Is blood thicker than water? Perceptions on the role of stepparents in medical decisions among minors.

Alternative family configurations are becoming more prevalent, yet current legislative statutory does not support stepparents in medical decisions for their stepchildren. We investigate opinions of Belgian and Dutch adults regarding inclusion of stepparents in medical decision-making in minors. We make two observations. First, participants wanted stepparents to be involved in cases when medical information had to be shared or informed consent signed. Second, when stepparents object against previously approved medical interventions by a biological parent, respondents were less likely to support stepparents. Participants with stepchildren were likely to favour inclusion of stepparents in decision-making. Overall, our findings indicate that Belgian and Dutch adults view stepparents as potential executive actors in medical decision-making for minors, but not as primary decision-makers. This study is a first step in showing to what extent stepparents could be included in medical information and decision-making regarding stepchildren. We reflect on these findings in light of implications for medical practice and legislative shortcomings.

Walking the Line: Balancing Access to Research and Protecting Prisoners.

Prisoners are often excluded from participating in clinical research (ie clinical trials and clinical investigations related to medicinal products and medical devices) due to the historical precedent of their abuse and exploitation. The exclusion of prisoners from clinical research is often deemed necessary to guarantee their protection from such abuse and exploitation. However, in this article, we argue that the right to science, which encompasses the right to access the benefits of science and research participation, is an emerging human right that is applicable to prisoners and may only be limited when this is necessary and proportionate. Whether this is necessary depends in part on the validity of a prisoner's informed consent. We discuss the importance of prison conditions for voluntary consent and examine the relationship between prison overcrowding and sub-par prison conditions by analysing the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights on the prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment. We contend that the special circumstances of being in prison warrant additional protective measures, concurring with the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics that research without the explicit aim of improving the situation of the individual prisoner or the prison community should be excluded. Given the complexity of the question of whether prisoners can give valid informed consent, rigorous oversight by an ethics committee with expertise concerning the prison system is necessary to provide a proportional balance between offering prisoners access to research and protection from abuse and exploitation.