Successful Visceral and Parietal Pericardiectomy for Refractory Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis: A Challenging Case Report.

BACKGROUND Effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP) is an uncommon clinical syndrome characterized by the coexistence of pericardial effusion and constriction involving the visceral pericardium. This differs from constrictive pericarditis, which presents with thickening of the pericardium without effusions. Specific diagnostic criteria of ECP include the failure of right atrial pressure to decrease by 50% or reach a new level below 10 mmHg after normalization of intrapericardial pressure. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 32-year-old obese man with multiple comorbidities who initially presented with flu-like symptoms and pleural effusion with development of constrictive-like symptoms. Despite undergoing numerous pericardiocentesis and appropriate medical management, the patient's condition failed to improve, leading to the likely diagnosis of effusive-constrictive pericarditis. Cultures of pericardial fluid revealed E. -faecium, which required multiple antimicrobial therapy. Despite infection, the exact etiology of ECP remained unknown and likely idiopathic. Common causes of ECP include idiopathic, tuberculosis, cardiac surgery complications, radiation, or neoplasia. Ultimately, the patient underwent a pericardiectomy involving the visceral and parietal pericardium, resulting in hemodynamic stability and resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing ECP, emphasizing the importance of considering surgical intervention in refractory cases. ECP initially presents as a pericardial effusion, often addressed through pericardiocentesis; however, in a small subset of patients, sustained symptoms and altered hemodynamics persist following pericardiocentesis, necessitating further evaluation and management. The success of pericardiectomy in our patient highlights the potential efficacy of surgical intervention in improving outcomes for patients with ECP.

Early, rapidly progressive vasculopathy in a transplanted heart: A possible complication of COVID-19.

The epidemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has had a significant global impact, especially on immunosuppressed populations such as heart transplant recipients. While SARS-CoV-2 initially infects the respiratory system, cardiovascular complications induced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, heart failure, myocarditis, arrhythmia, acute myocyte injury, thrombotic events, and cardiogenic shock. Here, we present a case of a 45-year-old African American male who tested positive for COVID-19 infection six months after receiving a heart transplant. The patient was asymptomatic initially, but two weeks later he developed dyspnea, early satiety, and abdominal bloating. The patient was admitted to the hospital for acute renal failure and subsequently diagnosed with moderate acute T cell-mediated allograft rejection (Grade 2R) by endomyocardial biopsy. Three months after testing positive for COVID-19, the patient suffered a sudden cardiac death. At autopsy, the epicardium was diffusely edematous and showed vascular congestion. The coronary arteries showed a striking concentric narrowing of lumens and diffusely thickened arterial walls of all major extramural arteries deemed consistent with a rapidly progressive form of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was localized by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endothelial cells of venules and capillaries within the epicardium. Our localization of SARS-CoV-2 in coronary vessel endothelial cells by IHC suggests that endothelial cell infection, endotheliitis, and immune-related inflammation may be a primary mechanism of vascular injury. The present case represents an early onset rapidly progressive form of CAV. This case may be the first case of post-transplant arteriopathy occurring in such a short time that includes corresponding autopsy, surgical pathology, and IHC data.

Care and Monitoring of Pregnant Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Although still rare, pregnancy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is becoming more common. Typical indications for the use of LVADs in reproductive-aged females include ischemic cardiomyopathy, nonischemic (familial) dilated cardiomyopathy, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and some forms of myocarditis. An LVAD drains blood through a cannula placed into the apex of the left ventricle and then returns it to the proximal aorta bypassing the aortic valve allowing hemodynamic support in parallel with the native circulation. The physiologic changes associated with pregnancy, mainly increased blood volume and hypercoagulability, may adversely affect patients with LVADs, leading to many experts recommending against pregnancy. Maternal-fetal medicine specialists should have a central role within a multidisciplinary team required to provide optimal care for this high-risk group of patients.

Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Viral Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Our study assessed the relationship between the duration of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and patient outcomes. We studied patients undergoing V-V ECMO support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between 2009 and 2017 who were reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. We evaluated survival, major bleeding, renal failure, pulmonary complications, mechanical complications, neurologic complications, infection, and duration of V-V ECMO support. Multivariable regression modeling assessed risk factors for adverse events. Of the 4,636 patients studied, the mean support duration was 12.2 ± 13.7 days. There was a progressive increase in survival after the initiation of V-VECMO, peaking at a survival rate of 73% at 10 days of support. However, a single-day increase in V-V ECMO duration was associated with increased bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] 1.038; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.029-1.047; p < 0.0001), renal failure (OR 1.018; 95% CI: 1.010-1.027; p < 0.0001), mechanical complications (OR 1.065; 95% CI: 1.053-1.076; p < 0.0001), pulmonary complications (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05; p < 0.0001), and infection (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05; p < 0.0001). V-V ECMO progressively increases survival for ARDS over the first 10 days of support. Thereafter, rising complications associated with prolonged durations of support result in a progressive decline in survival.

Short-Term Risk of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in Diabetic Patients.

This study compares the morbidity and mortality at 30 days following the use of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) vs a single internal mammary artery (SIMA) at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with a preoperative HbA1c. Patients undergoing CABG from January 2008 to December 2016 reported to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: use of BIMA or use of SIMA and propensity matched. To assess the effect of preoperative HbA1c, both groups were further divided into 5 subgroups: patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), or patients with DM and a preoperative HbA1c level in one of four groups (< 7%, 7-9%, 9-11%, or >11%). The postoperative outcomes in both the BIMA and SIMA groups were compared. There were 700,504 and 28,115 patients with measured preoperative HbA1c levels in the SIMA and BIMA groups, respectively. Propensity score matching identified 23,635 comparable patients in each group for analysis. There was no difference in postoperative mortality between the BIMA and SIMA groups (1.3% vs 1.2%). The incidences of sternal wound infection (SWI) in patients undergoing placement of BIMA vs SIMA were: 0.8% vs 0.4% with no DM (P < 0.0001), 1.9% vs 1.0% with HbA1c < 7% (P < 0.001), 2.4% vs 1.2% with HbA1c 7-9% (P < 0.001), 2.8% vs 1.4% with HbA1c 9-11% (P = 0.02), 4.1% vs 1.5% with HbA1c > 11% (P = 0.01). Based on the incidence of SWI, BIMA is a reasonable approach with an HbA1c<7%.

Anticoagulant Bridge Comparison in Mechanical Circulatory Support Patients.

Maintaining mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device patients in a specified therapeutic range for anticoagulation remains challenging. Subtherapeutic international normalized ratios (INRs) occur frequently while on warfarin therapy. An effective anticoagulant bridge strategy may improve the care of these patients. This retrospective review of MCS patients with subtherapeutic INRs compared an intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) strategy with a subcutaneous enoxaparin or fondaparinux strategy. Native thromboelastography (n-TEG) was used to evaluate anticoagulant effect with coagulation index (CI) as the primary outcome measure. Enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) every 12 hours or fondaparinux 2.5-5 mg SC daily were compared with an initial UFH rate of 5 units/kg/hr and titrated to stated n-TEG goal range. The anticoagulant groups UFH, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux were found to be statistically similar with regard to frequency in n-TEG goal range, above range (hypercoagulability), or below range (hypocoagulability). Clinical outcomes were similar among groups with three gastrointestinal bleeds in UFH, one in enoxaparin, and one in fondaparinux groups. Device thrombosis occurred in one UFH patient, while UFH and fondaparinux groups had one ischemic cerebrovascular accident event each. These strategies provided comparable n-TEG results and clinical outcomes when compared with intravenous UFH. Low-dose enoxaparin or fondaparinux may provide an alternative anticoagulant bridging option in MCS patients presenting with subtherapeutic INR.

Coronary Sinus Rupture Repair: Patency Is Important.

We report a case of coronary sinus (CS) injury with a retrograde cardioplegia catheter and repair that compromised CS patency. This resulted in acute global cardiac dysfunction shortly after weaning from bypass, which reversed after patch repair with confirmed CS patency. The case report shows that acute CS occlusion may not be tolerated in some humans.

Survival after intravenous thrombin prior to cardiopulmonary bypass.

We present a case of a patient undergoing aortic valve replacement being inadvertently administered 5000 U of bovine thrombin instead of heparin for anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. The labeling error was made within the operating room pharmacy. The key to survival of this patient was a rapid diagnosis, administration of antithrombin and heparin, and removal of cardiac and great vessel thrombi. It is recommended that point of care anesthesia providers `prepare heparin for cardiopulmonary bypass anticoagulation, as thrombin is not used in anesthetic practice and is not contained within anesthesia cabinet medication drawers.

Total Artificial Heart, Augmented by Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Shortly after SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH) implant, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) via a 31 Fr Avalon cannula was used for profound hypoxic lung dysfunction. Immediately after starting ECMO, TAH flow increased by 1.5-2.0 L/min, presumably because of augmented TAH filling by the ECMO jet.

Park's stitch for a bicuspid aortic valve in a patient on LVAD support.

A central coaptation stitch (Park's stitch) is a simple surgical option in the management of aortic insufficiency in patients with left ventricular assist devices. We describe a 66-year-old male with aortic insufficiency and a bicuspid aortic valve undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. His aortic insufficiency was successfully addressed with a Park's stitch.

Simple technique to preserve the LSVC during reoperative orthotopic heart transplant.

Increasingly, patients undergo heart transplant after previous heart surgery. In patients with a persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC), the preferred technique, preservation of drainage via the native coronary sinus, can be difficult in reoperative cases due to adhesions. We report a technique simplifying this operation in such a patient.

Transplantation of high panel-reactive antibody left ventricular assist device patients without crossmatch using on-bypass pheresis and alemtuzumab.

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized (HS) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients with high panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels present a challenge. Alemtuzumab, a potent depleting agent for T and B lymphocytes (months to years), and plasmapheresis, offer an opportunity for heart transplantation to these patients who might die of VAD complications on the transplant waiting list. This study compared rates of acute rejection and survival of a HS LVAD cohort with a contemporaneous control group after heart transplant. METHODS: Clinical courses of 31 consecutive patients who underwent transplantation between January 2006 and January 2011 were reviewed. Eight patients with a T or B PRA of 70 or more (HS+) received non-crossmatched, ABO-compatible hearts using intraoperative plasmapheresis and alemtuzumab induction. Controls (HS-) received basiliximab induction. Acute rejection was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grades 2R or higher, or antibody-mediated rejection. RESULTS: The difference in survival between HS+ and HS- groups at 1 year (100% vs 94%) or at a mean follow-up of 2.3 and 2.4 years (75% vs 70%) was not significant. Retrospective lymphocytotoxic crossmatches were positive in 7 of 8 HS+ patients (6 T+ and B+, 1 B+) vs none in the HS- group (p < 0.001). There was a trend toward increased risk of cellular rejection per 100 patient-days beyond 1 year in the HS+ group (p = 0.07). Risk of humoral rejection was significantly increased in the HS+ group (38% vs 4%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation with plasmapheresis and alemtuzumab in HS LVAD patients, most with a positive crossmatch, does not compromise midterm survival. The expected higher rates of rejection, especially beyond the first postoperative year, demand adjustments in surveillance strategies and immunosuppressive management.

"Snake-jaw" graft for aortic valve exposure during LVAD implant.

We report a simple technique of LVAD outflow anastomosis as patch closure of a standard aortotomy during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. Benefits are a single aortotomy, a low graft leaving ample native aorta for transplant, a wide-open LVAD outflow, and excellent aortic valve exposure.

Concomitant pulmonary infection with Nocardia transvalensis and Aspergillus ustus in lung transplantation.

Lung infections with Nocardia and Aspergillus spp in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) create diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The present case illustrates the difficulties in identifying these pathogens in LTRs. A high degree of clinical suspicion and aggressive early management are required to ensure good outcomes. Although prospective data on treating these conditions are scarce, the empiric use of combination broad-spectrum anti-microbials initially seems prudent.