Application of ceramic membranes with pre-ozonation for treatment of secondary wastewater effluent.

Membrane fouling is an inevitable problem when microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltraion (UF) are used to treat wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent. While historically the use of MF/UF for water and wastewater treatment has been almost exclusively focused on polymeric membranes, new generation ceramic membranes were recently introduced in the market and they possess unique advantages over currently available polymeric membranes. Ceramic membranes are mechanically superior and are more resistant to severe chemical and thermal environments. Due to the robustness of ceramic membranes, strong oxidants such as ozone can be used as pretreatment to reduce the membrane fouling. This paper presents results of a pilot study designed to investigate the application of new generation ceramic membranes for WWTP effluent treatment. Ozonation and coagulation pretreatment were evaluated to optimize the membrane operation. The ceramic membrane demonstrated stable performance at a filtration flux of 100 gfd (170LMH) at 20 degrees C with pretreatment using PACl (1mg/L as Al) and ozone (4 mg/L). To understand the effects of ozone and coagulation pretreatment on organic foulants, natural organic matter (NOM) in four waters - raw, ozone treated, coagulation treated, and ozone followed by coagulation treated wastewaters - were characterized using high performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC). The HPSEC analysis demonstrated that ozone treatment is effective at degrading colloidal NOMs which are likely responsible for the majority of membrane fouling.

Kinetics of nitrate and perchlorate reduction in ion-exchange brine using the membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR).

Several sources of bacterial inocula were tested for their ability to reduce nitrate and perchlorate in synthetic ion-exchange spent brine (30-45 g/L) using a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR). Nitrate and perchlorate removal fluxes reached as high as 5.4 g Nm(-2)d(-1) and 5.0 g ClO(4)m(-2)d(-1), respectively, and these values are similar to values obtained with freshwater MBfRs. Nitrate and perchlorate removal fluxes decreased with increasing salinity. The nitrate fluxes were roughly first order in H(2) pressure, but roughly zero-order with nitrate concentration. Perchlorate reduction rates were higher with lower nitrate loadings, compared to high nitrate loadings; this is a sign of competition for H(2). Nitrate and perchlorate reduction rates depended strongly on the inoculum. An inoculum that was well acclimated (years) to nitrate and perchlorate gave markedly faster removal kinetics than cultures that were acclimated for only a few months. These results underscore that the most successful MBfR bioreduction of nitrate and perchlorate in ion-exchange brine demands a well-acclimated inoculum and sufficient hydrogen availability.

Perchlorate and nitrate treatment by ion exchange integrated with biological brine treatment.

Groundwater contaminated with perchlorate and nitrate was treated in a pilot plant using a commercially available ion exchange (IX) resin. Regenerant brine concentrate from the IX process, containing high perchlorate and nitrate, was treated biologically and the treated brine was reused in IX resin regeneration. The nitrate concentration of the feed water determined the exhaustion lifetime (i.e., regeneration frequency) of the resin; and the regeneration condition was determined by the perchlorate elution profile from the exhausted resin. The biological brine treatment system, using a salt-tolerant perchlorate- and nitrate-reducing culture, was housed in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). The biological process consistently reduced perchlorate and nitrate concentrations in the spent brine to below the treatment goals of 500 microg ClO4(-)/L and 0.5mg NO3(-)-N/L determined by equilibrium multicomponent IX modeling. During 20 cycles of regeneration, the system consistently treated the drinking water to below the MCL of nitrate (10 mgNO3(-)-N/L) and the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) notification level of perchlorate (i.e., 6 microg/L). A conceptual cost analysis of the IX process estimated that perchlorate and nitrate treatment using the IX process with biological brine treatment to be approximately 20% less expensive than using the conventional IX with brine disposal.