The importance of anaesthesia in atrial fibrillation ablation: Comparing conscious sedation with general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia (GA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often preferred over conscious sedation (CS) to minimize patient discomfort and reduce the risk of map disruption from patient movement but may pose an additional risk to some patients with significant comorbidity or poor cardiac function. METHODS: We extracted data for 300 patients who underwent AF ablation between the years 2017 and 2019 and compared the outcomes of AF ablation with CS and GA. RESULTS: Compared to the GA group, patients were younger in the CS group (63 versus 66 years, p = 0.02), had less persistent AF (34% versus 46%, p = 0.048) and the left atrial dimension was smaller (41 versus 45 mm, p = 0.01). More patients had cryoballoon ablation (CBA) than radiofrequency (RFA) ablation in the CS than the GA group (88% CB with CS and 56% RF with GA, p < 0.01), frequency of ASA score 3-4 (higher anaesthetic risk) was less for CS than for GA (45% versus 75%, p < 0.01), and procedural duration was shorter for patients who had CS (110 versus 139 min, p < 0.001). Of the patients receiving CS, 127/182 (70%) were planned for same day discharge (SDD) and this occurred in 120 (94%) of those patients. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the groups (5.1% in GA and 6% in CS, p = 0.8). AF type was the only significant predictor of freedom from AF recurrence on multivariate analysis (HR 0.33, 0.13-0.82, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of CS compared with GA for AF ablation was associated with similar outcomes and complication rates.

Effect of Outcome Measures on the Apparent Efficacy of Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Why "Success" is an Inappropriate Term.

INTRODUCTION: Different endpoint criteria, different durations of follow-up and the completeness of follow-up can dramatically affect the perceived benefits of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS: We defined three endpoints for recurrence of AF post ablation in a cohort of 200 patients with symptomatic AF, refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). A 'Strict Endpoint' where patients were considered to have a recurrence with any symptomatic or documented recurrence for ≥30 seconds with no blanking period, and off their AADs, a 'Liberal Endpoint' where only documented recurrences after the blanking period, either on or off AADs were counted, and a 'Patient-defined Outcome endpoint' which was the same as the Liberal endpoint but allowed for up to two recurrences and one repeat ablation or DCCV during follow-up. We also surveyed 50 patients on the waiting list for an AF ablation and asked them key questions regarding what they would consider to be a successful result for them. RESULTS: Freedom from recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) at 5 years was 62% for the Strict Endpoint, 73% for the Liberal Endpoint, and 80% for the Patient-defined Outcome endpoint (p<0.001). Of the 50 patients surveyed awaiting AF ablation, 70% said they would still consider the procedure a success if it required one repeat ablation or one DCCV (p=0.004), and 76% would be accepting of one or two recurrences during follow-up (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, the majority of patients still considered AF ablation a successful treatment if they had up to two recurrences of AF, one repeat procedure or one DCCV. Furthermore, a 'Patient-defined' definition of success lead to significantly different results in this AF ablation cohort when compared to conventionally used/guideline directed measures of success.

Groin Haemostasis With a Purse String Suture for Patients Following Catheter Ablation Procedures (GITAR Study).

BACKGROUND: The most frequent complications from percutaneous electrophysiology procedures relate to vascular access. We sought to perform the first randomised controlled trial for femoral venous haemostasis utilising a simple and novel purse string suture (PSS) technique. METHODS: We randomised 200 consecutive patients who were referred for electrophysiology procedures at two different hospitals to either 10minutes of manual pressure or a PSS over the femoral vein and determined the incidence of vascular access site complications. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.8±12.1years and 138 (69%) were male. Bleeding requiring addition pressure or a FemStop (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) for complete haemostasis occurred in 17/99 (17%) patients in the PSS arm and 19/101 (19%) patients in the manual pressure arm (p=0.72). There were no cases of haematoma prolonging hospital stay, arterio-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysm or retroperitoneal bleeding. The mean duration to achieve haemostasis was 45seconds in the PSS arm and 10minutes 44seconds in the manual pressure arm (p<0.001). Pain/discomfort associated with haemostasis occurred in 15/99 (15%) patients in the PSS arm and in 29/101 (29%) patients receiving manual pressure (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised trial we demonstrate that an easy to perform PSS is as effective at achieving haemostasis as 10minutes of manual pressure for catheter ablation procedures. The PSS is considerably faster to perform and is more comfortable for patients than manual pressure.