RESUMO
Objective: The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998-2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010-2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons. Results: A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2 years (158.5 months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p = 0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p = 0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96 months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p = 0.984). Conclusion: Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a novel local therapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While effective, there is currently no reliable radiological marker to guide patient selection. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of capsule appearance on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for patients undergoing SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2017, 156 consecutive patients with Child-Pugh score class A/B and HCC ≥â¯5â¯cm who underwent SBRT were retrospectively analysed. Baseline triple-phase CTs of the abdomen were reviewed for the presence of capsule appearances and correlated with objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and pattern of treatment failure. RESULTS: Capsule appearance on CT was present in 83 (53.2%) patients. It was associated with improved ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) (60.2 vs. 24.7%, pâ¯< 0.001) and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) (78.3 vs. 34.2%, pâ¯< 0.001). The presence of a capsule was also associated with superior 2year local control (89.1 vs. 51.4%, pâ¯< 0.001) and 2year OS (34.1 vs. 14.8%, pâ¯< 0.01). Hepatic out-field failure was the dominant mode of progression, which was less common in patients with intact capsule (54.2 vs. 60.3%, pâ¯= 0.01). CONCLUSION: Capsule appearance on CT could potentially be a non-invasive prognostic marker for selecting HCC patients to undergo SBRT. A larger cohort is warranted to validate our findings.
