Equity in Clinical Care and Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.

People with disorders of consciousness (DoC) are characteristically unable to synchronously participate in decision-making about clinical care or research. The inability to self-advocate exacerbates preexisting socioeconomic and geographic disparities, which include the wide variability observed across individuals, hospitals, and countries in access to acute care, expertise, and sophisticated diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic interventions. Concerns about equity for people with DoC are particularly notable when they lack a surrogate decision-maker (legally referred to as "unrepresented" or "unbefriended"). Decisions about both short-term and long-term life-sustaining treatment typically rely on neuroprognostication and individual patient preferences that carry additional ethical considerations for people with DoC, as even individuals with well thought out advance directives cannot anticipate every possible situation to guide such decisions. Further challenges exist with the inclusion of people with DoC in research because consent must be completed (in most circumstances) through a surrogate, which excludes those who are unrepresented and may discourage investigators from exploring questions related to this population. In this article, the Curing Coma Campaign Ethics Working Group reviews equity considerations in clinical care and research involving persons with DoC in the following domains: (1) access to acute care and expertise, (2) access to diagnostics and therapeutics, (3) neuroprognostication, (4) medical decision-making for unrepresented people, (5) end-of-life decision-making, (6) access to postacute rehabilitative care, (7) access to research, (8) inclusion of unrepresented people in research, and (9) remuneration and reciprocity for research participation. The goal of this discussion is to advance equitable, harmonized, guideline-directed, and goal-concordant care for people with DoC of all backgrounds worldwide, prioritizing the ethical standards of respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Although the focus of this evaluation is on people with DoC, much of the discussion can be extrapolated to other critically ill persons worldwide.

An Exploratory Analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Factors Associated With Sleep Disturbance Assessed via the Neuro-QoL After Hemorrhagic Stroke.

Background and Purpose: Sleep disturbance after hemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage) can impact rehabilitation, recovery, and quality of life. We sought to explore preclinical and clinical factors associated with sleep disturbance after hemorrhagic stroke assessed via the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) short form sleep disturbance inventory. Methods: We telephonically completed the Neuro-QoL short form sleep disturbance inventory 3-months and 12-months after hemorrhagic stroke for patients >18-years-old hospitalized between January 2015 and February 2021. We examined the relationship between sleep disturbance (T-score >50) and social and neuropsychiatric history, systemic and neurological illness severity, medical complications, and temporality. Results: The inventory was completed for 70 patients at 3-months and 39 patients at 12-months; 18 (26%) had sleep disturbance at 3-months and 11 (28%) had sleep disturbance at 12-months. There was moderate agreement (κ = .414) between sleep disturbance at 3-months and 12-months. Sleep disturbance at 3-months was related to unemployment/retirement prior to admission (P = .043), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission (P = .021), higher NIHSS score on admission (P = .041) and infection while hospitalized (P = .036). On multivariate analysis, sleep disturbance at 3-months was related to unemployment/retirement prior to admission (OR 3.58 (95% CI 1.03-12.37), P = .044). Sleep disturbance at 12-months was related to premorbid mRS score (P = .046). Conclusion: This exploratory analysis did not demonstrate a sustained relationship between any preclinical or clinical factors and sleep disturbance after hemorrhagic stroke. Larger studies that include comparison to patients with ischemic stroke and healthy individuals and utilize additional techniques to evaluate sleep disturbance are needed.

Negative disease-related stigma 3-months after hemorrhagic stroke is related to functional outcome and female sex.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with negative disease-related stigma after hemorrhagic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-traumatic hemorrhage (ICH or SAH) admitted between January 2015 and February 2021 were assessed by telephone 3-months after discharge using the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Negative Disease-Related Stigma Short Form inventory. We evaluated the relationship between disease-related stigma (T-score >50) and pre-stroke demographics, admission data, and poor functional outcome (3-month mRS score 3-5 and Barthel Index <100). RESULTS: We included 89 patients (56 ICH and 33 SAH). The median age was 63 (IQR 50-69), 43 % were female, and 67 % graduated college. Admission median GCS score was 15 (IQR 13-15) and APACHE II score was 12 (IQR 9-17). 31 % had disease-related stigma. On univariate analysis, disease-related stigma was associated with female sex, non-completion of college, GCS score, APACHE II score, and 3-month mRS score (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, disease-related stigma was associated with female sex (OR = 3.72, 95 % CI = 1.23-11.25, p = 0.02) and 3-month Barthel Index <100 (OR = 3.46, 95 % CI = 1.13-10.64, p = 0.03) on one model, and female sex (OR = 3.75, 95 % CI = 1.21-11.58, p = 0.02) and 3-month mRS score 3-5 (OR = 4.23, 95 % CI = 1.21-14.75, p = 0.02) on a second model. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome and female sex are associated with disease-related stigma 3-months after hemorrhagic stroke. Because stigma may negatively affect recovery, there is a need to understand the relationship between these factors to mitigate stroke-related stigma.

Verification of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Survey of 12 Organ Procurement Organizations Across the United States.

BACKGROUND: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) to verify and document that any potential organ donor has been pronounced dead per applicable legal requirements of local, state, and federal laws. However, OPO practices regarding death by neurologic criteria (DNC) verification are not standardized, and little is known about their DNC verification processes. This study aimed to explore OPO practices regarding DNC verification in the United States. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all 57 OPOs in the United States from June to September 2023 to assess verification of policies and practices versus guidelines, concerns about policies and practices, processes to address concerns about DNC determination, and communication practices. RESULTS: Representatives from 12 OPOs across six US regions completed the entire survey; 8 of 12 reported serving > 50 referral hospitals. Most respondents (11 of 12) reported comparing their referral hospital's DNC policies with the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter and/or other (4 of 12) guidelines. Additionally, most (10 of 12) reported independently reviewing and verifying each DNC determination. Nearly half (5 of 12) reported concerns about guideline-discordant hospital policies, and only 3 of 12 thought all referral hospitals followed the 2010 American Academy of Neurology Practice Parameter in practice. Moreover, 9 of 12 reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination, and most (10 of 12) reported having received referrals for patients whose DNC declaration was ultimately reversed. All reported experiences in which their OPO requested additional assessments (11 of 12 clinical evaluation, 10 of 12 ancillary testing, 9 of 12 apnea testing) because of concerns about DNC determination validity. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate DNC determination is important to maintain public trust. Nearly all OPO respondents reported a process to verify hospital DNC policies and practices with medical society guidelines. Many reported concerns about clinician knowledge surrounding DNC determination and guideline-discordant policies and practices. Educational and regulatory advocacy efforts are needed to facilitate systematic implementation of guideline-concordant practices across the country.

An Update on Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria since the World Brain Death Project.

The World Brain Death Project (WBDP) is a 2020 international consensus statement that provides historical background and recommendations on brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination. It addresses 13 topics including: (1) worldwide variance in BD/DNC, (2) the science of BD/DNC, (3) the concept of BD/DNC, (4) minimum clinical criteria for BD/DNC determination, (5) beyond minimum clinical BD/DNC determination, (6) pediatric and neonatal BD/DNC determination, (7) BD/DNC determination in patients on ECMO, (8) BD/DNC determination after treatment with targeted temperature management, (9) BD/DNC documentation, (10) qualification for and education on BD/DNC determination, (11) somatic support after BD/DNC for organ donation and other special circumstances, (12) religion and BD/DNC: managing requests to forego a BD/DNC evaluation or continue somatic support after BD/DNC, and (13) BD/DNC and the law. This review summarizes the WBDP content on each of these topics and highlights relevant work published from 2020 to 2023, including both the 192 citing publications and other publications on BD/DNC. Finally, it reviews questions for future research related to BD/DNC and emphasizes the need for national efforts to ensure the minimum standards for BD/DNC determination described in the WBDP are included in national BD/DNC guidelines and due consideration is given to the recommendations about social and legal aspects of BD/DNC determination.

Relationship Between Hemorrhage Type and Development of Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol After Hemorrhagic Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Emotional and behavioral dyscontrol (EBD), a neuropsychiatric complication of stroke, leads to patient and caregiver distress and challenges to rehabilitation. Studies of neuropsychiatric sequelae in stroke are heavily weighted toward ischemic stroke. This study was designed to compare risk of EBD following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to identify risk factors for EBD following hemorrhagic stroke. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for nontraumatic hemorrhagic stroke between 2015 and 2021. Patients or legally authorized representatives completed the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) EBD short-form inventory 3 months after hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified risk factors for EBD after hemorrhagic stroke. RESULTS: The incidence of EBD was 21% (N=15 of 72 patients) at 3 months after hemorrhagic stroke. Patients with ICH were more likely to develop EBD; 93% of patients with EBD (N=14 of 15) had ICH compared with 56% of patients without EBD (N=32 of 57). The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at hospital admission was lower among patients who developed EBD (13 vs. 15 among those without EBD). Similarly, admission scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were higher among patients with EBD (median NIHSS score: 7 vs. 2; median APACHE II score: 17 vs. 11). Multivariable analyses identified hemorrhage type (ICH) and poor admission GCS score as predictors of EBD 3 months after hemorrhagic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICH and a low GCS score at admission are at increased risk of developing EBD 3 months after hemorrhagic stroke and may benefit from early intervention.

Beyond the Final Heartbeat: Neurological Perspectives on Normothermic Regional Perfusion for Organ Donation after Circulatory Death.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has recently been used to augment organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) to improve the quantity and quality of transplantable organs. In DCD-NRP, after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies and cardiopulmonary arrest, patients are cannulated onto extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to reestablish blood flow to targeted organs including the heart. During this process, aortic arch vessels are ligated to restrict cerebral blood flow. We review ethical challenges including whether the brain is sufficiently reperfused through collateral circulation to allow reemergence of consciousness or pain perception, whether resumption of cardiac activity nullifies the patient's prior death determination, and whether specific authorization for DCD-NRP is required. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:1035-1039.

New developments in guidelines for brain death/death by neurological criteria.

The declaration of brain death (BD), or death by neurological criteria (DNC), is medically and legally accepted throughout much of the world. However, inconsistencies in national and international policies have prompted efforts to harmonize practice and central concepts, both between and within countries. The World Brain Death Project was published in 2020, followed by notable revisions to the Canadian and US guidelines in 2023. The mission of these initiatives was to ensure accurate and conservative determination of BD/DNC, as false-positive determinations could have major negative implications for the medical field and the public's trust in our ability to accurately declare death. In this Review, we review the changes that were introduced in the 2023 US BD/DNC guidelines and consider how these guidelines compare with those formulated in Canada and elsewhere in the world. We address controversies in BD/DNC determination, including neuroendocrine function, consent and accommodation of objections, summarize the legal status of BD/DNC internationally and discuss areas for further BD/DNC research.