RESUMO
Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important risk factor for child physical abuse, most IPV-exposed children are not evaluated for abusive injuries. A Community Advisory Board (CAB) was formed to (a) optimize a program to evaluate IPV-exposed children for abusive injuries and (b) inform research methods to engage IPV victims and their children. The objectives of this study were to implement and to evaluate the family violence CAB. Following best practices on CAB formation, we recruited local stakeholders with key roles as service providers, community leaders, and knowledge experts in IPV, child abuse, and emergency care. Fourteen members met bimonthly to develop a family-centered intervention and to inform research and advocacy activities. A shared memorandum of understanding outlined goals and objectives. One year after the CAB's implementation, a research assistant interviewed CAB members to understand their experiences, perceived benefits of participation, and desired improvements. Eleven CAB members, including an IPV survivor, participated. Emerging categories included (a) motivations to join the CAB (victim advocacy), (b) benefits of participation (development of relationships among members and increased acceptability of research methods), (c) facilitators of sustainability (program adaptability and development of trust), and (d) desired improvements (case-based follow-up). The CAB was successfully implemented and facilitated the development of collaborative relationships among stakeholders with key roles in IPV and child abuse. The CAB led to community member-proposed changes in research activities and clinical care for victims of IPV.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/prevenção & controle , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Violência DomésticaRESUMO
It is unclear if surveillance bias (increased reports to Child Protective Services [CPS] related to program involvement) has a substantial impact on evaluation of home visiting (HV) prevention programs. We estimated surveillance bias using data from Connecticut's HV program, birth certificates, CPS, and hospitals. Using propensity score matching, we identified 15,870 families similar to 4015 HV families. The difference-in-differences approach was used to estimate surveillance bias as the change in investigated reports from the last 6 months of program involvement to the next 6 months. The median age of the children at program exit was 1.2 years (range: 60 days, 5 years). We estimated that 25.6% of investigated reports in the HV group resulted from surveillance bias. We reviewed CPS reports of 194 home-visited families to determine if a home visitor made the report and found that 10% were directly from home visitors. Program evaluations should account for surveillance bias.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controle , Visita Domiciliar , Serviços de Proteção Infantil , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
Importance: Several studies have demonstrated a decrease in the occurrence of child abuse in the US since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding has generated concern for missed cases due to the initial lockdowns and lack of childcare resources. Determining the association of the pandemic on hospitalizations for severe forms of abuse is essential to focus preventive efforts. Objective: To examine trends in abusive head trauma (AHT) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, multicenter, repeated cross-sectional study, conducted January 1, 2016, through April 30, 2022, with data from tertiary care children's hospitals and contributors to the Pediatric Health Information System. Data were obtained for 2380 hospitalizations of children younger than 5 years with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for both abuse and head trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly hospitalizations were analyzed using interrupted time-series analysis. Hospitalization severity (eg, intensive care unit stay) and clinical characteristics (subdural hemorrhages and retinal hemorrhages) were compared before and after the start of the pandemic. Results: We identified 2380 hospitalizations due to AHT (median age, 140 [IQR, 75.0-325.5] days) from 45 hospitals. The mean (SD) monthly incidence of AHT was 34.3 (5.8) before the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 25.6 (4.2) during COVID-19 (a 25.4% decrease). When the pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 periods were compared, there were no significant differences in severity or clinical characteristics. On interrupted time-series analysis, there was a significant decrease in the number of monthly hospitalizations (-8.1; 95% CI, -12.41 to -3.72; P < .001) in the first month of the pandemic. In the subgroup of children younger than 1 year, there was a significant decrease in monthly hospitalizations at the onset of the pandemic (-8.2; 95% CI, -12.02 to -4.43; P < .001) followed by a significant temporal increase across the COVID-19 period (P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest there was a significant decrease in monthly hospitalizations for AHT following the start of the pandemic in March 2020. Although there was no corresponding increase in hospitalization severity, the decrease during the pandemic may have been transient, as monthly hospitalizations for children younger than 1 year increased significantly over time during COVID-19, after the initial decrease.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Humanos , Criança , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Hospitalização , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controle , Política Pública , HospitaisRESUMO
This Viewpoint exposes the antiscience and misinformation used to generate skepticism about abusive head trauma in young children, putting this vulnerable population at risk.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Humanos , Lactente , Criança , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects 1 in 4 American women, and physical child abuse is reported to occur in 10-67 % of homes with IPV. Routine evaluation of physical abuse in IPV-exposed children is neither widespread nor informed by clinical guidelines. Thus, the true frequency of detectable injuries in IPV-exposed children remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of injuries in children <3-years-old reported for IPV to a regional child protective services (CPS) office. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we reviewed encounters of children whose caregivers agreed to an evaluation for injuries (physical exam and imaging, if indicated) from July 2019-June 2022. Children were included if: 1) a CPS investigator referred a child for evaluation for injuries ("non-acute" evaluation) or 2) a child presented immediately after an IPV incident ("acute" evaluation). RESULTS: Of 326 children <3-years-old reported to the CPS office after IPV exposure, 90 (27.6 %) were evaluated: 81(90 %) presented for a non-acute evaluation, and 21(23 %) were reported to have sustained trauma during the IPV event. Of the 90 children evaluated, 3 (3.3 %, 95 % CI 0.7-9.4) were found to have cutaneous injuries, fractures, and/or intracranial findings. Each was <6-months old and had an "acute" evaluation. CONCLUSION: In this study of children reported to CPS for IPV exposure, a small percentage was found to have injuries. A multi-center study that examines the frequency of and factors that increase the risk of abusive injuries in IPV-exposed children may ensure that testing targets children at highest risk.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Fraturas Ósseas , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Abuso Físico , Programas VoluntáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators of evaluating children exposed to caregiver intimate partner violence (IPV) and develop a strategy to optimize the evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: Using the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment) framework, we conducted qualitative interviews of 49 stakeholders, including emergency department clinicians (n = 18), child abuse pediatricians (n = 15), child protective services staff (n = 12), and caregivers who experienced IPV (n = 4), and reviewed meeting minutes of a family violence community advisory board (CAB). Researchers coded and analyzed interviews and CAB minutes using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Codes were expanded and revised until a final structure emerged. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) benefits of evaluation, including the opportunity to assess children for physical abuse and to engage caregivers; (2) barriers, including limited evidence about the risk of abuse in these children, burdening a resource-limited system, and the complexity of IPV; (3) facilitators, including collaboration between medical and IPV providers; and (4) recommendations for trauma- and violence-informed care (TVIC) in which a child's evaluation is leveraged to link caregivers with an IPV advocate to address the caregiver's needs. CONCLUSIONS: Routine evaluation of IPV-exposed children may lead to the detection of physical abuse and linkage to services for the child and the caregiver. Collaboration, improved data on the risk of child physical abuse in the context of IPV and implementation of TVIC may improve outcomes for families experiencing IPV.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Violência Doméstica , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Criança , Humanos , Cuidadores , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Background: Prior estimates of the cumulative risks of child welfare system contact illustrate the prominence of this system in the lives of children in the United States (U.S.). However, these estimates report national data on a system administered at the state and local levels and are unable to detail potential simultaneous geographic and racial/ethnic variation in the prevalence of these events. Methods: Using 2015-2019 data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, we use synthetic cohort life tables to estimate cumulative state- and race/ethnicity-specific risks by age 18 of experiencing: (1) a child protective services investigation, (2) confirmed maltreatment, (3) foster care placement, and (4) termination of parental rights for children in the U.S. Results: In the U.S., state-level investigation risks ranged from 14% to 63%, confirmed maltreatment risks from 3% to 27%, foster care placement risks from 2% to 18%, and risks of parental rights termination from 0% to 8%. Racial/ethnic disparities in these risks varied greatly across states, with larger disparities at higher levels of involvement. Whereas Black children had higher risks of all events than white children in nearly all states, Asian children had consistently lower risks. Finally, ratios comparing risks of child welfare events show these prevalences did not move in parallel, across states or racial/ethnic groups. Contribution: This study provides new estimates of spatial and racial/ethnic variation in children's lifetime risks of maltreatment investigation, confirmed maltreatment, foster care placement, and termination of parental rights in the U.S., as well as relative risks of these events.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical abuse of children is reported to occur in 30%-60% of homes with intimate partner violence (IPV). IPV in adult victims presenting to emergency departments (EDs) represents a critical opportunity to evaluate for child safety. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the frequency of child safety assessments (CSAs), defined as any documented inquiry about the presence of children in the household, when adults presented to EDs for IPV. The secondary aims were to assess (1) the impact of demographic factors, ED type, and social work (SW) involvement on the likelihood of CSAs; (2) the nature of children's exposure; and (3) the frequency of child protective services (CPS) reports. METHODS: We performed a chart review of encounters with ICD-10-CM codes for patients aged 18-60 with IPV presenting to three EDs in Connecticut from 2017 through 2019. RESULTS: CSAs were completed in 179/277 encounters (78.9%) and were more likely to be completed in encounters with SW involvement than without (162/171 [94.7%] vs. 17/56 [30.3%], p < 0.001). A total of 143 children lived in the home at the time of the incident; of the 107 children for whom the nature of exposure was known, 10 (9.3%) were physically involved and 26 (24.2%) were direct witnesses to the violence. CPS reports were made in 52.4% of the encounters in which children lived in the home. CONCLUSIONS: CSAs were omitted in one-fifth of encounters for IPV. Given the high prevalence of children involved in IPV episodes, ED encounters for IPV represent an opportunity to improve the safety of children.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Cuidadores , Violência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Parceiros Sexuais , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since child abuse and neglect (CAN) is prevalent worldwide, medical students should acquire basic knowledge, skills, and confidence in identifying and addressing CAN. Although significant educational efforts have been previously described, none has focused on using participatory methods to teach medical students CAN. PURPOSE: To: 1) develop a participatory educational workshop in CAN for medical students, 2) gather, train, and establish a peer-to-peer teaching group, and 3) assess the effectiveness of the workshop in gain of knowledge and improvement of self-confidence for participants. METHODS: A two-hour workshop was created with role-playing, the use of mannikins and peer-to-peer teaching. A 15-item knowledge and a 9-item self-confidence questionnaire were used before, right after, and six months after each workshop. RESULTS: Nine workshops in two academic pediatric departments with a total attendance of 300 6th year medical students were conducted. For the 69 students who completed the questionnaires at all three times, there were statistically significant gains in knowledge right after (p < .001) and six months after (p < .0001) the workshops. Similarly, self-confidence increased right after (p < .0001) and six months after (p < .001) the workshops. Self-selection bias testing indicated that these 69 students who completed all three questionnaires were representative of those who completed the pre-testing and the testing right after. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established a peer-to-peer teaching group to conduct nine participatory workshops that improved the participants' knowledge and self-confidence in CAN. This feasible and novel active learning approach may help address inadequacies in medical curricula.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Criança , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Caregivers' substance use is associated with child maltreatment. OBJECTIVE: Examine trends from 2005 to 2018 in percentages of three outcomes with caregivers' drug or alcohol use: child protective services (CPS) referrals, substantiated maltreatment reports, and foster care placements. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 22 U.S. states that contributed child-level maltreatment outcomes and caregivers' substance use data to the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System from 2005 to 2018. METHODS: Joinpoint regression was used to examine the average annual percent change (AAPC) in outcomes with caregivers' drug or alcohol use and to identify temporal changes. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2018, CPS referrals with caregivers' drug use increased (AAPC 2.33, p < .001), while referrals with alcohol use remained unchanged (AAPC -0.11, p = .92) (trend difference p = .04). Substantiated reports with caregivers' drug and alcohol use increased (AAPC drug use 3.63, p < .001, AAPC alcohol use 1.28, p = .03), with a greater increase observed with drug use (difference p = .03). Foster care placements with caregivers' drug use increased (AAPC 2.54, p < .001), while placements with alcohol use did not change (AAPC -1.22, p = .29), (difference p = .005). Within the study period, changes in trends with caregivers' drug use included increased substantiated reports from 2010 to 2018 (p < .001) and increased foster care placements from 2009 to 2018 (p < .001). With caregivers' alcohol use, CPS referrals and foster care placements decreased from 2007 to 2018 (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Trends differed for outcomes with caregivers' drug versus alcohol use. Findings can inform policies to improve care for families affected by substance use.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Cuidadores , Criança , Serviços de Proteção Infantil , Proteção da Criança , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Infants (children <12 months of age) are maltreated at more than twice the rate of any other child age group, and infants die because of maltreatment at 3 times the rate of any other age group in childhood. The incidence of hospitalization for serious physical abuse in children also is highest for infants. Successful recognition of medically mild signs of physical abuse in infants, such as certain bruising patterns, can, therefore, lead to lifesaving interventions. The importance of the recognition of medically mild injuries due to physical abuse is underscored by the finding that a high percentage of infants (27.5%) hospitalized with serious physical abuse were found to have previously sustained milder injuries, such as bruising. Clinicians must be aware of patterns of bruising suggestive of abuse to distinguish between infants who have been abused and those who have been accidentally injured. To maximize the likelihood that abused infants will be identified and protected, as well to minimize the likelihood that an accidentally injured infant will be mischaracterized as abused, the application of an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of bruised infants should be applied. A consistent, evidence-based practice in this setting also may reduce the influence of racial and socioeconomic bias and decrease disparities in care.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Contusões , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Contusões/diagnóstico , Contusões/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Abuso FísicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies of national emergency department (ED) data demonstrate a decrease in visits coded for physical abuse during the pandemic period. However, no study to date has examined the incidence of multiple child maltreatment types (physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect), within a single state while considering state-specific closure policies. Furthermore, no similar study has utilized detailed chart review to identify cases, nor compared hospital data to Child Protective Services (CPS) reports. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of child maltreatment-related ED visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, including characterizing the type of maltreatment, severity, and CPS reporting. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Children younger than 18 years old at two tertiary-care, academic children's hospitals in X state. METHODS: Maltreatment-related ED visits were identified by ICD-10-CM codes and keywords in chief concerns and provider notes. We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective review of ED visits and child abuse consultations during the pre-COVID (1/1/2019-3/15/2020) and COVID (3/16/2020-8/31/2020) periods, as well as state-level CPS reports for suspected maltreatment. RESULTS: Maltreatment-related ED visits decreased from 15.7/week in the matched pre-COVID period (n = 380 total) to 12.3/week (n = 296 total) in the COVID period (P < .01). However, ED visits (P < .05) and CPS reports (P < .001) for child neglect increased during this period. Provider notes identified 62.4% of child maltreatment ED visits, while ICD-10 codes identified only-CM captured 46.8%. CONCLUSION: ED visits for physical and sexual abuse declined, but neglect cases increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in X state.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Maus-Tratos Infantis , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have examined differences in the characteristics of abusive versus non-abusive injuries, no study has focused on the differences in the circumstances surrounding these injuries, such as whether the event that caused the injury was witnessed or heard, or EMS was called. OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors related to the circumstances of the injury (COI) for distinguishing abusive versus non-abusive injuries. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Children younger than 3-years-old who were hospitalized with either a head injury or a fracture and evaluated by the child abuse consultation service between June 1, 2008 and June 30, 2017. METHODS: In this case-control study, abusive (cases) and non-abusive (controls) injuries were determined by a consensus of two experts blinded to the COI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify COI predictors of abusive injuries. RESULTS: We identified 302 children: 80 cases (26.5%) and 222 controls (73.5%). Abused children were less likely to have a clear event described (p < .001). Of the 251 with a clear event, we found that the significant variables for abuse were father's presence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.37; 95% CI 3.35-20.92), delay ≥24 h in seeking care (aOR 6.23; 95% CI 1.95-19.92) and calling EMS (aOR 3.21; 95% CI 1.10-9.36). In contrast, the event being heard (aOR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.0.59) and the child being dropped (aOR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.77) were less likely to be abusive. CONCLUSION: We identified five COI predictors that may help clinicians in determining whether a child's injuries are due to abuse.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Razão de Chances , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Medically minor but clinically important findings associated with physical child abuse, such as bruises in pre-mobile infants, may be identified by frontline clinicians yet the association of these injuries with child abuse is often not recognized, potentially allowing the abuse to continue and even to escalate. An accurate natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify high-risk injuries in electronic health record notes could improve detection and awareness of abuse. The objectives were to: 1) develop an NLP algorithm that accurately identifies injuries in infants associated with abuse and 2) determine the accuracy of this algorithm. METHODS: An NLP algorithm was designed to identify ten specific injuries known to be associated with physical abuse in infants. Iterative cycles of review identified inaccurate triggers, and coding of the algorithm was adjusted. The optimized NLP algorithm was applied to emergency department (ED) providers' notes on 1344 consecutive sample of infants seen in 9 EDs over 3.5 months. Results were compared with review of the same notes conducted by a trained reviewer blind to the NLP results with discrepancies adjudicated by a child abuse expert. RESULTS: Among the 1344 encounters, 41 (3.1%) had one of the high-risk injuries. The NLP algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.0%-98.1%) and 98.1% (95% CI: 97.1%-98.7%), respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 60.3% and 99.8%, respectively, for identifying high-risk injuries. CONCLUSIONS: An NLP algorithm to identify infants with high-risk injuries in EDs has good accuracy and may be useful to aid clinicians in the identification of infants with injuries associated with child abuse.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Algoritmos , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Early Intervention (EI) programs promote early childhood development but remain underutilized. Few studies have examined correlations with completion of EI referrals using a standardized referral system. Our study examined a minority, underserved population for characteristics that affect this critical step. METHODS: Subjects were referred from an inner-city pediatric primary care clinic for EI evaluation from 3/1/15-5/31/18. Subjects were <3 years of age at the time of referral, received pediatric care at the clinic, and were referred for EI. The dependent variable was completion of EI evaluation, verified by the medical record. Independent variables included demographic, maternal (eg, depression), child (eg, chronic illness), and referral characteristics. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors for completing an evaluation. RESULTS: Of 181 children referred to EI, 61.9% completed an EI evaluation; the average age was 18.9 (SD 7.4) months at first referral. For every additional month of age at the initial referral, a child was 5.0% less likely to complete an evaluation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.99; P = .02). Two factors more than doubled the odds of completing an EI evaluation: having a chronic medical illness at the time of referral (aOR = 2.41, CI 1.21-4.79; P = .01), and being a child from a non-English speaking family (aOR = 2.22, CI 1.09-4.50; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The child's age and medical history, and language spoken at home affected the odds of successfully completing an EI evaluation. These findings can help clinicians target families at risk of failing to complete EI programs.
Assuntos
Intervenção Educacional Precoce , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adolescente , Criança , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Grupos Minoritários , Razão de ChancesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although child physical abuse is missed more frequently in community (CEDs) vs. pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), little information exists describing how evaluations of high-risk injuries differ between these settings. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences in evaluations of infants for abuse between a PED and CEDs and whether a child abuse guideline reduced these differences. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Infants presenting to one PED (n = 162) and three CEDs (n = 159) with 3 injury categories: 1) Injuries for which the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends skeletal survey (SS) testing (infants <5-months with an oral injury or bruising, <9-months with a non-skull fracture, and < 12-months with an intracranial hemorrhage); 2) an oral injury or high-risk bruising in older infants; and 3) multiple types of high-risk injuries. METHODS: We assessed differences in SS testing and child protective services (CPS) reporting between the PED and CEDs before and after implementation of a child abuse guideline. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age was 4 months (2-7). Before guideline implementation, infants with injuries in categories 1 and 2 had an increased odds of SS testing in the PED vs. the CEDs (Category 1: aOR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.01-8.10; Category 2: aOR 10.1, CI: 1.2-88.0) and CPS reporting (Category 1: aOR 7.96, CI: 2.3-26.7; Category 2: aOR 12.0, CI: 1.4-103.5). After guideline implementation, there were no statistically significant differences in testing and reporting for any injury category. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a child abuse guideline minimized differences between a PED and CEDs in the evaluation of infants with injuries concerning for abuse.