[Comparative observation of diffuse radiation in Qianyanzhou during the spring of 2012].

Global radiation and diffuse radiation were measured from March to June of 2012 in Qianyanzhou Experimental Station of Red Soil and Hilly Land, Chinese Academy of Sciences by ising three types of pyranometers, including CMP11 attached with a shadow ring, SPN1 and RSR3, which were placed in parallel. The observations showed that both global radiation and diffuse radiation measured by these pyranometers had a good linear correlation. The global radiation measured by SPN1 and RSR3 was respectively 3. 0% and 20.5% lower than that measured by the CMP 11. The diffuse radiation measured by SPN1 and RSR3. was respectively 5.5% and 7.9% lower of than that measured by the CMP11. Under the sunny, cloudy and overcast conditions, the daily variations of diffuse radiation measured by the three pyranometers were similar, and hence, the diffuse radiation values at a specific solar elevation angle measured by the different pyranometers were also similar. There was difference in daily accumulative diffuse radiation measured by the different pyranometers. Monthly diffuse fractions of March, April and May were 0.56, 0.59 and 0.70, respectively. In the subtropical area of southern China, the diffuse radiation accounted for a relatively large proportion of the global solar radiation and varied considerably over time. It is necessary to conduct long-term continuous measurements to capture the variability of diffuse radiation over different underlying surfaces.

[Simulation and validation of diffuse radiation in Qianyanzhou area, Jiangxi, China].

Accurate estimation of diffuse radiation is of great significance for evaluating its effect on terrestrial ecosystem carbon exchange. Based on the observed diffuse radiation data in the meteorological observation field in mid-subtropical Qianyanzhou, Jiangxi, China from March 1, 2012 to February 28, 2013, the simulated results of five widely used diffuse radiation decomposition models (Reindl-1, Reindl-2, Reindl-3, Boland, BRL) were validated. The results indicated that, on the 30 min scale, all of the five models could well simulate the diffuse radiation of this area overall. But the effect of models decreased significantly with the rising of clearness index (kt). Especially when kt>0.75, each model was.unable to simulate diffuse radiation in the region. Regarding the simulation of seasonal change of diffuse radiation, the five models could simulate diffuse radiation well in most months. Relative deviation between simulated and observed values of yearly diffuse radiation of five models had a maximum of 7.1% (BRL), a minimum of 0.04% (Reindl-1), and an average of 3.6%. The simulated values of the five models appeared to be overestimated in the summer when radiation was strongest, temperature was highest, and precipitation was relatively low. For example, in July, the diffuse radiation was overestimated by 14.5%-28.2%, 21.2% on average. This was primarily due to the. method of estimating diffuse radiation under the condition of high kt. The uncertainty requires further evaluation in the model application. Considering the results of validation, simulation precision and the accessibility of input variables, the order of the simulation performance of five models was BRL>Reindl-3>Reindl-2>Reindl-1 >Boland.