Effect of changes in an FFQ: comparing data from two national dietary survey instruments among 2-year-olds.

In the interpretation of dietary trends, it is important to consider the potential effect of modifications in the dietary assessment method. Therefore, our objective was to explore the comparability of data obtained at two time points by a semi-quantitative FFQ (SFFQ) which has had slight modifications over time. In the national dietary surveys among Norwegian 2-year-olds, diet was assessed by an SFFQ which underwent modifications between the 1999 survey and the 2007 survey. In the present study, fifty-nine families with a 2-year-old child participated by completing both the SFFQ in a crossover design within a month's time. With regard to the reported intake of energy and nutrients, the largest significant differences observed between the two questionnaires were for carbohydrates and added sugar. According to intake of food groups, significant differences were observed for five out of sixteen food groups. Spearman's correlation coefficients for energy, nutrients and food groups ranged from 0.43 (Ca) to 0.85 (soft drinks). Most Bland-Altman plots indicated broad limits of agreement. The differences between the two questionnaires can be explained by changes in the questionnaires, changes in the food composition databases used and random variation. Comparing differences between the questionnaires by maternal educational level, number of children and type of day care revealed minor differences. In conclusion, this study showed that at the group level there was reasonable comparability between the two questionnaires, except for carbohydrates, added sugar and some food groups. Moreover, there were moderate to high correlations for energy, nutrients and food groups.

Micronutrient recommendation stakeholders' beliefs on dietary guidelines: a qualitative study across six European countries/regions.

A range of stakeholders have been involved in the development and implementation of dietary guidelines (DG) across Europe. Seventy-seven semi-structured qualitative interviews explored stakeholders' beliefs of DG in six European countries/regions. A main theme, variation in the interpretation of the term dietary guideline, was identified using thematic analysis. Descriptions of DG varied across stakeholder groups and countries. Reference was made to both food-based and nutrient-based guidelines, including the terms food-based DG and food guides (for example, pyramids), nutrient recommendations, dietary recommendations, dietary reference values and guideline daily amounts. The terminology surrounding DG requires greater clarity. Until that time, stakeholders would benefit from increased awareness of potential misinterpretations and the implications of this on multi-stakeholder, multi-national policy development and implementation.

Relative validation of a pre-coded food diary among children, under-reporting varies with reporting day and time of the day.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate intake of energy, macro- and micronutrients assessed from pre-coded food diaries (PFDs) by using weighed records (WRs) as the reference method among a group of Norwegian 9-year-olds. We also examined how under-reporters (UR) differed from acceptable reporters (AR) according to the energy intake during the 4-day recording period and energy intake distribution during the day. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: One hundred 9-year-olds, 45 girls and 55 boys, were recruited to complete a 4-day record with a PFD followed 3 days later with a 4-day WR. RESULTS: There were no differences between energy and nutrient intake from the two recording methods among boys, but girls reported significantly higher intakes with PFD compared with WR. The median Spearman correlation coefficient between PFD and WR for energy and nutrients was 0.43 for girls and 0.49 for boys. Twelve participants were classified as UR with the PDF method. Energy percentages from macronutrients were not significantly different between UR and AR with the PFD method. UR had significantly lower energy intake in the last two recording days and from 1000 to 2200 hours during the day compared to AR. CONCLUSIONS: The PFD method is promising as a tool for assessing food intake in large surveys among children. The present study indicates that the PFD gives more valid data for boys than girls according to the group intake and ranking of nutrient intake when WR is the reference method. However, UR seemed to develop a study fatigue during the day and during the recording period. Increased awareness about the tendency of study fatigue can lead to more specific instructions on how participants can handle the problem.

Validation of a pre-coded food diary with energy expenditure, comparison of under-reporters v. acceptable reporters.

The objective of the present study was to compare energy intake (EI) assessed from a pre-coded food diary (PFD) with energy expenditure (EE) measured by a validated position-and-movement monitor (ActiReg); PreMed AS, Oslo, Norway) in a group of Norwegian 9-year-olds. Moreover, we examined whether and how under-reporters (UR), identified with ActiReg), differed from acceptable reporters (AR) according to food intake and BMI. A total of fifty-one 9-year-olds completed PFD and ActiReg. The present study showed that on average EI was underestimated by 18 % compared with EE measured by ActiReg. The 95 % confidence limits of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot for EI and EE varied from 1.97 MJ to -4.23 MJ (sd 2) among the girls and from 0.74 MJ to -5.26 MJ (sd 2) among the boys. The Pearson correlation coefficient between EI and EE was 0.28 (P=0.05) for males and females combined. Fifty-seven per cent of the participants were classified as AR, 39 % as UR and 4 % as over-reporters with the PFD. Under-reporting of energy remains a problem with the PFD method used in a group of 9-year-olds, especially among boys. However, UR and AR did not show a systematic misreporting related to macronutrients, unhealthy foods or BMI.

Can children and adolescents use photographs of food to estimate portion sizes?

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to investigate whether children and adolescents can accurately estimate portion sizes of preweighed food by viewing photographs of food, and whether age influences the ability to estimate food portion sizes. SUBJECTS: A total of 63 male and female volunteers aged 9-19 y participated in the study. DESIGN: Each participant received a photographic booklet with photograph series of 13 food items. Participants over 10 y of age were asked to estimate portion sizes of food on 34 plates placed in front of them by comparing the different portions to corresponding photographs of food. Younger participants were asked to estimate portion sizes of food on 17 plates by comparing the portions to photographs. RESULTS: Participants made 2019 comparisons between actual food portion sizes and photographs of food portion sizes. On average, 60% of the comparisons were made correctly. A photograph directly adjacent to the photograph depicting the correct portion size was chosen in 35% of the comparisons and 5% of the comparisons were made incorrectly. Portion sizes were estimated more accurately when the actual served portions of food had exactly the same appearance as the foods portrayed in the photographic booklet. No differences existed between children's and adolescents' abilities to estimate portion sizes using photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Large variability may exist in an individual's capability of choosing a photograph that correctly depicts food portion sizes, but the error at the group level is quite small. These data indicate that a photographic booklet of foods can be a useful tool for portion size estimates in these age groups. SPONSORSHIP: The Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation through Norwegian Health Association.