Breaking free from chemical spreadsheets.

Drug discovery scientists often consider compounds and data in terms of groups, such as chemical series, and relationships, representing similarity or structural transformations, to aid compound optimisation. This is often supported by chemoinformatics algorithms, for example clustering and matched molecular pair analysis. However, chemistry software packages commonly present these data as spreadsheets or form views that make it hard to find relevant patterns or compare related compounds conveniently. Here, we review common data visualisation and analysis methods used to extract information from chemistry data. We introduce a new framework that enables scientists to work flexibly with drug discovery data to reflect their thought processes and interact with the output of algorithms to identify key structure-activity relationships and guide further optimisation intuitively.

Applying medicinal chemistry transformations and multiparameter optimization to guide the search for high-quality leads and candidates.

In this article we describe a computational method that automatically generates chemically relevant compound ideas from an initial molecule, closely integrated with in silico models, and a probabilistic scoring algorithm to highlight the compound ideas most likely to satisfy a user-defined profile of required properties. The new compound ideas are generated using medicinal chemistry 'transformation rules' taken from examples in the literature. We demonstrate that the set of 206 transformations employed is generally applicable, produces a wide range of new compounds, and is representative of the types of modifications previously made to move from lead-like to drug-like compounds. Furthermore, we show that more than 94% of the compounds generated by transformation of typical drug-like molecules are acceptable to experienced medicinal chemists. Finally, we illustrate an application of our approach to the lead that ultimately led to the discovery of duloxetine, a marketed serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Beyond profiling: using ADMET models to guide decisions.

ADMET Models, whether in silico or in vitro, are commonly used to 'profile' molecules, to identify potential liabilities or filter out molecules expected to have undesirable properties. While useful, this is the most basic application of such models. Here, we will show how models may be used to go 'beyond profiling' to guide key decisions in drug discovery. For example, selection of chemical series to focus resources with confidence or design of improved molecules targeting structural modifications to improve key properties. To prioritise molecules and chemical series, the success criteria for properties and their relative importance to a project's objective must be defined. Data from models (experimental or predicted) may then be used to assess each molecule's balance of properties against those requirements. However, to make decisions with confidence, the uncertainties in all of the data must also be considered. In silico models encode information regarding the relationship between molecular structure and properties. This is used to predict the property value of a novel molecule. However, further interpretation can yield information on the contributions of different groups in a molecule to the property and the sensitivity of the property to structural changes. Visualising this information can guide the redesign process. In this article, we describe methods to achieve these goals and drive drug-discovery decisions and illustrate the results with practical examples.