Second pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer successfully treated with a re-reirradiation (3rd radiation course).

INTRODUCTION: In case of pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer, reirradiation of previously irradiated patients may increase the rate of salvage radical resection. Due to the high cumulative dose, one of the main concerns is radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy. This report describes multiple irradiations of a lesion adjacent to the lumbosacral plexus, using a highly selective technique, which allows optimal sparing of such a critical structure. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 53-year-old woman treated in 2008 for a locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma with preoperative pelvic irradiation and concomitant chemotherapy followed by surgery had disease recurrence in 2011 and underwent a second course of pelvic radiotherapy. In December 2015, magnetic resonance imaging showed a single local recurrence infiltrating the muscle next to the right lumbosacral plexus and close to the cauda equina. Repeat reirradiation was planned. The total dose deriving from the previous treatment plans was assessed by nonrigid image registration using the dedicated tool implemented in MIM 6.1.7 (MIMvista Corp., Cleveland, OH). The treatment was performed with Cyberknife (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) with a schedule of 20 Gy in 5 fractions (4 Gy per fraction). The dose was prescribed to 70% isodose and target coverage was 97%. Two months after the treatment, magnetic resonance imaging showed a decreased signal and stable disease with no change in tumor size. CONCLUSIONS: This case report suggests that pelvic re-reirradiation might be a possibility in very carefully selected cases of rectal cancer, using high-precision radiation modalities.

Radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of liver cancer: a survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology.

PURPOSE: To report the results of the first Italian survey investigating the role of liver-directed radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary approach of primary and metastatic liver cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 21-item, two-section questionnaire was sent to all Italian radiotherapy centers on June 2014. The two sections aimed at: (1) evaluating the presence of a multidisciplinary liver tumor board and describing the role of radiation oncologists within the latter, (2) analyzing Radiotherapy treatment details and differences between centers. RESULTS: A total of 37 centers completed the survey. A multidisciplinary liver tumor board was available in most centers (73 %), with a radiation oncologist routinely attending the latter in the majority of cases (85 %). Most of the respondents considered liver-directed Radiotherapy as the third line choice when other therapies were not indicated or technically suitable. 18 centers reported the use of liver-directed radiotherapy. The majority of centers started liver irradiation after 2010. The most adopted motion management strategy was abdominal compression. The most adopted GTV-CTV expansion was 0 and 5 mm for metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was the technique of choice; several treatment schedules were registered, being 45 Gy in three fractions the most reported fractionation scheme. Dose was prescribed at the PTV margin in most cases. CONCLUSION: Liver-directed radiotherapy represents a new field of interest which is currently adopted by 10 % of all Italian Centers. The technical equipment seems adequate. The variations observed in the treatment regimens reflect the lack of a well-established standard schedule.