Latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Background: This paper aims to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) tendon transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and to compare that to isolated RSA. Methods: A comprehensive search on PubMeb, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL was performed from inception up to January 20, 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cohort studies, case-control studies, randomized controlled trials and case series that were written in English, which involved patients who underwent RSA with LD/TM transfer were included. Quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Systematic review of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and range of movement (ROM) was conducted. Results: Eight studies with a total of 265 patients were included. The average mean follow-up time was 42.5 months, with a range of 6 months to 136 months. Of the studies that reported outcomes of RSA with LD/TM transfer, five reported the CMS, five reported external rotation (ER) ROM and six reported forward flexion ROM. Comparing postoperative to preoperative scores, there was an improvement above the minimal clinically important difference for CMS (mean difference (MD) range = 22.40 to 41.80), ER (MD range = 29° to 36°) and forward flexion (MD range = 50° to 75°). Three studies that compared postoperative ER between RSA with and without LD/TM reported no significant difference. Conclusion: RSA with LD/TM transfer has good clinical outcomes postoperatively, but there is insufficient comparative data to suggest that it is superior or inferior to an isolated RSA.

Raised body mass index and reduced muscle bulk reduces the incidence of Popeye's deformity post tenotomy of long head of biceps brachii.

OBJECTIVES: The development of the Popeye's deformity is a known complication of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) tenotomy. Incidence of developing Popeye's deformity after LHBT tenotomy ranges between 13% and 70%. While this complication is well tolerated, it can be avoided with proper patient selection. We aim to study patient and clinical factors resulting in the development of the Popeye's deformity after LHBT tenotomy so as to better identify suitable surgical candidates. METHODS: 91 patients underwent unilateral rotator cuff repairs and concomitant LHBT tenotomy between March 2013 and March 2017. Assessment of patient factors contributing to Popeye's deformity included patient demographics, and physical attributes were analyzed and correlated. Patients also completed a questionnaire regarding their overall postoperative satisfaction. Prospectively collated Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), Constant-Murley shoulder score (CSS), University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were compared at 6 and 24 months post operation between patients who developed Popeye's deformity and those who did not. RESULTS: The incidence of post-tenotomy Popeye's sign was 58.9%. Majority of patients were satisfied with their procedure, postoperative function, and cosmesis. Patients who developed Popeye's sign had a statistically significant lower body mass index (BMI) (24.9 â€‹± â€‹4.2 â€‹kg/m2 versus 27.3 â€‹± â€‹4.3 â€‹kg/m2, p â€‹= â€‹0.048) (rpb â€‹= â€‹- 0.210, p â€‹> â€‹0.05) and had a greater biceps-circumference-(in flexion)-to-wrist-circumference ratio (1.91 â€‹± â€‹0.16 versus 1.83 â€‹± â€‹0.13, p â€‹= â€‹0.012) (rpb â€‹= â€‹0.319, p â€‹< â€‹0.05) than those who did not. Nevertheless, the development of Popeye's sign did not affect clinical outcomes (VAS, CSS, UCLA, and OSS; p â€‹> â€‹0.05) at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Popeye's deformity is high post LHBT tenotomy. There was a greater incidence in patients with lower BMI and greater biceps brachii muscle bulk. However, this complication is well tolerated. By better selecting our patients, we can achieve better outcomes and minimize potential complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III evidence. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

Pre-operative transverse tendon thickness in small and mid-sized rotator cuff tears does not affect clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies on rotator cuff tears have examined both clinical and radiographic parameters which may influence post-operative clinical outcomes. While rotator cuff tears are frequently classified by size or depth, there is currently no literature available examining the thickness of the remnant tendon, and its impact on post-operative outcomes. We hypothesize that decreased pre-operative transverse tendon thickness will result in poorer post-operative clinical outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of small to medium full-thickness rotator cuff tears. These patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years post-operatively. Basic biodata, as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), UCLA Shoulder Score (USS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 3 different time points (pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively) were collected. Transverse tendon thickness was measured by independent blinded radiologists on pre-operative ultrasonographic images. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare outcome scores and multivariable robust linear model was fitted to assess the effect of transverse tendon thickness on post-operative scores. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were enrolled in this study, predominantly female (65%) and had a median age of 72 years. Pre-operatively, the median transverse cuff thickness was 5.0 â€‹mm and median tear size was 1.4 â€‹cm. The median VAS at preoperative was 7, which reduced to 0 â€‹at 2 year post-operative, indicating statistically significant improvement in pain levels (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Statistically significant improvement in shoulder function measured by CMS, UCLA score and OSS were also seen over time (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Robust regression analysis revealed that transverse cuff thickness had no statistically significant effect on VAS (p â€‹= â€‹0.99), CMS (p â€‹= â€‹0.84), UCLA score (p â€‹= â€‹0.22), and OSS scores (p â€‹= â€‹0.73) at 2 years postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Pre-operative transverse tendon thickness of small- to mid-sized supraspinatus tears does not influence clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair. Differences in transverse tendon thickness may have an association with tendon healing but do not translate to an association with post-operative outcomes in terms of pain, function, and patient-reported outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Gender-based differences in mid-term clinical outcomes and patient acceptable symptomatic state attainment after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Minimum 2-year follow up.

OBJECTIVE: There is paucity of literature on the impact of patients' gender on recovery and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study investigates the effect of gender on patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and postoperatively (minimum 2 years), and to determine if gender affects the attainment of patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) thresholds. METHODS: 266 patients (117 males, 149 females), who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for atraumatic, full-thickness tears, were included. Functional outcomes and pain scores were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Percentage of attainment of PASS for the various outcome scores was calculated and compared between males and females. RESULTS: Women had statistically significantly poorer functional outcome and pain scores preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively (P â€‹< â€‹0.01). They also experienced less improvement in outcome scores throughout the postoperative period. Women had statistically significantly lower rates of PASS attainment at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Women experience greater pain and poorer shoulder function compared with men preoperatively, and up to 2 years postoperatively. Women are less likely to achieve PASS thresholds postoperatively, compared to their male counterparts. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 â€‹± â€‹10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSION: This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Determining patient acceptable symptom states from patient reported outcome measures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Constant-murley, UCLA, Oxford Shoulder Scores.

Aims: To establish cut-off values for Patient-Acceptable Symptom States (PASS) in three Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 3, 6, and 12-months following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted for individuals who were treated for massive rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff arthropathy or proximal humerus fractures with RSA from January 2011 and February 2020. This study included patients who have completed the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction questions preoperatively, and at 3, 6 and 12-months after the procedure. Functional outcome were evaluated by CMS, UCLA shoulder score and OSS, with one anchoring question regarding satisfaction. PASS thresholds for each PROM were obtained with the Youden method, by using the receiver operating characteristic analysis, and secondary analysis was performed with the 80% specificity and 75th percentile method. Results: 129 patients were included. 74.2%, 83.9%, and 89.3% of patients were found to have a satisfactory symptom state at 3, 6 and 12-months postoperatively. At 3, 6 and 12-month intervals, the respective PASS thresholds were 42, 39 and 52 for CMS, 17, 21 and 26 for UCLA score and 28, 25 and 18 for OSS. Conclusions: PASS thresholds for RSA at 3, 6 and 12-months were found for CMS (42, 39, 52), UCLA (17, 21, 26) and OSS (28, 25, 18). These thresholds suggest increasing expectations with a trend towards higher functional requirements at each time point.

Different types of rotator cuff tear morphology do not affect post-repair clinical outcomes in large to massive tears.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this current study is to evaluate the effects of rotator cuff tear morphology on clinical outcomes in large to massive tears, using a modified version of the existing classification system, with specific focus on tear symmetry and use of margin convergence. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of large to massive, full thickness rotator cuff tears were retrospectively analysed. The tear pattern was classified at the time of surgery as Type IA, Type IB, Type IIA, and Type IIB according to tear symmetry and direction of maximum tear diameter, with Type I being symmetrical and Type II being asymmetrical. Type IA (U-shaped) had greater mediolateral (ML) than anteroposterior (AP) diameter while Type IB (crescent shaped) had greater AP than ML diameter. Type IIA tears have an anterior extension towards the rotator interval while IIB tears have a posterior extension into the infraspinatus, similar to AP L-shaped tears established in the literature. Type I tears were typically repaired from medial to lateral while Type II tears were repaired diagonally. All types were repaired using double row technique, with the addition of margin convergence for Types IA and IIB, which had larger tears in the medial and lateral directions. Primary outcome measures were Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant Shoulder Score, University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score followed-up at 6, 12, and 24-months as well as retear rates at latest follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 65.5 â€‹± â€‹9.4. The prevalence of each tear morphologies from Type IA to IIB was 22.0 â€‹%, 34.9 â€‹%, 27.5 â€‹%, and 15.6 â€‹%, respectively. All four groups showed statistically significant improvement from pre-operative scores in all 3 outcome measures at 24 months (p â€‹< â€‹0.001 for all). No significant difference in primary outcome measures or retear rates was detected between all 4 groups. CONCLUSION: This study found that different types of cuff tear morphology, despite affecting surgical repair technique, does not influence clinical outcomes post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort study, Level III.

Comparable outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for rotator cuff arthropathy in a predominantly asian population.

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was initially developed for rotator cuff arthropathy but has been expanded to treat comminuted proximal humerus fractures. Few studies have compared RSA for traumatic and degenerative indications. We present the first report of mid-term outcomes of RSA comparing both indications in an Asian population. Methods: 113 degenerative and 20 fracture patients underwent RSA from 2010 to 2019. Patients with degenerative indications were 4:1 propensity-score matched to fractures and adjusted for age and sex. Patients were assessed for range of motion (ROM), strength, pain, Constant-Murley score (CMS), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA) and Oxford shoulder score (OSS) preoperatively, at 6-months and 1-year. Patients' satisfaction, expectation fulfilment and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were analysed. Results: Degenerative patients had better ROM, isometric strength and CMS at 6-months, although at 1-year only abduction was superior (104.8 ± 17.3° vs 86.7 ± 19.8°). No significant differences in pain, UCLA and OSS were observed. Most improvements occurred within 6 months. Similar proportions of patients were satisfied (83.3% vs 73.3%, p = 0.460) and attained MCID (85.0% vs 86.7%, p = 1.000) at 1-year. Discussion: Although initially exhibiting slower recovery, patients with proximal humerus fractures can expect similar functional recovery and satisfaction at 1-year compared to those who received RSA for degenerative indications.

Salvaging the 'irreparable' tear: Superior Capsular Reconstruction augmented with partial cuff repair.

Introduction: Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) have long posed a complex problem for both patients and surgeons. If not treated promptly, tendon retraction, fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles occur. These lead to irreparable RCTs with poor functional outcomes. We describe our technique of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) augmented with partial cuff repair and report on our short term outcomes. Method: Seven consecutive patients who underwent the procedure were recruited at our institution from January 2019 to December 2019. Medical records of these patients were reviewed looking at pre-operative symptoms and examination findings, imaging studies, intra-operative findings, the surgical technique employed, post-operative progress in terms of pain, affected shoulder range of movement and outcome scores. Results: All patients showed complete tears of at least two tendons and were deemed irreparable intra-operatively. All patients exhibited Goutalier grade 2-4 wasting of the affected tendons on MRI and Patte grade 3 intra-operatively. At 12 months, the mean improvement shown in Constant score is 12.1 points, in University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score is 9.4 points and in Oxford Shoulder Score is 17 points. Active forward flexion improved in all patients with a mean improvement of 40 degrees. Numerical Pain Rating Scale improved in all patients with a mean of 5.1 points. Conclusion: Our case series shows good short-term outcomes can be achieved with SCR augmented with partial cuff repair. Notably, our SCR results showed encouraging results even for challenging revision rotator cuff repairs.

The double-lasso loop technique of Biceps tenodesis has lower displacement after cyclic loading, compared to interference screw fixation: Biomechanical analysis in an ovine model.

Background: Biceps tenodesis is an effective treatment for symptomatic long head of biceps tendon pathology. Recently the arthroscopic "double lasso-loop" suture anchor (DLSA) technique was described, advantaged by reduced cost, complexity, and operative time. We aimed to compare the in vitro strength of DLSA with conventional interference screws (IS). Methods: A biomechanical analysis was conducted on 14 sheep shoulders (8 DLSA, 6 IS), consisting of a 500-cycle cyclic loading experiment of 5-70 N and ultimate failure load (UFL) test where each specimen was pulled until failure. Displacement (mm) was recorded every 100 cycles, while stiffness and UFL were observed. Results: Cyclic displacement was significantly lower with DLSA at 100 cycles, but not above. During the UFL test, IS was stiffer (27.68 ± 6.56 N/mm versus 14.10 ± 5.80 N/mm, p = .005) and had higher UFL (453.67 ± 148.55 N versus 234.22 ± 44.57 N, p = .001) than DLSA. All DLSA failures occurred with suture/anchor pull-out, while all IS constructs failed at the muscle/tendon. Discussion: Comparison of the novel DLSA technique with a traditional IS method found lower initial displacement. While our IS constructs could withstand higher UFL, peak load characteristics of DLSA were similar to previous ovine studies. Hence, the DLSA technique is a viable alternative to IS for biceps tenodesis with its purported non-biomechanical advantages.

Abduction causes increased strain gradient compared to forward flexion: Evidence from a cadaver model of simultaneous strain study of the rotator cuff tendons.

BACKGROUND: Various strain studies of the supraspinatus have been done in isolation. Given that rotator cuff muscles function as a group, it may be physiologically representative to measure strain behaviour with the glenohumeral joint intact. Here, we explored a novel method in measuring simultaneous strain behaviour of the rotator cuff tendons and investigated the effect of full-thickness anterior tear of the supraspinatus on the infraspinatus and subscapularis tendons. METHODS: Nine cadaveric shoulders were evaluated on a customized rig. Using linear differential variable transducers to measure strain, each shoulder was subjected to up to 60° of elevation in the coronal, scapular, and sagittal planes. We also assessed 30° of external rotation and up to 60° of internal rotation of the humerus. Full-thickness anterior tear of the supraspinatus was then made before re-assessing strain patterns in the scapular plane. FINDINGS: Strain measurements of the intact tendons revealed a significant strain gradient between the articular and bursal sides of the supraspinatus during increasing degrees of elevation in the coronal and scapular planes. Full thickness anterior tear of the supraspinatus is localised to the tendon and does not affect the surrounding cuff musculature, with a potential shielding effect of the infraspinatus during early glenohumeral abduction. INTERPRETATION: Significant strain gradient exists between the articular and bursal sides of the supraspinatus during abduction but not during forward flexion in an intact glenohumeral joint. Rehabilitation exercises for anterior supraspinatus tears can be appropriately targeted on the remaining intact rotator cuff musculature.

Short- to medium-term outcomes and future direction of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Current concepts.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is typically indicated for patients with severe shoulder osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear arthropathy, or proximal humerus fractures that have failed to heal properly. The primary goal of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is to improve shoulder function and reduce pain, while also restoring the ability to perform daily activities. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in improving shoulder function and reducing pain in patients with severe shoulder osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is associated with significant improvements in shoulder function and pain reduction compared to non-surgical treatments. This paper aims to summarize current knowledge, practices and present a summary of the long-term effects of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) on patient outcomes, including how these outcomes are defined and what measures are typically used to assess them. It will also cover newer definitions of outcomes for RSA that have been developed in recent years in order to better understand the long-term effects of the procedure on patient-reported outcomes and functional ability, as well as information on revision surgery and implant survivorship, and the future of RSA (3D-navigation, patient-specific instrumentation, robotics and artificial intelligence) and its effects on outcomes.

The modified fascial sling technique for ulnar nerve anterior transposition: surgical techniques and results.

Background: Approaches to surgical treatment to cubital tunnel syndrome include simple decompression, decompression with medial epicondylectomy, and decompression with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. Transposition of the ulnar nerve involves decompression and transposition of the nerve anteriorly to a subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular position. However, transposing the ulnar nerve to subcutaneous plane renders it more susceptible to external trauma. Hence, this technique article introduces the use of a modified fascial sling. Methodology: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve involves careful dissection to identify the ulnar nerve, decompression of the nerve, then transposition of the ulnar nerve anterior to the medial epicondyle. An AlloWrap (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) is first wrapped around the ulnar nerve, followed by wrapping a fascial sling fashioned from the flexor carpi ulnaris fascia. A prospective case series for this surgical technique was conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared preoperative and postoperative qDASH-9 scores, an abbreviated questionnaire to assess functional limitations of the upper limb. Results: Five patients were included in this study, with a mean duration of follow-up of 530.4 days. The mean QuickDASH-9 functional disability score was 36.5 ± 25.1 preoperatively and 20.6 ± 12.8 postoperatively, demonstrating statistically significant improvement (P = .008). Conclusion: The modified fascial sling technique for anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was developed to address the complications of perineural adhesions after transposition causing tethering of the ulnar nerve. At the same time, the fascial sling prevents posterior subluxation of the ulnar nerve back to its original location, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent symptoms.

Anatomic risk factors for arthroscopic Bankart repair failure: A case-control study comparing failure and non-failure groups in an Asian population.

Introduction: Post-arthroscopic Bankart repair failure/re-dislocation rates are influenced by several risk factors, including anatomic defects. There is limited evidence on the role of anatomic defects, especially for Hill-Sachs size in on-track lesions. This study aimed to assess glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesion and labral tear size and evaluate their contribution to post-operative instability after a primary repair. Material and methods: Across 169 patients with on-track Bankart lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2015, this study matched 14 failure with 14 non-failure cases based on age/gender. Patient demographics, pre-operative radiological parameters (including size of glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesion) and labral tear size were compared between the failure and non-failure groups. Result: All patients were male with a mean age of 21.01 ± 4.97. Significantly greater glenoid bone loss (p = 0.024) and labral tear size (p = 0.039) were found in the failure group. However, there was no significant difference in mean volume of Hill-Sachs lesion between the two groups (p = 0.739). Conclusion: Extensive glenoid bone loss and labral tears are risk factors for post-arthroscopic Bankart failure. However, the size of Hill-Sachs lesion is not a risk factor for failure, in a specific group of on-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Level of evidence: Retrospective Study, Level IV.

Rotator cuff repair with an interposition polypropylene mesh: A biomechanical ovine study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic large to massive rotator cuff tears are difficult to treat and re-tears are common even after surgical repair. We propose using a synthetic polypropylene mesh to increase the tensile strength of rotator cuff repairs. We hypothesize that using a polypropylene mesh to bridge the repair of large rotator cuff tears will increase the ultimate failure load of the repair. AIM: To investigate the mechanical properties of rotator cuff tears repaired with a polypropylene interposition graft in an ovine ex-vivo model. METHODS: A 20 mm length of infraspinatus tendon was resected from fifteen fresh sheep shoulders to simulate a large tear. We used a polypropylene mesh as an interposition graft between the ends of the tendon for repair. In seven specimens, the mesh was secured to remnant tendon by continuous stitching while mattress stitches were used for eight specimens. Five specimens with an intact tendon were tested. The specimens underwent cyclic loading to determine the ultimate failure load and gap formation. RESULTS: The mean gap formation after 3000 cycles was 1.67 mm in the continuous group, and 4.16 mm in the mattress group (P = 0.001). The mean ultimate failure load was significantly higher at 549.2 N in the continuous group, 426.4 N in the mattress group and 370 N in the intact group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The use of a polypropylene mesh is biomechanically suitable as an interposition graft for large irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Non-selective NSAIDs do not increase retear rates post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) are known to be associated with substantial pain and post-operative pain management is critical in overall patients' outcomes. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used oral medications and can reduce opioid usage. However, controversies arise due to its postulated effect on postoperative tendon healing. As the evidence of safety and efficacy of NSAIDs remains unclear, this study aims to investigate the effect of NSAIDs on retear rates and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) was conducted, identifying studies that compared cohorts with post-RCR NSAIDs use versus control groups without NSAID use. Meta-analysis was conducted for retear rate as well as pain and functional outcomes (Visual Analogue Scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score). Subgroup analysis was conducted for retear rates to determine the overall treatment effect of including selective COX-2 inhibitors. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total baseline cohort size was 916, with 443 (48.3%) patients in the NSAID group and 473 (51.6%) patients in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Meta-analysis between the two groups showed that there were no statistically significant differences in retear rates (p â€‹= â€‹0.70), early and late post-operative Visual Analogue Scale score (p â€‹= â€‹0.10 and p â€‹= â€‹0.10, respectively) and latest American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (p â€‹= â€‹0.31). However, subgroup analysis of retear rates revealed a statistically significant difference between the subgroup including COX-2 selective inhibitor versus non-selective COX inhibitor (p â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSION: NSAID use in post-arthroscopic RCR pain relief does not increase retear rates and can provide similar clinical outcomes compared to a non-NSAID regimen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis, level of evidence, 4.

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Oxford, Constant, and University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scores After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty to Allow Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Future Statistical Power Analyses.

PURPOSE: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients were prospectively followed up between January 2011 and February 2020. Inclusion criteria was that of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, and fractures, with and without previous cuff repair, by a fellowship-trained surgeon. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months' postoperatively. Functional outcome was assessed by the CMS, UCLA Shoulder Score, and OSS and the respective MCIDs were determined using simple linear regression in consonance with patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were followed up for 12 months. The MCIDs at 3 months for CMS, UCLA Shoulder Score, and OSS were 7.2, 3.3, and 6.9, respectively. At 6 months, the MCIDs for CMS, UCLA Shoulder Score, and OSS were 6.6, 2.4, and 4.7, respectively. At 12 months, the MCIDs for CMS, UCLA Shoulder Score, and OSS were 9.3, 2.9, and 6.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CMS, UCLA Shoulder Score, and OSS are valid scores to calculate MCID after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and the MCID established in this study can be used for the interpretation of these scores to help in statistical power analysis for future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Diagnosis and treatment of avascular necrosis of the humeral head: Current concepts.

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is an uncommon clinical entity which can result in significant morbidity for patients. There is a paucity of literature concerning humeral head AVN, which may be due to the relatively rarity of the condition and poorly understood nature. Despite being first described decades ago, the underlying pathophysiology leading to humeral head AVN is still poorly defined. While the staging of humeral head AVN is well described, not much is known about prognosticating factors to predict the eventual course. Most of the management options are based on that of femoral head AVN, and even so, there is a paucity of good quality clinical trials in the literature. This current concepts paper describes what is known about humeral head AVN and proposes a management algorithm to guide clinicians.

Relooking at double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical model to evaluate which can confer better rotatory stability.

BACKGROUND: To treat anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, double-bundle ACL reconstruction has been proposed as a more anatomical approach relative to single-bundle reconstruction. However, controversy remains over which technique is superior in addressing knee instability, particularly rotational laxity. We hypothesize that double-bundle reconstruction better restores rotational knee laxity, while both methods are similar in restoring anterior knee laxity, to intact knee levels. METHODS: A controlled laboratory study. Eight cadaveric knees were tested accordingly: (1) static anterior laxity testing under 150 N-anterior tibial loading at 20°, 60° and 90° knee flexion using a material testing machine, followed by (2) dynamic simulated pivot-shift with knee-specific loading involving iliotibial band forces, valgus and internal rotation torques, while the knee was brought from extension to 90° flexion on a 6°-of-freedom custom-designed rig. Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system for the ACL-intact, ACL-deficient, single-bundle and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knee conditions. FINDINGS: Double-bundle reconstruction reduced internal rotation under pivot-shift to levels not significantly different from ACL-intact conditions (P > .173), unlike single-bundle that remained significantly higher at 10-40° flexion (P < .05). For anterior laxity, there was no significant difference between double-bundle, single-bundle, and ACL-intact conditions under static testing (P > .175) or pivot-shift (P = .219). The maximum extent of knee envelope laxity was significantly reduced for double-bundle relative to single-bundle, particularly for the rotatory component (P = .012). INTERPRETATION: Double-bundle was biomechanically superior to single-bundle in addressing envelope of rotation, while both techniques restored anterior knee laxity to ACL-intact levels.

Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction improves anatomic tunnel placement with similar clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While the use of navigation systems in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction theoretically improves tunnel placement accuracy and clinical outcomes, the existing literature remains inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of navigated ACL reconstruction on tunnel placement and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated a cohort of patients who underwent conventional or navigated (OrthoPilot system) primary ACL reconstruction at our institution from June 2004 to October 2009. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographic knee assessments were evaluated to assess postoperative tunnel positioning. Clinical outcomes, including the International Knee Documentation Committee classification, Lysholm score, and Tegner score, were evaluated preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared and analysed using independent 2-sample t-tests and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis, comprising of 26 navigated and 34 conventional reconstructions. Postoperative radiographs showed no differences in tibial tunnel position between both groups, but a significantly smaller deviation from the recommended position in the navigated group (navigated: 5.96 %; conventional: 7.92 %; p = 0.008). Femoral tunnel placements in the navigated group were significantly more perpendicularly away from the Blumensaat line (navigated: 38.90 %; conventional: 31.94 %; p = 0.001), with a greater deviation from recommended position (navigated: 11.00 %; conventional: 6.94 %; p = 0.009). There were no differences in 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Navigated ACL reconstruction resulted in a more anatomic femoral tunnel placement and similar clinical outcomes as conventional reconstruction. Further research should be conducted to clarify the potential biomechanical and clinical impacts of navigated ACL reconstruction.