The utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in the diagnosis and prediction of loss of ovarian function following chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

AIM: Chemotherapy results in permanent loss of ovarian function in some premenopausal women. Accurate identification in women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer (eBC) would allow optimisation of subsequent endocrine treatment. We sought to assess whether analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) using a sensitive automated assay could identify women who would not regain ovarian function after chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from women in the Ovarian Protection Trial in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients (OPTION) trial of goserelin (a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue) for ovarian protection were analysed. Women were assessed for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI: amenorrhoea with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)) at 24 months after diagnosis. The accuracy of AMH for the diagnosis of POI and its prediction from measurement at the end of chemotherapy was calculated. RESULTS: AMH below the level of detection showed good diagnostic accuracy for POI at 24 months (n = 73) with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity 1.0 and specificity 0.73 at the assay limit of detection. In women aged >40 at diagnosis who did not receive goserelin, AMH measured at end of chemotherapy also gave good prediction of POI at 24 months (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89 95% CI 0.75-1.0, n = 32), with sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.82, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 42.8. FSH gave slightly lower AUC, and specificity was low at 0.55. Age but not tamoxifen impacted on AMH levels. CONCLUSION: Using this sensitive AMH assay, the finding of an undetectable AMH level in women aged >40 at the end of chemotherapy for eBC gave a good prediction that ovarian function would not return. This may allow alterations in post-chemotherapy endocrine management.

GnRH agonist for protection against ovarian toxicity during chemotherapy for early breast cancer: the Anglo Celtic Group OPTION trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) impacts fertility and other aspects of women's health. The OPTION trial tested whether administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during chemotherapy for early breast cancer reduced the risk of POI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group study of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin administered before and during chemotherapy for breast cancer with stage I-IIIB disease. The primary outcome was amenorrhoea between 12 and 24 months after randomization, supported by elevated follicle stimulating hormone concentrations to give an additional analysis as rate of POI. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were randomized and the primary analysis was conducted on 202 patients. Goserelin reduced the prevalence of amenorrhoea between 12 and 24 months to 22% versus 38% in the control group (P = 0.015) and the prevalence of POI to 18.5% versus 34.8% in the control group (P = 0.048). Follicle stimulating hormone concentrations were also lower in all women treated with goserelin at both 12 and 24 months (P = 0.027, P = 0.001, respectively). The effect of goserelin was not statistically significant in women >40 years. Assessment of the ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone showed a marked fall in both groups during treatment to median values of 5% of pretreatment levels in the control group and 7% in the goserelin group, which were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that goserelin reduced the risk of POI in women treated with chemotherapy for early breast cancer, with particular efficacy in women aged ≤40 years old. The degree of ovarian protection also seems limited and the clinical significance for fertility and longer term prevention of estrogen deficiency-related outcomes needs to be determined.

A randomised trial of secondary prophylaxis using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ('SPROG' trial) for maintaining dose intensity of standard adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by the Anglo-Celtic Cooperative Group and NCRN.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors for patients having adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are designed to minimise the risk of neutropaenic infection (Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al. Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006; 3: 187-205; Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al. Effect of primary prophylactic G-CSF use on systemic therapy administration for elderly breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 47: 8-32; Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al. Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7: 122-192). Non-randomised data suggest that the achievement of planned dose intensity (DI) may have an important effect on survival. This trial compared the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, GCSF, against standard management following a first neutropaenic event (NE) in achieving planned DI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomised following a first NE, defined as hospitalisation due to neutropaenic fever, an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1.5 × 10(9)/l requiring treatment delay or dose reduction of 15% or more of planned dose. The study was initially planned to enrol 816 patients to detect a difference of 10%. This was difficult to achieve in the timeframe and the trial size was amended. Thus, 407 patients were randomly assigned to filgrastim for 7 days or pegfilgrastim versus standard care. The amended study was designed to have 80% power to detect an absolute difference of 14% of planned DI between the two groups. RESULTS: Most regimens were anthracycline-based many of which included a sequential taxane and/or were in clinical trials. Around 82.7% had an NE in the first three cycles. A total of 401 had calculable relative dose intensity (RDI) data. A target of 85% planned RDI was achieved in only 50% of patients in the control arm compared with 75% in the GCSF arm (P < 0.0001). A secondary end point revealed a reduction in post-randomisation NEs, 65.7% controls versus 18.2% with GCSF. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary intervention with GCSF showed a statistically significant improvement in the achievement of adequate RDI in non-intensive regimens. This may have important clinical implications for outcome.

Adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) vs CMF in early breast cancer: results with over 7 years median follow-up from the randomised phase III NEAT/BR9601 trials.

BACKGROUND: The National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT) and BR9601 trials tested the benefit of epirubicin when added to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (E-CMF) compared with standard CMF in adjuvant chemotherapy for women with early breast cancer. This report details longer follow-up with interesting additional time-dependent analyses. METHODS: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial used epirubicin (E) 3-weekly for four cycles followed by classical (c) CMF for four cycles (E-CMF) compared with cCMF for six cycles. BR9601 used E 3-weekly for four cycles followed by CMF 3-weekly for four cycles, compared with CMF 3-weekly for eight cycles. RESULTS: In all, 2391 eligible patients were randomised and with a median 7.4-year follow-up, E-CMF confirmed a significant benefit over CMF in both relapse-free survival (RFS) (78% vs 71% 5 years RFS, respectively, hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.86), P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (84% vs 78% 5 years OS, respectively, HR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.89), P=0.0007). Interaction of treatment effect and prognostic factors was demonstrated for duplication of chromosome 17 centromeric enumeration (Ch17CEP) as previously reported. Poor prognostic factors at diagnosis (ER and PR negative and HER2 positive) showed time-dependent annual hazard rates for RFS and OS. In univariate analysis, these factors demonstrated more favourable HRs for RFS after 5 years. Treatment effects also suggested a differential benefit for E-CMF within the first 5 years for poor prognosis tumours. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up has confirmed E-CMF as significantly superior to CMF for all patients. Ch17CEP duplication was the only biomarker that demonstrated significant treatment interaction. Standard poor prognostic factors at diagnosis were time-dependent, and after 5 years disease-free, poor prognosis patients demonstrated favourable HRs for survival.

Improving the therapeutic index of anthracycline chemotherapy: focus on liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet).

Anthracyclines are valuable cytotoxic agents in cancer treatment. However, their usefulness is limited by cumulative dose-dependent cardiotoxicity that may manifest as life-threatening congestive heart failure. To avoid cardiotoxicity, the use of doxorubicin is typically capped at a safe cumulative dose. Liposomal formulations may reduce cardiac risks whilst maintaining anti-cancer efficacy. Efficacy and safety studies of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are reviewed, along with studies that examine efficacy and cardiac tolerability in combination with newer agents such as paclitaxel and trastuzumab. These show that cardiac safety of liposomal doxorubicin is similar to that of epirubicin in cumulative dose, but that the formulation, unlike epirubicin, has similar anti-cancer efficacy to doxorubicin at equimolar doses. Liposomal doxorubicin may have a better therapeutic index than non-liposomal anthracyclines. This justifies further studies in patients where cumulative cardiotoxicity is a concern, as does study of its use with other potentially cardiotoxic agents.

How age affects the biology of breast cancer.

Breast cancer incidence increases with age, but there are important age-related differences with respect to the frequency of different tumour subtypes with respect to hormone receptor status and pathological grade. In general, younger patients show a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor-negative, higher-grade tumours, whereas in older patients there is a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor-positive, low-grade tumours. This accounts for the fact that, in general, elderly patients are thought to have a less aggressive form of the disease. However, this does not mean that all elderly patients with breast cancer necessarily have a good prognosis. An increased understanding of the mechanisms of tissue ageing and how these affect the molecular biological phenotype of breast cancers in cohorts of different ages will aid the oncologist's confidence in tailoring treatment more appropriately to the likely prognosis, and the development of novel, hopefully less toxic, treatments for specific subtypes of breast cancer in the elderly population.

Quality of life and sexual function after high-dose or conventional chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer.

Three hundred and ninety women participated in the quality of life (QL) study of ACCOG1, a high-dose vs conventional adjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer trial, for patients with a high risk of relapse. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, questions on menopausal symptoms and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire. Pretreatment, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 and 60-month assessments were conducted. For the high dose group the median decrease in global QL at 6 months was significantly greater than in the conventional group. At 12 months, however, the median change had returned to 0 for both groups. Social functioning was also significantly lower in the high-dose group at 6 months, again returning to prebaseline levels for both groups after 12 months. The most persistent changes appear to be in the effect of treatment in both arms on sexual outcomes, reflected in problems with discomfort and pleasure. Both high-dose and conventional chemotherapy showed persisting negative effects on sexual health. This has not been previously reported as a long-term complication of high-dose chemotherapy. However, it did not have long-term affects on sexual habit, which appeared to return to pretreatment frequency and similar to that of conventional chemotherapy by about 12 months from treatment.

Treatment options for older woman with early breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and its incidence increases with age. Older women are not often offered optimal treatment compared with younger women for any particular stage. This is due to various reasons, including the lack of evidence for older women from well-conducted clinical trials. In this paper, the currently available evidences from clinical trials are reviewed and the various treatment options for older women with early breast cancer are discussed.

Adjuvant hormonal therapy in early breast cancer.

For many years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard adjuvant hormonal therapy with the greatest impact in early breast cancer for both pre- and postmenopausal women. Tamoxifen-based adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy have together contributed substantially to the reduction in breast cancer mortality that has occurred in recent years. Over the past few years, the role of aromatase inhibitors has grown in prominence and they are now on the threshold of supplanting tamoxifen as the new gold standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive disease. With extended use of oral antihormones such as tamoxifen, the role of ovarian suppression on the other hand has become less clear in the adjuvant setting. This article reviews the most important data regarding the various adjuvant hormonal treatments in the management of early breast cancer and will also give a brief overview of the role of these agents in the neoadjuvant setting.

Chemotherapy for older women with early breast cancer.

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age, reaching over 300 per 100,000 in women aged 70-75 years in the U.K., increasing to almost 400 per 100,000 in women aged over 85 years. As a healthy 70-year old woman can now expect to live for an average of 15 years, control of breast cancer is likely to significantly affect survival. Variations exist in surgical care, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, depending on age; however, virtually all elderly women with hormone-responsive disease are given adjuvant endocrine therapy, usually tamoxifen. For older women who do not have hormone-responsive cancer, and who have high-risk disease characteristics, questions remain over their best management. Overview data of adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical trials show a significant benefit of chemotherapy for women up to the age of 69 years but, for older women, there are too few data to draw any firm conclusions. When considering treatment options for older women, assessment is critical; functional status and comorbidity are some of the factors linked to shorter survival.

A comparison of self-reported satisfaction between adolescents treated in a "teenage" unit with those treated in adult or paediatric units.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations that adolescents should have in-patient management amongst their peers, there is little literature to support this. The study aim was to evaluate and contrast patient satisfaction for teenage cancer patients treated in two settings. The first is a split site unit (a paediatric ward and adult cancer centre in different locations within one city) and the second, a dedicated adolescent unit for patients aged 13-20. PROCEDURE: Eligible patients aged 13-20 years received treatment from September 1997 to June 2000 and totalled sixty-five adolescents. The patients were identified at both centres from departmental databases. Postal questionnaires (the Youth Satisfaction Questionnaire) were sent to those eligible. RESULTS: Patients receiving treatment in the teenage cancer unit (TCU) were not significantly more satisfied overall than those receiving treatment in adult or paediatric units. However, significant differences were noted in: recreational and relaxation facilities (P < 0.005, P < 0.0002), studying space (P < 0.004), ward noise (P < 0.02), and company of the same age (P < 0.0001). The Grade Point Average (a score of all specific items) was higher in favour of the TCU (P < 0.03). Patients at both centres were dissatisfied with hospital food and menus offered. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with cancer are satisfied with the overall care they receive independent of whether it is a TCU or a split site unit. Teenagers are significantly more satisfied with environmental aspects of care in the TCU. More research is required to establish the correct provision for teenagers with cancer. This is the first study that contrasts satisfaction between different centres and thus adding to an understanding of the needs of teenagers with cancer.

Breast cancer patients' experiences on endocrine therapy: monitoring with a checklist for patients on endocrine therapy (C-PET).

Women with hormone responsive breast cancer routinely receive endocrine therapy. There is growing evidence that patients experience significant side effects. Between 1996 and 1998, all patients on endocrine therapy for adjuvant or advanced breast cancer, attending the Edinburgh Breast Unit, were invited to complete a checklist for patients on endocrine therapy. This simple form, designed as a communication aid, was completed by patients before their consultation. 708 patients (age 28-93) completed 1060 forms. These forms were analysed in order to gain a better understanding of the side effects experienced. Most patients were on tamoxifen (n = 524), with 103 on anastrazole and 35 on megestrol acetate. Common symptoms experienced were hot flushes, sweats and weight gain. Symptoms varied according to the patients' ages and the setting in which they received endocrine treatment. Pre-menopausal women were more likely to experience problems with flushes, sweats, weight gain and reduced libido.

Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients.

The UK audit was undertaken in primary breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to: (1) record the incidence of neutropenic events (hospitalisation due to febrile neutropenia, dose delay of > or =1 week or dose reduction of > or =15% due to neutropenia); (2) evaluate the impact of neutropenic events on overall dose intensity (DI) received and (3) review the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in clinical practice. Data from 422 patients with Stage I-III breast cancer were collected from 15 centres. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil(CMF)- or anthracycline-based regimens were the most commonly used. Only 5.2% of patients received G-CSF. Overall, 29% of patients experienced a neutropenic event, most frequently dose delay. Neutropenic events had a significant impact on the ability to deliver planned DI. Out of 422 patients, 17% did not achieve 85% of their planned DI; due to neutropenia in 11% of patients. Of the neutropenic patients receiving CMF- or anthracycline-based regimens, around 40 and 32% of patients, respectively, did not achieve 85% of their planned DI. Patients who experienced one neutropenic event had a higher risk of a second event. During adjuvant chemotherapy of primary breast cancer, neutropenic events are common, likely to occur in subsequent chemotherapy cycles, and have a significant impact on receiving planned DI.

Moderate neutropenia with adjuvant CMF confers improved survival in early breast cancer.

Despite the extensive literature clearly demonstrating the survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer, there are few data confirming this in routine practice. Some studies have suggested that not all women gain to the same extent, with older women showing a smaller benefit and lower doses achieving poorer outcomes. We therefore reviewed the case notes of 750 women treated over a 15-year period at The Edinburgh Cancer Centre with the same intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) regimen, to identify patient- and treatment-related factors influencing outcome in routine practice. The actuarial 10-year survival for these women was 59.3%, with the anticipated poorer outcome for those with more involved ipsilateral axillary nodes, higher grade and ER-negative tumours. There was no evidence that a lower delivered dose intensity or older age at presentation resulted in a poorer survival. Of particular interest was the observation that 45% of patients who had grade 2/3 neutropenia had a 10% absolute survival advantage over those with no neutropenia (P<0.001). This strongly suggests that some degree of neutropenia has more influence on outcome than age or delivered dose intensity.

Is there a relationship between HLA type and prognostic factors in breast cancer?

No convincing association exists between HLA type and breast cancer development but certain HLA types have been suggested to be associated with poor risk disease. Here, the HLA type (class I and II) for 141 breast cancer patients was compared to a control population of 100 individuals and to the prognostic indicators for the patients. No association was found between HLA type and breast cancer development. Consideration of individual HLA/prognostic factor relationships previously reported confirmed that HLA-B7 was over-represented in premenopausal oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positive, grade 3 tumours (p = 0.04) and that HLA-A1 correlated positively with Nottingham Prognostic Index (p < 0.05) and with ER-negative disease (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that some previously identified associations between HLA type I and particular prognostic factors may be real, if weak but appear to conflict with the only other sizeable study investigating HLA type II in breast cancer (which negatively correlated HLA-DR 11 with early onset disease).

Type 1 growth factor receptor expression in node positive breast cancer: adverse prognostic significance of c-erbB-4.

BACKGROUND: There is a clear need to define biological markers that will predict the response to treatment in breast cancer, and several recent studies suggest that the expression of type 1 growth factor receptors may prove important in this regard. The type 1 growth factor receptors are a family of transmembrane receptors comprising epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), c-erbB-2, c-erbB-3, and c-erbB-4. Both EGFR and c-erbB-2 are associated with poor prognosis in certain tumours. AIMS: There is very little information concerning expression patterns of the full range of type 1 growth factor receptors, especially with respect to c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-4. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the expression of each, and to assess whether expression of any of the factors was related to patient survival in a clinical series. METHODS: Type 1 growth factor receptor expression was investigated by means of immunohistochemistry in a series of node positive patients with breast cancer (n = 66), and statistical analysis was carried out to determine associations between variables and survival analysis for each variable. RESULTS: There were several correlations between variables, and overexpression of EGFR, c-erbB-2, and c-erbB-4 was found to be associated with adverse clinical outcome, although the results were significant only for c-erbB-4 (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although patient numbers are small, this is the first report describing c-erbB-4 as an adverse prognostic marker. These findings are in contrast to previous investigations and may relate to the fact that the patients studied all had advanced stage disease and had undergone similar chemotherapy regimens in the context of a clinical trial.

Block sequential adriamycin CMF--optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer?

After the publication of the 10-year survival data from Milan on the adjuvant use of the block sequential regimen consisting of four cycles of adriamycin followed by eight cycles of intravenous CMF, many centres adopted this as standard of care for high risk, multiple node-positive breast cancer. For this reason it was identified as the standard arm for the Anglo-Celtic adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy trial. This study reports on the experience of this regimen in 329 women with early breast cancer involving at least four axillary nodes, who were treated outside any adjuvant chemotherapy trial. At a median follow-up of 3 years, the overall 5-year disease-free survival is 61%, and the overall survival is 70%. These data confirm the efficacy of this regimen in non-trial patients, and, for the same high risk subgroup, indicate that this approach offers an outcome at least as good as that seen in the CALGB 9344 AC-Taxol arm, and the NCIC days 1 and 8 CEF.

Capecitabine named-patient programme for patients with advanced breast cancer. the UK experience.

Following the encouraging results achieved with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in clinical trials, a named patient programme was initiated in the UK, through which patients with advanced breast cancer were prescribed capecitabine monotherapy. In this programme, patients were treated with the standard dose of oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day treatment cycle). Efficacy and safety data were collected and analysed from 102 patients receiving outpatient treatment with capecitabine. All patients had previously received chemotherapy and for the majority (75%) this was in the metastatic setting. In total, 482 treatment cycles were administered, with a median of 4.5 treatment cycles (range 1-22) per patient. Tumour responses were observed in 20 patients (20%), with an additional 47 patients (46%) achieving disease stabilisation. The median time to disease progression was 4.1 months and median overall survival was 7.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE) (36%) and gastrointestinal toxicities (diarrhoea (33%) and nausea (24%)). Dose reductions due to adverse events were required in 33% of patients, but capecitabine was administered without a dose reduction for 90% of cycles. The results achieved with capecitabine in this named-patient programme confirm that, under 'real practice' conditions, capecitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced breast cancer.