Accelerant-related burns and drug abuse: Challenging combination.

BACKGROUND: Accelerants are flammable substances that may cause explosion when added to existing fires. The relationships between drug abuse and accelerant-related burns are not well elucidated in the literature. Of these burns, a portion is related to drug manufacturing, which have been shown to be associated with increased burn complications. OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the demographics and clinical outcomes of accelerant-related burns in a Provincial Burn Centre. 2) To compare the clinical outcomes with a control group of non-accelerant related burns. 3) To analyze a subgroup of patients with history of drug abuse and drug manufacturing. METHODS: Retrospective case control study. Patient data associated with accelerant-related burns from 2009 to 2014 were obtained from the British Columbia Burn Registry. These patients were compared with a control group of non-accelerant related burns. Clinical outcomes that were evaluated include inhalational injury, ICU length of stay, ventilator support, surgeries needed, and burn complications. Chi-square test was used to evaluate categorical data and Student's t-test was used to evaluate mean quantitative data with the p value set at 0.05. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors affecting burn complications. RESULTS: Accelerant-related burns represented 28.2% of all burn admissions (N=532) from 2009 to 2014. The accelerant group had higher percentage of patients with history of drug abuse and was associated with higher TBSA burns, ventilator support, ICU stay and pneumonia rates compared to the non-accelerant group. Within the accelerant group, there was no difference in clinical outcomes amongst people with or without history of drug abuse. Four cases were associated with methamphetamine manufacturing, all of which underwent ICU stay and ventilator support. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerant-related burns cause significant burden to the burn center. A significant proportion of these patients have history of drug abuse.

Delayed mobilization after microsurgical reconstruction: an independent risk factor for pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Large defects secondary to oral cancer resection are reconstructed with microsurgical free flaps. Pulmonary complications in these patients are common. Postoperative mobilization is recommended to decrease respiratory complications; however, many microsurgeons are reluctant to adopt early mobilization protocols due to the perceived risk of flap compromise. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pneumonia among patients undergoing oral cancer resection and immediate free flap reconstruction and to compare the incidence of this complication between patients mobilized early (<4 days postoperative) versus later. A secondary goal was to determine whether early postoperative mobilization affected microvascular flap outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive patients treated between 2005 and 2009 with oral carcinoma resection and free flap reconstruction were studied. Information pertaining to comorbidities, postoperative care, and complications were collected. Risk factors for development of pulmonary and flap complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of pneumonia was 30.6%. Longer intensive care unit stay (P = 0.01), tracheostomy decannulation later than 10 days (P = 0.04), and longer operative times (P = 0.04) were significantly associated with pneumonia. Delayed mobilization (after day 4 postoperative) was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 17.1). Early mobilization (before day 4 postoperative) was not associated with an increased incidence of secondary flap procedures or flap failure. CONCLUSION: Late mobilization of free flap patients is an independent risk factor for developing postoperative pneumonia. Earlier mobilization does not increase flap failure rates, is safe, and should be strongly considered in all free flap patients to reduce pulmonary complications.