The evolution of factor VIIa in the treatment of bleeding in haemophilia with inhibitors.

The use of activated factor VII (FVIIa) for the treatment of bleeding events in haemophilia patients with inhibitors was first reported over 30 years ago. Since then clinical trials, registries, case series, real-world experience and an understanding of its mechanism of action have transformed what was originally a scientific curiosity into one of the major treatments for inhibitor patients, with innovative therapeutic regimens, dose optimization and individualized care now widely practiced. Given current understanding and use, it might be easy to forget the years of clinical research that led up to this point; in this review, we lay out changes based on broad eras of rFVIIa use. These eras cover the original uncertainty associated with dosing, efficacy and safety; the transformation of care ushered in with its widespread use; and the optimization and individualization of patient care and the importance of specialized support provided by haemophilia treatment centres. Today with the introduction of novel prophylactic agents such as emicizumab, we once again find ourselves dealing with the uncertainties of how best to utilize rFVIIa and newer investigational variants such as marzeptacog alfa and eptacog beta; we hope that the experiences of the past three decades will serve as a guide for this new era of care.

Acquired hemophilia A: Updated review of evidence and treatment guidance.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease resulting from autoantibodies (inhibitors) against endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) that leads to bleeding, which is often spontaneous and severe. AHA tends to occur in elderly patients with comorbidities and is associated with high mortality risk from underlying comorbidities, bleeding, or treatment complications. Treatment, which consists of hemostatic management and eradication of the inhibitors, can be challenging to manage. Few data are available to guide the management of AHA-related bleeding and eradication of the disease-causing antibodies. Endorsed by the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society of North America, an international panel of experts in AHA analyzed key questions, reviewed the literature, weighed the evidence and formed a consensus to update existing guidelines. AHA is likely underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed in real-world clinical practice. Recommendations for the management of AHA are summarized here based on the available data, integrated with the clinical experience of panel participants.

Advances in the clinical management of inhibitors in hemophilia A and B.

Inhibitors to factor (F)VIII or FIX are the most serious and challenging complication of hemophilia treatment, increasing morbidity and mortality because bleeds no longer respond to standard clotting factor replacement therapy. For patients with high-titer inhibitors, immune tolerance induction achieved through regular factor exposure is the only proven therapy capable of Inhibitor eradication and is almost always indicated for inhibitors of recent onset. Bypassing therapy is used to treat and prevent bleeding, but neither of the two currently available bypassing agents has the predictable hemostatic efficacy of factor replacement in hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Major research efforts are focused on the development of new, more potent therapies for the management of patients with inhibitors.

Acquired hemophilia A: emerging treatment options.

Acquired hemophilia A is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by an autoantibody (inhibitor) to factor VIII (FVIII) that interferes with its coagulant function and predisposes to severe, potentially life-threatening hemorrhage. Disease management focuses on controlling bleeding, primarily with the use of bypassing therapy and recombinant porcine FVIII, and permanently eradicating the autoantibody using various immunosuppressants. Treatment challenges include delayed diagnosis, difficulty achieving hemostasis and durable remissions, and complications associated with the use of hemostatic and immunosuppressive therapy in a primarily older patient population.

Prevention of bleeding in hemophilia patients with high-titer inhibitors.

Inhibitor development is the most serious adverse event linked to the treatment of hemophilia, as it renders standard hemostatic therapy ineffective. Consequently, inhibitor patients are at increased risk for difficult-to-control bleeding and complications, particularly arthropathy and physical disability. Three randomized clinical trials in patients with inhibitors have demonstrated that compared with on-demand bypassing therapy, prophylaxis with a bypassing agent reduces joint and other types of bleeding and improves health-related quality of life. In hemophilia patients without inhibitors, the initiation of prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII or IX prior to the onset of recurrent hemarthroses can prevent the development of joint disease. Whether this is also true for bypassing agent prophylaxis remains to be determined.

How I use bypassing therapy for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors.

Inhibitor development poses a significant challenge in the management of hemophilia because once an inhibitor is present, bleeding episodes can no longer be treated with standard clotting factor replacement therapy. Consequently, patients with inhibitors are at increased risk for difficult-to-control bleeding and complications, particularly arthropathy and physical disability. Three clinical trials in patients with inhibitors have demonstrated that prophylaxis with a bypassing agent reduces joint and other types of bleeding and improves health-related quality of life compared with on-demand bypassing therapy. In hemophilia patients without inhibitors, the initiation of prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII or FIX prior to the onset of recurrent hemarthroses can prevent the development of joint disease. Whether this is also true for bypassing agent prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Use of Factor XIII (FXIII) concentrate in patients with congenital FXIII deficiency undergoing surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital Factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency have impaired fibrin stabilization and are at high risk for surgical bleeding. Data regarding the use of FXIII concentrates before and during surgery are lacking. The objective of this study was to report the use of plasma-derived FXIII concentrate (Corifact in the United States; Fibrogammin P in other countries) in patients with congenital FXIII deficiency undergoing surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: FXIII concentrate at preoperative doses ranging from 25 to 40 U/kg was administered to six patients with congenital FXIII deficiency undergoing major or minor surgeries. RESULTS: FXIII concentrate was administered immediately before surgery for five surgical cases; three of these patients achieved excellent hemostasis during and after surgery, while two had intraoperative bleeding. In one surgical case, a regular prophylactic dose of FXIII concentrate was administered to the patient 1 week before minor surgery. FXIII concentrate provided rapid replacement of FXIII activity. In all but one of the patients given a dose of FXIII designed to increase FXIII levels more than 50%, there was satisfactory intraoperative and postoperative hemostasis. One patient undergoing aortic valve replacement on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was the exception. Intraoperative bleeding in this patient was associated with lower-than-expected blood levels of FXIII. CONCLUSION: Preoperative plasma-derived FXIII concentrate allowed for sufficient hemostasis in most patients with FXIII deficiencies. Additional doses were necessary to achieve hemostasis in one patient who underwent a CPB procedure.

Identification and basic management of bleeding disorders in adults.

Adults with bleeding disorders may present to their family physician with minor bleeding symptoms or hematologic laboratory abnormalities discovered during evaluation for surgery or another purpose. Identifying the small proportion of adults who have an underlying bleeding disorder as the cause for such signs or symptoms may be challenging. In cases of asymptomatic hematologic laboratory abnormalities, the particular abnormality should narrow down the potentially affected hemostatic component(s), ideally streamlining subsequent investigation. In patients presenting with bleeding symptoms, a thorough history and physical examination are critical for first identifying bleeding as pathologic, then performing the appropriate diagnostic evaluation after excluding identifiable causes. Knowledge of the pathophysiologic processes contributing to impaired hemostasis in any given bleeding disorder ensures proper treatment and avoids therapies that are unnecessary or even contraindicated. Management is further determined by bleeding phenotype and, for invasive procedures, the anticipated risk for bleeding. Consultation with a hematologist may facilitate proper evaluation and treatment, particularly in adults with rare bleeding disorders or no identifiable cause for bleeding. This article reviews the diagnostic approach to hematologic laboratory abnormalities and abnormal bleeding in adults, as well as basic preventive care and hemostatic management of adults with bleeding disorders.

The literature on inhibitors: articles that influence my management of patients with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors.

High-titer inhibitors represent the greatest management challenge faced by clinicians who treat patients with hemophilia A, as bleeding episodes no longer respond to standard factor VIII replacement therapy. Over the last seven decades, major strides have been made in inhibitor treatment. This article focuses on the seminal clinical observations and studies that provided the foundation for these advances in hemophilia care.

Reduced production of IFN-γ and LT-α is associated with successful prednisone therapy in patients with acquired hemophilia A: a pilot study.

Glucocorticoids (GC) are a standard treatment for acquired hemophilia A (AH). Although the optimal treatment regimen and duration of GC's is unknown, measurement of sub-clinical immune responses may help direct therapeutic decision making. To study the helpfulness of this approach, three male patients diagnosed with AH were treated with prednisone. The therapy resulted in inhibitor elimination in two out of the three individuals. During the treatment, peripheral mononuclear cells were isolated at different time points and stimulated in vitro. The expression of IFN-γ and LT-α were monitored at both the protein and the mRNA levels. The amount of IFN-γ and LT-α were markedly reduced by the time of inhibitor disappearance in the patients responding to GC therapy but remained high in the non-responder until cyclophosphamide was added. This study suggests that the secretion level of IFN-γ and/or LT-α could be a predictive marker of prednisone responsiveness.

Current management of acquired factor VIII inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acquired hemophilia is a rare autoimmune disease that can result in life-threatening bleeding if not treated effectively. Appropriate management requires the urgent treatment of bleeding episodes and prompt institution of immunosuppressive therapy for long-term inhibitor eradication. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute bleeding episodes are generally best controlled with 'bypassing' hemostatic factor concentrates. Corticosteroid-based immunosuppressive therapy is effective in eliminating most acquired inhibitors; additional therapies, such as rituximab, are useful for patients who do not respond to standard immune-suppressing regimens. Up to 20% of patients relapse after immunomodulation and require additional treatment. A lack of controlled clinical data hampers the optimal selection of immunosuppressive therapy. SUMMARY: Patients with acquired hemophilia remain at risk for severe hemorrhage until their inhibitors are permanently eradicated. Concurrent with bleed management, immunomodulation should be initiated with corticosteroid-based therapy in order to eliminate the autoantibody and restore normal hemostasis.

Role of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversing warfarin anticoagulation: a review of the literature.

Over-anticoagulation is a common problem with warfarin therapy and can lead to major or life-threatening bleeding. The goal of urgent warfarin reversal is to elevate or replace vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. In the United States, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is considered the standard of care for warfarin reversal. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) offer an alternative to FFP for rapidly replacing deficient clotting factors and correcting the international normalized ratio (INR). However, few prospective clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of these concentrates relative to other treatment modalities. A review of the published literature over the last 30 years found that PCCs offer a rapid and specific method for replacing vitamin K-dependent clotting factors and restoring normal hemostasis in the context of over-coagulation. In those studies in which PCCs were compared with FFP, PCCs were found more effective in shortening the time to INR correction and were associated with a low risk of thrombotic adverse events. Evidence-based treatment guidelines are needed to optimize the use of PCCs for warfarin reversal.

Diabetes treatments have differential effects on nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of basal insulin, alone or with a sensitizer, or a combination of oral agents on nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We randomized 57 patients with T2DM to either (1) continuous subcutaneous basal Lispro insulin at a single rate using an insulin pump (basal insulin) or (2) basal insulin and oral pioglitazone 30 mg daily (basal insulin +Pio) or (3) a sulfonylurea and metformin (SU+M). We measured glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), 8-epi-prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2alpha), serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)], and lipoprotein profile at baseline and after 20 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased by >or=2% (P<.001) and to comparable levels (P=NS) in all groups. Despite improved glycemia, hsCRP did not change in any group, whereas plasma PAI-1 fell with basal insulin +Pio (P<.02) and SU+M (P<.01). PGF2alpha declined with basal insulin (P<.02) and SU+M (P<.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased only with basal insulin +Pio (18.2%, P<.05). Lp (a) increased with basal insulin therapy alone (P<.01). Data were pooled from all groups to determine the overall effect of glycemic control-there was a significant (P<.001) decline in HbA1c, PAI-1, and PGF2alpha and an increase in HDL-C (P<.001). There was no correlation between HbA1c reduction and changes in these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that excellent glycemic control per se does not impact nontraditional risk factors for CVD equally, but various diabetes medications have different effects on these risk factors. These findings may have implications for making appropriate therapeutic choices for patients with Type 2 diabetes, although larger studies with more appropriate treatment comparisons may be necessary.

Evidence of HIV exposure and transient seroreactivity in archived HIV-negative severe hemophiliac sera.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of hemophiliacs that were frequently exposed to blood clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) contaminated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are presently HIV seronegative. In this study, we sought to determine if some of these individuals were at any time transiently HIV seropositive. In the early to mid-1980s the majority of severe hemophilia patients were exposed to CFCs contaminated with HIV. Although many of these hemophiliacs became HIV-positive, a small percentage did not become infected. To determine if some of these individuals successfully resisted viral infection, we attempted to document the presence of transient HIV reactive antibodies in archived plasma samples (1980-1992) from currently HIV-negative severe hemophiliacs who had a high probability of repeated exposure to HIV contaminated CFC. Archived plasma samples were retrospectively tested using an FDA approved HIV-1Ab HIV-1/HIV-2 (rDNA) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a HIV-1 Western blot assay (Wb), neither of which were commercially available until the late 1980s, which was after many of these samples had been drawn. RESULTS: We found that during the high risk years of exposure to HIV contaminated CFC (1980-1987), low levels of plasma antibodies reactive with HIV proteins were detectable in 87% (13/15) of the haemophiliacs tested. None of these individuals are presently positive for HIV proviral DNA as assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that some severe hemophiliacs with heavy exposure to infectious HIV contaminated CFC had only transient low-level humoral immune responses reactive with HIV antigens yet remained HIV-negative and apparently uninfected. Our data supports the possibility of HIV exposure without sustained infection and the existence of HIV-natural resistance in some individuals.

Prevention of bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: emerging data and clinical direction.

In patients with hemophilia, the development of high-responding inhibitors to factor VIII prevents adequate replacement therapy and results in increased risk of serious bleeding episodes, poor control of joint bleeding, and progressive, debilitating joint disease. Immune tolerance therapy can eradicate inhibitors, but it is not uniformly successful. Emerging data suggest that prophylaxis using activated prothrombin complex concentrates may be effective and safe in reducing the incidence of joint bleeding during immune tolerance therapy and for patients in whom immune tolerance induction fails. However, only controlled clinical trials will ultimately demonstrate whether prophylaxis can prevent joint bleeding and damage, and improve quality of life in patients with inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma-derived and recombinant F IX concentrates in previously treated patients with moderate or severe hemophilia B.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia B is an X-linked bleeding disorder that affects approximately 1 in 25,000 males. Therapy for acute bleeding episodes consists of transfusions of plasma-derived (pd-F IX) or recombinant (r-F IX) concentrates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A double-blind, two-period crossover study was initiated to assess the pharmacokinetics of pd-F IX and r-F IX and to address patient-specific variables that might influence in vivo recovery. Study product was administered by a single bolus infusion (50 IU/kg) to 43 previously treated patients in the nonbleeding state, and F IX:C levels were measured over a period of 48 hours after infusion. RESULTS: The mean in vivo recovery in the pd-F IX group was 1.71 +/- 0.73 IU per dL per IU per kg compared with 0.86 +/- 0.31 IU per dL per IU per kg with r-F IX (p