RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms. RESULTS: The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88 vs. 8.84%, P =0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124-6.250, P =0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374-4.473, P =0.00) as independent predictors of AL. CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomia , Artéria Gastroepiploica , Humanos , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , China/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymph nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) is thought to be highly involved in esophageal cancer. Given the unique anatomical positioning of the nerve, performing lymphadenectomy in this region requires advanced techniques within limited working space. Meanwhile, high incidence of morbidity and mortality is associated with lymphadenectomy. Although several methods have been applied to reduce the technical requirement and the incidence of postoperative complication, the optimal method remains controversial. METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial to investigate the utility of lymphadenectomy along the LRLN during the minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients by comparing the surgical outcome, postoperative complication, survival rate, and quality of life (QoL) between the retraction method (RM) and the suspension method (SM) in patients with esophageal cancer from June 2018 to November 2020. QoL was assessed according to questionnaire: EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Of 94 patients were enrolled and randomized allocated to RM and SM group equally. Characteristics did not differ between groups. The duration of lymph node dissection along LRLN was significant longer in SM group ( P <0.001). No difference was observed about postoperative complications. One of in-hospital death was occurred in each group ( P >0.999). Patients in neither of groups exhibiting difference about 3-year disease-free survival rate ( P =0.180) and overall survival rate ( P =0.430). No difference was observed in postoperative QoL between groups at different time points (all, P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Both methods of lymph node dissection along the LRLN during minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients are technically feasible and safe. The RM appears more favorable in terms of reducing surgical duration compared to the SM.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Nervo Laríngeo Recorrente/cirurgia , Nervo Laríngeo Recorrente/patologia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The potential impact of learning curve on long-term health-related quality of life (QoL) after esophagectomy for cancer has not been investigated. The aim of this article is to investigate the relationship between learning curve for McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and health-related quality of life (QoL) in long-term, disease free survivors up to 10 years after esophageal cancer resection. METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients who underwent McKeown MIE between 2009 and 2019 were identified in which 280 who were free of disease at the time of survey and completed health-related QoL and symptom questionnaires, including EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-OES18, and Digestive Symptom Questionnaire. Patients were assessed in 3 cohorts according to the learning phases of expertise reported by our previous study: initial phase; plateau phase, and; experienced phase. RESULTS: Median time from operation to survey was 5.8 years (interquartile range 4.6-8.2). The QLQ-C30 mean scores of functional scales, and symptom scales of respiratory and digestive systems including dyspnea (P = 0.006), shortness of breath (P = 0.003), and dysphagia (P = 0.031) were significantly better in experienced phase group. Furthermore, in the subgroup analyses for patients without postoperative major complications, patients in the initial learning phase remained suffering from more symptoms of dyspnea (P = 0.040) and shortness of breath (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Esophageal cancer patients undergoing McKeown MIE in initial learning phase tend to suffer from a deterioration in long-term health-related QoL and higher symptomatic burden as compared to experienced learning phase, which did not improved over time and warranted more attention.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Curva de Aprendizado , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Sobreviventes , Dispneia/complicações , Dispneia/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication following esophagectomy with high mortality. Perioperative decreased serum albumin level is considered a predictive of AL, however, its impact on AL incidence in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is not well defined. METHODS: The data of 318 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE were collected retrospectively from January 2021 to December 2021. The perioperative level of albumin was detected and the baseline of altering levels for albumin was established. The incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate were analyzed between groups. RESULTS: After exclusion, 137 patients were enrolled and assigned to more decreased albumin (MA) and less decreased albumin (LA) groups. The levels of albumin descended significantly after MIE (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the clinicopathologic characteristics or surgical outcomes between groups. The incidence of postoperative AL was 10.2% in MA group and 1.4% in LA group (p = 0.033). Three patients died due to AL in MA group, while no mortality was observed in LA group (p = 0.120). The rate of other postoperative complications was similar between groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in LA group was a little higher than that in MA group, but it was no significant difference (p = 0.853). Similarly, no difference was observed in overall survival (OS) between groups (p = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: Severely deficient serum albumin after MIE was an indicator of AL in esophageal cancer patients treated with NCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200066694, registered December14th,2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=185067&htm=4 .
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Albumina Sérica , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/complicações , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Albumina Sérica/análise , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To evaluate effectiveness of concurrent radiotherapy in esophageal cancer patient treated with neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: The data of 1026 consecutive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) were retrospectively collected. The main inclusion criteria were patients with locally advanced (cT2-4N0-3M0) ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by MIE, and divided into two groups according to different neoadjuvant strategies. Propensity score matching was performed to improve the comparability between the two groups. RESULTS: After exclusion and matching, 141 patients were enrolled retrospectively: 92 received NCT, and 49 received NCRT. No difference in clinicopathologic characteristics or incidence of adverse events between groups. A shorter operation time (215.7 ± 35.5 min) (p < 0.001), less blood loss (111.2 ± 67.7 ml) (p = 0.0007) and a greater number of lymph nodes retrieved (33.8 ± 11.7) (p = 0.002) were observed in NCT group than in NCRT group. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between groups. Although patients in NCRT group had better pathological complete response (16, 32.7%) (p = 0.0026) and ypT0N0 (10, 20.4%) (p = 0.0002) rates, there was no significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival (p = 0.1378) or disease-specific survival (p = 0.1258) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NCRT, NCT has certain advantages in that it can simplify the surgical procedure and decrease the surgical technique required without compromising the surgical oncological outcomes and long-term survival of patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Taxa de Sobrevida , QuimiorradioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To compare the perioperative outcomes from McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) when performed in three-dimensional versus two-dimensional visualization system, and investigate the learning curve of a single surgeon who implemented three-dimensional McKeown MIE. METHODS: A total of 335 consecutive cases (three-dimensional or two-dimensional) were identified. Perioperative clinical parameters were compared and cumulative sum learning curve was plotted. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias from confounding factors. RESULTS: Patients in three-dimensional group were associated with more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23.9% vs 3.0%, p < 0.01). After propensity score matching (108 matched patients in each groups), this finding was no longer statistically significant. Comparing to two-dimensional group, significant improvement in total retrieved lymph nodes (28 vs 33, p = 0.003) was observed in three-dimensional group. In addition, more lymph nodes around the right recurrent laryngeal nerve were harvested in three-dimensional group than that in two-dimensional group (p = 0.045). However, there were no significantly differences were found between the two groups in terms of other intraoperative parameters (e.g., operative time) and postoperative relevant outcomes (e.g., lung infection). Furthermore, the change point in the cumulative sum learning curves for intraoperative blood loss and thoracic procedure time was 33 procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional visualization system appears to be superior in performing lymphadenectomy during McKeown MIE to that of a two-dimensional technique. For surgeons proficient in performing two-dimensional McKeown MIE, the learning curve for a three-dimensional procedure appears to begin near proficiency after more than 33 cases.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodosRESUMO
Optimal bowel preparation is a prerequisite for a successful colonoscopy; however, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation remains relatively high. In this study, we establish a smartphone app that assesses patient bowel preparation using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction system trained on labeled photographs of feces in the toilet and evaluate its impact on bowel preparation quality in colonoscopy outpatients. We conduct a prospective, single-masked, multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolling outpatients who own a smartphone and are scheduled for a colonoscopy. We screen 578 eligible patients and randomize 524 in a 1:1 ratio to the control or AI-driven app group for bowel preparation. The study endpoints are the percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation and the total BBPS score, compliance with dietary restrictions and purgative instructions, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate (secondary). The prediction system has an accuracy of 95.15%, a specificity of 97.25%, and an area under the curve of 0.98 in the test dataset. In the full analysis set (n = 500), adequate preparation is significantly higher in the AI-driven app group (88.54 vs. 65.59%; P < 0.001). The mean BBPS score is 6.74 ± 1.25 in the AI-driven app group and 5.97 ± 1.81 in the control group (P < 0.001). The rates of compliance with dietary restrictions (93.68 vs. 83.81%, P = 0.001) and purgative instructions (96.05 vs. 84.62%, P < 0.001) are significantly higher in the AI-driven app group, as is the rate of additional purgative intake (26.88 vs. 17.41%, P = 0.011). Thus, our AI-driven smartphone app significantly improves the quality of bowel preparation and patient compliance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The extent to which the presence of pleural adhesions affects the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer (EC) has not previously been studied. METHODS: Data of consecutive EC patients undergoing McKeown MIE by a single surgeon in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Daping Hospital from November 2015 to December 2020 were collected. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of pleural adhesions when entering the chest cavity. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias from confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier was used to assess the survival differences. RESULTS: A total of 617 consecutive EC patients underwent McKeown MIE were enrolled. There were 116 patients with pleural adhesions (Group A) and 501 patients without pleural adhesions (Group B). Patients in Group A were more likely to be older than those of patients in Group B: (66.26 vs. 63.27, P = 0.001). In addition, Group A had more patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (24.1% vs. 16.8%, P = 0.04). After propensity score matching (102 matched patients in Group A and 185 matched patients in Group B), these findings were no longer statistically significant. Postoperative pulmonary infection occurred in 57 patients in Group A and in 15 patients in Group B (53.9% vs. 13.0%, P < 0.001). In addition, the presence of pleural adhesions was significantly associated with the prolonged operation time (232 min vs. 210 min, P < .001), length of stay (12 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.001), and hydrothorax requiring drainage (12.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.04). However, the disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.40 and 0.13, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of pleural adhesions predicted an increased operation time, length of stay, postoperative pneumonia, and hydrothorax requiring drainage of EC patients undergoing McKeown MIE, but did not exert unfavourable effect on long-term survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Hidrotórax , Doenças Pleurais , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Pontuação de Propensão , Hidrotórax/etiologia , Hidrotórax/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Doenças Pleurais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, wearing masks became crucial for preventing infection risk and maintaining basic health. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavioral characteristics of the mask-wearing public to provide theoretical reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey on the mask-wearing behavior of the public and their health literacy levels by distributing electronic questionnaires. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors influencing mask-wearing behavior. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the correlation between mask-wearing behaviors and e-health literacy. Results: A total of 1,972 valid questionnaires were collected; 99.8% of the public wore masks when going out and 59.2% showed good mask-wearing behavior. Most people choose to wear disposable medical masks (61.3%), followed by medical surgical masks (52.9%). All participants indicated that they had understood the information on how to use masks, and most obtained it through social media (61.8%). The average of the e-health literacy scores of those with good mask-wearing behavior was significantly higher than those with poor mask-wearing behavior (P < 0.05), and each item score of the former's e-health literacy was significantly higher than the latter (P < 0.05). Further, there was a positive correlation between mask-wearing behavior and e-health literacy (R = 0.550, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that seven factors are related to mask-wearing behavior, including gender, place of residence, educational level, work or living environment, marital status, flu symptoms, and whether living with people in home quarantine (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The overall compliance of the public's mask-wearing behavior in China during COVID-19 is good. However, there are shortcomings regarding the selection, use, and precautions. The differences in mask-wearing behavior are related to factors including gender, place of residence, educational level, work or living environment, marital status, presence of flu symptoms, and whether living with people in home quarantine. Higher levels of e-health literacy indicated better mask-wearing behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the public's popularization and education regarding the prevention and control of COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Letramento em Saúde , Máscaras , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Background: Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant Anlotinib for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced ESCC. Methods: Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant Anlotinib combined with chemotherapy (Anlotinib group) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone (nCRT group) with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was the R0 surgical resection rate. Secondary endpoints included postoperative pathologic stage, complete response (CR) rate, and safety. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications. Results: From August 2019 to August 2021, 93 patients were assigned to the nCRT or Anlotinib group. Of the 93 patients, 79 underwent MIE and were finally included in the per-protocol set (nCRT group: n=39; Anlotinib group: n=40). The R0 resection rate was 97.4% for nCRT versus 100.0% for Anlotinib group (p>0.05). Compared with the nCRT group, patients in the Anlotinib group had shorter total operation duration (262.2 ± 39.0 vs. 200.7 ± 25.5 min, p=0.010) and less blood loss (161.3 ± 126.7 vs. 52.4 ± 39.3 mL, p<0.001). No significant differences were found in the postoperative pathologic stage between the Anlotinib group and nCRT group (all p>0.05). Besides, the incidences of AEs (80.0% vs. 92.3%) and postoperative complications (22.5% vs. 30.8%) were similar between the two groups (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a similar safety profile and pathologic response, but better surgical outcomes than nCRT for locally advanced ESCC.
RESUMO
Introduction: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is reported to be a potential prognostic predictor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Aim: To investigate the prognostic value of LVI in ESCC node-negative patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Material and methods: 1406 consecutive ESCC patients who underwent MIE were reviewed retrospectively. After exclusion, 880 patients were enrolled, and 298 node-negative patients were used for the further analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine the survival difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic predictors. Results: LVI was observed in 29.4% of all patients. Totally, the proportion of LVI was increased with advanced T (p < 0.01) and N (p < 0.01) stage and poor tumor differentiation (p < 0.01). In the node-negative patients, a similar result was obtained in T stage (p = 0.0252) and tumor differentiation (p = 0.0080). In survival analysis, the disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.0146) rate was significantly lower in node-negative patients with LVI than in those without. The difference was absent when calculating disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.0796). Additionally, the presence of LVI was associated with lower DSS (p = 0.0187) but not DFS (p = 0.0785) in univariate analysis in node-negative patients. Moreover, in multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of LVI was identified as an independent prognostic factor only in DSS (p = 0.0496) but not in DFS (p = 0.5670) in node-negative patients. Conclusions: LVI is associated with shorter DSS and an independent prognostic factor in ESCC node-negative patients after MIE.
RESUMO
Introduction: The prognostic value of high body mass index (BMI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still controversial. Aim: To evaluate the impact of high BMI on postoperative complications and survival after minimally invasion esophagectomy (MIE) for ESCC patients. Material and methods: Three hundred and fourteen consecutive ESCC patients were used to analyze the potential association between high BMI and postoperative complications and survival. Results: Patients were divided into two groups. There was no significant difference between high and low BMI groups in terms of postoperative complications, including respiratory disease (p = 0.8362), pneumothorax (p = 0.6058), anastomotic leakage (p = 0.8678), chylothorax (p = 0.9062), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.5763), vocal cord paresis (p = 0.8349), wound infection (p = 0.5763) and perioperative death (p = 0.7179). Patients in the high BMI group had a longer operative time (p = 0.003) and more blood loss (p = 0.002) than in the low BMI group. There was no difference in number of retrieved lymph nodes between the two groups (p = 0.728). Patients could not benefit from high BMI in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.2459). High BMI was not an independent prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.1735, HR = 0.776 and 95% CI: 0.5386-1.1180). Conclusions: High BMI is associated with prolonged operative time and increased blood loss in MIE. However, high BMI is not associated with postoperative complications and not an independent prognostic factor for survival in ESCC patients who undergo MIE.
RESUMO
Background: The prognostic benefit of extensive lymphadenectomy remains controversial in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential effect of solitary mediastinal (SM) lymph node metastasis and solitary celiac (SC) lymph node metastasis on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Methods: From September 2009 to December 2020, a total of 934 cases were diagnosed with ESCC and underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in our department; 223 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to contrast the postoperative results and long-term survival of Group 1 (SM) and Group 2 (SC). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used on possible predictors of survival. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were available for outcome comparison after PSM. The postoperative results were not significantly different between the two groups. In terms of long-term survival, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 37.6% and 57.3% (p = 0.191) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 39.7% and 68.4% (p = 0.028) for Group 1 (SM) and Group 2 (SC), respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that body mass index (BMI), pathologic stage (pStage), and SC/SM grouping had significant hazard ratios (HRs), which suggested that SC is associated with better DSS. Conclusion: This cohort study showed that SC lymph node metastasis has a better long-term survival compared with SM lymph node metastasis in esophagectomy of ESCC. The results challenge the current understanding and need confirmation in further research.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The implementation of McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is associated with a steep learning curve. However, there is no consensus on the number of cases required before effective and safe McKeown MIE can be achieved. METHODS: Data on consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy performed by a single surgeon in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Daping Hospital in Chongqing, China from September 2009 to June 2019 were collected. The cumulative sum learning curve was plotted on the basis of the learning associated parameters. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias from confounding factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the survival differences. RESULTS: The learning curve was divided into the ascending period (cases 1-197), the plateau period (198-314), and the descending period (315-onward). After 197 cases, significant improvements in operative time (300 minutes vs 210minutes; P < .001), retrieved lymph nodes (17 vs 20; P = .004), hospital length of stay (18 days vs 13 days; P = .001), major postoperative complications (38.6% vs 32.5%; P < .001), vocal cord palsy (6.1% vs 0.9%; P = .04), and pulmonary complications (31.5% vs 17.1%; P = .005) were observed. In addition, after 314 cases, significant decreases in blood loss (200 mL vs 100 mL; P < .001), anastomotic leak (24.8% vs 14.8%; P = .02), and chylothorax (4.3% vs 0%; P = .001) were observed. After propensity score matching, the overall and disease-free survival rates were significantly improved during the experienced period (P = .02 and .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The initial learning phase of McKeown MIE consisted of 197 procedures in 51 months. Moreover, the surgeon's experience did have a direct impact on the long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Assuntos
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Magnifying chromoendoscopy (ME-CE) through the observation of pit patterns is a productive way to distinguish between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Magnifying optical enhancement technology (ME-OE) is an emerging virtual chromoendoscopy imaging technology and appeared to be a promising approach. However, this information is currently not available. This study is aimed at comparing the differential diagnostic value of ME-CE and OE for neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized (1 : 1) into examination by ME-OE or ME-CE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of two endoscopy methods were compared using ME-OE (were classified according to the JNET classification) and ME-CE (were classified according to the Kudo pit pattern classification), respectively, and the time to predict the histological polyp type was compared. And the agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis by ME-OE or ME-CE were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 365 polyps were found in the 220 patients included (ME-OE: 185; ME-CE: 180.202 had nonneoplastic polyps, 163 had neoplastic polyps). The diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-CE (93% vs. 92%, p > 0.05). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than ME-CE (83 ± 26.4 s vs. 194 ± 17.7 s, p < 0.001). The agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis were at least substantial in both groups. CONCLUSION: ME-OE was superlative to ME-CE in predicting the histology of polyps. OE devoted classification would possibly similarly enhance the endoscopist performance. The trial is registered with ChiCT2000032075.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion of the stomach, which severely affects human life and health. Currently, a variety of endoscopic techniques are used to screen/evaluate GIM. Traditional white-light endoscopy (WLE) and acetic-acid chromoendoscopy combined with magnifying endoscopy (ME-AAC) are the interventions of choice due to their diagnostic efficacy for GIM. Optical-enhanced magnifying endoscopy (ME-OE) is a new virtual chromoendoscopy technique to identify GIM, which combines bandwidth-limited light and image enhancement processing technology to enhance the detection of mucosal and vascular details. We hypothesized that ME-OE is superior to WLE and ME-AAC in the evaluation of GIM. AIM: To directly compare the diagnostic value of WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE for detection of GIM. METHODS: A total of 156 patients were subjected to consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examinations using WLE, ME-AAC, and ME-OE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the three endoscopy methods in the diagnosis of GIM were evaluated. Moreover, the time to diagnosis with ME-AAC and ME-OE was analyzed. Two experts and two non-experts evaluated the GIM images diagnosed using ME-OE, and diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-observer agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: GIM was detected in 68 of 156 patients (43.6%). The accuracy of ME-OE was highest (91.7%), followed by ME-AAC (86.5%), while that of WLE (51.9%) was lowest. Per-site analysis showed that the overall diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-AAC (P = 0.011) and WLE (P < 0.001). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than in ME-AAC (64 ± 7 s vs 151 ± 30 s, P < 0.001). Finally, the inter-observer agreement was strong for both experts (k = 0.862) and non-experts (k = 0.800). The internal consistency was strong for experts (k = 0.713, k = 0.724) and moderate for non-experts (k = 0.667, k = 0.598). CONCLUSION: For endoscopists, especially experienced endoscopists, ME-OE is an efficient, convenient, and time-saving endoscopic technique that should be used for the diagnosis of GIM.
RESUMO
Metastasis and malignant proliferation are major obstacles to the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and UTP14A is associated with poor prognosis in ESCC. However, its mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The TCGA and GEO databases were used to identify candidate target genes and possible downstream targets. Then, the effects were determined in vitro and in vivo through knockdown and overexpression techniques, and the mechanism was explored. UTP14A was significantly higher in the tumour tissue of ESCC patients than in normal tissue. Knockdown of UTP14A significantly suppressed the migration and proliferation of ESCC cells. The PERK/eIF2a signalling pathway was positively regulated by UTP14A, and its tumour-promoting effect was further activated by overexpression of UTP14A. In conclusion, UTP14A might promote the proliferation and metastasis of ESCC cells by inducing PERK/eIF2a signalling pathway expression.
RESUMO
There is growing focus on the relationship between surgical start time and postoperative outcomes. However, the extent to which the operation start time affects the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy has not previously been studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential effect of surgical start time on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients who underwent thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy. From September 2009 to June 2019, a total of 700 consecutive patients suffering from esophageal cancer underwent thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Daping Hospital. Among these patients, 166 esophagectomies were performed on the same day and were classified as the first- or second-start group. Patients in the first-start group were more likely to be older than those in the second-start group: (64.73 vs. 61.28, P = 0.002). In addition, patients with diabetes mellitus were more likely to be first-start cases (8.4 vs. 1.2%). After propensity score matching (52 matched patients in first-start cases and 52 matched patients in second-start cases), these findings were no longer statistically significant. There was no difference in the incidence rate of peri- or postoperative adverse events between the first- and second-start groups. The disease-specific survival rates and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.236 and 0.292, respectively). On the basis of the present results, a later start time does not negatively affect the short- or long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is commonly used in patients with gastric cancer after a partial or full gastrectomy since it is safe to use and nutrient delivery is in line with human physiological characteristics. However, enteral feeding often leads to deficiency, when the actual intake of the patient is lower than the target demand, which seriously affects the recovery of patients. OBJECTIVE: To implement the best practice for preventing and managing underfeeding during enteral nutrition, and to improve the nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The current study was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System program. Phase one referred to the development of the project, consisting of the generation of the best evidence, mainly based on literature review and discussions within a panel of experts. Phase two was the implementation of the project, including baseline audit, training of enteral nutrition and change of clinical practice. Phase three was a postimplementation reaudit. The intake of enteral nutrition was observed in the first 3 days, and feeding intolerance of enteral nutrition was observed within the first week of enteral nutrition. Data were collected using self-designed questionnaires. The nutritional status of patients was measured using Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) at admission, and 1 week after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with gastric cancer and 10 registered nurses were enrolled in this study. The compliance rate for all audit criteria increased postimplementation. The feeding rate of enteral nutrition postimplementation was higher than the baseline audit on the third day, 54.29% (±12.01) vs. 42.89% (±10.63), and the incidence of underfeeding was lower (30%, nâ=â30) than the baseline audit (76.67%, nâ=â30). Furthermore, the feeding intolerance postimplementation (26.67%, nâ=â30) was lower than the baseline audit (76.67%, nâ=â30) within 1 week of enteral nutrition. The PG-SGA scores were not significantly different between the baseline audit and postimplementation on the day of admission, while the scores were lower postimplementation (12.90â±â1.47) compared with the baseline audit (14.00â±â1.82). CONCLUSION: In this study, we performed an audit of the clinical nursing quality, which can guide nurses to accurately identify obstacles to the implementation of enteral nutrition, and standardize the implementation and management process, thereby improving the quality of nursing and the nutritional status of patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The evidence-based practice might optimize the enteral nutrition process, enhance the efficacy of enteral nutrition, and improve the nutritional status of patients. Medical staff should develop an individualized nutritional support protocol for patients based on the results of nutritional status assessments.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Gastrectomia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Cuidados Pós-OperatóriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is one of the most aggressive and poor prognosis cancers. To date, no standard procedures have been established for the surgical treatment of Siewert type II. In this study, we proposed the approach of thoracoscopic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis surgery plus D2 celiac lymphadenectomy (TLILD2) and aimed to investigate the patterns of lymph node metastasis and long-term survival. METHODS: From June 2015 to June 2018, 72 patients accepted TLILD2 and enrolled in this study. Relevant patient characteristics and postoperative variables were collected and evaluated. The disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. RESULTS: There was no case of postoperative death in this study, and the most common complication was anastomotic mediastinal fistula (5/72, 6.9%). A total of 2811 lymph nodes were retrieved, and the positivity rate was 11.9% (334/2811). The positivity rate of celiac and mediastinal lymph nodes was 14.4% (314/2186) and 3.2% (20/625), respectively. The percentage of patients who had positive celiac and mediastinal lymph nodes reached up to 58.3% (42/72) and 8.3% (6/72), respectively. The DFS and DSS of these 72 patients were 94% and 93.4% at 1 year after surgery and 59.8% and 62% at 3 years after surgery, respectively. The pTNM stage showed a significant difference between DFS and DSS. CONCLUSIONS: TLILD2 could be a potential way to promote long-term survival of AEG patients. On the basis of the patterns of lymph nodes metastasis, we suggest that lower mediastinal and D2 celiac lymphadenectomy is necessary to improve the oncological outcome.