Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurooncol Adv ; 4(1): vdac022, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35386569

RESUMO

Background: Brain metastasis quantity may be a negative prognostic factor for patients requiring resection of at least one lesion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019 at our institution, and examined outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and rates of local failure (LF). Patients were grouped according to the number of metastases at the time of surgery (single vs multiple). Results: We identified 130 patients who underwent surgical resection as the initial treatment modality. At the time of surgery, 87 patients had only one lesion (control) and 43 had multiple (>1). Two-year OS for the entire cohort was 46%, with equal rates in both the multiple metastases group and the control group (P = .335). 2-year PFS was 27%; 21% in the multiple metastases group and 31% in the control group (P = .766). The rate of LF at 2 years was 32%, with equal rates in both the multiple lesion group and control group (P = .889). On univariate analysis, multiplicity was not significantly correlated to OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.51-1.26, P = .336), PFS (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.71-1.59, P = .766) or LF (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.97, P = .840). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative tumor volume of the resected lesion to be the single correlate for OS (P = .0032) and PFS (P = .0081). Conclusions: Having more than one metastasis does not negatively impact outcomes in patients treated with surgery. In carefully selected patients, especially those with large tumors, surgery should be considered regardless of the total number of lesions.

2.
J Neurooncol ; 157(1): 157-163, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is the most common brain tumor in adults. It is the standard of care at most North American centers to obtain an early postoperative imaging after their resection. However, the necessity of this practice in the absence of a new postoperative deficit remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our surgical cohort of patients who underwent resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019. We collected demographic data and reviewed results of routine postoperative CT scans and neurological morbidities to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of an early postoperative scan. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the topic. RESULTS: Our review included 130 patients, all of whom underwent gross total resection of one or more brain metastases. On postoperative CT, none had unexpected findings such as cavity hematoma or new ischemia; no changes in management resulted from postoperative imaging. One patient required a higher dose of dexamethasone on postoperative day 4 for delayed hemiparesis and aphasia due to cerebral edema. Three additional patients underwent a wound washout for delayed infection during a subsequent admission. Our systematic review identified three additional studies; in a combined cohort of 450 patients (including our own), no patients had clinically actionable findings on routine postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Following resection of brain metastases, a routine postoperative CT scan has low diagnostic yield and did not change patient management in any cases examined in this work.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Craniotomia , Humanos , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA