Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide in Children and Elderly: An Analysis of 132,850 Patients From 4 Observational Studies and Pharmacovigilance Covering >288 Million Administrations.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iopromide in children and elderly patients in comparison to adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four observational studies were pooled and analyzed (analysis I). In addition, spontaneous reports from 1985 to 2020 from the pharmacovigilance database were evaluated (analysis II). All patients received iopromide for angiographic procedures or contrast-enhanced computed tomography in various indications. In analysis I, a nested case-control analysis, including a multivariable logistic regression model, based on pooled observational study data, was performed. Cases were defined as patients with a typical and unequivocal HSR; controls were patients without any recorded reaction. In analysis II, all spontaneous reports on HSRs after iopromide administration recorded in the pharmacovigilance database were descriptively analyzed. Exposure estimates on the size of the exposed age groups were derived from sales data and data from market research. The primary target variable was the risk of HSR to iopromide in children (<18 years) and elderly patients (≥65 years) compared with adults (≥18 to <65 years). RESULTS: In analysis I, a total of 132,850 patients were included (2978 children, 43,209 elderly, and 86,663 adults). Hypersensitivity reactions were significantly less frequent in children (0.47%) and elderly (0.38%) compared with adults (0.74%). The adjusted odds ratio (vs adults) for children was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.98; P < 0.043), and that for the elderly was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.61; P < 0.001), indicating a lower risk for both subpopulations as compared with adults. In analysis II, of the overall >288 million iopromide administrations, 5.87, 114.18, and 167.97 million administrations were administered to children, elderly, and adults, respectively. The reporting rate for HSRs in children (0.0114%) and elderly (0.0071%) was significantly lower as compared with adults (0.0143%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide were significantly less frequent in children and elderly compared with adults.

Developments in X-Ray Contrast Media and the Potential Impact on Computed Tomography.

Over the past 120 years, continuous developments in medical imaging has improved diagnosis and treatment for many diseases and has thereby improved treatment outcome and quality of life of many patients. The number of computed tomography (CT) examinations is today increasing by 4% per year worldwide, for a total of approximately 300 million CT scans per year. About 40% of CT scans are contrast enhanced. Intravenous iodinated contrast media are commonly used for contrast enhancement in CT scans to evaluate diseases and determine treatment response. The current gold standards for intravenous x-ray contrast media in CT or interventional angiography are iodinated low- and iso-osmolar compounds such as iopromide, iohexol, or iodixanol. Both classes have similar and favorable efficacy and safety profiles. Although iodine is biologically inert, iodinated contrast media can cause adverse reactions. In the future, one possibility would be to develop iodine-free contrast media that are better suited to higher x-ray tube voltage ranges, allowing greater flexibility for scanning protocols and thus leading to techniques that can provide equivalent diagnostic value at lower doses of radiation. Iodine-free contrast media would in addition provide an alternative to the market standard that could offer benefits for patients with known reactions to low-osmolality contrast media or thyroid disorders. The development of a new contrast medium, however, needs to be put in context with all upcoming technological advances in x-ray and CT. New detector technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms will in the future also improve the CT image reconstruction enabling the reduction of contrast media and radiation doses.

Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide After Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Administration: A Nested Case-Control Analysis of 133,331 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide after intra-arterial (IA) administration and intravenous (IV) administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four observational studies were pooled. Almost half of the study population (48.1%) was from Europe, and one quarter each from China (27.6%) and other Asia countries (24.1%). All patients received iopromide either intra-arterially or intravenously for angiographic procedures (mostly cardio-angiography) or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A nested case-control analysis, including a multivariable logistic regression model, was performed. Cases were defined by patients with a typical and unequivocal hypersensitivity (assumed non-IgE-mediated) reaction; controls were patients without any recorded reaction. The primary target variable is the odds ratio of having a hypersensitivity reaction after IA versus IV administration. RESULTS: A total of 133,331 patients met the inclusion criteria, 105,460 and 27,871 patients received iopromide IV or IA, respectively. Hypersensitivity reactions were recorded for 822 patients, and 132,509 patients served as controls.Major risk factors for hypersensitivity reactions were method of injection (IV vs IA), age (18 to <50 years vs ≥65 years), history of allergy or previous contrast media reaction (all P < 0.001), and asthma (P = 0.005).A total of 766 patients (0.7%) and 56 patients (0.2%) were recorded with hypersensitivity reactions after IV or IA administration, respectively (P < 0.0001).Adjusted odds ratio (IA vs IV) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.32) for all countries together: for China only, 0.22 (0.11-0.44); for all countries without China, 0.36 (0.25-0.53).Most frequent reactions were erythema/urticaria/rash, pruritus, and cough/sneezing. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide were significantly less frequently recorded after IA administrations. This could be related to the delayed and diluted arrival of iopromide to the lungs.

Safety and tolerability of iopromide intravascular use: a pooled analysis of three non-interventional studies in 132,012 patients.

BACKGROUND: Determining the safety of contrast agents is challenging. In the absence of large controlled clinical trials, non-interventional (post-marketing surveillance) studies provide an opportunity to clearly investigate the safety profile of contrast agents. PURPOSE: To assess the safety profile of iopromide in contrast-enhanced X-ray in clinical practice, using pooled data from three non-interventional studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All studies were international, multicenter, non-interventional studies examining iopromide tolerability in clinical practice. Patients received iopromide (iodine concentrations of 300 mg/mL or 370 mg/mL) via intravenous or intra-arterial administration according to the diagnostic indication and in compliance with the local package insert. RESULTS: In total, 132,012 patients (37 countries, >1600 centers) were included. Overall, 3823 patients (2.49%) reported an adverse drug reaction (ADR) and 1983 patients (1.50%) reported an ADR without tolerance indicators (injection site warmth, feeling hot or injection site pain, of mild intensity only). This is a similar rate to other low osmolar contrast media. In most patients, ADRs were mild (n = 2632; 1.99% of all patients) and did not require any action (n = 2799; 2.12% of all patients). ADRs were more common among women (n = 1680 [2.8%]) than men (n = 1586 [2.2%]) and among younger patients (<18 years: n = 98 [3.2%]) than older patients (18-49 years: n = 1261 [3.5%]; 50-69 years: n = 1224 [2.2%]; ≥70 years: n = 362 [1.5%]). The most common ADRs were injection site warmth/feeling hot, nausea/vomiting, and dysguesia. Forty-five serious ADRs were reported in 19 patients. ADRs were more common in at-risk patients (5.00%) than in the overall population. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis confirms the well-established good safety profile of iopromide in clinical practice in Asian and European countries and the USA.

The effect of iodinated contrast agent properties on renal kinetics and oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed renal kinetics and renal oxygenation in rats after administration of several classes and formulations of contrast agents (CAs) with a focus on the influence of osmolality and substance-specific properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the renal kinetics of a nonionic, dimeric CA (iodixanol) formulated in 3 different osmolalities (hypo-osmolar, iso-osmolar, low-osmolar) and compared it to nonionic, low-osmolar (iopromide), and ionic, low-osmolar CAs (ioxaglate) using computed tomography for a period of 24 hours. The CAs were administered intravenously at a dosage of 4 g iodine/kg body weight. The average exposure was calculated, and urine viscosities were compared before the injection and during the time intervals of 0 to 60 minutes and 60 to 120 minutes after the injection. Renal oxygenation levels of the renal cortex and medulla were estimated using blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging. We used histologic methods to systematically analyze the gravity of vacuole formation based on the physicochemical and substance-specific properties of each CA. RESULTS: Iso-osmolar and hypo-osmolar iodixanol and, to a lesser extent, iodixanol/mannitol accumulated rapidly in the kidneys during the first 5 minutes of the injection and remained higher 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours after the injection compared with iopromide and ioxaglate, which showed fast iodine excretion. Similarly, lower renal blood oxygen levels were estimated for all iodixanol formulations as compared with ioxaglate and iopromide. The incidence of vacuole formation was high for all iodixanol formulations and for ioxaglate (6 of 6 rats) and low for iopromide (1 of 6 rats). Moderate severity of vacuoles was determined for the iodixanol solutions; minimal severity, for ioxaglate and iopromide. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a superior profile for the low-osmolar CAs compared with the iso-osmolar CAs regarding rapid excretion, short-term renal exposure, and renal oxygenation.

The osmolality of nonionic, iodinated contrast agents as an important factor for renal safety.

OBJECTIVE: Nonionic iodinated contrast agents (CAs) can be divided into monomeric, low-osmolar, and dimeric, iso-osmolar classes. In clinical practice, renal tolerance of CAs is a concern, especially in patients with impaired renal function. With regard to renal safety, we wanted to evaluate the role of osmolality and viscosity in renal tolerance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We generated a formulation (iodixanol/mannitol) consisting of the dimeric iodixanol with an osmolality of the monomeric iopromide. Male Han-Wistar rats were intravenously injected with low-osmolar iopromide 300, iso-osmolar iodixanol 320, and iodixanol/mannitol. Saline and diatrizoate were used as controls. A total number of 227 rats were used in the following experiments. We compared the impact of osmolality on renal iodine retention using computed tomography 2 and 24 hours postinjection (p.i.). The animals were killed 2, 24, and 72 hours after injection, and the kidneys were excised for further investigations. Changes in renal cell proliferation were analyzed by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation 48 hours p.i. as a degree of tissue regeneration after induced injury. To specify potential renal injury, we quantified the expression of acute kidney injury (AKI) markers (kidney injury marker-1 [KIM-1], neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1]) by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, the kidneys were analyzed histologically, including immunofluorescence analysis. RESULTS: After intravenous application of the CAs into Han-Wistar rats, renal iodine concentration was increased (3-fold) for iodixanol 2 hours p.i. and iodine retention was detected to be prolonged 24 hours p.i. compared with iopromide injection (iodixanol, 520 ± 50 Hounsfield Units [HU] vs iopromide, 42 ± 5 HU). The higher iodine concentration 2 hours p.i. upon iodixanol injection was reduced almost to the level of iopromide when injecting iodixanol/mannitol (iopromide: 289 ± 68 HU vs iodixanol/mannitol: 343 ± 68 HU). In addition, iodixanol application induced increased renal cell proliferation (2.7-fold vs saline), indicating renal injury, which was significantly lower in iopromide-treated animals (1.6-fold vs saline). More detailed analysis of markers for AKI revealed that iodixanol significantly induced the expression of PAI-1 (7.7-fold at 2 hours) as well as KIM-1 (2.1-fold) and NGAL (3.2-fold) at 2 and 24 hours when compared with saline treatment. In contrast, the expression of markers for AKI was low after iopromide (1.4-fold NGAL, 1.7-fold PAI-1, KIM-1 not significant) and iodixanol/mannitol (1.6-fold NGAL, 2.6-fold PAI-1, KIM-1 not significant) injection. CONCLUSION: The present results clearly show that prolonged iodine retention and the enhanced expression of kidney injury markers are caused mainly by the explicitly higher urine viscosity induced by iodixanol. We conclude that the osmolality of low-osmolar CAs such as iopromide induces a positive diuretic effect that is responsible for rapid iodine clearance and prevents increased expression of acute injury markers in the kidney.

Impact of iso- and low-osmolar iodinated contrast agents on BOLD and diffusion MRI in swine kidneys.

PURPOSE: To assess whether functional MR imaging using blood-oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging demonstrate changes in renal oxygenation and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a pig model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After administration of either 1-g iodine/kg body weight low-osmolar iopromide or iso-osmolar iodixanol, 8 mini pigs underwent a series of repeated BOLD measurements (TR/TE 106/5.9-48.7 ms, slice thickness 4 mm) and diffusion-weighted imaging measurements (TR/TE 3900/79 ms, slice thickness 4 mm) for 1 hour at 1.5 T. In this intraindividual cross over study, the second contrast agent injection with the other iodinated contrast agent was performed at least 24 hours after the initial contrast agent injection. BOLD-based R2* values as indirect measures of the renal oxygenation were determined for the cortex, the inner medulla, and the outer medulla. ADC values were measured for the cortex and the whole kidney. RESULTS: For both contrast agents, a drop in R2* was found in the cortex, which normalized after 55 minutes. In the outer medulla and particularly in the inner medulla, a decreased initial drop of R2* was encountered with both contrast agents, with a slow increase toward the baseline R2*. In the inner medulla, elevated R2* values were found with the iso-osmolar contrast agent only. The ADC revealed an initial increase, which slowly decayed over the measurement period. This finding was more pronounced for the cortex compared with the whole-kidney analysis. CONCLUSION: Functional MR imaging of the kidneys demonstrates increased R2* in the inner medulla only after the administration of the iodixanol potentially indicating hypoxia and thus a pathomechanism of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Development of a physiologically based computational kidney model to describe the renal excretion of hydrophilic agents in rats.

A physiologically based kidney model was developed to analyze the renal excretion and kidney exposure of hydrophilic agents, in particular contrast media, in rats. In order to study the influence of osmolality and viscosity changes, the model mechanistically represents urine concentration by water reabsorption in different segments of kidney tubules and viscosity dependent tubular fluid flow. The model was established using experimental data on the physiological steady state without administration of any contrast media or drugs. These data included the sodium and urea concentration gradient along the cortico-medullary axis, water reabsorption, urine flow, and sodium as well as urea urine concentrations for a normal hydration state. The model was evaluated by predicting the effects of mannitol and contrast media administration and comparing to experimental data on cortico-medullary concentration gradients, urine flow, urine viscosity, hydrostatic tubular pressures and single nephron glomerular filtration rate. Finally the model was used to analyze and compare typical examples of ionic and non-ionic monomeric as well as non-ionic dimeric contrast media with respect to their osmolality and viscosity. With the computational kidney model, urine flow depended mainly on osmolality, while osmolality and viscosity were important determinants for tubular hydrostatic pressure and kidney exposure. The low diuretic effect of dimeric contrast media in combination with their high intrinsic viscosity resulted in a high viscosity within the tubular fluid. In comparison to monomeric contrast media, this led to a higher increase in tubular pressure, to a reduction in glomerular filtration rate and tubular flow and to an increase in kidney exposure. The presented kidney model can be implemented into whole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models and extended in order to simulate the renal excretion of lipophilic drugs which may also undergo active secretion and reabsorption.

Safety and diagnostic image quality of iopromide: results of a large non-interventional observational study of European and Asian patients (IMAGE).

BACKGROUND: Iodine-based contrast agents such as iopromide play a central role in improving the diagnostic quality of imaging modalities using ionizing radiation. PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and diagnostic image quality of iopromide in the routine clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, prospective, single-arm, non-interventional study (NIS). The study was performed in out- and inpatients in 738 study centers in 21 countries in Europe and Asia. Iopromide was administered in a routine manner, in compliance with the local package insert. The use of premedication was at the discretion of the attending physician. Case report forms for 44,835 patients were analyzed (57.4% men). The median age of the patients was 55 years. RESULTS: For the vast majority of patients (94.8%), the contrast quality was rated as 'good' (55.8%) or 'excellent' (39.0%). For 1265 (2.8%) patients, there were reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) excluding tolerance indicators (TIs) (i.e. injection site warmth, feeling hot, or injection site pain of mild intensity). At least one ADR including TIs was reported in 2415 (5.4%) patients. There were 11 (0.02%) patients with serious ADRs, and no drug-related deaths. Events of injection site warmth and/or feeling hot were reported by 3.5%, nausea and/or vomiting by 0.96%, and urticaria, erythema, and/or rash by 0.54% of patients. Patients at risk for an acute idiosyncratic reaction (i.e. patients with a history of bronchial asthma, allergies, and/or contrast media reaction) had a higher incidence of ADRs compared with the overall study population. At-risk patients who did not receive premedication reported distinctly more ADRs compared with those who received premedication (12.0% versus 5.9%). CONCLUSION: Iopromide was shown to be a well-tolerated contrast agent whose usage resulted in high image quality. No unknown ADRs were observed. Premedication with antiallergy drugs should be considered in at-risk patients.

Changes of renal water diffusion coefficient after application of iodinated contrast agents: effect of viscosity.

OBJECTIVE: X-ray contrast agents (CA) possess specific physicochemical properties and are excreted renally by glomerular filtration. Thereby, they may affect the diffusion of water molecules within the kidney. The aim of our preclinical study was to investigate potential changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the kidney after administration of monomeric, low-osmolar, and dimeric, iso-osmolar CA by using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, the relationship between CA viscosity and the ADC of water was assessed by phantom measurements. Subsequently, Han Wistar rats (8 per group) received an intravenous injection of iso-osmolar CA (iodixanol) or low-osmolar CA (iopromide) at a dosage of 4 gI/kg body weight. The control group received saline (0.9% NaCl) at the same volume. The renal ADC was dynamically monitored up to 40 minutes postinjection (p.i.) by DWI using a 1.5-T clinical MR unit. After DWI, the animals were killed and the kidneys were removed for iodine measurements by x-ray fluorescence analysis. RESULTS: The in vitro measurements yielded an inverse relationship between increasing viscosity and decreasing water diffusion. In vivo, a slight increase in ADC was observed immediately after administration of the low-osmolar iopromide (ΔADC=80±78 µm²/s) and saline (ΔADC=89±53 µm²/s), which normalized to the baseline level at 40 minutes p.i. In contrast, a strong decrease in ADC was observed after administration of the iso-osmolar iodixanol. This was most prominent 12 minutes p.i. (ΔADC=-555±194 µm²/s) and persisted throughout the investigation. Concomitantly, the kidney iodine concentration 50 minutes p.i. was significantly higher after iodixanol (58.6±5.3 mgI/g kidney) compared with iopromide injection (18.4±4.5 mgI/g kidney). CONCLUSION: A significant difference in the renal ADC was observed between the low-osmolar CA/saline and the iso-osmolar CA. The in vitro measurements suggest that the substantial decrease in ADC observed after administration of the iso-osmolar CA is based on the high viscosity of the agent during renal passage. This, in turn, may explain the delayed iodine retention after administration of iso-osmolar CA and demonstrates the importance of the physicochemical properties of CA during their renal elimination.

Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents during renal excretion.

OBJECTIVE: Modern iodinated non-ionic contrast agents (CAs) can be classified based on their molecular structure into monomeric and dimeric CAs and have at comparable iodine concentrations a different viscosity and osmolality. During their renal excretion, CAs are concentrated in the renal tubuli which might enhance the viscosity difference between monomeric and dimeric CAs. The viscosity of a CA might have an underestimated importance for renal safety, as suggested by recent publications. In this study, we investigated the viscosities of CAs at the concentrations expected to be present in renal tubules. This concentration process was simulated in vitro using dialysis. Furthermore, we investigated urine viscosity and urine flow in rodents after administration of several non-ionic monomeric and dimeric CAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To estimate the viscosity of the CAs in vivo, we performed an in vitro dialysis of monomeric and dimeric CAs at various physiological osmolalities of the renal tubulus (290, 400, 500, 700 and 1000 mOsm/kg H2O). Following the dialysis, the iodine concentrations and the viscosities of the CAs were determined. Furthermore, to investigate the concentration process in vivo, we measured the urine viscosity and the urine flow in Han Wister rats after the administration of Iopromide, Iohexol, Ioversol, Iomeprol, Iodixanol, and Iosimenol at comparable iodine concentrations. As a control, saline was injected at the same volume. RESULTS: In vitro dialysis of the dimeric CA increased the iodine concentration and strongly increased the viscosity at all tested osmolalities. In contrast, for the monomeric agents an increase in concentration and viscosity was observed only at 700 as well 1000 mOsm/kg H2O but to a lesser extent. In summary, dialysis strongly enhanced the viscosity differences between the non-ionic monomeric and dimeric CAs. The administration of dimeric CAs leads to a strong increase in urine viscosity; this was not observed for the monomeric CAs. In contrast, a significantly higher urine flow was measured after the administration of the monomeric CAs as compared to the dimeric CAs. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the viscosity differences between monomeric and dimeric CAs are strongly enhanced due to a concentration process of the CAs upon increasing osmolalities, a process which is likely to take place in a similar manner in the tubular system. This result suggests that the viscosity of the dimeric agents increases dramatically in vivo and gives a plausible explanation for measured enhancement of urine viscosity upon dimeric CA administration. On the other hand, the higher osmolality of the monomeric agents causes an osmodiuresis, indicated by a higher urine flow, which leads to a faster elimination of the CAs from the kidney.

The impact of the viscosity and osmolality of iodine contrast agents on renal elimination.

OBJECTIVE: The iodinated contrast agents (CAs) that are currently used in radiographic procedures possess special physicochemical properties and a high safety profile; however, according to a large retrospective study (Swedish registry), the viscosity of CAs may have an underestimated impact on renal failure. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible consequences of CA viscosity differences, such as CA retention in the kidney. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five Göttingen minipigs were each intravenously injected in a crossover setting at intervals of at least 7 days with monomeric (Iopromide) and dimeric (Iodixanol) CAs at 2 doses (1 and 2 g iodine/kg bodyweight), and the retention of the CA in the kidneys was determined during the first 6 hours postinjection using a 64-slice computed tomography scanner. Additionally we performed in vitro dialysis of the monomeric and dimeric CAs across the various physiological osmolalities of the renal tubulus (300, 600, 800, and 1200 mOsm/kg H(2)O) to estimate CA viscosity in vivo. Following the dialyzes, iodine concentrations and CA viscosities were determined. RESULTS: A different exposure of the kidneys to iodine and a different elimination kinetics from the kidneys was observed after the administration of monomeric and dimeric CAs. The monomeric agent was observed to clear from the kidney immediately after administration. In contrast, after administration of the dimeric CA an increase in iodine concentration in the kidney was observed up to 180 minutes postinjection, before the CA was observed to begin clearing; however, no difference was observed between the plasma half-lives of the 2 investigated CAs. In vitro dialysis of the dimeric CA increased iodine concentrations and strongly increased viscosity at all of the tested osmolalities. In contrast, the monomeric agent only demonstrated increases in iodine concentration and viscosity at 800 and 1200 mOsm/kg, and these changes were smaller than those observed for the dimeric CA. In summary, dialysis strongly enhanced the viscosity differences between the 2 investigated CAs. CONCLUSION: The viscosity differences between the investigated monomeric and dimeric CAs are strongly enhanced by concentration processes, such as the process taking place in the tubular system. These viscosity differences may be the cause of the prolonged retention and the different elimination kinetics from the kidney observed after application of the dimeric CA relative to the monomeric CA.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents and NSF: evidence from animal experience.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a potentially severe systemic disease typically characterized by fibrosis of the skin and connective tissues. The etiology of NSF is still unknown but is likely to be multifactorial. Specific triggers under scientific evaluation have included surgery and/or the occurrence of thrombosis or other vascular injury, proinflammatory state, the administration of high doses of erythropoietin, and more recently the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). The aim of this review is to summarize knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of NSF and the potential role of GBCAs in its pathology, with a focus on animal experiments. The potential role of complex stability of GCBAs will be highlighted by results from several in vitro and in vivo experiments in rodent models of NSF. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1268-1276. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Evaluating the role of zinc in the occurrence of fibrosis of the skin: a preclinical study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the possible role of Zn as a trigger for NSF we were using a previously established preclinical model. The depletion of endogenous Zinc ions (Zn) caused by the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) has been suggested as a possible pathomechanism for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the Zn supplementation study, rats were injected with Gadodiamide, Omniscan, and Magnevist with or without Zn supplementation. In the Zn depletion study, animals were kept on a Zn-deficient diet or a special control diet and received injections of Omniscan, OptiMARK, Magnevist, Gadovist, and Gd-EDTA. Gd, Zn, and Cu concentrations in tissue were measured and histology of the skin was performed. RESULTS: As seen in earlier studies, a difference in Gd concentration in the skin was observed following treatment with the different GBCAs. High Gd concentration in the skin correlated with the occurrence of NSF-like skin lesions. We observed no differences in the occurrence of skin lesions between the Zn supplementation and the Zn-deficient groups compared to their respective control groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant effect of Zn on the initiation of NSF-like skin lesions. The results further support data from previous studies highlighting the importance of complex stability of the investigated GBCAs.

Dicentric chromosomes and gamma-H2AX foci formation in lymphocytes of human blood samples exposed to a CT scanner: a direct comparison of dose response relationships.

Experiments using the induction of dicentric chromosomes (dicentrics) as well as the gamma-H2AX foci formation in lymphocytes of blood samples from a healthy donor were performed to directly evaluate the radiation sensitivity of both biological endpoints. For computed tomography scans at dose levels from 0.025 to 1 Gy, a linear-quadratic dose-response relationship for dicentrics and a linear dose-response relationship for gamma-H2AX foci were obtained. The coefficients of the dose-response relationship for dicentrics are alpha = (3.76 +/- 0.29) x 10(-2) Gy(-1) and beta = (5.54 +/- 0.45) x 10(-2) Gy(-2), the linear coefficient for gamma-H2AX foci is (7.38 +/- 0.11) Gy(-1). The findings indicate that scoring of dicentrics as well as microscopic analysis of gamma-H2AX foci are sensitive methods to quantify a radiation-induced biological damage at low doses. However, since gamma-H2AX foci can be partially repaired within a few hours, biological damages present for days or even months, which constitute the clinically relevant endpoints, can only be quantified reliably by scoring of chromosome aberrations. Thus currently the quantification of dicentrics or reciprocal translocations remains the recommended method for estimating the effect of exposures to low dose levels of radiation ('biological dosimetry'). However, owing to the high radiation sensitivity of the gamma-H2AX foci assay observed in the present study, further investigations on the effectiveness of low-linear energy transfer radiation qualities in producing gamma-H2AX foci in lymphocytes from healthy donors should be performed.

Impact of renal impairment on long-term retention of gadolinium in the rodent skin following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

OBJECTIVE: Several publications have suggested a possible association between Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, a rare but serious disease. To date, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been observed only in patients with severe renal insufficiency.The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a prolonged circulation time of GBCAs caused by reduced renal clearance on the long-term retention of Gd in the skin of rats after administration of different GBCAs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Renally impaired Han Wistar Rats (5/6-nephrectomized rats) were injected with Omniscan, OptiMARK, Magnevist, or Gadovist. The contrast agents were administered once daily for 5 consecutive days into the tail vein at a dose of 2.5 mmol Gd/kg b.w. Skin biopsies were taken at various time points, and the gadolinium (Gd) concentration was determined by inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) over an observation period of 168 days post injection (p.i.). RESULTS: Differences in the skin Gd concentrations were observed between the 4 investigated GBCAs. For the nonionic linear compounds, Omniscan and OptiMARK, high Gd concentrations were maintained in the skin over the observation period of up to 168 days p.i. For the ionic linear compound, Magnevist, comparatively lower Gd retention in the skin was observed over time. For the macrocyclic compound, Gadovist, the Gd values in the skin were even lower, and significantly lower than Gd values in the skin in Omniscan and OptiMARK treated animals. CONCLUSION: The results of this preclinical study support the use of 5/6-nephrectomized rats as a model for prolonged circulation time of GBCAs as seen in patients with severe renal impairment. Surgically induced severe renal impairment resulted in delayed clearance of the administered GBCAs in the study animals. The highest amount of Gd was observed in the skin after treatment with the nonionic linear GBCAs, whereas the lowest Gd values were observed after treatment with the macrocyclic agent. This suggests that the difference in the Gd values observed in rat skin tissue after treatment with the different GBCAs is caused of a different propensity of the different GBCAs to release Gd in vivo. However, the analytical method used does not distinguish between chelated and unchelated Gd.

Long-term retention of gadolinium in the skin of rodents following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Several publications suggest a potential association between the administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and the onset of a rare but serious disease, Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF). The aim of this study was to determine the elimination time-course of Gadolinium (Gd) from skin tissue after application of GBCAs in rats. Seven different marketed GBCAs were injected on five consecutive days at a dose of 2.5 mmol/kg bodyweight into the tail vein of Han-Wistar rats and the Gd concentrations were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) in skin biopsies taken at various time-points up to a year after the last injection. Most of the administered Gd was eliminated from the skin within a time-period of about 2 months. However, the repeated administration of linear GBCAs resulted in long-term retention of a small portion of the administered Gd in the skin tissue of rats, with substantially higher values observed in animals treated with non-ionic linear agents than in those that received ionic linear GBCAs. Following treatment with macrocyclic GBCAs, Gd values in the skin were in the same range as observed in the controls from day 24 post-injection onwards. In summary, we observed a correlation between the complex stability of GBCAs and the amount of residual Gd in the skin up to a year after application of GBCAs.

Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.

AIM: To evaluate for the first time in an animal model the possibility of absolute regional quantification of renal medullary and cortical perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using a blood pool contrast agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 adult female pigs (age, 16-22 weeks; body weight, 45-65 kg; no dietary restrictions) were investigated by DCE-MRI. Absolute renal blood flow (RBF) measured by an ultrasound transit time flow probe around the renal vein was used as the standard of reference. An inflatable stainless cuff placed around the renal artery near its origin from the abdominal aorta was used to reduce RBF to 60%, 40%, and 20% of the baseline flow. The last measurement was performed with the cuff fully reopened. Absolute RBF values during these 4 perfusion states were compared with the results of DCE-MRI performed on a 1.5-T scanner with an 8-channel phased-array surface coil. All scans were acquired in breath-hold technique in the coronal plane using a field of view of 460 mm.Each dynamic scan commenced with a set of five 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequences with different flip angles (alpha = 2 degrees, 5 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees): TE, 0.88 milliseconds; TR, 2.65 milliseconds; slice thickness, 8.8 mm for 4 slices; acquisition matrix, 128 x 128; and acquisitions, 4. These data served to calculate 3D intrinsic longitudinal relaxation rate maps (R10) and magnetization (M0). Immediately after these images, the dynamic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo images were acquired with the same parameters and a constant alpha = 30 degrees, half Fourier, 1 acquisition, 64 frames, a time interval of 1.65 seconds between each frame, and a total duration of 105.6. Three milliliters of an albumin-binding blood pool contrast agent (0.25 mmol/mL gadofosveset trisodium, Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) was injected at a rate of 3 mL/s. Perfusion was calculated using the arterial input function from the aorta, which was extracted from the dynamic relaxation rate change maps and perfusion images were calculated on a voxel-by-voxel basis using a singular value decomposition. RESULTS: In 11 pigs, 4 different perfusion states were investigated sequentially. The reduced kidney perfusion measured by ultrasound highly correlated with total renal blood flow determined by DCE-MRI, P < 0.001. The correlation coefficient between both measurements was 0.843. Regional cortical and medullary renal flow was also highly correlated (r = 0.77/0.78, P < 0.001) with the degree of flow reduction. Perfusion values smaller than 50 mL/min/100 cm were overestimated by MRI, high perfusion values slightly underestimated. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI using a blood pool contrast agent allows absolute quantification of total kidney perfusion as well as separate determination of cortical and medullary flow. The results show that our technique has sufficient accuracy and reproducibility to be transferred to the clinical setting.

Retention of iodine and expression of biomarkers for renal damage in the kidney after application of iodinated contrast media in rats.

OBJECTIVE: Commercially available iodinated contrast media (CM) show significantly different physico-chemical properties. The relevance of the viscosity of CM may be underestimated as a contributing factor for clinically relevant renal failure as suggested by a large registry data analysis (Swedish registry study). The objective of this preclinical study is to assess differences of a low and high-viscous CM regarding their retention time in the kidney. Furthermore, we investigated the expression of marker genes for renal damage and hypoxia to evaluate a potential renal damage and hypoxia after application of iodinated CM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After application of Iopromide 300 and Iodixanol 320 CM, the iodine concentration over time was determined using computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in healthy Han Wistar and renally impaired ZSF1 rats. The latter served as a model for age and diabetes-related renal impairment. X-ray attenuation (Hounsfield units) in the renal cortex was analyzed by 2 independent blinded readers. Furthermore, the expression of kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1/Havcr1) and heme oxygenase I (HO-1/HMOX1) was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain-reaction. RESULTS: Computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in the kidneys of animals treated with Iodixanol revealed significantly prolonged retention of iodine in the kidney as compared with animals treated with Iopromide. This difference was even more pronounced in renally impaired rats. Twenty-four hours after Iodixanol treatment, significantly increased levels of Kim-1/Havcr1 and HO-1/HMOX1 transcript levels were observed compared with the saline and Iopromide treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged retention of contrast media in the kidney was observed after administration of dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320). One possible explanation for this effect could be the high viscosity of the dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320) and the lack of dilution by osmotic diuresis. This prolonged exposure is possibly associated with higher renal toxicity as indicated by the elevated expression of biomarkers for hypoxia and renal injury.