Toward Physiological Detection of a "Just-Right" Challenge Level for Motor Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Motor learning, a primary goal of pediatric rehabilitation, is facilitated when tasks are presented at a "just-right" challenge level-at the edge of the child's current abilities, yet attainable enough to motivate the child in persistent efforts for success. Immersive virtual reality (VR) may be ideally suited for "just-right" task challenges because it enables precise adjustments of task parameters in motivating environments. Rehabilitation-specific VR tasks often use dynamic difficulty algorithms based on task performance to personalize task difficulty. However, these approaches do not consider relevant cognitive processes that could also impact "just-right" challenges, such as attention and engagement. Objective physiological measurement of these cognitive processes using wearable sensors could support their integration within "just-right" challenge detection and prediction algorithms. As a first step, it is important to explore relationships between objectively and subjectively measured psychophysiological states at progressively challenging task difficulty levels. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) evaluate the performance of wearable sensors in a novel movement-based motor learning immersive VR task; (2) evaluate changes in physiological data at 3 task difficulty levels; and (3) explore the relationship between physiological data, task performance, and self-reported cognitive processes at each task difficulty level. METHODS: This study uses the within-participant experimental design. Typically developing children and youth aged 8-16 years will be recruited to take part in a single 90-minute data collection session. Physiological sensors include electrodermal activity, heart rate, electroencephalography, and eye-tracking. After collecting physiological data at rest, participants will play a seated unimanual immersive VR task involving bouncing a virtual ball on a virtual racket. They will first play for 3 minutes at a predefined medium level of difficulty to determine their baseline ability level and then at a personalized choice of 3 progressive difficulty levels of 3 minutes each. Following each 3-minute session, participants will complete a short Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating engagement, attention, cognitive workload, physical effort, self-efficacy, and motivation. Data loss and data quality will be calculated for each sensor. Repeated-measures ANOVAs will evaluate changes in physiological response at each difficulty level. Correlation analyses will determine individual relationships between task performance, physiological data, and self-reported data at each difficulty level. RESULTS: Research ethics board approval has been obtained, and data collection is underway. Data collection was conducted on December 12, 2023, and April 12, 2024, with a total of 15 typically developing children. Data analysis has been completed, and results are expected to be published in the fall of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable sensors may provide insights into the physiological effects of immersive VR task interaction at progressive difficulty levels in children and youth. Understanding the relationship between physiological and self-reported cognitive processes is a first step in better identifying and predicting "just-right" task challenges during immersive VR motor learning interventions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55730.

Exploring the perspectives of health care professionals on digital health technologies in pediatric care and rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies are increasingly used by healthcare professionals working in pediatric hospital and rehabilitation settings. Multiple factors may affect the implementation and use of digital health technologies in these settings. However, such factors have not been identified in a multidisciplinary, pediatric context. The objective of this study was to describe actual use and to identify the factors that promote or hinder the intention to use digital health technologies (mobile learning applications, virtual/augmented reality, serious games, robotic devices, telehealth applications, computerized assessment tools, and wearables) among pediatric healthcare professionals. METHODS: An online survey evaluating opinions, current use, and future intentions to use digital health technologies was completed by 108 professionals at one of Canada's largest pediatric institutes. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the attitudes of healthcare professionals who intend to increase their use of digital health technologies and those who do not. Linear regression analyses were used to determine predictors of usage success. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals reported mostly using mobile and tablet learning applications (n = 43, 38.1%), telehealth applications (n = 49, 43.4%), and computerized assessment tools (n = 33, 29.2%). Attitudes promoting the intention to increase the use of digital health technologies varied according to technology type. Healthcare professionals who wished to increase their use of digital health technologies reported a more positive attitude regarding benefits in clinical practice and patient care, but were also more critical of potential negative impacts on patient-professional relationships. Ease of use (ß = 0.374; p = 0.020) was a significant predictor of more favorable usage success. The range of obstacles encountered was also a significant predictor (ß = 0.342; p = 0.032) of less favorable evaluation of usage success. Specific factors that hinder successful usage are lack of training (ß = 0.303; p = 0.033) and inadequate infrastructure (ß = 0.342; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: When working with children, incorporating digital health technologies can be effective for motivation and adherence. However, it is crucial to ensure these tools are implemented properly. The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing training and infrastructure needs when elaborating technology-specific strategies for multidisciplinary adoption of digital health technologies in pediatric settings.

Virtual Reality and Active Video Game Integration within an Intensive Bimanual Therapy Program for Children with Hemiplegia.

AIMS: To describe the nature of custom and non-custom virtual reality and active video game (VR/AVG) implementation within a Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) intervention program for children with hemiplegia. METHODS: Six children aged 8-11 years participated in a 10-day HABIT-ILE intervention (65 h; 6.5 planned VR/AVG hours). VR/AVG implementation details were recorded daily and summarized with descriptive statistics; active motor engagement was quantified as minutes of active game participation. Post-intervention interviews with interventionists were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: On average, participants received 79% of the planned VR/AVG dosage (314/400 planned minutes, range 214-400 min), of which the per-session active motor engagement average was 68% (27 min, SD 12 min). Participation involved equivalent amounts of custom (49%) and non-custom (51%) VR/AVG system use. Material and verbal adaptations facilitated alignment with HABIT-ILE principles. Interventionists identified type of task (gross versus fine motor), children's perceived motivation, and VR/AVG attributes as factors influencing active motor engagement and alignment with HABIT-ILE principles. CONCLUSIONS: Describing individual and technological challenges of VR/AVG integration within HABIT-ILE can advance knowledge about VR/AVG use in intensive interventions and identify directions for subsequent research.

Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude in Motor Behavior-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Systematic Review.

Motor evoked potential amplitude (MEPamp) is frequently measured in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies that target the primary motor cortex (M1), and a subset of these studies involve motor behavior. This systematic review explored the role of MEPamp as an indicator of neural change in M1-targeted tDCS studies involving motor behavior (i.e., motor practice and/or evaluation of motor performance) in healthy individuals, and examined the association between changes in motor performance and MEPamp. We executed our search strategy across four bibliographic databases. Twenty-two manuscripts met eligibility criteria. While anodal tDCS combined with motor practice frequently increased MEPamp, MEPamp outcomes did not necessarily align with changes in motor performance. Thus, MEPamp may not be the most appropriate indicator of neural change in tDCS studies that aim to improve motor performance.

Cognitive behavioral therapies for individuals with cerebral palsy: A scoping review.

AIM: To synthesize the evidence about the main intervention characteristics of cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) for individuals with cerebral palsy and identify barriers and facilitators to their success, focusing on aspects of feasibility and markers of success. METHOD: A scoping review methodology informed a literature search for papers published between 1991 and 2021. Articles were screened, reviewed, and categorized using the DistillerSR systematic review software, and critically appraised for quantitative and/or qualitative criteria. RESULTS: Out of 1265 publications identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Elements associated with the specific study participant characteristics (46% female; aged 6-65 years), type of CBT techniques used (third-wave [n = 6], cognitive [n = 3], cognitive and behavioral [n = 2], biofeedback training [n = 2]), and features of the study context and methodological quality (two randomized clinical trials and small sample sizes [n ≤ 12]), were identified. Most studies had psychological targets of intervention (n = 10) and secondary physiological (n = 3) or social (n = 2) objectives. Feasibility indicators were described in nearly one-third of the papers. INTERPRETATION: This study highlights the high flexibility within CBT interventions, enabling their adaptation for individuals with cerebral palsy. However, relatively little, and only low-certainty evidence was identified. More high-quality research in terms of specific CBT techniques, optimal treatment doses, and detailed population characteristics are needed.

Integrating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation into an Existing Inpatient Physiotherapy Program to Enhance Motor Learning in an Adolescent with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: Describe how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was incorporated into an inpatient physiotherapy program for an adolescent with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), detail the motor learning focus of the physiotherapy sessions, and summarize gross motor progress. METHOD: This case report describes an adolescent who received 20 minutes of anodal tDCS immediately prior to 16 physiotherapy sessions over four weeks. Potential side effects were tracked pre/post tDCS. Gross motor outcomes were measured pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Physiotherapy session content was analyzed using therapist documentation and the Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument. RESULTS: The youth tolerated tDCS well. The primary side effect was itchiness under the electrodes during tDCS sessions. His mobility progressed from wheelchair use pre- 'tDCS + physiotherapy' to ambulation with a walker post-intervention. His Gross Motor Function Measure score increased 33.1% points pre/post intervention. Session tasks often had several foci (e.g., skill acquisition, strength, and balance) with task focus changing as the youth progressed. Various motor learning strategies were layered within tasks to support performance and learning. CONCLUSIONS: tDCS was successfully integrated into an existing inpatient physiotherapy program for an adolescent with TBI. This protocol provides a structure for implementing, monitoring, and measuring tDCS + physiotherapy in pediatric rehabilitation.

Gross motor change after inpatient rehabilitation for children with acquired brain injury: A 10-year retrospective review.

AIM: To estimate gross motor change in inpatient school-aged children with subacute acquired brain injury (ABI), identify factors associated with gross motor change, and describe inpatient physiotherapy focus. METHOD: This retrospective chart review involved inpatient children (5-18 years) with subacute ABI who had either two Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) assessments or one GMFM-88 with another pre/post gross motor outcome measure. Outcome change scores and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) T scores were calculated. Regression analyses examined factors predicting gross motor change. GAS goal areas were analysed to determine physiotherapy focus. RESULTS: Of the 546 charts screened, 266 (118 female) met study criteria. The GMFM-88 was generally administered first, followed by other measures. GMFM-88 (n = 202), Community Balance and Mobility Scale (n = 89), and Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) (n = 98) mean change scores were 18.03% (SD 19.34), 17.85% (SD 10.77), and 142.3 m (SD 101.8) respectively. The mean GAS T score was 55.06 (SD 11.50). Lower baseline scores and increased time between assessments were most predictive of greater GMFM-88 change (r ≥ 0.40). Twenty-five percent of GAS goals were ambulation-based. INTERPRETATION: Appropriate outcome measure selection is integral to detecting gross motor change in pediatric inpatient ABI rehabilitation. Mean change score estimates can be used to compare standard inpatient rehabilitation with new treatment approaches.

Training Intervention and Program of Support for Fostering the Adoption of Family-Centered Telehealth in Pediatric Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Multimethod, Prospective, Hybrid Type 3 Implementation-Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND: Children with disability face long wait times for rehabilitation services. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth adoption was low across pediatric rehabilitation. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, pediatric therapists were asked to rapidly shift to telehealth, often with minimal training. To facilitate the behavior changes necessary for telehealth adoption, provision of appropriate evidence-based training and support is required. However, evidence to support the effective implementation of such training is lacking. The successful real-world implementation of a training intervention and program of support (TIPS) targeting pediatric therapists to enhance the adoption of family-centered telerehabilitation (FCT) requires the evaluation of both implementation and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate TIPS implementation in different pediatric rehabilitation settings and assess TIPS effectiveness, as it relates to therapists' adoption, service wait times, families' perception of service quality, and costs. METHODS: This 4-year, pan-Canadian study involves managers, pediatric occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech-language pathologists, and families from 20 sites in 8 provincial jurisdictions. It will use a multimethod, prospective, hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness design. An interrupted time series will assess TIPS implementation. TIPS will comprise a 1-month training intervention with self-paced learning modules and a webinar, followed by an 11-month support program, including monthly site meetings and access to a virtual community of practice. Longitudinal mixed modeling will be used to analyze indicators of therapists' adoption of and fidelity to FCT collected at 10 time points. To identify barriers and facilitators to adoption and fidelity, qualitative data will be collected during implementation and analyzed using a deductive-inductive thematic approach. To evaluate effectiveness, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design will use questionnaires to evaluate TIPS effectiveness at service, therapist, and family levels. Generalized linear mixed effects models will be used in data analysis. Manager, therapist, and family interviews will be conducted after implementation and analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Finally, cost data will be gathered to calculate public system and societal costs. RESULTS: Ethics approval has been obtained from 2 jurisdictions (February 2022 and July 2022); approval is pending in the others. In total, 20 sites have been recruited, and data collection is anticipated to start in September 2022 and is projected to be completed by September 2024. Data analysis will occur concurrently with data collection, with results disseminated throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study will generate knowledge about the effectiveness of TIPS targeting pediatric therapists to enhance FCT adoption in pediatric rehabilitation settings, identify facilitators for and barriers to adoption, and document the impact of telehealth adoption on therapists, services, and families. The study knowledge gained will refine the training intervention, enhance intervention uptake, and support the integration of telehealth as a consistent pediatric rehabilitation service option for families of children with disabilities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05312827; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05312827. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/40218.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on therapy service delivery and functioning for school-aged children with disabilities in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused wide-scale disruptions to therapy services for children with disabilities in the United States. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated changes in therapy service delivery during the first four months of the pandemic, examined the impact of these changes on children's functioning, and analyzed factors predicting the loss of in-person services and receipt of teletherapy services. METHODS: We undertook an anonymous cross-sectional online survey of parents/caregivers of children with a disability aged 5-17 years. Changes in therapy service delivery and children's functioning were descriptively summarized. Logistic regressions examined individual and contextual predictors of loss of therapy services or receipt of teletherapy services. RESULTS: 402 parents of children aged 5-17 years old with one or more disabilities participated; 42% of children lost access to all therapy services, and 34% of children received at least one therapy service via telehealth. Children receiving a greater number of services pre-COVID and having access to more technological devices pre-COVID were significantly more likely to receive teletherapy. Over 40% of parents attributed declines in their child's motor, behavior, social, and communication skills to changes in therapy services; this impact was greater for children with multiple diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the negative impact of therapy service disruptions on children with disabilities.

Performance Variability During Motor Learning of a New Balance Task in a Non-immersive Virtual Environment in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy and Typically Developing Peers.

Background: Motor impairments contribute to performance variability in children with cerebral palsy (CP) during motor skill learning. Non-immersive virtual environments (VEs) are popular interventions to promote motor learning in children with hemiplegic CP. Greater understanding of performance variability as compared to typically developing (TD) peers during motor learning in VEs may inform clinical decisions about practice dose and challenge progression. Purpose: (1) To quantify within-child (i.e., across different timepoints) and between-child (i.e., between children at the same timepoint) variability in motor skill acquisition, retention and transfer in a non-immersive VE in children with CP as compared to TD children; and (2) To explore the relationship between the amount of within-child variability during skill acquisition and learning outcomes. Methods: Secondary data analysis of 2 studies in which 13 children with hemiplegic CP and 67 TD children aged 7-14 years undertook repeated trials of a novel standing postural control task in acquisition, retention and transfer sessions. Changes in performance across trials and sessions in children with CP as compared to TD children and between younger (7-10 years) and older (11-14 years) children were assessed using mixed effects models. Raw scores were converted to z-scores to meet model distributional assumptions. Performance variability was quantified as the standard deviation of z-scores. Results: TD children outperformed children with CP and older children outperformed younger children at each session. Older children with CP had the least between-child variability in acquisition and the most in retention, while older TD children demonstrated the opposite pattern. Younger children with CP had consistently high between-child variability, with no difference between sessions. Within-child variability was highest in younger children, regardless of group. Within-child variability was more pronounced in TD children as compared to children with CP. The relationship between the amount of within-child variability in performance and performance outcome at acquisition, retention and transfer sessions was task-specific, with a positive correlation for 1 study and a negative correlation in the other. Conclusions: Findings, though preliminary and limited by small sample size, can inform subsequent research to explore VE-specific causes of performance variability, including differing movement execution requirements and individual characteristics such as motivation, attention and visuospatial abilities.

Exploring Physiotherapists' Use of Motor Learning Strategies in Gait-Based Interventions for Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Aim: This study investigated physiotherapists' experiences using motor learning strategies (MLS) in gait-based interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The objectives were to explore how child characteristics, physiotherapist decision-making, and treatment approach influenced intentional MLS use.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight physiotherapists who provided gym- and/or Lokomat-based treatment to children with CP. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis and a modified constant comparison method.Results: Three themes described their experiences: (1) MLS use is driven by the unique aspects of the child, physiotherapist, and intervention; (2) The use and description of motor learning content varies among physiotherapists; and (3) The Lokomat is "the same but different." Child characteristics were at the forefront of MLS selection in both interventions. The terminology used to describe MLS use varied considerably among therapists. They used similar clinical decision-making in gym- and Lokomat-based interventions.Conclusions: Conscious reflection on the factors affecting MLS use could facilitate related clinical decision-making in physiotherapy interventions for children with CP. Increased awareness of MLS and use of a structured framework for reporting MLS are required to promote intentional MLS use and generate CP-specific evidence-based MLS research.

Learning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review.

The development of more effective rehabilitative interventions requires a better understanding of how humans learn and transfer motor skills in real-world contexts. Presently, clinicians design interventions to promote skill learning by relying on evidence from experimental paradigms involving simple tasks, such as reaching for a target. While these tasks facilitate stringent hypothesis testing in laboratory settings, the results may not shed light on performance of more complex real-world skills. In this perspective, we argue that virtual environments (VEs) are flexible, novel platforms to evaluate learning and transfer of complex skills without sacrificing experimental control. Specifically, VEs use models of real-life tasks that afford controlled experimental manipulations to measure and guide behavior with a precision that exceeds the capabilities of physical environments. This paper reviews recent insights from VE paradigms on motor learning into two pressing challenges in rehabilitation research: 1) Which training strategies in VEs promote complex skill learning? and 2) How can transfer of learning from virtual to real environments be enhanced? Defining complex skills by having nested redundancies, we outline findings on the role of movement variability in complex skill acquisition and discuss how VEs can provide novel forms of guidance to enhance learning. We review the evidence for skill transfer from virtual to real environments in typically developing and neurologically-impaired populations with a view to understanding how differences in sensory-motor information may influence learning strategies. We provide actionable suggestions for practicing clinicians and outline broad areas where more research is required. Finally, we conclude that VEs present distinctive experimental platforms to understand complex skill learning that should enable transfer from therapeutic practice to the real world.

End-user involvement in rehabilitation virtual reality implementation research.

PURPOSE: Despite increasing evidence for the effectiveness of off-the-shelf and rehabilitation-specific active video games (AVGs) and virtual reality (VR) systems for rehabilitation, clinical uptake remains poor. A better match between VR/AVG system capabilities and client/therapist needs, through improved end-user involvement (UI) in VR/AVG implementation research, may increase uptake of this technology. The purpose of this paper is to review four case examples from the authors' collective experience of including end users in VR/AVG research to identify common benefits, challenges and lessons learned. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors apply knowledge and lessons learned from the four cases to make recommendations for subsequent user-engaged research design and methods, including evaluation of the impact of end UI. FINDINGS: A better match between VR/AVG system capabilities and client/therapist needs leads to improved end UI in all stages of VR/AVG implementation research. There are common benefits of increasing buy-in and soliciting early on the knowledge and skills of therapists as well as input from the ultimate end users: people participating in rehabilitation. Most settings have the challenges of balancing the technology requirements with the needs and goals of the practice setting and of the end users. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Increasing end UI in VR/AVG implementation research may address issues related to poor clinical uptake. In the VR/AVG context, end users can be therapists, clients or technology developers/engineers. This paper presented four case scenarios describing the implementation of different VR/AVG systems and involving a variety of populations, end users and settings. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The set of recommendations for subsequent user-engaged research design and methods span the process of development, research and implementation. The authors hope that these recommendations will foster collaborations across disciplines, encourage researchers and therapists to adopt VR/AVGs more readily, and lead to efficacious and effective treatment approaches for rehabilitation clients.

What is the impact of user affect on motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review.

PURPOSE: The purported affective impact of virtual reality (VR) and active video gaming (AVG) systems is a key marketing strategy underlying their use in stroke rehabilitation, yet little is known as to how affective constructs are measured or linked to intervention outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review is to 1) explore how motivation, enjoyment, engagement, immersion and presence are measured or described in VR/AVG interventions for patients with stroke; 2) identify directional relationships between these constructs; and 3) evaluate their impact on motor learning outcomes. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken of VR/AVG interventional studies for adults post-stroke published in Medline, PEDro and CINAHL databases between 2007 and 2017. Following screening, reviewers used an iterative charting framework to extract data about construct measurement and description. A numerical and thematic analytical approach adhered to established scoping review guidelines. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five studies were included in the review. Although the majority (89%; N = 138) of studies described at least one of the five constructs within their text, construct measurement took place in only 32% (N = 50) of studies. The most frequently described construct was motivation (79%, N = 123) while the most frequently measured construct was enjoyment (27%, N = 42). A summative content analysis of the 50 studies in which a construct was measured revealed that constructs were described either as a rationale for the use of VR/AVGs in rehabilitation (76%, N = 38) or as an explanation for intervention results (56%, N = 29). 38 (76%) of the studies proposed relational links between two or more constructs and/or between any construct and motor learning. No study used statistical analyses to examine these links. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a clear discrepancy between the theoretical importance of affective constructs within VR/AVG interventions and actual construct measurement. Standardized terminology and outcome measures are required to better understand how enjoyment, engagement, motivation, immersion and presence contribute individually or in interaction to VR/AVG intervention effectiveness.

Reliability of the Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument in physiotherapy intervention for children with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To evaluate the reliability of the Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument (MLSRI-20) in gait-based, video-recorded physiotherapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Thirty videos of 18 children with CP, aged 6 to 17 years, participating in either traditional or Lokomat-based physiotherapy interventions were rated using the MLSRI-20. Physiotherapist raters provided general and item-specific feedback after rating each video, which was used when interpreting reliability results. RESULTS: Both interrater and intrarater reliability of the MLSRI-20 total score was good. The interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.78 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.53-0.89 and a coefficient of variation (CV) of 11.8%. The intrarater reliability ICC was 0.89 with a 95% CI of 0.76-0.95 and CV of 7.8%. Rater feedback identified task delineation and interpretation of therapist verbalizations as sources of interrater reliability-related scoring challenges. INTERPRETATION: The MLSRI-20 is a reliable tool for measuring the extent to which a physiotherapist uses motor learning strategies during a video-recorded intervention. These results have clinical and research implications for documenting and analyzing the motor learning content of physiotherapy interventions for children with CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument (MLSRI-20) is reliable for use by trained physiotherapist raters. Measuring motor learning strategies can identify active 'ingredients' in physiotherapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy. The MLSRI-20 promotes a common language in motor learning.

FIABILIDAD DEL INSTRUMENTO DE CLASIFICACIÓN DE LAS ESTRATEGIAS DE APRENDIZAJE MOTOR EN FISIOTERAPIA: OBJETIVO: Evaluar la fiabilidad del Instrumento de Clasificación de las Estrategias de Aprendizaje Motor (Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument, MLSRI-20, siglas en inglés,) en intervenciones fisioterapéuticas basadas en la marcha y grabadas en vídeo para niños con parálisis cerebral (PC). METODOLOGÍA: Se clasificaron 30 vídeos de 18 niños y niñas con PC, de edades comprendidas entre los 6 y 17 años y participando en intervenciones de Fisioterapia tradicionales o basadas en el Lokomat, usando el MLRSI-20. Los evaluadores fisioterapeutas proporcionaron retroalimentación general y específica de los ítems después de clasificar cada vídeo, el cual fue usado al interpretar los resultados de fiabilidad. RESULTADOS: Tanto la fiabilidad inter-observador de la puntuación total del MLSRI-20 como la fiabilidad intra-observador fueron buenas. El coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI) de la fiabilidad inter-observador fue de 0,78 con un intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC) de 0,53-0,89 y la variación del coeficiente (VC) del 11,8%. EL CCI de la fiabilidad intra-observador fue 0,89 con un IC95% de 0,76-0-95 y un CV de 7,8%. La retroalimentación del evaluador identificó la delineación de la tarea y la interpretación de las verbalizaciones del terapeuta como fuentes de desafío para puntuar la fiabilidad inter-observador. INTERPRETACIÓN: El MLSRI-20 es una herramienta fiable para medir en qué grado los fisioterapeutas usan estrategias de aprendizaje motor durante una intervención grabada en vídeo. Estos resultados tienen implicaciones clínicas y de investigación para documentar y analizar el contenido de aprendizaje motor en las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas en niños con PC.

CONFIABILIDADE DO INSTRUMENTO DE PONTUAÇÃO DAS ESTRATÉGIAS DE APRENDIZAGEM MOTORA NA INTERVENÇÃO DE FISIOTERAPIA PARA CRIANÇAS COM PARALISIA CEREBRAL: OBJETIVO: Avaliar a confiabilidade do Instrumento de Pontuação das Estratégias de Aprendizagem Motora (Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument, MLSRI-20) em intervenções de fisioterapia para crianças com paralisia cerebral (PC) baseadas na marcha e registradas por vídeo. MÉTODO: Trinta videos de 18 crianças com PC, com idades de 6 a 17 anos, participando ou em intervenções de fisioterapia baseada no Lokomat foram pontuadas usando o MLSRI-20. Os examinadores fisioterapeutas forneceram uma avaliação geral e item-específica após pontuar cada vídeo, o que foi usado para interpretar os resultados de confiabilidade. RESULTADOS: Tanto a confiabilidade inter-examinador quanto intra-examinador do MLSRI-20 foi boa. O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) da confiabilidade inter-foi 0,78 com intervalo de confiança (IC) a 95% de 0,53-0,89 e coeficiente de variação (CV) de 11,8%. O CII da confiabilidade intra-examinador foi 0,89 com CI a 95% de 0,76-0,95 e CV de 7,8%. A avaliação dos examinadores identificou o delineamento da tarefa e as verbalizações dos terapeutas para interpretação como fontes de desafios na pontuação da confiabilidade inter-examinadores. INTERPRETAÇÃO: O MLSRI-20 é uma ferramenta confiável para mensurar a extensão em que um fisioterapeuta usa estratégias de aprendizagem motora durante uma intervenção gravada em video. Os resultados têm implicações clínicas e científicas para a documentação e análise do conteúdo de aprendizagem motora em crianças com PC.

Does Narrative Feedback Enhance Children's Motor Learning in a Virtual Environment?

Augmented feedback has motivational and informational functions in motor learning, and is a key feature of practice in a virtual environment (VE). This study evaluated the impact of narrative (story-based) feedback as compared to standard feedback during practice of a novel task in a VE on typically developing children's motor learning, motivation and engagement. Thirty-eight children practiced navigating through a virtual path, receiving narrative or non-narrative feedback following each trial. All participants improved their performance on retention but not transfer, with no significant differences between groups. Self-reported engagement was associated with acquisition, retention and transfer for both groups. A narrative approach to feedback delivery did not offer an additive benefit; additional affective advantages of augmented feedback for motor learning in VEs should be explored.

The Effects of a 5-Day Virtual-Reality Based Exercise Program on Kinematics and Postural Muscle Activity in Youth with Cerebral Palsy.

Aims: To determine the effects of a 5-day virtual reality (VR)-based intervention on anticipatory and reactive mechanisms of postural control in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: Eleven youth with CP (GMFCS levels I and II), ages 7-17, were allocated to intervention (N = 5) and control (N = 6) groups. Both groups attended balance assessment sessions 1 week apart. Participants in the intervention group received 1-hour one-on-one physiotherapist-supervised VR balance games for 5 consecutive days between assessments. For balance assessments, participants stood erect with eyes open on a movable platform that translated progressively through four speeds in the anterior/posterior direction. Participants performed two trials each of experimenter-triggered and self-triggered perturbations. Postural muscle activity and kinematics were recorded. The Anchoring Index and body segment cross-correlations were calculated as an indication of body stabilization, and the number of steps taken to regain balance/avoid falling were counted. Mann-Whitney U tests for between group differences in change scores were undertaken with an accepted significance level of 0.01. Results: No consistent differences in change scores were identified between groups. Conclusions: There was no effect of a 5-day VR-based intervention on postural control mechanisms used in response to oscillating platform perturbations. Subsequent studies will further tailor VR interventions to patients' functional balance needs.

Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions to Support Virtual Reality Implementation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.

Virtual reality and active video games (VR/AVGs) are promising rehabilitation tools because of their potential to facilitate abundant, motivating, and feedback-rich practice. However, clinical adoption remains low despite a growing evidence base and the recent development of clinically accessible and rehabilitation-specific VR/AVG systems. Given clinicians' eagerness for resources to support VR/AVG use, a critical need exists for knowledge translation (KT) interventions to facilitate VR/AVG integration into clinical practice. KT interventions have the potential to support adoption by targeting known barriers to, and facilitators of, change. This scoping review of the VR/AVG literature uses the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to (1) structure an overview of known barriers and facilitators to clinical uptake of VR/AVGs for rehabilitation; (2) identify KT strategies to target these factors to facilitate adoption; and (3) report the results of these strategies. Barriers/facilitators and evaluated or proposed KT interventions spanned all but 1 and 2 TDF domains, respectively. Most frequently cited barriers/facilitators were found in the TDF domains of Knowledge, Skills, Beliefs About Capabilities, Beliefs About Consequences, Intentions, Goals, Environmental Context and Resources, and Social Influences. Few studies empirically evaluated KT interventions to support adoption; measured change in VR/AVG use did not accompany improvements in self-reported skills, attitudes, and knowledge. Recommendations to target frequently identified barriers include technology development to meet end-user needs more effectively, competency development for end-users, and facilitated VR/AVG implementation in clinical settings. Subsequent research can address knowledge gaps in both clinical and VR/AVG implementation research, including on KT intervention effectiveness and unexamined TDF domain barriers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A Tablet-Based Interactive Movement Tool for Pediatric Rehabilitation: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Motivating interactive tools may increase adherence to repetitive practice for children with disabilities, but many virtual reality and active video gaming systems are too challenging for children with significant needs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and conduct a usability evaluation of the Fun, Interactive Therapy Board (FITBoard), a movement toy bridging digital and physical interactions for children with disabilities. METHODS: The FITBoard is a tablet app involving games controlled by hand, head, or foot touch of configurable, wired surfaces. Usability evaluation involved a cognitive walkthrough and think-aloud processes. Participants verbalized aloud while completing a series of 26 task actions involved in selecting a game and configuring the FITBoard to achieve the therapeutic goal. Therapists then responded to questions about usability perceptions. Unsuccessful actions were categorized as goal or action failures. Qualitative content analysis supported understanding of usability problems. RESULTS: Participants included 5 pediatric physical therapists and 2 occupational therapists from 2 clinical sites. Goal failure was experienced by all participants in 2 tasks, and action failure was experienced by all participants in 2 tasks. For 14 additional tasks, 1 or more patients experienced goal or action failure, with an overall failure rate of 69% (18 of 26 tasks). Content analysis revealed 4 main categories: hardware usability, software usability, facilitators of therapy goals, and improvement suggestions. CONCLUSIONS: FITBoard hardware and software changes are needed to address goal and action failures to rectify identified usability issues. Results highlight potential FITBoard applications to address therapeutic goals and outline important practical considerations for product use by therapists. Subsequent research will evaluate therapist, parent, and child perspectives on FITBoard clinical utility when integrated within regular therapy interventions.

Usability of the 'Kinect-ing' with Clinicians Website: A Knowledge Translation Resource Supporting Decisions About Active Videogame Use in Rehabilitation.

Objective: Commercially available active videogames (AVGs) are promising rehabilitation options, but lack of familiarity with game options may limit clinical integration. We evaluated content and format usability of the 'Kinect-ing' with Clinicians (KwiC) website, an online tool that characterizes commercially available games to support clinical decision-making about Kinect™ game use for rehabilitation. Materials and Methods: This study is a cross-sectional online survey of physical therapists (PTs). Participants selected a case scenario and reviewed the KwiC resource for information about five Kinect games. Based on this interaction, participants selected two games that would meet case scenario goals and answered Likert scale and open-ended questions about KwiC usability and usefulness of the content in guiding game selection for clinical case scenarios. Results: Twenty-five PTs participated, six of whom had previous AVG experience. All KwiC items achieved prespecified consensus of 80% "agree" or "strongly agree" on statements evaluating ease of understanding, usefulness, and format usability. There were no differences in ratings between those with and without AVG experience. Participants most appreciated the videos illustrating game play. Eighty-four percent strongly agreed that the KwiC helped them to make a decision about their case scenario. Participants suggested improving the KwiC by including more information about game use with rehabilitation populations. Conclusions: Positive usability feedback supports continued KwiC development efforts to add additional games, expand information about use specific to clinical populations, and broaden the online format to allow opportunities for clinicians to provide feedback and suggestions. We will then evaluate utility of the KwiC in clinical practice.