Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir combination against COVID-19 caused by omicron BA.2.2 in the elderly: A single-center large observational study.

BACKGROUND: Since coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) swept the world, a variety of novel therapeutic and prevention strategies have been developed, among which nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is highly recommended. We intended to assess the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in the elderly mild-to-moderate COVID-19 population caused by the omicron BA.2.2 variant in real-world settings. METHODS: An observational study was conducted retrospectively to review the outcomes of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients admitted between April 26 and June 30, 2022. Patients' baseline characteristics were collected and assessed. Participants in the intervention group were administered nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in addition to standard care, whereas those in the control group only received standard care. The primary outcome was the duration between the initial positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and the subsequent conversion to a negative result. RESULTS: The analysis included 324 patients who were administered nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and an equal number of control patients. The patient characteristics in both groups were evenly matched. The average duration from the initial positive RT-PCR to negative conversion was similar in both groups (16.2 ± 5.0 vs. 16.1 ± 6.3 days, p = .83). Control patients exhibited slower conversion in comparison to patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment within 10 days of symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that administering nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 10 days of symptom onset could potentially reduce the time it takes for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients to negative RT-PCR results, thereby expanding the current usage guidelines for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary liver cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a rare, but potentially serious adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to examine the incidence, clinical features and the clinical correlation between occurrence of AI and efficacy in primary liver cancer (PLC) patients treated with ICIs; and to evaluate the significance of the continuation of ICIs treatment in PLC patients who developed AI. METHODS: Between January 2020 and March 2022, 47 PLC patients with ICIs-associated AI (AI cohort) were screened from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan university, a general hospital in China. Between December 2019 and August 2021, 419 PLC patients who were treated with ICIs were reviewed to identify those without immune- associated adverse events (irAEs) (control cohort). Clinical features and outcomes of the PLC patients from the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS: Totally, 47 PLC patients with AI (AI cohort) and 63 PLC patients without irAEs (control cohort) were included. The incidence of grades 3-4 of AI and all irAEs were 40.4 % and 48.9 %, respectively. The median three-year survival was significantly longer in the AI cohort than that in the control cohort (26.3 months (95 % CI: 18.9--33.5) vs.16.1 months (95 % CI:10.4--21.7); p = 0.021). Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model showed that the development of AI remained significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.561; p = 0.033) in the adjusted regression analysis. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that PLC patients undergoing ICIs therapy and developing AI after ICIs treatment had favorable survival outcomes compared to those without irAEs.