Pregnancy Outcomes in Living Kidney Donors: Protocol of a Population-Based Cohort Study in Three Canadian Provinces.

Background: A substantial proportion of living kidney donors are women of childbearing age. Some prior studies report a higher risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia in living kidney donors compared with nondonors. Further research is needed to better quantify the risk of adverse maternal, fetal/infant, and neonatal outcomes attributable to living kidney donation. Objective: To determine the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia, and other maternal and fetal/infant outcomes in living kidney donors compared with a matched group of nondonors of similar baseline health. Design and Setting: Protocol for a population-based, matched cohort study using Canadian administrative health care databases. The protocol will be run separately in 3 provinces, Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, and results will be combined statistically using meta-analysis. Participants: The cohort will include women aged 18 to 48 years who donated a kidney between July 1992 and March 2022 and had at least one postdonation singleton pregnancy of ≥20 weeks gestation between January 1993 and February 2023. We expect to include at least 150 living kidney donors with over 200 postdonation pregnancies from Ontario and a similar number of donors and pregnancies across Alberta and British Columbia combined. Nondonors will include women from the general population with at least one pregnancy of ≥20 weeks gestation between January 1993 and February 2023. Nondonors will be randomly assigned cohort entry dates based on the distribution of nephrectomy dates in donors. The sample of nondonors will be restricted to those aged 18 to 48 years on their cohort entry dates with delivery dates at least 6 months after their assigned entry dates. A concern with donor and nondonor comparisons is that donors are healthier than the general population. To reduce this concern, we will also apply 30+ exclusion criteria to further restrict the nondonor group so that they have similar health measures at cohort entry as the donors. Donor and nondonor pregnancies will then be matched (1:4) on 5 potential confounders: delivery date, maternal age at delivery date, time between cohort entry and delivery date, neighborhood income quintile, and parity at delivery date. Measurements: The primary outcome will be a composite of maternal gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia. Secondary maternal outcomes will include components of the primary outcome, early pre-eclampsia, severe maternal morbidity, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, and gestational diabetes. Fetal/infant/neonatal outcomes will include premature birth/low birth weight, small for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, and neonatal death. Methods: The primary unit of analysis will be the pregnancy. We will compute the risk ratio of the primary composite outcome in donors versus nondonors using a log-binomial mixed regression model with random effects to account for the correlation within women with multiple pregnancies and within matched sets of donors and nondonors. We will perform the statistical analyses within each province and then combine aggregated results using meta-analytic techniques to produce overall estimates of the study outcomes. Limitations: Due to regulations that prevent individual-level records from being sent to other provinces, we cannot pool individual-level data from all 3 provinces. Conclusion: Compared to prior studies, this study will better estimate the donation-attributable risk of adverse maternal, fetal/infant, and neonatal outcomes. Transplant centers can use the results to counsel female living donor candidates of childbearing age and to inform recommended practices for the follow-up and care of living kidney donors who become pregnant.

Contexte: Une importante proportion des donneurs de rein vivants sont des femmes en âge de procréer. Quelques études antérieures rapportent un risque plus élevé d'hypertension gestationnelle et de prééclampsie chez les donneuses d'un rein par rapport aux non-donneuses. D'autres recherches sont nécessaires pour mieux quantifier le risque d'issues néonatales négatives attribuables au don de rein par un donneur vivant pour la mère et le fœtus/nouveau-né. Objectif: Déterminer le risque de troubles hypertensifs pendant la grossesse, notamment l'hypertension gestationnelle, la prééclampsie et l'éclampsie, et d'autres résultats pour la mère et le fœtus/nouveau-né chez les donneuses d'un rein par rapport à un groupe apparié de non-donneuses avec caractéristiques de santé initiales similaires. Cadre et conception de l'étude: Protocole pour une étude de cohorte avec populations appariées utilisant les bases de données administratives de santé canadiennes. Le protocole sera réalisé séparément dans trois provinces (Ontario, Alberta et Colombie-Britannique) et les résultats seront combinés statistiquement au moyen d'une méta-analyze. Sujets: La cohorte sera constituée de femmes âgées de 18 à 48 ans ayant donné un rein entre juillet 1992 et mars 2022 et ayant vécu au moins une grossesse unique de plus de 20 semaines post-don entre janvier 1993 et février 2023. Nous prévoyons inclure au moins 150 donneuses de rein vivantes avec plus de 200 grossesses post-don en Ontario et des nombres similaires en combinant les donneuses et les grossesses pour l'Alberta et la Colombie-Britannique. Les non-donneuses seront des femmes de la population générale ayant eu au moins une grossesse de plus de 20 semaines entre janvier 1993 et février 2023. Les non-donneuses se verront attribuer au hasard une date d'entrée dans la cohorte en fonction des dates de néphrectomie chez les donneuses. L'échantillon des non-donneuses sera limité aux femmes âgées de 18 à 48 ans à la date de leur entrée dans la cohorte avec un accouchement prévu au moins 6 mois après la date d'entrée leur ayant été attribuée. Les donneuses sont généralement en meilleure santé que la population générale, ce qui entraîne une préoccupation quant à leur comparaison à des non-donneuses. Pour atténuer cette différence, plus de 30 critères d'exclusion seront appliqués aux non-donneuses afin qu'elles présentent des mesures de santé similaires à celles des donneuses à leur entrée dans la cohorte. Les grossesses des donneuses et non-donneuses seront ensuite appariées (1:4) selon 5 facteurs de confusion potentiels : date d'accouchement, âge maternel à l'accouchement, temps entre l'entrée dans la cohorte et l'accouchement, quintile de revenu du quartier de résidence et parité à la date d'accouchement. Mesures: Le principal critère de jugement sera un composite d'hypertension gestationnelle maternelle, de prééclampsie ou d'éclampsie. Les résultats maternels secondaires comprendront des composantes du résultat primaire, la prééclampsie précoce, la morbidité maternelle grave, la césarienne, l'hémorragie post-partum et le diabète gestationnel. Les résultats fœtaux/néonataux comprendront les naissances prématurées ou de faible poids, un bébé petit pour l'âge gestationnel, l'admission en unité de soins intensifs néonataux, la mortinaissance et le décès néonatal. Méthodologie: La principale unité d'analyze sera la grossesse. Nous calculerons le rapport de risque du résultat composite primaire chez les donneuses comparativement aux non-donneuses à l'aide d'un modèle mixte de régression log-binomiale à effets aléatoires pour tenir compte de la corrélation chez les femmes avec grossesses multiples et au sein d'ensembles appariés de donneuses et de non-donneuses. Nous effectuerons des analyses statistiques dans chaque province, puis nous utiliserons des techniques méta-analytiques pour combiner les résultats agrégés et produire des estimations globales des résultats de l'étude. Limites: En raison des règlements qui empêchent l'envoi de dossiers individuels à d'autres provinces, nous ne pouvons regrouper les données individuelles des sujets des trois provinces. Conclusion: Cette étude permettra de mieux estimer le risque de résultats indésirables maternels, fœtaux et néonataux attribuable au don d'organe que les études précédentes. Les centers de transplantation pourront utiliser ces résultats pour conseiller les candidates au don vivant d'organe en âge de procréer et éclairer les recommandations de pratique pour le suivi et les soins des donneuses de rein vivantes qui deviennent enceintes.

Pre-transplant Loco-Regional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Post-transplant Outcomes: A National Study.

The ultimate preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension is an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Loco regional therapy (LRT) has emerged to prevent tumor growth and progression of disease beyond the Milan criteria to achieve transplant. There is a paucity of data regarding safety, posttransplant survival benefits, and tumor recurrence rate achieved by these LRT modalities. We aim to assess and compare the five-year survival rate and tumor recurrence rate with or without LRT in patients after OLT with diagnosed HCC utilizing the nation's largest dataset. This is a retrospective observational study approved by Saint Louis University institutional review board. We utilized the largest dataset from the years 2003-2013 where pertaining data were gathered from Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) standard analysis and research files (STAR) through novel linkages with Medicare bills. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed. 2412 (51.6%) patients received any form of locoregional therapy (single or combination) out of 4669 total study sample size. The overall five-year survival in the study sample was 76.1%. There was statistically no significant improvement seen in five-year posttransplant survival in the group that received one mode of LRT (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.97, P<0.64) or a combination of LRT (aHR 0.94, P<0.58) in comparison to those that received none after adjusting donor and recipient clinical characteristics. However, five-year survival trended higher among those treated with combination therapy over those treated with single LRT or none. Overall HCC recurrence was 4.8%, while no significant difference was noted when comparing above-mentioned groups. Five-year posttransplant survival and HCC recurrence rate were also found to have no difference when compared between above-mentioned groups after adjusting explant pathology. This is the largest retrospective study comparing liver transplant patients with HCC who received LRT to none. Although it did not show any statistically significant benefit of single or combination of LRT on survival or tumor recurrence after liver transplant for HCC patients, the outcomes encourage the safe and feasible use of LRT as a bridging therapy. Our study also suggests an observed pattern of improved posttransplant survival and tumor recurrence rate with combination loco-regional therapy. Larger multicenter prospective studies will be required to achieve the effect size to determine the best therapies for maximizing patient survival cost-effectively.

Interplay of Donor-Recipient Relationship and Donor Race in Living Liver Donation in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Living liver donation improves survival of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. Yet, it continues to represent a small proportion of United States (U.S.) liver transplantation with existing racial disparities. We investigated the interplay of donor-recipient relationship and donor race to understand donor subgroups with no significant increase. METHODS: We studied 4407 living liver donors in the U.S. from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2022 (median age = 36 years, and 59% were biologically related to the recipient). We quantified the change in the number of donors per 3-year increment using negative binomial regression (incidence rate ratio [IRR]), stratified by donor-recipient relationship and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among biologically related donors, the observed annual number of White donors increased from 146 to 253, Hispanic donors from 18 to 53, and Black donors decreased from 11 to 10. Among unrelated donors, White donors increased from 65 to 221, Hispanic donors from 4 to 25, and Black donors from 3 to 11. For the IRR of biologically related donors aged <40 and ≥40 years, White donors increased by 18% and 22%; Hispanic donors increased by 25% and 54%; and Black donors did not change. Likewise, the IRR of unrelated donors aged <40 and ≥40 years, White donors increased by 48% and 55%; Hispanic donors increased by 52% and 65%; and Black donors did not change. CONCLUSIONS: While biologically related donors represent the majority of donors, unrelated donors have substantially risen in recent years, primarily driven by White donors. Although the rate of unrelated donations increased among Hispanic donors, the absolute number remains very small (≤25 donors/year). Interventions are needed to increase education among Hispanic and Black communities to grow unrelated living liver donations across race/ethnicity.

Association of early steroid withdrawal with kidney transplant outcomes in first-transplant and retransplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) is often preferred over conventional steroid maintenance (CSM) therapy for kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risks because it may minimize immunosuppression-related adverse events while achieving similar transplant outcomes. However, the risk-benefit balance of ESW could be less favorable in retransplant recipients given their unique immunological risk profile. We hypothesized that the association of ESW with transplant outcomes would differ between first-transplant and retransplant recipients. METHODS: To assess whether the impact of ESW differs between first and retransplant recipients, we studied 210 086 adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Recipients who discontinued maintenance steroids before discharge from transplant admission were classified with ESW; all others were classified with CSM. We quantified the association of ESW (vs. CSM) with acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and death, addressing retransplant as an effect modifier, using logistic/Cox regression with inverse probability weights to control for confounders. RESULTS: In our cohort, 26 248 (12%) were retransplant recipients. ESW was used in 30% of first-transplant and 20% of retransplant recipients. Among first-transplant recipients, ESW was associated with no significant difference in acute rejection (aOR = 1.04 [95% CI = 1.00-1.09]), slightly higher hazard of graft failure (HR = 1.09 [95% CI = 1.05-1.12]), and slightly lower mortality (HR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.91-0.95]) compared to CSM. Nonetheless, among retransplant recipients, ESW was associated with notably higher risk of acute rejection (OR = 1.42 [95% CI = 1.29-1.57]; interaction p < 0.001) and graft failure (HR = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.14-1.34]; interaction p = 0.003), and similar mortality (HR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.94-1.08]; interaction p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In retransplant recipients, the negative impacts of ESW on transplant outcomes appear to be non-negligible. A more conservatively tailored approach to ESW might be necessary for retransplant recipients.

Management of Failing Kidney and Pancreas Transplantations.

Survival rates for allografts have improved over the last 2 decades, yet failing allografts remains a challenge in the field of transplant. The risks of mortality and morbidity associated with failed allografts are compounded by infectious complications and metabolic abnormalities, emphasizing the need for a standardized approach to management. Management of failing allografts lacks consensus, highlighting the need for unified protocols to guide treatment protocols and minimize risks with postdialysis initiation. The decision to wean off immunosuppression depends on various factors, including living donor availability and infectious risks, necessitating improved coordination of care and a standard guideline. Treatment of failed pancreas focuses on glycemic control, with insulin as the mainstay, while considering surgical interventions such as graft pancreatectomy in advanced symptomatic cases. Navigating the complexities of failed allograft management demands a multidisciplinary approach and standardized stepwise protocol. Addressing the gaps in management plans for failing allografts and employing a systematic approach to transplant decisions will enhance patient outcomes and facilitate informed decision-making.

Water/fluid intake in Kidney transplant recipients: An underrated topic.

Although kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease, long-term complications such as chronic kidney allograft dysfunction and cardiovascular disorders are observed. To decrease these complications, preventive measures must be applied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). One of these common measures is the increase of water/fluid intake although this is not evidence-based practice. Indeed, surprisingly very limited studies evaluated the impact of increased water/fluid intake on graft function, with small number of KTRs and short term follow-up. We suggest that the water/fluid intake should be personalized based on baseline graft function, time onset after KT (which water homeostasis changes), presence of hyponatremia and hypervolemia, concomitant medications, and patient willingness. Methods for estimating water/fluid intake (direct measurement, 24-h urine volume measurement, urine osmolarity) has both advantages and drawbacks and the best method has not been identified. Increase of water/fluid intake in specific conditions (in hot, and humid weather, before exercise, during Ramadan fasting) or in distinct KTRs (KTRs with de novo nephrolithiasis, frequent urinary tract infections) is not tested. Furthermore, the relationship between water/fluid intake and major cardiovascular adverse events are not known. There is no doubt that minimum amount of water/fluid intake is necessary for graft function (the amount is not known) but there is no evidence for a particular target level of water/fluid intake. In the current review, we summarize the studies assessing fluid/water intake in KTR, explained the pathophysiologic basis of water disorders in early period of KT and late after KT, elucidate conflicts and unknown issues of water intake in KTRs and suggest future research needs.

Determining Predictors of Actual Living Kidney Donation Based on Potential Donor Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease; however, few living donor candidates (LDCs) who begin evaluation actually donate. While some LDCs are deemed medically ineligible, others discontinue for potentially modifiable reasons. METHODS: At five transplant centers, we conducted a prospective cohort study measuring LDCs' clinical and psychosocial characteristics, educational preparation, readiness to donate, and social determinants of health. We followed LDCs for 12 months after evaluation to determine whether they donated a kidney, opted to discontinue, had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, were medically ineligible, or had other recipient-related reasons for discontinuing. RESULTS: Among 2184 LDCs, 18.6% donated, 38.2% opted to or had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, and 43.2% were deemed ineligible due to medical or recipient-related reasons. Multivariable analyses comparing successful LDCs with those who did not complete donation for modifiable reasons (N = 1241) found that LDCs who discussed donation with the recipient before evaluation (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.54-3.46), had completed high school (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.35), or were a "close relation" to their recipient (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.33-2.69) were more likely to donate. Conversely, LDCs who reported religion as important (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.80), were Non-White (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00), or had overall higher anxiety scores (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99) were less likely to donate. CONCLUSION: With fewer than a fifth of LDCs donating, developing programs to provide greater emotional support and facilitate open discussions between LDCs and recipients earlier may increase living donation rates.

The Relationship between Sclerostin and Kidney Transplantation Mineral Bone Disorders: A Molecule of Controversies.

Kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease due to reduced mortality, decreased cardiovascular events and increased quality of life compared to patients treated with dialysis. However, kidney transplantation is not devoid of both acute and chronic complications including mineral bone disorders (MBD) which are already present in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before kidney transplantation. The natural history of MBD after kidney transplantation is variable and new markers are needed to define MBD after kidney transplantation. One of these promising molecules is sclerostin. The main action of sclerostin is to inhibit bone formation and mineralization by blocking osteoblast differentiation and function. In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), various studies have shown that sclerostin is associated with graft function, bone parameters, vascular calcification, and arterial stiffness although non-uniformly. Furthermore, data for inhibition of sclerostin with monoclonal antibody romosozumab for treatment of osteoporosis is available for general population but not in KTRs which osteoporosis is highly prevalent. In this narrative review, we have summarized the studies investigating the change of sclerostin before and after kidney transplantation, the relationship between sclerostin and laboratory parameters, bone metabolism and vascular calcification in the context of kidney transplantation. We also pointed out the uncertainties, explained the causes of divergent findings and suggest further potential study topics regarding sclerostin in kidney transplantation.

The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors on gut microbiota: a scoping review.

Studies consistently showed that sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLTi) have cardiovascular and renal benefits, independent of their glucose lowering effects. Recent studies showed that SGLTi might influence gut microbiota. We performed a narrative review of publications focusing on use of SGLTi and changes in gut microbiota. Most studies showed that use of SGLTi re-shapes gut microbiota. These studies are heterogeneous regarding in study designs, doses and types of drugs used (SGLT1i vs. SGLT2i, or SGLT1/2i in combination) and the methods used to determine gut microbiota. However, existing data showed that SGLTi might alter food fermentation and gut permeability, which might translate into clinical outcomes. Thus the objective of this review is to summarize and discuss the updated data regarding SGLTi and changes in gut microbiota for the first time and suggest further study points that needs to be discovered.

LIM Zinc Finger Domain Containing 1 Risk Genotype of Recipient Is Associated with Renal Tubular Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Homozygosity for LIMS1 rs893403-GG genotype is linked to an increased risk of allograft rejection after kidney transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion of the kidney allograft leads to long term infiltration of activated and effector-memory T lymphocytes and resulting in rejection and long-term fibrosis. However, the genotype, LIMS1 expression under ischemic conditions and the long-term histopathological relationships remain ill-defined. METHODS: We examined the impact of the recipient's LIMS1-rs893403 genotype with transplant kidney histopathology. The association of the LIMS1-rs893403 genotype and LIMS1 and GCC2 mRNA expression in ischemic donor kidneys were also examined. Recipients who underwent transplant kidney biopsy were genotyped for the LIMS1-rs893403 variant and associated deletion. Histopathological findings were compared between recipients with LIMS1 risk and non-risk genotypes. Real-time PCR and immunofluorescence staining for LIMS1 and GCC2 expression were performed in non-utilized donor kidneys. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics and the histopathological diagnosis were similar between recipients with rs893403 GG and AA/AG genotype. The Banff tubulitis score was higher in GG recipients (n = 24) compared to AA/AG (n = 86) recipients (1.42 ± 0.65 vs. 1.12 ± 0.66, p = 0.03). Ischemic kidneys with GG showed higher LIMS1 and GCC2 mRNA expression than kidneys with AG. Kidneys with rs893403-GG had higher tubular LIMS1 and GCC2 immunohistochemical staining compared to kidneys with rs893403-AG. CONCLUSIONS: Our data supports the role of the LIMS1 locus in kidney transplant rejection, particularly in lymphocyte infiltration into the internal aspect of the tubular basement membranes. Increased LIMS1 and GCC2 expression in ischemic donor kidneys with the GG genotype require further studies.

Brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide in kidney transplantation: More than just cardiac markers.

Although kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) due to reduced mortality, morbidity and increased quality of life, long- term complications such as chronic kidney allograft dysfunction (CKAD) and increased cardiovascular disease burden are still major challenges. Thus, routine screening of KT recipients (KTRs) is very important to identify and quantify risks and guide preventative measures. However, no screening parameter has perfect sensitivity and specificity, and there is unmet need for new markers. In this review, we evaluate brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as promising markers for risk stratification in the kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The usefulness of these markers are already proven in heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease. In the context of KT, evidence is emerging. BNP and NT-proBNP has shown to be associated with kidney function, graft failure, echocardiographic parameters, major cardiovascular events and mortality but the underlying mechanisms are not known. Although BNP and NT-proBNP interact with immune system, renin angiotensin system and sympathetic system; it is not known whether these interactions are responsible for the clinical findings observed in KTRs. Future studies are needed whether these biomarkers show clinical efficacy, especially with regard to hard outcomes such as major adverse cardiovascular events and graft dysfunction and whether routine implementation of these markers are cost effective in KTRs.

Psychosocial Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: A Survey of Current Practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established. METHODS: We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation. RESULTS: We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors. CONCLUSIONS: There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.

A holistic review of sodium intake in kidney transplant patients: More questions than answers.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Acute rejection rates have decreased drastically in recent years but chronic kidney allograft disease (CKAD) is still an important cause of allograft failure and return to dialysis. Thus, there is unmet need to identify and reverse the cause of CKAD. Additionally, cardiovascular events after KT are still leading causes of morbidity and mortality. One overlooked potential contributor to CKAD and adverse cardiovascular events is increased sodium/salt intake in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In general population, the adverse effects of high sodium intake are well known but in KTRs, there is a paucity of evidence despite decades of experience with KT. Limited research showed that sodium intake is high in most KTRs. Moreover, excess sodium intake is associated with elevated blood pressure and albuminuria in some studies involving KTRs. There is also experimental evidence suggesting that increased sodium intake is associated with histologic graft damage. Critical knowledge gaps still remain, including the exact amount of sodium restriction needed in KTRs to optimize outcomes and allograft survival. Additionally, best methods to measure sodium intake and practices to follow-up are not clarified in KTRs. To meet these deficits, prospective long term studies are warranted in KTRs. Moreover, preventive measures must be determined and implemented both at individual and societal levels to achieve sodium restriction in KTRs.

A Case of Hypernatremia in a Newly Diagnosed Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Lessons for Nephrologists.

Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D), formerly known as central diabetes insipidus, is a disease characterized by polyuria, polydipsia, and hypernatremia. The concomitant diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an underappreciated event that requires prompt recognition and treatment by practicing nephrologists and hematologists. This report highlights this importance by describing the case of a 39-year-old patient newly diagnosed with AML who developed severe hypernatremia. The role of diagnostic testing through desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge and copeptin testing to confirm the diagnosis of AVP-D in this context and the use of DDVAP for treatment are discussed. Practicing nephrologists and primary care providers taking care of patients with similar symptoms will benefit from understanding the pathophysiology of AVP-D, its relationship with AML, and the prognosis in this patient cohort.

Renin angiotensin system-induced muscle wasting: putative mechanisms and implications for clinicians.

Renin angiotensin system (RAS) alters various mechanisms related to muscle wasting. The RAS system consists of classical and non-classical pathways, which mostly function differently. Classical RAS pathway, operates through angiotensin II (AngII) and angiotensin type 1 receptors, is associated with muscle wasting and sarcopenia. On the other hand, the non-classical RAS pathway, which operates through angiotensin 1-7 and Mas receptor, is protective against sarcopenia. The classical RAS pathway might induce muscle wasting by variety of mechanisms. AngII reduces body weight, via reduction in food intake, possibly by decreasing hypothalamic expression of orexin and neuropeptide Y, insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), signaling, AngII increases skeletal muscle proteolysis by forkhead box transcription factors (FOXO), caspase activation and muscle RING-finger protein-1 transcription. Furthermore, AngII infusion in skeletal muscle reduces phospho-Bad (Ser136) expression and induces apoptosis through increased cytochrome c release and DNA fragmentation. Additionally, Renin angiotensin system activation through AT1R and AngII stimulates tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 which induces muscle wasting, Last but not least classical RAS pathway, induce oxidative stress, disturb mitochondrial energy metabolism, and muscle satellite cells which all lead to muscle wasting and decrease muscle regeneration. On the contrary, the non-classical RAS pathway functions oppositely to mitigate these mechanisms and protects against muscle wasting. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of RAS-induced muscle wasting and putative implications for clinical practice. We also emphasize the areas of uncertainties and suggest potential research areas.

Sociodemographic disparities in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use among US kidney transplant recipients: An observational study of real-world pharmacy records.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials demonstrate benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with chronic kidney disease, but data on use in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients are limited. METHODS: We examined a novel database linking SRTR registry data for KTx recipients (2000-2021) with outpatient fill records from a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2015-2021). Adult (≥18 years) KTx recipients treated with SGLT2i were compared to those who received other noninsulin diabetes medications without SGLT2i. Characteristics associated with SGLT2i use were quantified by multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio, 95%LCLaOR95%UCL). RESULTS: Among 18 988 KTx recipients treated with noninsulin diabetes agents in the study period, 2224 filled an SGLT2i. Mean time from KTx to prescription was 6.7 years for SGLT2i versus 4.7 years for non-SGLT2i medications. SGLT2i use was more common in Asian adults (aOR, 1.091.311.58) and those aged > 30-59 years (compared with 18-30 years) or with BMI > 35 kg/m2 (aOR, 1.191.411.67), and trended higher with self-pay status. SGLT2i use was lower among KTx recipients who were women (aOR, .79.87.96), Black (aOR, .77.881.00) and other (aOR, .52.751.07) race, publicly insured (aOR, .82.921.03), or with less than college education (aOR, .78.87.96), and trended lower in those age 75 years and older. SGLT2i use in KTx patients increased dramatically in 2019-2021 (aOR, 5.015.636.33 vs. prior years). CONCLUSION: SGLT2i use is increasing in KTx recipients but varies with factors including race, education, and insurance. While ongoing study is needed to define risks and benefits of SGLT2i use in KTx patients, attention should also focus on reducing treatment disparities related to sociodemographic traits.