Characteristics of older adults receiving enteral feeding at a geriatric medical center.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a prevalent and hard-to-treat condition in older adults. enteral feeding is common in acute and long-term care. Data regarding the prognosis of patients receiving enteral feeding in geriatric medical settings is lacking. Such data is important for decision-making and preliminary instructions for patients, caregivers, and physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and risk factors for mortality among older adults admitted to a geriatric medical center receiving or starting enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: A cohort retrospective study, conducted from 2019 to 2021. Patients admitted to our geriatric medical center who received EN were included. Data was collected from electronic medical records including demographic, clinical, and blood tests, duration of enteral feeding, Norton scale, and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire score. Mortality was assessed during and after hospitalization. Data were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the variables most significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 9169 patients admitted, 124 (1.35%) received enteral feeding tubes. More than half of the patients (50.8%) had polypharmacy (over 8 medications), 62% suffered from more than 10 chronic illnesses and the majority of patients (122/124) had a Norton scale under 14. Most of the patients had a nasogastric tube (NGT) (95/124) and 29 had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs). Ninety patients (72%) died during the trial period with a median follow-up of 12.7 months (0.1-62.9 months) and one-year mortality was 16% (20/124). Associations to mortality were found for marital status, oxygen use, and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW). Age and poly-morbidity were not associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving EN at a geriatric medical center mortality was lower than in a general hospital. The prognosis remained grim with high mortality rates and low quality of life. This data should aid decision-making and promote preliminary instructions.

Implementation of a program for treatment of acute infections in nursing homes without hospital transfer.

Background: Nursing care residents have high hospitalization rates. To address this, we established a unique virtual geriatric unit that has developed a program aimed at providing support to nursing homes. Aims: We aimed to evaluate effectiveness of in-house intravenous antibiotic treatment in nursing hospitals after the implementation of the specially designed training program. Methods: A cohort study of nursing home residents to evaluate a training program for providers, designed to increase awareness and give practical tools for in-house treatment of acute infections. Data obtained included types of infections, antibiotics used, hospital transfer, and length of treatment. Primary outcomes were in-house recovery, hospitalization and mortality. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess association between different factors and recovery. Results: A total of 890 cases of acute infections were treated with intravenous antibiotics across 10 nursing homes over a total of 4,436 days. Of these cases, 34.8% were aged 90 years or older. Acute pneumonia was the most prevalent infection accounted for 354 cases (40.6%), followed by urinary tract infections (35.7%), and fever of presumed bacterial infection (17.1%). The mean duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment was 5.09 ± 3.86 days. Of the total cases, 800 (91.8%) recovered, 62 (7.1%) required hospitalization and nine (1.0%) resulted in mortality. There was no significant difference observed in recovery rates across different types of infections. Discussion: Appling a simple yet unique intervention program has led to more "in-house" residents receiving treatment, with positive clinical results. Conclusion: Treating in-house nursing home residents with acute infections resulted in high recovery rates. Special education programs and collaboration between healthcare organizations can improve treatment outcomes and decrease the burden on the healthcare system.

Do Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio Need to Be Stratified for Age and Comorbidities in COVID-19 Disease? A Subgroup Analysis of Two Distinct Cohorts over Disease Course.

Several studies described neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as markers of COVID-19 severity. In a recently published study, age and frailty affected NLR and PLR more than disease severity. The study compared two distinct cohorts. The first comprised older frailer patients positive for SARS-CoV-2, with mild or asymptomatic disease, admitted to designated COVID-19 departments in a large geriatric medical center (GMC). The second cohort comprised COVID-19 patients admitted to a large general hospital (GH) for symptomatic disease. This was a follow-up study comparing a subgroup of patients who had NLR and PLR values measured a week after admission. Only 100 of 177 patients in the original GMC cohort had a second NLR test compared to almost all (287 of 289) patients in the general hospital (GH) cohort. The subgroup baseline characteristics did not change significantly from that of the original cohort. Disease symptoms were more prevalent in the GH cohort. In the GMC group, the median second NLR rose from 3.9 to 4.6, while in the GH cohort, the NLR value dropped from 3.5 to 2.8, enhancing the NLR differences between the groups. Smaller changes were observed in the second PLR. These results strengthen the prior results that age and frailty seem to have a stronger impact on NLR and PLR than disease severity.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio, are they markers of COVID-19 severity or old age and frailty? A comparison of two distinct cohorts.

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are simple markers of systemic inflammatory responses. It has been previously suggested that they can predict COVID-19 severity. Age and frailty may also influence their values. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 severity versus age and frailty on NLR and PLR values. This was a retrospective, observational two cohorts' comparative study. The first cohort is comprised of patents positive for SARS-CoV-2, with mild or asymptomatic disease, admitted to designated COVID-19 departments in a large geriatric medical center (GMC). The second included patients with COVID-19 admitted to designated COVID-19 departments in a large general hospital for symptomatic disease from March 2020 to March 2021. We compared baseline characteristics including comorbidities and chronic medications, disease symptoms, laboratory tests and compared the NLR and PLR between the two groups. The 177 patients admitted to the COVID-designated department in the GMC were over three decades older than the 289 COVID-19 patients admitted to the general hospital care (HC). They had substantially more comorbidities and chronic medications. All common disease symptoms were significantly more common in the HC group. Almost two thirds of the GMC patients remained asymptomatic compared to 2.1% in the HC group. Inflammatory markers, such as CRP and LDH, were significantly higher in the HC group. The NLR and PLR were both significantly higher in the GMC cohort comprised of older frailer patients with milder disease. NLR and PLR seem to be affected more by age and frailty than COVID-19 severity.

Association of Anemia with Dementia and Cognitive Decline among Community-Dwelling Elderly.

INTRODUCTION: The association of anemia with dementia in elders is controversial. We examined the potential association of anemia with dementia in a large population of elders. METHODS: Historical-prospective registry-based study. Included 36,951 community-dwelling elders (65-113 years) that were followed during 2002-2012. Anemia of all kinds was defined according to Clalit Health Services (CHS) definitions: hemoglobin (HGB) <14 g/dL men, <12 g/dL women; and World Health Organization (WHO): HGB <13 g/dL men, <12 g/dL women. Anemia was categorized as mild (HGB 11-13 g/dL men, 11-12 g/dL women) or moderate-severe (HGB <8-10.9 g/dL men and women). Background data, laboratory values, and diagnosis of dementia and cognitive decline (DCD) were reviewed. RESULTS: During the 10-year follow-up period, DCD was newly diagnosed in 7,180 subjects (19.4%). Subjects with DCD had a higher rate of anemia than those without DCD. Time to development of DCD was 1.5 years shorter in those with than without anemia. On multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, the hazard ratio (HR) for DCD was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.37-1.54) by CHS and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.41-1.61) WHO anemia criteria. The more severe the anemia, the greater the risk of DCD development (HGB 13-14 g/dL [men only], HR = 1.20 [95% CI: 1.09-1.32]; mild anemia, HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.28-1.49]; moderate-severe anemia, HR = 1.64 [CI: 1.41-1.90]). Every decrease in 1 standard deviation of HGB (1.4 g/dL) increased the DCD risk by 15%. A competing risk model has weakened the association of anemia with DCD risk. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Anemia in community-dwelling elders appears to be associated with an increased DCD risk in a dose-response manner. Application of the WHO anemia criteria in men may miss patients with mild anemia that places them at DCD risk. Further research should look at anemia as a cause of reversible dementia.

Frail Older Adults with Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Clinical Course and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a pandemic threatening millions of people worldwide. This study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors of SARS-CoV-2-positive, asymptomatic, frail older adults. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 6 designated COVID-19 units, in skilled nursing homes. Subjects were severely frail older adults, positive for SARS-CoV-2, and asymptomatic at the time of their admission in these units. Residents' characteristics and symptoms were obtained via electronic medical records. The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization by day 40. We looked at time to the primary outcome and used Cox regression for a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During March-November 2020, 849 residents met inclusion criteria. Median age was 84 years. Most were completely dependent for basic activities of daily living and showed cognitive impairment. Six hundred forty-one (75.5%) residents were discharged after considered cured from COVID-19, 125 (14.7%) were hospitalized, and 82 (9.7%) died in the facilities. In survival analysis, 35% reached the primary outcome of death or hospitalization by day 40. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.4), male gender (HR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.1-1.88), and COPD (HR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.23-2.67) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, we report care and prognosis of asymptomatic older adults with major functional or cognitive impairments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most presymptomatic patients do not develop severe infection, and age stays a predominant risk factor, even in the frailest older adults.

Rehabilitation under Social Isolation: Outcomes of Older Individuals with Hip Fractures, Admitted to a Postacute Geriatric Rehabilitation Center, during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of an ongoing pandemic. The highest mortality rate is observed among the older adult population. During the first wave of the pandemic (March-June 2020), following a national health decree demanding that no visitors or family members be allowed in health institutions, our geriatric rehabilitation center closed gates to all visitors from the outside. We aimed to assess the rehabilitation outcomes of older patients with hip fractures in the first pandemic wave, who underwent rehabilitation under complete social isolation from primary care givers and family members. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. It took place at a university-affiliated, major postacute geriatric rehabilitation center. Rehabilitation outcomes measured were discharge functional independence measure (FIM) score and motor FIM score, FIM score change, motor FIM score change, favorable motor FIM effectiveness, length of stay, discharge destination, and home aid at discharge. RESULTS: The study group included 36 patients who were admitted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020). The control group comprises 106 individuals with hip fractures who were admitted in the respective time periods during the previous 2 years, that is, March 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018, and March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019. The facility's occupancy rates were much lower during the first wave of the pandemic in comparison with previous years (78 and 99%, respectively). Patients showed similar demographics and comorbidities, but the social isolation group was more severely deconditioned upon admission. All rehabilitation outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this retrospective study, social isolation from family and caregivers did not have a detrimental effect on the rehabilitation outcomes of these patients. More evidence must be gathered and presented on the matter.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized in an Orthogeriatric Unit Versus an Orthopedic Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a significant health risk in older adults and a major cause of morbidity, functional decline and mortality. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes of older patients hospitalized in an ortho-geriatric (OG) unit to those hospitalized in an orthopedic department (OD) for surgical treatment of a hip fracture. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of hip fractured patients hospitalized between 2015-2016 in a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center. Included were patients aged 65 and older who had undergone hip fracture surgery and were admitted to either a geriatric or orthopedic ward. RESULTS: 441 patients met the inclusion criteria (195 in the OG unit, 246 in the OD); 257 were transferred to an affiliated geriatric center hospital (107 from the OG unit and 127 from the OD) for rehabilitation. Patients in the OG unit were older, more cognitively and functionally impaired and with more comorbidities. The 1-year mortality rate was significantly lower in the OD group (OR 0.32, CI 95% 0.19-0.53, p < 0.001), however, after propensity matching, the 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were similar in both groups. No difference was found in the rehabilitation length of stay between the groups. The functional independence measure improvement was similar in both groups, with a non-significant trend toward better functional improvement among OG unit patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher complexity of patients, worse baseline functional capacity in the OG unit, improvement after rehabilitation was similar in both groups. These results demonstrate the advantages of the OG unit in treating and stabilizing frail older adults, thus maximizing their chances for a successful recovery after hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

[EVALUATION OF THE ELDERLY PATIENT WITH CANCER].

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of adult patients with malignant diseases. These patients are a major therapeutic challenge due to a high incidence of comorbidities, lower functional status and often a diagnosis of the disease at a relatively advanced stage. The preferred approach to the treatment of cancer is a multidisciplinary approach. In the last decade, we have witnessed the integration of geriatricians as part of the multidisciplinary team in order to better assess patients' ability to withstand oncological or surgical treatment and, if necessary, to prepare them better for these treatments. In this article we review the use of various geriatric tools, such as generalized geriatric assessment, fragility and sarcopenia, and their effect on the decision-making process of the treating physicians and on the outcomes of the various treatments, including the outcomes of the operations. We show that comprehensive geriatric assessment is the basis for the evaluation of the adult oncology patients, and proper preparation for treatment in order to improve the outcomes of the treatment and reduce its complications. The rapid growth rate of the elderly population in Israel, together with the continuous development of oncology and cancer treatments, indicate the need to allocate resources and efforts to treat this unique population. We recommend an integration of geriatricians in the multidisciplinary team that treats this population.

[ANEMIA IN PATIENTS AFTER HIP FRACTURE REPAIR SURGERY].

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures (HF) are common among the elderly. The prevalence increases with age and occurs more frequently among females. Up to 30% mortality rates have been observed during the first year following HF, with or without surgery. Additional implications may include functional and cognitive decline and significant morbidity. Many factors are associated with morbidity and mortality after HF repair surgery, including anemia. Anemia is present in approximately 50% of these patients upon admission to the hospital and its incidence increases further following surgery. The mean reduction in the hemoglobin level after surgery is estimated at 0.7-2.5 g/dL. There are several causes of anemia, some are patient dependent and some are related to the type of fracture and surgery. Anemia has a significant effect on the elderly patient in general, and on the patient's condition post-HF in particular. Anemia on admission is associated with short and long-term mortality, in addition to the length of stay, amount of blood transfusions, repeated hospitalizations, post-operative complications, poor functioning and a reduced quality of life. The most common treatment for anemic patients before and after HF repair surgery is the administration of blood transfusions. It has been common practice to administer blood transfusions when hemoglobin reaches a level of 8g/dL, however the effectiveness of this approach in older patients is not conclusive. Regarding other modalities, i.e., iron, erythropoietin and tranexamic acid, there are currently no clear guidelines in the literature and their effectiveness has not been fully established. Further research is needed to address these issues.