Hydrophobic residues in S1 modulate enzymatic function and voltage sensing in voltage-sensing phosphatase.

The voltage-sensing domain (VSD) is a four-helix modular protein domain that converts electrical signals into conformational changes, leading to open pores and active enzymes. In most voltage-sensing proteins, the VSDs do not interact with one another, and the S1-S3 helices are considered mainly scaffolding, except in the voltage-sensing phosphatase (VSP) and the proton channel (Hv). To investigate its contribution to VSP function, we mutated four hydrophobic amino acids in S1 to alanine (F127, I131, I134, and L137), individually or in combination. Most of these mutations shifted the voltage dependence of activity to higher voltages; however, not all substrate reactions were the same. The kinetics of enzymatic activity were also altered, with some mutations significantly slowing down dephosphorylation. The voltage dependence of VSD motions was consistently shifted to lower voltages and indicated a second voltage-dependent motion. Additionally, none of the mutations broke the VSP dimer, indicating that the S1 impact could stem from intra- and/or intersubunit interactions. Lastly, when the same mutations were introduced into a genetically encoded voltage indicator, they dramatically altered the optical readings, making some of the kinetics faster and shifting the voltage dependence. These results indicate that the S1 helix in VSP plays a critical role in tuning the enzyme's conformational response to membrane potential transients and influencing the function of the VSD.

S1 hydrophobic residues modulate voltage sensing phosphatase enzymatic function and voltage sensing.

The voltage sensing domain (VSD) is a four-helix modular protein domain that converts electrical signals into conformational changes, leading to open pores and active enzymes. In most voltage sensing proteins, the VSDs do not interact with one another and the S1-S3 helices are considered mainly as scaffolding. The two exceptions are the voltage sensing phosphatase (VSP) and the proton channel (Hv). VSP is a voltage-regulated enzyme and Hvs are channels that only have VSDs. To investigate the S1 contribution to VSP function, we individually mutated four hydrophobic amino acids in S1 to alanine (F127, I131, I134 and L137). We also combined these mutations to generate quadruple mutation designated S1-Q. Most of these mutations shifted the voltage dependence of activity to higher voltages though interestingly, not all substrate reactions were the same. The kinetics of enzymatic activity were also altered with some mutations significantly slowing down dephosphorylation. The voltage dependence of VSD motions were consistently shifted to lower voltages and indicated a second voltage dependent motion. Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated that none of the mutations broke the VSP dimer indicating that the S1 impact could stem from intrasubunit and/or intersubunit interactions. Lastly, when the same alanine mutations were introduced into a genetically encoded voltage indicator, they dramatically altered the optical readings, making some of the kinetics faster and shifting the voltage dependence. These results indicate that the S1 helix in VSP plays a critical role in tuning the enzymes conformational response to membrane potential transients and influencing the function of the VSD.

Imaging different cell populations in the mouse olfactory bulb using the genetically encoded voltage indicator ArcLight.

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) are protein-based optical sensors that allow for measurements from genetically defined populations of neurons. Although in vivo imaging in the mammalian brain with early generation GEVIs was difficult due to poor membrane expression and low signal-to-noise ratio, newer and more sensitive GEVIs have begun to make them useful for answering fundamental questions in neuroscience. We discuss principles of imaging using GEVIs and genetically encoded calcium indicators, both useful tools for in vivo imaging of neuronal activity, and review some of the recent mechanistic advances that have led to GEVI improvements. We provide an overview of the mouse olfactory bulb (OB) and discuss recent studies using the GEVI ArcLight to study different cell types within the bulb using both widefield and two-photon microscopy. Specific emphasis is placed on using GEVIs to begin to study the principles of concentration coding in the OB, how to interpret the optical signals from population measurements in the in vivo brain, and future developments that will push the field forward.

Improving the flexibility of genetically encoded voltage indicators via intermolecular FRET.

A new family of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) has been developed based on intermolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). To test the hypothesis that the GEVI ArcLight functions via interactions between the fluorescent protein (FP) domains of neighboring probes, the FP of ArcLight was replaced with either a FRET donor or acceptor FP. We discovered relatively large FRET signals only when cells were cotransfected with both the FRET donor and acceptor GEVIs. Using a cyan fluorescent protein donor and an RFP acceptor, we were able to observe a voltage-dependent signal with an emission peak separated by over 200 nm from the excitation wavelength. The intermolecular FRET strategy also works for rhodopsin-based probes, potentially improving their flexibility as well. Separating the FRET pair into two distinct proteins has important advantages over intramolecular FRET constructs. The signals are larger because the voltage-induced conformational change moves two FPs independently. The expression of the FRET donor and acceptor can also be restricted independently, enabling greater cell type specificity as well as refined subcellular voltage reporting.

Mechanism of ArcLight derived GEVIs involves electrostatic interactions that can affect proton wires.

The genetically encoded voltage indicators ArcLight and its derivatives mediate voltage-dependent optical signals by intermolecular, electrostatic interactions between neighboring fluorescent proteins (FPs). A random mutagenesis event placed a negative charge on the exterior of the FP, resulting in a greater than 10-fold improvement of the voltage-dependent optical signal. Repositioning this negative charge on the exterior of the FP reversed the polarity of voltage-dependent optical signals, suggesting the presence of "hot spots" capable of interacting with the negative charge on a neighboring FP, thereby changing the fluorescent output. To explore the potential effect on the chromophore state, voltage-clamp fluorometry was performed with alternating excitation at 390 nm followed by excitation at 470 nm, resulting in several mutants exhibiting voltage-dependent, ratiometric optical signals of opposing polarities. However, the kinetics, voltage ranges, and optimal FP fusion sites were different depending on the wavelength of excitation. These results suggest that the FP has external, electrostatic pathways capable of quenching fluorescence that are wavelength specific. One mutation to the FP (E222H) showed a voltage-dependent increase in fluorescence when excited at 390 nm, indicating the ability to affect the proton wire from the protonated chromophore to the H222 position. ArcLight-derived sensors may therefore offer a novel way to map how conditions external to the ß-can structure can affect the fluorescence of the chromophore and transiently affect those pathways via conformational changes mediated by manipulating membrane potential.

Biophysical Parameters of GEVIs: Considerations for Imaging Voltage.

Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) continue to evolve, resulting in many different probes with varying strengths and weaknesses. Developers of new GEVIs tend to highlight their positive features. A recent article from an independent laboratory has compared the signal/noise ratios of a number of GEVIs. Such a comparison can be helpful to investigators eager to try to image the voltage of excitable cells. In this perspective, we will present examples of how the biophysical features of GEVIs affect the imaging of excitable cells in an effort to assist researchers when considering probes for their specific needs.