do anxiety traits predict subjective short-term outcomes following prolapse repair surgery?

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in orthopedic surgery have suggested that patients with anxiety have less symptomatic improvement following surgery than those without. We hypothesized for this study that patients with anxiety traits experience less symptomatic improvement following pelvic organ prolapse surgery than patients without. METHODS: All patients presenting for prolapse repair surgery were offered enrollment in this prospective cohort study. Prior to surgery, subjects were asked to complete the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20. Subjects were also asked to list up to five goals related to the outcome of surgery for goal-attainment scaling. At the 6-8-week postoperative visit, subjects were asked to repeat the STAI and PFDI questionnaires and respond to the single question tool assessing Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Subjects were also asked to rate on a Visual Assessment Scale how well preoperative goals were met. All three questionnaires were repeated at >12 weeks following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with anxiety trait and 58 without were recruited. Preoperatively, the mean STAI-T was 45.0 (± 7.2.) and 27.7 (± 4.9) for subjects with and without anxiety; PFDI 20 scores were 96.1 (± 48.8) and 94.7 (± 57.5), respectively. At 12+ weeks postoperatively, the mean PFDI-20 for subjects with anxiety was 31.3 (± 20.9) and 30.3 (± 27.9) (p = 0.22) for those without. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find the anxiety trait to be a predictor of subjective outcomes following pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Risk factors for explantation due to infection after sacral neuromodulation: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation is an effective therapy for overactive bladder, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. Infection after sacral neurostimulation is costly and burdensome. Determining optimal perioperative management strategies to reduce the risk of infection is important to reduce this burden. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify risk factors associated with sacral neurostimulator infection requiring explantation, to estimate the incidence of infection requiring explantation, and identify associated microbial pathogens. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective case-control study of sacral neuromodulation procedures completed from Jan. 1, 2004, through Dec. 31, 2014. We identified all sacral neuromodulation implantable pulse generator implants as well as explants due to infection at 8 participating institutions. Cases were patients who required implantable pulse generator explantation for infection during the review period. Cases were included if age ≥18 years old, follow-up data were available ≥30 days after implantable pulse generator implant, and the implant was performed at the institution performing the explant. Two controls were matched to each case. These controls were the patients who had an implantable pulse generator implanted by the same surgeon immediately preceding and immediately following the identified case who met inclusion criteria. Controls were included if age ≥18 years old, no infection after implantable pulse generator implant, follow-up data were available ≥180 days after implant, and no explant for any reason <180 days from implant. Controls may have had an explant for reasons other than infection at >180 days after implant. Fisher exact test (for categorical variables) and Student t test (for continuous variables) were used to test the strength of the association between infection and patient and surgery characteristics. Significant variables were then considered in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine risk factors independently associated with infection. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period at 8 academic institutions, 1930 sacral neuromodulator implants were performed by 17 surgeons. In all, 38 cases requiring device explant for infection and 72 corresponding controls were identified. The incidence of infection requiring explant was 1.97%. Hematoma formation (13% cases, 0% controls; P = .004) and pocket depth of ≥3 cm (21% cases, 0% controls; P = .031) were independently associated with an increased risk of infection requiring explant. On multivariable regression analysis controlling for significant variables, both hematoma formation (P = .006) and pocket depth ≥3 cm (P = .020, odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-8.89) remained significantly associated with infection requiring explant. Of the 38 cases requiring explant, 32 had cultures collected and 24 had positive cultures. All 5 cases with a hematoma had a positive culture (100%). Of the 4 cases with a pocket depth ≥3 cm, 2 had positive cultures, 1 had negative cultures, and 1 had a missing culture result. The most common organism identified was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (38%). CONCLUSION: Infection after sacral neuromodulation requiring device explant is low. The most common infectious pathogen identified was methicillin-resistant S aureus. Demographic and health characteristics did not predict risk of explant due to infection, however, having a postoperative hematoma or a deep pocket ≥3 cm significantly increased the risk of explant due to infection. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous hemostasis as well as ensuring the pocket depth is <3 cm at the time of device implant.

Vaginal Obliterative Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.

IMPORTANCE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition, the prevalence of which is likely to increase with the aging of our population. Also changing are parameters by which outcomes are assessed, shifting toward patient-centered care. OBJECTIVE: To review vaginal obliterative procedures for surgical treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse historically and to discuss evidence on indications for colpocleisis, outcomes, and complications, as well as review pros and cons for concomitant vaginal hysterectomy and anti-incontinence procedures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Review predominantly of the English language literature on issues associated with obliterative vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse from LeFort's and Neugebauer's original description in the late 1800s to now. RESULTS: LeFort and total colpocleisis are effective procedures for surgical treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse with relatively low complication rates. Patient satisfaction is high. Loss of coital function is rarely a reason for regret. Hysterectomy is not required in most patients with procidentia. Anti-incontinence procedures can be performed at time of colpocleisis for patients with coexisting stress incontinence. Evidence is conflicting with regard to occult stress urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Colpocleisis are valuable procedures for women with severe pelvic organ prolapse who do not wish to retain coital function. Results are maintained in women with recurrent prolapse after prior failed reconstructive surgery. Considering a patient's goals for surgery and comprehensive presurgical counseling are important determinants of patient satisfaction. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to list indications and contraindications for vaginal obliterative procedures, discuss risks and benefits of sling placement at time of colpocleisis, list perioperative complications, and discuss perioperative workup for LeFort colpocleisis.